If CNN, BBC, Washington post etc. are all fake news, what is the source of real news, pol?
What is the REAL NEWS Sup Forums
Gabriel Foster
Other urls found in this thread:
Elijah Young
William Carter
drudgereport.com
Jacob Young
>Implying CNN and Washington Post are on the same tier as BBC.
Bentley Kelly
www.infowars.com
Check out super male vitality too
Carson King
ZeroHedge, Wolf Street, Ponziworld among others.
Julian Bell
Breitbart, zerohedge, and infowars for unbiased news
Stormfrontnand Fox News gets it right sometimes
Adam Jackson
Look at me, look at me!
I'm the real news now.
Kevin Mitchell
Also natural news is based af
Connor Parker
Anything that agrees with them of course.
The same goes for the left.
Carter Robinson
>>
Nicholas Richardson
Juan Price
Wikileaks
Easton Smith
Sup Forums is as real as it gets bby
Landon Smith
Sup Forums
Isaac White
There is no such thing as "real" news. All news has a bias. All news is a second hand observation of a what is claimed to be a real event. Journalists can alter the facts by adding information out of context, or removing information from a story to suit their agenda.
The only "real" news you will ever be able to obtain, is the news that happens directly in front of you, as it happens, in live action. When you are able to confidently gather all the information of that event, from all perspectives, all witnesses, and all preceding conditions, you will have "real" news.
I mean to say that "real" news is wholly unobtainable. As a responsible citizen, it is up to you to sift through articles of news by different outlets, study and learn where a journalist is using heavy language, study other articles to confirm bias, and to make up your mind on the issue yourself.
Andrew Jones
>If CNN, BBC, Washington post etc. are all fake news, what is the source of real news, pol?
I question all MSM and alternative news but usually more inclined to trust alternate news after cross referencing their sources.
Just never take a Jews word and you will get closer to the truth.
David Long
infowars is biased as fuck. It took me a long time to find a source for their statistic which talked about many illegals taking part in the election
Asher Martinez
Sup Forums
Connor Edwards
Straight from the horses mouth.
Want to know about the white house, watch the daily press conference.
Want to know which bills were voted on, check government websites.
its really easy to get info straiht from the source, don't be lazy
Landon Anderson
We are the real news.
Benjamin Green
...
Jayden Diaz
Reuters is pretty unbiased
Ryder Sullivan
Sup Forums
Brody Ross
Sup Forums is news crowdsourced by autists
If you are a newfag you'll just end up pissing away your time looking into a bunch of shitposts but if you are an oldfag Sup Forums will give you espedient factual news you can't get anywhere else
Grayson Flores
Sup Forums
Adrian Morales
Society is doing well when the stock market is up and unemployment is low. The "news" is just entertainment.
Landon Gonzalez
shills
Grayson Green
Follow the money, financial news provide a pretty good lens of what different interests are pursuing
Cooper Edwards
RT
Benjamin Johnson
democracy now
some RT
propublica
wikileaks
panama papers
the intercept
Benjamin Jones
To be fair Reuters is pretty unbiased.
Look at the title of their post then compare to Foxnews or Cnn
Jayden Williams
Havent checked out ponziworld but zerohedge and wolf street are solid
Daniel Gray
you're on the
World Wide Web
Zachary Murphy
Obviously a leaf would ask this incredibly stupid question.
The answer is, always has been, Sup Forums.
kys, newfag
Christopher Murphy
Reuters/AP are pretty much the only ones I'd consider trying to be completely bias-free
The economist is also pretty good, articles without an opinion only tell so much and I think they do a pretty good job of keeping it high quality while opinioniated
David Adams
Your brain.