What Are Some Stances That Leftist Are Anti-Science On?

...

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=D-m09lKtYT4&
youtube.com/watch?v=vZUJ7PZ8f74&
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_military_nuclear_accidents
archive.is/8wtgM
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Being disarmed makes you safe.

Race
Intelligence
Sex
Family

Statistics and non-class divisions on general. The first tool of the Marxist is to turn all differences to class differences or remove them in the eyes of the people.

(((science)))

Theyre god awful at understanding the difference between correlation and causation

That there are around 99 genders

Women can have penises and men can have vaginas.

That transgenderism is not a mental illness (it is).

Evolution

They think consensus makes things fact. 97% of "scientists" believe in global warming and to them that makes it fact. They assume the other 3% are hillbilly retards, not accredited researches who viewed the data, came to different conclusions, and aren't afraid to speak out.

Genetic modifying especially in the catgirl field of research

Abortion is the main one.

Explain how they are anti-science when it comes to race.

alternative medicine
astrology
those energy crystals you're supposed to hang in your house

STOP SHILLING YOUR GAY COMIC

Maybe we should give them exactly what they want on tranny bullshit.

After all, if it's not an illness, there's nothing that needs to be treated from a medical point of view, therefore insurance and UHC doesn't need to cover it.

They can pay for their own hormones and surgical mutilation.

anthropogenic carbon dioxide causing climate change:
youtube.com/watch?v=D-m09lKtYT4&

...

Y is not doing Z
and only X is

>Yeah but it's not all Xs and Y might be to blame for why some of X is doing Z. Don't forget when Y did W!

>GMOs
>Renewable Energy/Nuclear Power
>Vaccinations
>Racial differences (in IQ, Healthcare, athleticism, psychology, physiology etc etc
>Gender differences as above

GMO foods and Vaccines.

Fucking Genders. There is only two. The fact that women and men aren't built equally? Just two off the top of my head.

Evilution
LGBT-"science"
Psychology

There are two sexes, gender is a social construct.

Biases.
It's all about them 2bh. Understanding Biases is the ultimate redpill

Economics

Two words
Nuclear Power
If it weren't for those goddamn hippies and faggots at greenpeace we would be in space right now

>a determinant
also
>implying you can measure intelligence

inb4 6million turboraging poltards carpet bomb my post with unsourced infographics

Honestly this.
I can understand how a religious person can deny race and believe "all men are created equal."
But if you remove an intelligent creation from the equation and believe humans are entirely the result of evolution and survival of the fittest then it follows that not all men are created equal. There are observable differences between the races, severe enough that if they where observed in an animal species they would be considered significant to be a subspecies.

58 genders
a fetus is part of the mother's body
"scientific consensus"
50,000 years of geographically isolated human evolution would produce no difference other than skin color, ignores structural, neurological, and behavioral differences

Mankind should not play with the Nuclear Devil.

We have no right to smash his Atoms and we will pay the price for our transgressions.

I have a feeling that Donald Trump will address this problem very soon. Every Nuclear Plant in America should be closed.

Oil and Coal are 100% safe and cause no environmental damage. When was the last time you heard of somebody getting cancer from coal?

youtube.com/watch?v=vZUJ7PZ8f74&
Actually there are some major flaws with evolutionary theory's fundamental assumptions.

...

What is race? Skin color?

that Africans have the most genetic diversity on earth right? Labeling black people as a single 'race' is a joke.

But hey, I'm sure everyone here has graduate degrees in genetics and evolutionary psychology.

No nigger.

AFAIK gender is different from sex.
Sex is what kind of junk your have between your legs, gender is what you identify as.
Then again I'm a filthy commie, what do I know.

Those aren't mainstream beliefs among leftists.

Only big one is vaccines.

This is exactly the sort of bullshit that keeps us from exploring the solar system and freeing ourselves from camel jockeys controlling our energy sources.

If Fukushima put out that much radiation everyone on the west coast would be dead right now. This is a moronic image meant just to scare the sheeple.

Trump needs to make ALL vaccines illegal. The Bible forbids them.

Damn right, I am what americans would call a "liberal" but I seriously cannot understand how some fellow lefties sabotage the best clean energy available right now.

A lot of it is just their attitude towards alternative facts and learning. I swear I've never met a group more impregnable to counter arguments for so many of the wrong reasons.
Then they act like they're all psychologists because they follow PsychFacts on tumblr and think it makes them an expert. I don't know what it is about Leftists that makes them think they're qualified to analyze everyone. They're all fucking Dennis Reynolds.

There is no """solar system""". The Earth is a flat plane and the """planets""" are mere projections on the Firmament.

...

Nice disinfo there kike.

sauce?

This is bait, but nuclear actually kills substantially less people per unit of power generated than any fossil fuel source.

And that's if you try as hard as possible to rig it in favor of fossil fuels.

you're fucking dumb even by spic standards

RWBY

If true post link faggot

My fav thing about those studies is that it's even more than 97% but if you say 99.89% then the public thinks its even more fake.
>t. poor af textbook writer

Their denial of the 3% is that they're just paid off by big oil. Not agreeing with them, just pointing out the retort you'd get for arguing on behalf of the 3%

>fetuses aren't human
>climate change is entirely caused by humans
>there are 6 billion genders
>trannies are not mentally ill
>faggots deserve the right to marry
>the only differences between races are skin color and facial structure
>the mind is a blank slate at birth and people are "socialized" into being one way or another

>forcing other people to get vaccines
When you get abandoned in a forest of pakis start going race war mode i'll be laughing at you while you puke your guts out because your immune system is shit.

I do love it. Ain't nothing more beautiful than hewing a Jew...

>explain how leftists are anti science on race
You can't be this new...

seriously?
>RACE IS A SOCIAL CONSTRUCT THERE IS NO BIOLOGICAL BASIS FOR RACE
that doesn't ring a bell?

I accept evidence for climate change and race differences. Don't consider myself leftist of course, but it's a bit discouraging that in the USA-centric world you are basically forced to deny some part of scientific reality if you uphold a certain political stance. It's so petty and dumb.

btw does Peter Thiel also deny climate change?

>We have no right to smash his Atoms and we will pay the price for our transgressions.

Are you from the fucking Church of Atom or some shit?

Climate change, GMOs and the Holocaust

Admitting the scientific truth about all three will get you similar levels of social ostracization

At least you can't be arrested for climate change skepticism... yet, at least

"one race the human race!!!"

Ignoring that there is racial correlation between peoples indigenous to africa with black skin is absolutely retarded

>gender is a social construct.
In their own framework, gender is meaningless. If gender is a set of beliefs or behaviors that is wholly independent from biology, and can only be determined by the individual in question's self-identity, then there are by definition over 7 billion unique genders on the planet.

Of course, the idea that gender is not based on biology is unsubstantiated nonsense so their argument fails right out of the gate.

...

checked
I've been saying this for a while
gender is jewish bullshit
same as patriarchy and gender dysphoria, among others
all jewish bullshit
we need to call this shit out
people think those are real things

>all races are physiologically and mentally identical to one another

t.leftist

The term anti-science is a buzzword.

Anyone who thinks dogmatically can is anti-science, meaning someone who blindly accepts what authorities tell them is guilty of it. This ironically means that someone who blindly accepts what "experts" in science tell them are anti-science.

The term, of course, has been coopted to mean anyone who doesn't blindly accept what a scientist tells me them even when there's a ton of contention in the study/field.

Vaccines.

Killing their offspring because muh feelz. Kek

Nuclear energy.
GMO Agriculture.
Any biologically based difference in the traits and aptitudes of male and female humans, or different races.

embryos aren't human. No brain = not human

>scientists can be cravenly bought?
I wonder if that knife cures both ways.

I remember once having the nerve to suggest that GW scientists support it because they get funding and the person acted like I just insulted they firstborn.
It's funny how their scientists are always objective and above reproach but ours are all just toadies and sell outs.

>be trans
>gender is a social construct independent of biology
>i identify as a different gender
>makes biologically changes

you can't make this shit up

Abortion.

Racial studies were generally accepted until a prominent Jewish anthropologist and socialist, Franz Boas, began a crusade along with other prominent sociologist and anthologists (most Jews he hand picked) to reduce and delegitimize racial studies.

science is a liberal code word for "facts". They are all in on it.

If people came from bacteria how come there are still bacteria? Check&mate

Ah but you see they're just caving to society's oppressive forces, which demand that they must be either biologically male or female. That's #whytheymarch

Fun fact: the concept of gender as separate from sex was originated by Dr John money, a Jewish doctor at John's Hopkins Hospital, based on research where he had two parents chop off their child's penis following a botched circumcision, and get a surgically reconstructed vagina,and raise him as a girl. That boy, David Reimer, resisted the process the entire step now the way and knew he was a boy, but Dr. Money's confirmation bias clouded his judgment and he claimed it was definitive proof that gender was social. He molested David and his brother, BTW, making them mimic sex acts to "program David as a bottom", and eventually, David transitioned back into a male. Both David and his brother committed suicide in adulthood.
Gender theory is all based on the lies of a child molester.

