Why hasn't Trump pressed to prosecute hillary?

Why hasn't Trump pressed to prosecute hillary?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=k80y6GkZjfY
youtube.com/watch?v=rCTzFNrsKns&list=PLcgk8FfGnzkxDSYW-3gqzNBVxJVE2a9Hh
youtube.com/watch?v=Ix49LjgaTaI
breitbart.com/big-government/2017/01/10/jeff-sessions-will-recuse-future-hillary-clinton-investigations/
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

A good question.

Because drumpf lied and the little drumpfkins are scared (^:

He doesn't even have an Attorney General yet.

More important things to take care of right now

She'd squeal about human trafficking/pizzagate faster than epstien's 8 year old locked in bird cage full of spiked dildos.

haha you sound like some "edgy" anarchist pussy who would have voted for clinton anyways. fucking loosers. You know trump is letting the courts take care of this right now. But trump has done this before where he goes quiet about a certain subject but then end s up prevailing. So don't be surprised when we start seeing trump trying to properly criminalize Hillary.

He's doing too much at once as it is. Let him finalize preparations for the wall first.

exactly

he needs his attorney general to be confirmed first.

Your country is not as corrupt as my country so am talking from expirience here . It's impossible to prosecute someone like Hillary it's eazy for her to avoid and you seriously have bigger fish to fry . Furthermore her career is finish clinton foundation is shuting down and norway SA and other countries are not longer funding her the DNC was ruined because of her and her future is looking grim

When will the AG be confirmed?

True, but it's not like Mexico is cooperating.

Because he was bullshitting as usual.

He's gone so far as to say he's not going to prosecute her.

DON'T WORRY I'M SURE HE'LL DO IT ANY SECOND NOW

Yeah, in other words, he will recuse himself because he was her political opponent.

That doesn't mean Jeff Sessions won't prosecute.

Democrats are being faggots and depends on how big of dicks they want to be before the GOP invoke the nuclear option.

Why is Trump shoving a pinecone down that woman's throat?

Cling to whatever helps you.

Because nobody actually cares about Hillary.
(Nobody includes sjws and retarded alt righters)

>That doesn't mean Jeff Sessions won't prosecute.

Yes just like how he was only saying all that pro-Jew / Israel stuff during the general and would gas the kikes once in office right user?

Sessions isn't confirmed yet. There is no Attorney General

I doubt he will be able to. She knows too much and has too many connections. Just like noone could get rid of Hoover.

>Democrats are being faggots

Guess you missed the last eight years you fucking faggot?

W A L L

Sessions isn't AG yet
/thread

>Sessions isn't AG yet

Ok and once he is and doesn't, what will you say?

lol triggered

Y O U G O T P A S S E D T H E B I L L

He has more important thins to do and he has to flush Obama's justice department out before he moves in for the kill. After Lynch is gone for about 3-6 months Her and Bill will be a non extradition country. That or he just might not want to go down as the fist President to arrest a former rival. It does set a bad precedent.

Oh shut the fuck up. The Democrats had a supermajority in 2009.

I bet you CTR faggots are glad to be getting paid again.

Republicans tried to come to the table on things with Obama nearly every time, but Obama wasn't interested in compromise.

>The Democrats had a supermajority in 2009.

For like a week, eat shit Republifag.

>HURRR DURRR OBSTRUCTIONISM IS BAD NOW BECAUSE WE DON'T HAVE THE POWER TO DO IT ANYMORE

>but Obama wasn't interested in compromise.

Yup you didn't pay attention, Obama compromised all the time, the GOP was the lunatics who didn't.

>Because nobody actually cares about Hillary.
right on breh

>LOCK HER UP! LOCK HER UP! LOCK HER UP!
>hey guys, I'm not gonna prosecute her, we don't care anymore right guys?
>lol right we don't care lololol who cares inorite kekekekeke derp

>Republicans tried to come to the table on things

That's a weird way of saying Mitch McConnell sperging out at every turn.

You're just butthurt because you fucked yourselves by invoking the Nuclear option and now you literally cannot do anything to stop Trump.

