Did we miss out by not electing her President?

I mean, by numbers, she's way more popular than Trump. She got 3,000,000 more votes than him. On top of that, she's been in office for so long and has so much experience. Obama even called her the most qualified person to ever run for president in history.

Trump on the other hand is proving to be one of the most unpopular presidents since Nixon. His approval ratings are abysmal and he seems to always be feuding with the media. He also caused one of the largest protests in U.S. history.

Thoughts?

Other urls found in this thread:

washingtontimes.com/news/2017/jan/26/hillary-clinton-received-800000-votes-from-nonciti/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

>1 post by this ID

Check once more, faggot.

bump

>She got 3,000,000 more votes than him.
dead people and illegals dont count

>people are this crybaby this early

Leave America. No one wants you here with your cunt shill attitude.

>muh popular vote

This thread again? Ok, you asked for it

Some facts for you:

Trump won the popular vote in 31 states to Hillary's 19 and DC. 62% to her 38%.
Trump led in the total popular vote for all states except California.

Hillary won California 5,860,714 to Trump’s 3,151,821. 61.6% to 33.1% exclusive of the other candidates. Thus California gave Hillary the popular vote for all states as claimed by the Democrats and their media stooges.

But deduct her California vote from her national vote leaving her with 54,978,783, and deduct Trump’s California vote from his national total, leaving him with 57,113.976, he wins in a landslide in the other 49 states, 51.3% to her 48.7%.

So, in effect, Hillary was elected president of California and Trump was elected president of the rest of the USA by a substantial margin.

This exemplifies the wisdom of the Electoral College, to prevent the vote of any one populace state from overriding the vote of the others. Trump’s Campaign Manager, Kellyanne Conway, whose expertise is polling, saw this early on and devised her strategy of “6 pathways to the White House”.

This meant ignoring California with its huge Democrat majority and going after the states that would give him the necessary electoral votes to win, FL, NC, MI, PA, OH, and WI.

Could this mean the end of the Democrat Party? At its lowest point since the civil war when the afternoon of January 20, 2017 arrives, the Republican Party will have:

1) The Presidency.
2) A majority of the House of Representatives.
3) A majority of the Senate.
4) Almost two-thirds of all the governorships.
5) Total control of the statehouses in almost two-thirds of all the states.

And in the near future, Republicans will be able to add:
6) A majority of the Supreme Court. The above has never happened before in American history.

So yeah, keep saying Trump lost.

Copy this and paste it whenever someone makes this thread.

Hello CTR

Experience doesn't mean shit. Trump doesn't have any political experience and he's already accomplished more for the USA in his first week than any president in recent memory has in their entire presidency. The only thing Hillary would've done in her first week is secure the future of her foundation and leave all her other promises till much later.

Do you people really believe this? I've always thought it was just a meme but some of you seem to be seriously arguing it.

What possible justification could you have for taking those claims seriously?

So... your argument is that California isn't America and we shouldn't consider it's votes? Why? Californians are just as America as everyone else. OP is right, Trump is a hugely unpopular president. That was his point, not that Hillary should be president. Your random tangent about California is borderline irrelevant and just comes across as butthurt. So why do you think California should just be ignored?

Obama lost the popular vote to her 8 years ago in primaries, she should have been President then

>3,000,000 more votes than him.
Illegal votes.

And now the MSM is starting to admit it cause they know it will com out in the investigation. DAMAGE CONTROL

washingtontimes.com/news/2017/jan/26/hillary-clinton-received-800000-votes-from-nonciti/

checksem

...

>So... your argument is that California isn't America and we shouldn't consider it's votes? Why? Californians are just as America as everyone else. OP is right, Trump is a hugely unpopular president. That was his point, not that Hillary should be president. Your random tangent about California is borderline irrelevant and just comes across as butthurt. So why do you think California should just be ignored?
brainwashed idiot
read the US Constitution and the Federalist Papers 5 more times
Then post here
until then, fuck right off

take the illegal spics out, and she loses the popular vote as well. Stay SALTY fag. kys now.

Hi.

>by numbers, she's way more popular than Trump. She got 3,000,000 more votes than
Only in a few states shill.

And obviously not enough to be sworn in as prez.

He essentially explained why the electoral college system is valid. The states with the largest population would be able to influence the election to a ridiculous degree if that system were not in place.

So many paid shills shilling their bullshit. Pathetic people being paid in a lame attempt to dissuade, discourage, and harass any with an opinion that differs from George Soros'.

