Would you execute a surrendering enemy?

would you execute a surrendering enemy?

Other urls found in this thread:

imdb.com/title/tt3213684/
youtube.com/watch?v=uTAQFDXMg2s
youtube.com/watch?v=rCyD9hrqK84
forgottenweapons.com/mp-44-the-german-sturmgewehr/
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Only cost resources, so yes

If the enemy is honorable and follow war rules no , if not bye bye

Executing POWs is a war crime

Only the commissars famalam

depends on who's the enemy

Oh, well then...

if you came to kill whites because of some ideology your leader is pushing....you will be killed

enemies must be destroyed so that they cannot amass again, learn from your history

Only if they are chanting 'Whose streets?! Our Streets!'

No, I would rape them instead

this.

Yes. It's a foolish concept that an enemy simply throwing down their arms will erase their crimes. Weakness breeds weakness.

The rarest leaf, a far right leaf.

Depends who the enemy is and how detrimental to our efforts it would be to manage the prisoners.

...

it's a war crime

War crimes

kinda dumb if you think about it, then you realise its white """"people""" who made them up lol

...

filter by skin tone and skull shape

Depends on them being white or not.

>war
>crime
ayy lmao

That's not true, we have the Sweden Effect going on. Leafposters are always either huge faggots or the most redpilled, hate-spewing literal Nazis on the board. Same goes for Swedes.

It's because our countries are so cucked that the ones who take the redpill tend to overdose.

No. I would amputate their thumb and index fingers and release them to the enemy camp.

Now they are useless since they cannot use a gun, and a burden to society since the state needs to give them military disability pensions.

No, you need to torture them for any and all information they have

if they were female i'd make them rim me and i'd fuck them and then, yes, execute them

No idea how I'd react in that situation if those were the guys who'd been killing my friends.

>Kill if not white

>believing war crimes are an actual thing
top kek

i actually did. but the gun was still in his hands so i was covered.
i only realized he was trying to surrender afterwards.

as for shooting them when they're already unarmed and surrendered i've never wanted to but i did see some people do it.mostly out of anger.

I would teleport behind them and help them die after such a dishonorable gesture.

I wouldn't unless we didn't have any other options

only if he's white

they are an actual thing fucking edgelord

What is this a still from?

this the jude is right

What movie is that? Only thing I get about it is, Estonia and WW2.

Well, the only enemy I'll ever be fighting in a war will be Muslims and leftists, so no, they don't deserve my mercy.

yes

Even asians are honorables some times

Yes. Traitors, jews, niggers, shitskins, zipperheads, chinks, pooinloos, spics, ect... have no place in this world. Not even as slaves.

I'm with Israel on this one.

Execution of the enemy is fine so long as you review their case and give them a trial. But killing a surrendering enemy is nigger-tier.

lyl international law is for boats

imdb.com/title/tt3213684/

Well first we have to determine the context and what the ennemy really is. I'll never be involved in a symetrical war between two nations, as I don't give a fuck about this state and would never fight for it. Furthermore such wars are unlikely to happen.
A most realistic scenario would be a SHTF type of situation, in which I would try to leave some city with millions of shitskins destroying everything and raping/torturing/killing any white person they see. In such a scenario I don't have the time to take prisonners, I'll kill and move on immediately. Furthermore, I don't give a fuck about a sandnigger or a nigger's life, so there wouldn't even be the slightest hesitation.

What about 60%ers?

if they were Jews, i wouldn't execute them but i would kill them slowly as they cry and ...

>surrender

>imdb.com/title/tt3213684/
Nice get and many thanks.

Nope , no killing for soldiers that surrendered , you're a coward and not honorable if you kill them , no point arguing about that.

And honestly , it's funny that most people in this thread would kill them , and yet you talk about niggerish behaviors and muh white pride.

What's the point of a trial? You're there on the battlefield to kill each other in the first place.

>execute
well it's logical to do so. if they are unfit for labor usage then they will be nothing more but a drain on resources and if you let them go most will end up back on the battlefield again.

why i also support the idea of utilizing prisoners for labor.

you edgy spergs wouldn't do shit in real life

this

enjoy prison and having your career fucked over because you wanted to murder some people for no good reason

Kek. This is how the world really works, kiddo:
If you win, you're a hero.
If you lose, you're a war criminal

if there is some base/camp nearby to keep them, then yes, if not then I would execute them, because there's possibility of them running away and killing my bros in future. :^ )
t. private ryan.

While we are in the topic of movies and video games. How come I never release a death camp in games like call of duty during my campaigns?!!

>would you execute a surrendering enemy?
It would depend on if I was fighting a person or an ideology.

ahahahha madman
underrated

>Be me Afghanistan 2009
>Muzzies firing from Mosque
>Begin to open fire
>Get ordered to stop "IT'S A WAR CRIME!"
>Keep shooting at the windows and minaret tower
>Lieutenant starts screaming into my radio to cease fire and order the section to cease.
>Do so.
>Get punished for it
>mfw ordered to stop shooting at a religious building filled with militants firing at us because its illegal despite the fact these people don't show the same restraint with Churches or Synagogues.

