Why are all great artists and thinkers liberals?

Why are all great artists and thinkers liberals?

Other urls found in this thread:

liveleak.com/view?i=44e_1406655216
youtube.com/watch?v=jpZgpeFsDmk&ab_channel=BBC
youtube.com/watch?v=Ooq23i-QGBM&ab_channel=franzferdinandVEVO
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

>he thinks a pop musician is a great thinker

because they hate christians

YEA YEA YEA YEA YEA YEA YEA

>doesn't post any examples

They aren't. It's just difficult to reach a certain level of success while shilling for conservative ideals.

Lumping those two together is retarded and disqualifies you from being in any way at all, a great thinker.

Not all artists and great thinkers are/were liberal, but some of the disproportion of the past is due to historically the conservatives also advocating moral and social authoritarianism, restricting the expression of many artists who wanted to break the mould. But now you have liberals censoring artwork and artists, so it isn't set in stone.

>my "peer reviewed" study is fact
>yours is racist and your theory is racist
>go away racist only globalist jewry is allowed in our schools
>those grants are ours now
>also we're promoting our people to top positions so they can be led to our beliefs, not yours

>great thinkers
who
also
they're famous because they had to sell their souls to the jews

>great artists

Posts bono

Screwed up people make great art

Because they are actually smart

great artists
>posts bono

im little triggered

>BONO
>GREAT

hahahhahhahahh

Because atheism is tied in perfectly with leftism.

Feminism, disdain of nationalism, destruction of the traditional family, and cowardice towards guns is only possible when big chunks of the popular follow atheism.

Because art is about feelings.

>"Great" "artists" and "thinkers"

They usually won't speak up if they are right leaning, or else they will be shunned

All of their best records were produced by Eno, who incidentally says give Trump a chance.

Because liberals are creative=chaos
Conservatives are grounded=order

Liberals innovate, conservatives execute. Both are needed and neither should dominate.

I have a theory. So these people and others in white enclaves throughout the states are so privileged and well off that they see all of the whites doing so well, and some whites not doing so well, they adopt a 1 for all sort of mindset that they believe will only benefit the caste of people they are exposed to every day, having never met absolute scum that don't ever deserve aid in any form on accounts of how horrible they are. Thus adopting a liberal mindset.

Bono isn't even liberal, he caught a lot of flak for speaking positively about trump and the election process.

And let's not forget Hitler

inb4 not great
OP posted Bono Vox as an example

because jews pick the winners in these fields

Conservatives are linear thinkers. They make great peasants and racists. Liberals are brighter and able to synthesize information and create. They make great leaders, scientists and artists.

True

>he thinks a pop musician is a great artist

>kek
yes. Bono is right up there with Aristotle, downs infested liberal

Bono is a practicing Catholic. A fruity Catholic who supports gay sex but a Catholic none the less.

Yes and people who actually can get shit done are more conservative.

The fuck are you talking about? Bach was considered a old-fashioned conservative in his lifetime. Wagner was a socialist in his younger days before he fucking grew up, realized the ideology was shallow trash, adopted a traditionalist view of life and wrote his greatest operas.

Great post

Because success in the arts requires introspection, dedication, optimism and lateral thinking. Conservatives usually have a pretty rigid, linear way of thinking. They either follow a simple prescribed path to success or they become failures. Almost never do they forge their own paths through life.

Most great artists aren't very successful.

Because they are superior to you?

cause theyre dumb just like you

baltshit

Probably, they've achieved all of Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs and now feel generosity.

because 50 year old men and women who own their own homes, and have families, don't buy shitty pop/rock records

it's simply to appeal to their market base, of kids with idealistic dreams

No, art is about concept and technique.

Is it true that if you come home to someone raping your wife in Canada you have to let the rapist finish or you'll get charged for killing/assaulting him?

It's easy to be liberal when you're super-rich. It makes you seem virtuous and cost you nothing. Does Bono share his street with refugees, does he pay excessive tax rates in his home nation?

Often very famous people become delusional, they believe they're gods among men. Bono is one of the worst offenders.

>some faggot musician says something about that all people are the same
>he is a great thinker
Ay lmao.

The only great thinker are the ones, who pushed society forward. Physicists etc.
Tell me, were all physicists and great engineers liberals?
I certainly don't think so. At least, they weren't retarded liberals like nowadays.

Liberals are great leaders?
Who is the current great leader of the liberals?

Check and Mate.

>tfw can't get enough of U2 but The Edge hates The Donald

Because they usually suffer from at least one mental illness.

>any member of U2
>"great artist"
Only good guy they have is the live keyboard player who they hide beneath floor panels.

A lot of modern art stems from Dada garbage which is rooted in liberalism, and you're used to consuming such garbage, that is why you think so.

But I'd also add that modern art stemmed from resistance to mainstream culture, and satirizing the right at a time in which they were heavily prevalent culturally. Well, we are now at a crossroads, where being a right winger is like it once was to be a communist, and Sup Forums, (((TRS))), and Nick Dipaolo make me laugh harder than any libshit comedy, and Death in June feels more authentic than your hipster folk NPR bullshit. So it is likely the pop culture of tomorrow stems from the right, as counter culture eventually evolves into it.

Just look at MSNBC wanting to become more "right wing," and the bankruptcy of Hollywood as it becomes more and more "progressive".

>thinkers
name some of them please

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.

BECAUSE OF SURVIVOR BIAS.

AND ALL GREAT THINKERS WERE BASED.

TODAY'S (((THINKERS))) ARE TRASH.

LAST GREAT THINKER WAS SOREN KIERKEGAARD AND HE WAS BASED AS FUCK.

PAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAATHETIC


SHADILAY BITCH.

Topkek

they get money -> buy a mansion faaar faaar away from daquan and the gang -> think their white neighbors are the entire world -> meryl streep

Kek

Bach didn't leave much around regarding politics. He was too busy for that. All I know is that he was seen as old fashioned but also got in trouble a few times with royalty and church officials because he didn't always listen to their requests.
Other composers like Mozart, Beethoven, Britten, Bartok, and Cage were unapologetic about their political and social views.

Free thought, free Exchange of ideas are all liberal foundations.

Right wing is for restriction, contaminant, decline.

>great thinkers
>liberals

>BONO
>GREAT ARTIST

His music is dogshit. Literally the worst garbage on a CD ever.

Because modern art and music is all about generally shared and understandable feelings.
And the only thing left is good with is control and manipulation of human emotions.

>people are only librul cause they're rich and virtue signalling
>people are only librul cause they're poor and mootching
>if only there were more people like me who have experienced neither success nor hardship

Because modern thinkers are building their philosophies on the French revolution premises: "Égalité, fraternité et liberté". I mean they get the idea we're all equals, brothers and free as the foundation of their philosophy.
However, that doesn't only apply to "great thinkers", it is deeply rooted in everybody's psyche.
Obviously, if you start with such premises, you will end up being a libertarian. As, there is no greater equality and freedom than in total anarchy.
The issue here is that once someone becomes a libertarian and doesn't apply rigorous methodology to not contradict themselves, they will surely turn into a libtard.

the interesting thinkers are not in academia today but on jewtube or on some blog. you cant be a thinker (whatever that means) if you just swim with the swarm

We don't have any interesting thinkers anymore. Name me an interesting one who hasn't made the same mistakes as every thinker post-French revolution by assuming we are or should be all equals.

MillenialWoes

Artists and thinkers are different.

Great artists and musicians are often liberals because they tend to come from third-generation wealth. The first generation of a wealthy family is usually built by an enterprising member of the working class. