What is the right answer to the drug question?

Is legalization the answer?

>pic somewhat related

yes it is. for a variety of reasons not limited to tax money, more safe drugs, less black money, black market and gangs would be hit significantly, less burden and cost on the legal system, police time can be doing spent combating things that actually are a detriment to society

ITT: people defending drug abuse that are already taking (((SSRI)))

Duterte is the answer.

To what extent though? Do we seriously legalize ALL banned substances?

Legalize the cool drugs. Execute people who consume/create uncool drugs.

Ones that aren't incredibly risky. I just thing that legal or illegal people will take drugs and surely its better if they are regulated and taxed

Make MDMA, weed, DMT and psilocybin legal

They're the natural cures of the world

>Mdma
>Natural

Maybe in the gutters you reside in

O shit that slid

You get what I mean though. MDMA is super good with dealing with a number of mental defects

Drugs need to remain illegal because it has been proven that access to drugs and drug use drops significantly.

Back to the warehouse rave, we don't want your dilated pupils to see the light of day

this is the answer to all of our problems

Lmao

Take it you haven't noticed the papers on PTSD and depression treatment with MDMA?

>legalize weed and hallucinogens
>decriminalize possession of hard drugs (heroin, meth)
>harsher sentencing for dealers of hard drugs
>use any money saved towards rehabilitation and enforcing law against dealers of hard drugs

wouldn't it compel criminal organizations to branch out into violent crime if their main source of profit was taken away?

Have you read the papers on HRT for gender dysphoria?

Does this name thing really works?

...

So you're using paranoid thoughts of an "agenda" (personally think it's weird) to discredit something you've never read?

Aye, good one mate

Drugs destroy nations.
Do you really want your children to live horrible lives and to die early?

Violent crime doesn't gain anywhere near as much wealth for a criminal organisation as drug dealing, if you rob people the might fight back, there is a higher risk of being caught, if the ability to make money through dealing drugs was taken away criminal gangs would collapse and disperse.

Both are degenerate and have consequences beyond a niche of helping others

>Is legalization the answer?
Yes. The only people who support prohibition are the people who profit from it (LEOs, drug dealers, politicians) and brain-dead statists.

step aside

Complete degeneracy

Aw do they? Tell me the negative consequences of medically-monitored doses of MDMA for PTSD treatment.

Legalize usage but have stiff penalties for distribution

That way people aren't afraid to seek help for their problems

Legalization is the answer.

1. legalize weed, revive ag sector

2. no one uses cocaine, disregard

3.lol meth

4. Duterte/singapore-style policy on heroin. Users will get free addiction treatment if they turn themselves in immediately. Dealers get 10 years mand. minimum. Large traffickers or distributers can work in a labor camp/prison factory for 40 years or face death penalty. Large publicity campaign alerting people of this. Large rewards (20k per head and reduction in outstanding fines or debt) to turn distributers in.

Essentially a more civilized Philippines

*sniff
that's beautiful

I was talking in the scope of legality not medical instance.

Should be culturally discouraged because its degenerate, but should be legal

Aaaand we've came to a full circle

Obviously man, that's why we're discussing shit that should legal.

Why not? Fuckheads will still take them except, instead of a slice of the profits going to healthcare and policing, they go to criminals.

>t. shitmeme economic argument

Duterte.

No shit it should be legal are you that dumb? Only people who want it illegal are those who profit from it. There's no moral issue with drugs

legalize steroids and dude weed lmao, most people will be satisfied

It's your stupid money. The only people who benefit from narcotics being illegal are criminals, private prison owners and incompetent DEA/equivalent agency employees.

And also all the childen who arent introduced to heroin because it isnt in the school vending machine.


If we had mandatory death for heroin dealing, it would disappear immediately, and we wouldnt have to argue about who should benefit and who should lose everything

The average dealer is a lot less discerning about the age of their clientele than a liquor store. Why would heroin have less restrictions on its sale than alcohol?

Someone doesn't understand context

Weed is pretty much legal here

Lower drugs related crimes
People here smoke/try less weed than the US states where its banned (research done by Uni of cali) (40% in the US vs 22% here)
Government makes some bucks
Less people being jailed for having a joint in their pocket
Less money spent on jails etc

Some stoners, but that is very very rare.

So far it looks better than the war on drugs the US is currently fighting