Cuckservatives will defend this

>Cuckservatives will defend this

whiteland, restland, spicland, niggerland, mudslimeland.

You're an idiot, inequality increased under Obama like it always does with socialism/corporatism.

Yes, because land mass is the same exact thing as wealth.

It literally is though.

Are you retarded?

Do the same land to wealth division with china, communism is way better guise!!

1% of the US is over three million people. That's a lot of people.

Not an argument

Our trade policy has been suborned by crypto-communists and this is the result. Of course a massively increasing labor pool increases the returns to capital holders. What else could possibly happen?

But we're fixing that. Free trade and illegal immigrants are out the door. MAGA.

>40% would have a small camp
>US is 60% white

Really fires those neurons.

fixed

How much of that land is owned by the federal government? And how much of that did the federal government confiscate to create national parks?

Looks like that red dot needs a nuke

The decline of aristocracy proved that wealth is more powerful than land and political authority

keked and saved

Sounds good, Why is this bad.

NYC and a half would fit on that red dot easy

I don't get the pushback

>30% would own some of the most productive land in America
How is this an issue? That is pretty damn good.

Sounds like you need communism

>Implying that it's other people's fault when idiots can't manage their finances
>Inplying that our massive entitlement programs are not enough
>Implying that a $20 trillion federal debt is not enough
>Implying radical leftist policies doesn't benefit the ultra rich
>Implying that wealth inequality hasn't exasperated under Obama (see Warren Buffett, Zuckerberg, Soros, Bill Gates)

That's why liberalism is a mental disorder

>I am too stupid to understand difficult subjects

That's what those type of pictures are showing.

Cool, you can have the entire Sahara desert, and I'll take West Virginia.

Underrated post

>lefties admitting that left wing areas are of the 1%

The class divide is growing. The invisible hand doesn't do shit about and never will. The trend is to be slowed or stopped then action must be taken.

Wealth naturally pools at the top and effort must be taken to prevent it.

>idiots can't manage their finances
What "finances" per se? Most people make poverty wages.
>massive entitlement..
The welfare state as it exists costs society quite a lot without benefiting anyone much. It is a bureaucratic exercise and mostly a subsidy for the agriculture and medical industries.
>muh 20 gorillion
Debt is used as leverage in financial transactions between individuals and nations as well (you are showing your ignorance now)
>radical leftists benefit the ultra rich
Yes; because our problems aren't solved by any politics
>Obama
It is no secret that Obama is a capitalist pig

Better crazy than stupid like you user

This.
Socialists always say they're going to "tax the rich", but in reality they end up taxing the living shit out of the middle class because it's easier.

>tax someone with 1 billion dollars and they'll just find a million loopholes or make them disappear somehow

>do it to someone who works a corporate job and makes 150-200K and he has no way to dodge your tax.

So baiscally you'r taxing that 59%, not the 1%.
Congratulations, you made everyone who wasn't already le ebil 1% poor, and destroyed social mobility.

>socialism at work

> defend the natural state of free men
Nah. Reality sucks.

I think you mean "hasn't been exacerbated."

You're actually retarded

That is not how socialism works. Working socialism would not have a massively rich tax base to draw from anyway. Socialism that actually works institutionalizes community needs (like free public education in the US) thereby decreasing individual burdens to meet these needs. It is like you people are rats who can't imagine the world outside of your cheese maze.

Nice baseless rebuttal I will take it as a massive concession to my assertions
you fuckface.
Also
>Not An Argument

THis. But they do want to destroy the middle class as well. Harry potter's middle-class depiction, the durseleys, is a good example -- SJWs despise regular people and families.

but most of the richest people are liberal jews

sage

They don't mention that the 1% is comprised almost entirely of (((them))) do they?

The "bourgoisie" is not synonymous with the family--in fact in Marxian terminology it translates more to Wall Street types. Not that I am a Marxist but I do suggest that the family as a unit entrusted with all the burden of care for itself tends towards its own destruction--you should check out the Scot psychiatrist RD Laing's study of family problems.

ftfy

Still better than living in a commie shithole of a country where people own nothing and living in public housing complexes, live off food stamps and have to take public transportation with degenerates.

Racism is another way that the real them use (((divide and conquer))) tactics to control a submissive populace. It works quite well especially when they defund education and subsidizes toxic obesity inducing foods and an entertainment industry which preaches a gospel of self loathing and aristocrat worship. The boot licking on this board leaves a bad taste in my mouth. The rich don't care about you!!! Trump will send US ground troops into a war in the next four years. Pin this post mods.

It's funny because in the US more and more people are living on welfare but the stock market breaks records. For more and more people; life in the richest country resembles life in a commie shit hole. What is going on user, it is like all this ass kissing and cowardice is getting us nowhere fast!

That's because the stock market is speculatory and is no representation of the actual health of the economy.

Exactly, and yet we are all at great risk by the speculations done on the market. The Great Depression is an obvious example. The rich are leveraging the livelihood of most of us for a possible gain for them. They use people like pawns and we love them for it--we elect a Billionaire! The politics that justify such a broken scheme of things are vampiric..left or right, they are just after your neck.

What's there to object to?

Is the country supposed to be fully equal?

If there's 320 million americans and 320 million dollars total to possess, does that mean everyone should have 1 dollar?

That's what I never got about the fight against income inequality. What's the endgame? What's the goal? At what point do they say 'we have beaten income inequality'? When everyone makes the same amount of money and owns the same amount of land?

False dichotomy things don't have to be either "totally equal" or completely in disparity. The current situation is unsustainable..wealth inequality creates a society of unskilled, transient and dependent people--it is therefore not a society at all but a form of slavery.

Kek

>Working socialism would not have a massively rich tax base to draw from anyway.

Yeah, because with socialism everyone is equally poor. How great.

Listen, I'm not against state funded secondary healthcare and primary/secondary education, because it's an investment.

I AM against state funded universities and colleges, because they are massively inefficient. If people actually had to pay 30-40,000€ to attend university they wouldn't fuck around and attend it just for the lulz like they do.

I am also against welfare, unless it's someone who demonstrably cannot provide for themselves due to conditions outside of their control (e,g, disabled people).

You want money from the state? Cool, you can go clear ditches and river beds from fallen trees for 3€/h.

I shouldn't have to pay because you don't want to work.
I shouldn't have to pay because you never bothered to upgrade your skill set and you only know COBOL in a world of Java.

Those are choices that you made and I don't see why I should foot the bill for them.