Communism Thread

/CT/ - COMMUNISM THREAD
Lets do it.

...

Nice argument.

...

Reporting in, comrades.

lol its gunna be hilarious if we make a communism thread people will RAGE im telling you guys

>Lets do it
Do what? It has already been done and it failed miserably over and over.

...

hi guys

...

HEHE WE DA COMMIE NOW GULAG U GO TO GULAG

THE BOURGEOISIE THE BOURGEOISIE

MUH CLASS CONFLICT

...

...

...

Threads over

Fuck off kikes

The anti-commie sentiment is still strong.

You make us proud, Polbro

...

Hi porky.

It's probably same with other soviert sphere states. At least ones that aren't infested with Russians.
I belive one of the baltic states (I think Lithuania) considers WWII to end in 1991 when Soviet occupation ended.

...

Over the last century, capitalism has repeatedly revealed its worst tendencies: instability and inequality. Instances of instability include the Great Depression (1929-1941) and the Great Recession since 2008, plus eleven "downturns" in the US between those two global collapses. Each time, millions lost jobs, misery soared, poverty worsened and massive resources were wasted. Leaders promised that their "reforms" would prevent such instability from recurring. Those promises were not kept. Reforms did not work or did not endure. The system was, and remains, the problem.

Inequality likewise proved to be an inherent trend of capitalism. Only occasionally and temporarily did opposition from its victims stop or reverse it. Income and wealth inequalities have worsened in almost every capitalist country since at least the 1970s. Today we have returned to the huge 19th-century-sized gaps between the richest 1 percent and everyone else. Rescuing the "disappearing middle class" has become every aspiring politician's slogan. Extreme inequality infects all of society as corporations and the rich, to protect their positions, buy the politicians, mass media and other cultural forms that are for sale.

Over the last century, communism has repeatedly revealed its worst tendencies: instability and inequality. Instances of instability include the Holodomor (1932-1933) and Prague Spring of 68, plus many "downturns" in the Soviet sphere throughout the 20th century. Each time, millions lost jobs, misery soared, poverty worsened and massive resources were wasted. Leaders promised that their "reforms" would prevent such instability from recurring. Those promises were not kept. Reforms did not work or did not endure. The system was, and remains, the problem.

Inequality likewise proved to be an inherent trend of communism. Only occasionally and temporarily did opposition from its victims stop or reverse it. Income and wealth inequalities between ruling and working class have worsened in almost every communism country since communism revolution. Today we have returned to the 19th-century equlibrium that communism ruined. Rescuing the "disappearing middle class" has become every aspiring politician's slogan. Extreme inequality are being fought by corporations and the rich by creating job opportunities for the poor.

Anyone up for a helicopter ride?

Capitalism in Western Europe, North America and Japan -- its original centers -- has boosted profits in four basic ways since the 1970s. First, it computerized and robotized, not to lessen everyone's work time, but instead to raise profits by reducing payrolls. Second, it exploited low-wage immigrant labor to offset wage increases won by years of labor struggles. Third, it moved production to lower-wage countries such as China, India, Brazil and others. Fourth, it divided and weakened the labor unions, political party groups and other organizations that pursued labor's interests. As a result, inside nearly every country of the global capitalist system, the rich-poor divide deepened.

The Great Depression provoked economic "reforms," such as FDR's New Deal. These included regulations restricting risky bank and other market practices. Reforming governments also established public pensions, unemployment insurance, public employment systems, minimum wages, monetary and fiscal policies, and so on. Advocates believed that such reforms would end the 1930s depression and prevent future depressions. They dismissed critics who diagnosed depressions as systemic and prescribed system change (or "revolution") as the necessary solution. "Reform versus revolution" was then a hot debate.