Doesn't matter she got the popular vote. The electoral college decides. Get that through your thinly veiled shill head of yours.

Man, CTR posting quality is down.

Trump hasn't even been president for a week, and he already has the EU, Mexico, and China sweating bullets. The US has a gigantic dick to swing around on the geopolitical stage, but we've had our pants on for too long.

It's time for the rest of the world to see what happens when a true superpower wants things done their way.

The sources for that article are (1) a blog post and (2) a study by Jesse Richman. Richman has come out multiple times saying people are deliberately misreading his work in order to deceive the public. He does not believe hundreds of thousands voted illegal like your article claims.

Alright. So you gave a wild response to OPs statement and had an autistic shutdown moment when you were called on it. I'll give you some space so you can recover.

Whenever you're ready, I'd like to hear your thoughts on why you don't think Californians are Americans. I can gaurentee you there is nothing in the constitution about California not counting.

>The sources for that article are (1) a blog post and (2) a study by Jesse Richman. Richman has come out multiple times saying people are deliberately misreading his work in order to deceive the public. He does not believe hundreds of thousands voted illegal like your article claims.
>missing the point this badly

The media knows there was massive fraud. They are trying to get ahead of the game so they can say they reported on it before the investigation.

nice satire, very believable.

How not to argue

LOSER
O
S
T

sage

Can you provide a valid source for this? A single article by the Washington Times doesn't count as "the media".

It's inductive logic based on their previous behavior. Are you autistic?

You can walk into California and get an ID (and the right to vote) just like that.

So it's paranoid speculation coupled with confirmation bias? Gotcha.

Trumps done more in one week than Obama has in 8 years. Shit it hasnt even been a full week yet. Trump is keeping his election promises. Hillary would have won, stuck a cigar in humas snatch then nuked Russia.

>unfamiliar with what inductive logic is
hahaha

>why you don't think Californians are Americans
Who said any of that fuckwit?

Although it's true at least 5-10 million Californians aren't US citizens
This is not in question

BTFO, Shills get rekt, prophecy of Kek

Shadilay!

>faggot.

Do they teach you that at CTR. Is the class called "How to shit post on the chan?" How does feel to become what you state you stand against? Do they tell you or do you tell yourself that this is a "war" and you "must fight fire with fire."

Just remember, you are a tool.

...

...

Yes.

The failures of my state lead a lot of people here to be voting federally for something that really is only an issue in California because of our dumbass governor. 15 dollar minimum wage seems to make sense to some places in the state due to the high cost of living, but not the entire fucking country, let alone even just the state, but people here don't care, they're going to vote to benefit just themselves at the expense of everyone else.

Not to say the other states didn't make their vote based off of specific issues that we here in California probably don't struggle with like job security, but if that issue is something that can't be solved by one state government, but by multiple different state governments, it's more likely to be something that should be a federal issue.

This thread again? Ok, you asked for it

Some facts for you:

Trump won the popular vote in 31 states to Hillary's 19 and DC. 62% to her 38%.
Trump led in the total popular vote for all states except California.

Hillary won California 5,860,714 to Trump’s 3,151,821. 61.6% to 33.1% exclusive of the other candidates. Thus California gave Hillary the popular vote for all states as claimed by the Democrats and their media stooges.

But deduct her California vote from her national vote leaving her with 54,978,783, and deduct Trump’s California vote from his national total, leaving him with 57,113.976, he wins in a landslide in the other 49 states, 51.3% to her 48.7%.

So, in effect, Hillary was elected president of California and Trump was elected president of the rest of the USA by a substantial margin.

This exemplifies the wisdom of the Electoral College, to prevent the vote of any one populace state from overriding the vote of the others. Trump’s Campaign Manager, Kellyanne Conway, whose expertise is polling, saw this early on and devised her strategy of “6 pathways to the White House”.

This meant ignoring California with its huge Democrat majority and going after the states that would give him the necessary electoral votes to win, FL, NC, MI, PA, OH, and WI.

Could this mean the end of the Democrat Party? At its lowest point since the civil war when the afternoon of January 20, 2017 arrives, the Republican Party will have:

1) The Presidency.
2) A majority of the House of Representatives.
3) A majority of the Senate.
4) Almost two-thirds of all the governorships.
5) Total control of the statehouses in almost two-thirds of all the states.

And in the near future, Republicans will be able to add:
6) A majority of the Supreme Court. The above has never happened before in American history.

So yeah, keep saying Trump lost.

Copy this and paste it whenever someone makes this thread.