It was then I stopped believing in "war crimes". A mate of mine is being investigated for shooting dead a seriously wounded taliban fighter as a mercy. Fucking ridiculous PC no spined attitudes have ruined the west.

and you're just a sad edgelord pretending to be a real man

I don't care for that. Only for STG-44 porn.

if japan surrenders to you you should shoot me. it will be cunning plans to throw a grenade or explode on you.

>Would you
This a question, nobody who hasn't faced it can't answer. They all come down to the situation and prior experiences.
All answers here are just some idea based on abstract thought, those things happening in real-life will be different.
There will be people here saying
>Ah hell, I'll kill those roaches
deciding not to do it. And there will be people who will say
>It's a war crime
that will tear surrendering soldiers to shreds.

it's only a war crime if your side loses

This. If both sides follow the rules of war, they can be treated respect. If one side suicide bombs and specifically targets civilians and hides with plain clothes they should be executed.

Yeah. And i will sell the wife as a sex slave and i will keep the daughter in my sex dungeon.
If he has a son he will integrated in my child paramilitary regiment.

I justify this because my enemies violate the NAP.

youtube.com/watch?v=uTAQFDXMg2s

Live by the Sword, Die by the Sword

You kill people in battle. Surrendering marks the end of battle. To kill prisoners is cowardice.

I would actually buy a CoD game for a German campaign desu. It's boring playing as allies(except for soviet).

Can someone tell me in layman terms how good the MP44 was?

I just want to have fun with you, that is all.

Don't you want to have fun with me?

Do Greeks do this to themselves so they can claim disability and not have to pay debnts?

>all these edgelord fags in this thread

Then the Nuremberg trials are war crimes then.

if they've been committing war crimes on a mass scale against my side, then yes. see soviet union in germany 1945

depends what said enemy is

if its for example a muslim extremist or a commie I would fire away

if its just a normal person who happens to be born in a different country I would not

Give the enemy a way out so he doesn't fight like a cornered dog. Hope is a weapon.

Up to the first time someone tries to pull a fast one. After that it would be "Sorry, the last guy pulled a knife in men after he surrendered so your ass is getting shot"

It's one of a kind to me. Decide for yourself. I just love them.

youtube.com/watch?v=rCyD9hrqK84

forgottenweapons.com/mp-44-the-german-sturmgewehr/

The Israelis do it all the time

Why are they my enemy? Are we fighting a political war or an ideological war?

If it's a simple political war then they're just dudes doing their job. It sucks but they'll live.

Ideological wars are way less likely to take prisoners, or treat the ones they do take civilly. Bathe them in pigs blood and line em up.

>would you execute a surrendering enemy?
If white, yes. Otherwise, no.

This. You would go to jail for the rest of your life.

The edgy stuff is torturing POW.

It's about being pragmatic. It's war and things have already gone too far at that point. But I guess it is part of propaganda that you can have "legal warfare".

only if commie or muslim

If I was fighting for the US nah.

If it was a civil war I would, but after some "gentle persuasion".

Yes and torture them if I can, maybe shoot all of them in the stomach once and then cave their heads in with a large heavy object.

I want to torture someone to death.

Of course. And I would do it in the most brutal fashion possible,to break the morale of remaining enemy.

>would you execute a surrendering enemy?
Depends on whether they're white or not.

The left often take noble ideas from the old establishment and go full retard with them. Literally everything they touch turns to shit. Yours is an example with rules of war, another would be the welfare state.

Under the Geneva convention it is perfectly legal to kill a surrendering enemy. It is illegal to accept their surrender and then kill them. The movie Saving Private Ryan concealed the fact that our allied forces were under specific orders not to accept any surrender for the first three days of the D-Day invasion of Normandy and instead to kill every German soldier on sight because to have done otherwise would have slowed down the allied advance. There is a scene in the movie where soldiers debate what to do with some surrendering Germans that would not have happened.

Depends, if nobody was looking then probably

Save a lot of effort and paperwork desu

its true though, allies in ww2 never got punished for their warcrimes

Because cornering any enemy is a good idea.
God why are you all retarded ?

Well good news mate. 5500-9800 are being used in Syria along with a few Flak 88's. An old partially sunk German cargo ship was looted by "rebels" along the Syria coast in 2012 aswell as looted surplus stores from the SAA's older storage.
Probably because its sexy as fuck,accurate, has attachments for scopes including the Vampyr thermal scope prototypes and is the first assault rifle ever made.
Germans were way ahead of the allies in terms of tech(minus the nukes and even then they were only a few months behind despite bombings)

Sometimes you don't have the luxury of showing mercy to your enemy. If every bit counts and you can't get any useful information out of a prisoner, what the fuck are you supposed to do with them? Let the waste your precious resources? Let them go so they can shoot at you again later? Let them starve?

War is hell. It isn't fair. Sometimes there is only a bad choice and a worse one.

Depends. Are they wearing a uniform? Are they lawful combatants under the Geneva Conventions?
If so, I have no business killing surrendering soldiers. It sets a bad precedent.

If it's some insurgent/guerrilla/mercenary I have no problem with summarily executing every single one personally.

White and non Jewish - even if communist - no. We must do our best to save our race , even during war amongst ourselves.

Depends on if they are leftist or not.

>Killing free and expendable workforce
Who would be so retarded?