Prepare to reap the Whirlwind CREW faggot.

No one really cares, and it would be a dangerous precedent for him to set. Locking up leaders is not something you really want to start if you yourself are a leader, and a controversial one at that.

then why did he say he'd put her in jail?

why?

>Obama compromised all the time,

lolno, obama was a full my way or the highway asshole.

It's only been a week.

then why did he say he's not gonna lock her up?

That's a bingo.

Trumptards do mental gymnastics about him
>Lock her up
>Nahh now we don't care
youtube.com/watch?v=k80y6GkZjfY

Trump is a jew puppet, if Soros told him to stay away from her he will.

Because if he did then the media would scream bloody murder about how Trump is prejudiced and its a witch-hunt.

Because the FBI is protecting her and he doesn't want to take on the FBI so early in his presidency.

youtube.com/watch?v=rCTzFNrsKns&list=PLcgk8FfGnzkxDSYW-3gqzNBVxJVE2a9Hh

It was politics. If Hillary won, he was setting up a situation wherein her legitimacy could easily be challenged.

Now that he won, what's the point? Hilldog's lawyers would make any legal actions take against her insanely time-consuming. Why waste time on that when he can work to fix the country instead? The Clintons are finished as politicians anyway, unless you think Chelsea has it in her (she doesn't).

Waittttt for it

since when has Trump given ½ a shit about the media giving him shit?

>namefagging

post boipuss

>Why hasn't Trump pressed to prosecute hillary?

Because that's DOJ territory. If Trump were to even comment on it, the MSM would go apeshit about Trump politicizing it, and using his office improperly

Pointing this out on Sup Forums is the fastest, surest way of outing /leftypol/

That and pointing out it was Democrats who killed Single Payer.

>Now that he won, what's the point?
being true to his word. "it was politics hurr", yeah.. like when Obongo promised the libruls to shut down Gitmo, right?

exactly.

We just ended week one, take it easy cuck.

So it was literally a campaign promise he knew he wouldn't be able to follow up on.

Color me fucking shocked.

>Trump broke his promises guys..
>FUCK YOU AND YOUR COMMIE ASS
>k den

He'd fucking better. He's an idiot if he doesn't.

She's attacked him several times since losing the election. First with the recount, next by threatening electoral college voters, and again by supporting the women's marches as a way of undermining his presidency.

Now her cronies at CTR have received a new round of funding. They're obviously gearing up for a new series of attacks.

Hillary Clinton has a massive war chest, unlimited free time and a serious appetite for bloody revenge.

She will spend the next 8 years doing everything she can to fuck up and undermine the Trump presidency.

And he's not the only one in danger. So are we. We all know Hiro is a data miner. We all know his mod staff was sold out to CTR. Clinton and her cult have figured out that we cost her the election. It's only a matter of time before they come for us too. Possibly IRL. Unless we do something first.

Start Tweeting at Trump to prosecute Clinton. He hinted at the possibility recently in his interview with Sean Hannity. We must force his hand.

God speed Anons

>We just ended week one
And achieved more that Obama did in his first 6 months.

They're going to have to start calling the White House the Shade House. Because the future's so bright...

youtube.com/watch?v=Ix49LjgaTaI

it's not gonna happen, brah.

There was never a strong enough case. The FBI said she wasn't guilty. Sure you could still try to prosecute, but it would be an immense undertaking.

Because any half-decent defense attorney would argue that the case should be dismissed/declared a mistrial because of it being prejudiced.

>So it was literally a campaign promise he knew he wouldn't be able to follow up on.


Did your reading comprehension issues cause you problems in school?

Are you legitimately retarded? I posted nothing about Trump.

>Trump lied according to MSM.
>A week into his presidency and he's enacting his campaign promises.

Because he wants to seem nice, it's not his job, and he has already hired people who will eventually do just that.

so, he was just kidding?
see above.
then what the fuck were you referring to?

