Spekr Political Compass

A more accurate version of the political compass test. Post em'.

spekr.org/

Other urls found in this thread:

spekr.org/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

...

bamp

Stop right here. This is a troll - their definitions have no basis in actual ideology. It is a liberal sham to make people think "wait.. what... I'm actually a centrist, or progressive??! Wtf, I'm with her now!".

8/8 g8 b8 m8

...

...

>100 questions

Fuck off mate

>100 loosely asked questions
meh/10

I need to obtain more edgy opinions.

Really made me think

It's bullshit

If you pick you are against hate speech, it makes you a "liberal"

Politicalcompass always has me scoring a little further to the left and a little higher towards authoritarian. However, your scores are vastly different.

the real term of liberal
the current liberals are "progressive"

...

If you pick you want to give tax exemptions to churches, it makes you more capitalist.

What kind of retarded shit is this?

The questions are loaded and some results are retarded

I'm usually authoritarian on political compass as well. I've noticed that I am a libertarian at an individual level and authoritarian at a state level towards foreign policy. I don't remember, but I am sure that political compass has more foreign policy questions

The questions are incredibly loaded.

because the guy who created the test is an unironic AnCap so for him "no taxes for churches" is right leaning

How is this a loaded question? Seems pretty straightforward to me

Violence should only be used to project life and property from aggression
>Disagree
>ur a liberal
>but I want wars of expansion

these questions are pretty stupid, answers pretty vague

it's from the 'murican constitution
basically it means no private surveillance and no cops abuse of power

Well I have the problem where I believe some things are wrong (such as homosexuality) but I do not believe that I have the authority (or the state for that matter) to control what people do in their personal lives. So I'm against and for stuff at the same time.

Because literally everybody will vote yes. Who doesn't want to be "secure"?

The question should be framed more neutrally. Something like: "Is surveillance okay sometimes?"

This guy is data mining, you fucking retards.

I'm the same way but ultimately I choose freedom of choice. However, if the question involves government funds or giving them privilege over "normal" people then fuck that.

>tfw the guy who created the compass is rassembling his bitcoins for recruiting assassins and kill every statists who did the test

I guess... It should probably be broken up into several questions, as opposed to just lumping all of it together like that.

since it's a beta he may make an uptade with 200 questions instead

Why is this test so bad?

...

kill me

This. I believe that trannies should be treated publically different and shouldn't be catered to in their mental illness, though I don't believe the government should be able to pick and choose who to select their duties for.

p accurate i guess

>spekr.org/

GOVERNMENT GET OUT!!! REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!

)))

Zzz

>shows you the results as you pick them
Can't be accurate

...

I took a shitty screenshot

Anyone that isn't centrist or close to a centrist is just an edgelord

How'd i do

...

Get on my level

100 questions?

are you fucking serious? LOL

anyone who does this is a fag

>flag
as excepted

Eh

>Israel
>opposes critisism of religion and culture
Oy vey

seemed a lot like this was made by some lefty fag

Rate me Sup Forums

nope it was made by an ancap
not joking

Too bad your countries aren't like us, huh?

It seems nigh fucking impossible to get non centrist, especially authoritarian

Minarchist

Islam violates the human right and the Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizens,we should be allowed to ban it's members ;_;

Security from the gubmint or the rampaging niggers and antifa?

neither if you have a motherfucking gun

All of it

>Literally Hitler
>Progressive

Rephrasing: Is it the government protecting you by jailing all darkies or you shooting your neighbour if his sprinkler violates your NAP?
Should be two separate questions tbqh.

>minimalist design
>name that is a reduction of a word 'tindr' 'tumblr' 'imgur'
>has the word beta in it

fuck web 3.0

cuck

Sheeeeeeeiittttt
Am I full blown ancap yet?

Their description of a liberal is quite different to what I would associate modern day liberals as.

>FREEDOM
>LIBERTY
>JUSTICE
>FOR ALL (except criminals)

I'LL TAKE ALL 4 THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

GUBMINT FUCK OFF.

>bootlicker
>calling anyone cucks

this
Apperently I have to love slavery to support a stronger government

>libertarian socialism
What the fuck am I reading?

>Liberal
>Economic: 2
>Cultural: -53

This is how I view myself. Policompas tries to put me in middle of Bottom left quadrant.

It's not loaded.

And if you think that it's loaded just skip it.

Free Market fixes everything.

Pic

so what i thought

cuckservative/10

>Swede gets the hippie spectrum
It's like pottery
no wonder your country went to shit

there was literally nothing regarding immigration/nationalism so my autism-spectrum wasn't defined

Step it up.

>commie
>calling anyone a bootlicker

I hate to tell you this you delusional fuckhead, but commies are the ultimate bootlickers. In fact, that's all you fagots do, circlejerk around >muh statelessness
while being a huge centralized state. get rekt you fucking queers.

>banning hate speech make you authoritarian

into the trash this test goes

...

>there was literally nothing regarding immigration/nationalism
Except there was: "Do you support the idea of borders?"
grossly paraphrased, but that was a question on there.

I'm not a commie retard

...

checkd it

>"Do you believe in the american dream"
No
>+2 Left wing authoritarian
These things are always pants on head retarded.

that's the difference between republicans and democrats in the us

It's better than political compass but I can't see it being as popular since it doesn't use labels that follow US party lines. For example, when asked if the right to bear arms should not exist I said strongly disagree which moved me down the liberal scale. Now this is obviously the case if you're using the classical definition of liberal but of course the democratic party has shanghaied the term and turned it the other direction, especially on this one case.

...

Progressives are like hitler

The second statement is self-reinforcing. "Individuals have the freedom to decide what they knowingly and voluntarily consume"

By being able to volunteer to consume something they have the freedom to choose, by definition. There is no other answer to this statement than "strongly agree". If they don't have the freedom to decide what they consume they can't volunteer themselves to consume it. This test is garbage.

I should add that saying you should not be prosecuted for self-defense is also labeled as a liberal policy but that hasn't been the case now for some time. It's a very conservative idea in fact. So really not sure that I trust this test very much at this point.

>Being this Jewish

That's not what that question is saying.

>imblying it doesnt

It's not a question, it's a statement. The question is do you agree or disagree with the statement. Logically if you can volunteer yourself to do something, you have the freedom to decide. In which case the statement is true, and "strongly agree" is the only permissible option.

I do feel like this is a shitty question but clearly it's trying to say "If I choose to buy and eat something at 'the whole foods' it should say that it has x, y, z in it" and the same for media & news.

>yuro-canada doesn't believe in the american dream
>ugh this thing makes no sense

spoken like a true communist rat. fuck off.

>Logically if you can volunteer yourself to do something
That's not what the statement is saying. Also, that conclusion does not necessarily follow logically.

It's a bit ambigious though. I'm culturally much more of a liberal because that is necessary to fend of the crazy coercive marxist establishment. Otherwise I would be way more authoritarian, deus vult

saying ''ban hate speech'' is like saying ''ban the prohibition of alcool''. its fucking retarded

hate speech is authoritarian in nature it ban whatever society doesnt like at x point. Anyway this test is fucking terrible overall not just that question

Then please enlighten me.