Okay pol

I can't really be bothered right now so I'll just keep posting retarded analogies.

Embracing globalism is like embracing a cancerous tumor in your body instead of cutting it out.

Your standards of life decrease since you will be flattened with the africans in africa.

/Thread

Rural and suburban retards oppose globalism because they are greedy parasites. Whereas city people allocate each joule as efficiently as possible among each human, rural and suburban retards drive massive cars, live in huge houses that take up absurd amounts of space and use up to 10 times as much energy as an average city person.

Whereas the brain of the city person is programmed to use its energy in a way that benefits humanity as a whole, which results in glorious large scale civilizations, the brain of the rural and suburban retard functions in such a way that it must hog as much energy as it can for itself, even if it means sabotaging the rest of its community, which results in drug abuse, alcoholism and incest.

The main purpose in life of rural and suburban retards is to shit up civilization as much as possible. Rural and suburban retards are incompatible with the civilized world.

Sure, take trade for example. Each country has a capacity to produce certain good depending on their technology, culture, and natural resource reservoir. Globalism enforces efficient allocation of these capitals as seen in the post modern world as opposed to say the renaissance. Europe, Asia, Africa, and America largely operated as separate entities during the previous eras and did not take part in large scale economic unions.

inb4 The trade triangle
Again, small scale.

Nice try Soros

Well Burger.
Do you want all the world to be the same, everywhere you go is poor , race mixed and totall shit.
There is a reason why Countries have Borders and Law.
But if you want to see how a global state would look go south of your border.

>globalism enforces efficient allocation
>globalism efficient
>globalism

You realize that globalism is the epitome of a bureaucratic nightmare right? Name one instance where globalism did some more efficiently then fair trade deals would have between individual nations.

Not all countries have equal capacity to produce goods.

>Globalism enforces efficient allocation of these capitals as seen in the post modern world

If you think this is true, then you only need to look at the state of today's post modern world in order to answer your original question on what is wrong with globalism: everything.

Multi-cultural societies are unnatural. There has never been such a society which has survived the test of time.

I'd love to unify the world, I'd love to live in peace and harmony with all humans. The issue here is not where I want to, it's whether THEY want to. Look at Europe. If all those refugees were genuine and good people who just wanted a new home to make a life they should show gratitude to the inhabitants and do their best to contribute right? But they're not, they're causing havoc with huge amounts of crime, assaults, sexual abuse, taking over entire suburbs and turning them into Little Syria where if natives walk in they get harassed, accosted and even beaten.

Every day that passes just proves the point further that they never had any intention of showing gratitude. They are there because they feel it's their right, they are there because they see western countries as weak institutions who they can exploit for their own benefit.

Time to wake up and realize the majority of the world is like this. Humans aren't altruistic by nature. The majority are fucking scumfucks who would gladly drain you of all your wealth to enrich themselves. They do not give one solitary fuck about you, your family, your community, your culture or your nation.

Why would I be ok with globalism when it promotes the west having to prostrate itself to these people who want to take what we have for their own and leave us to rot?