>sure
>"humans didn't cause it, therefor we should surrender the species to nature"
>there are 2
>they're harmlessly ill
>this isn't a science thing bro
>it should take roughly twenty thousand years to get ANY stable mutagenic change in brain structure in a specific geographic culture, regardless of it's value.
>Nature/Nurture isn't a dichotomy and to argue about it as if it were is childishly retarded

>ITS NOT A HUMAN BEING ITS A ZYGOTE

When does it become a human?

>YOU CANT MEASURE THAT

We know it has to become a life at some point and if you can't know when it doesn't make sense to pick an arbitrary point or else we're committing murder.
To play on the side of safety and logic it would only make sense to claim life begins at conception.

Fpbp

so brave

humans came from niggers and they are still around

Nuclear power is great and all, but if you've read a list of times we've lost nuclear fuel or weapons, you might rethink it. Honestly, I'd be surprised if nobody wrote a spy novel about terrorists finding a lost nuclear missile.
>en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_military_nuclear_accidents

There's a reason why South Africa dismantled their secret nuclear program before apartheid ended.

>homophobic
>judeaphobic
>pedophobic
>transphobic
>suicidphobic

Can you not?

That's because their opponents are brazen about doing precisely that because they know they can be. It's like calling someone stupid for being replaced by a machine, we know that's really not the responsible force at work en masse and they constantly hear the argument which relies on a logic trick and has no reflection of real world evidence.
>you asked bro

...

A college cancelled the planned speech of one of the codiscoverers of DNA because his findings show differences in race.

Scientists no longer get any funding for studying that kind of thing either.

>hungary
shit if not for your flag i mighta bought it

>scientific evidence that x is...
Redpanels fails again

Climate change is accepted because we have disproven that earth's temperatures stay constant. You disprove models with science. You don't offer "evidence to support it". That's confirmation bias.

1/10 bad bait

>This ironically means that someone who blindly accepts what "experts" in science tell them are anti-science.

But there's literally no way to have educated opinion on every socially relevant field of science. I know a bit about biology because I have a master's in physiology, and that allows me to discuss GMOs or genetics, but as for climate or particle physics, I can only compare the appearances, "looks like honest research" vs. "looks like shilling", and assume that it's impossible to falsify nearly every study in a major field.

I don't get how you rednecks evaluate the level of contention or certainty of evidence in fields you know nothing about. Thinking for yourself is amazing, sure. As long as you don't apply it exclusively to things you disagree with.

to believe this you have to accept that aliens are running an experiment on us and have been forcefeeding evolution at a rate unseen in nature but only right before we started doing science and tracking it.

Your only hope for argument is that we live in a sci fi novel.

I never said all fields were in contention.

Don't put your bias on me.

I was watching the Pro Life March today and they had a good point, which I will use from now on. If the cells have a different DNA than the mother's, how is it the mother's body?

Honestly, I think abortion shouldn't necessarily be illegal. It should be a very tough decision between a woman and her doctor, and in the earliest of early times of pregnancy, never to exceed first trimester or whenever the heart starts beating. It should never, EVER, just be a backup to being a slut. All that said, I just love the asspain it brings so I kind of want Roe v. Wade to be reversed just to drink tears.

wtf I love Wendy's now!

archive.is/8wtgM

abortion should 100 percent be illegal. Giving women rights is for feminist cuckolds. If the man decides he doesn't want the baby he can wait till it's born and throw it in the river like any sane person.

Balance of nature is a myth

It was taught for decades
they discovered in the 80s there was no evidence to support it.

but the hippy dippy ying yang nature worshiping Commies continue to promote it

they point to anything in nature,
show it is out of balance,
and then screech that it proves humans are the devil and muh climate change

It's not balance; it's Harmony.
It's a harmonious self operating system.

At the same time, we must not forget that scientific paradigms do shift. It was less than 50 years ago that there was global scientific consensus that homosexuality was a diagnosable mental illness. Now it not only isn't, but even suggesting as such gets you ejected out of the medical community and completely destroys your scientific credibility.

Race and biology
Crime and statistics
Economics (mention how welfare destroyed the black family, which leads to statistically more crime and less employment among blacks, which leads to more welfare, etc, and watch then reee)
Biology and psychology regarded sex and gender dysphoria (There is literally no scientific backing for validating transgenderismn as anything other than a disorder)