Is might right?

Is might right?

>Is might right?

No, it's practical.

Canuck is based.

Legally, yes. Laws only have meaning if you can enforce them. And to enforce them, you must be stronger than everyone else.

Philosophically, I would say no. Others may say yes. For example, I don't agree with communism. So when they were in power in Russia, I wouldn't call them a right or just government.

Might is useless without right.

Define "might". It might be.

can you prove otherwise in the face of unstoppable might?

this is backwards

Only betas without might believe this.

Nope just the last one standing usually.

>native americans being genocided
"fucking white people might doesn't make right!"
>still gets genocided