Yeah sure, we will "keep clinging" to the casual speculation he nonchalantly put out there
Stay salty, little libcuck

>If Trump were to even comment on it
youtube.com/watch?v=Ix49LjgaTaI

>A week into his presidency and he's enacting his campaign promises
then why hasn't he locked her up?

Both wrong.

The evidence against her ha far greater than the evidence used in three other high profile cases.

You also need to watch his interview with Sean Hannity. Although he wouldn't say her name he was clearly talking about sending Clinton to jail. He compared her case to that of a military serviceman who received 30 years for a much lesser crime.

>and he has already hired people who will eventually do just that
youtube.com/watch?v=Ix49LjgaTaI

Prosecuting Clinton would cost him the 2020 election.

Seriously, the whole "Third world banana republic dictator that prosecutes his political opponents" meme would run rampant, and it would turn moderate normies against Trump.

If Trump prosecutes Clinton, it will be after the 2020 election.

>then what the fuck were you referring to?

That pointing out that Obama refused to compromise with congressional Republicans is a surefire way to out lefties on Sup Forums because they cannot stop themselves from regurgitating the MSM narrative that Obama was a good president who dindu nuffin and was ready to get his presidency on track.

Prosecuting Clinton will ensure him victory in the 2020 election.

She's already planning to run again

>The evidence against her ha far greater than the evidence used in three other high profile cases.
then why is he backing down on his promise, to lock her up?
>Although he wouldn't say her name he was clearly talking about sending Clinton to jail
then why does he say, on stage in front of cameras, that he won't send her to jail?

valid point, user.

>why is he backing down

He's not.

Watch the interview from last night.

She's going to prison for a very long time.

breitbart.com/big-government/2017/01/10/jeff-sessions-will-recuse-future-hillary-clinton-investigations/

Sessions recused himself too, but whoever is the deputy attorney general could do it and take all the flak and then noone will be able to reasonably say it was a political arrest


FBI said there was evidence but noone would prosecute, that was true for the Obama administration, not necessarily true for Trump

Chaffetz's investigation is still ongoing. She's going to jail whether the liberals like it or not.

>Prosecuting Clinton would cost him the 2020 election
so, he just lied?
then why does he say he won't prosecute her?

No way in hell she wins the 2020 primary.

Why hasn't Trump done everything at once? WTF I am now a Cruz missile.

Watch the interview from last night

She's going to jail

It's only been a week. We'll see what happens.

>>If Trump were to even comment on it

As President, not as Candidate.

Do you even know the fucking difference? As candidate he can say what he wants, likes, should do, should do, or will have done when elected.

As President, there is a different separation because his words have the weight of Office.

Anything he says becomes prejudicial, influential, and pretty much the word of God as far as employees of the Executive are concerned. The DOJ is part of that. For him to make any official or even off the cuff comment undermines whatever DOJ is doing, and makes it a Political prosecution, and not a legitimate legal one.

>He's not
he said, before the election, that he'd put her in jail. Now, after the election, he say he won't put her in jail. Both statements can't be true, user.

They'll rig it again for her

Notice how Sessions also said he "WILL" recuse himself, not that he "would".

Watch the interview from last night

She's going to jail

You haven't seen it so you aren't fit to comment

>She's going to jail whether the liberals like it or not
great, but then why did he say he's not going to put her in jail?

Because the media would say bad things about him if he does

Watch the Hannity interview and STFU

>She's going to jail
so, he lied when he said he's not going to put her in jail?

>implying he has to do the arrest
come on, face it, you were duped, he's just another globalist elite player.

There's no way in hell they try that again after they've been exposed.

Also, she's losing support from within her own core group of surrogates. They will be way less likely to shill for her this time around.

I already fucking told you, because if Trump makes it personal then Clinton's lawyers will try and possibly succeed in having the case thrown out as some kind of political witch-hunt.

so... it doesn't matter what a candidate says, really?

Clinton will be lucky if she's not a drooling vegetable by 2020.

I saw him saying he'd put her in jail, then I saw him saying that he's not gonna put her in jail anyway, and now you say that he's going to put her in jail all the same.

so, at some point, he must've been lying.