This is not a bait thread, also we won get over it is not exactly a good argument. Why does the Trump team seem to be anti-science ? What good does it do our country to end our research? Why wouldn't we protect our environment ?
thehill.com
time.com
latimes.com
washingtonpost.com
We win is not actually an argument. I voted for him because i hate Hillary but you are killing your kids, you are burying the human race.
Other urls found in this thread:
Because science is for nerds and Trump doesnt fuck with nerds
>TheHill
>Time
>WaPo
>latimes
Yet claims it's not a bait thread.
War on science PUBLIC SCIENCE FUNDING.
I.E. No more Religious guilt-trip shakedowns = climate change
Dated daughter of head of biology department @ a top 50 US Uni. Said the way to guarantee funding is to tie your research into CO2 emissions, no matter how inplausible the association
>the hill
>time
>LA times
>WaPo
which news sources would you like sir?
Breitbart or infowars?
>Trump is antiscience according to (((them)))
Hmm I wonder
they're not anti-science, they just care about the environment slightly less than others
Public science funding is important in many fields and helps us advance as a civilization
>dated someone whose dad was in the scientific field
>not in the scientific field.
...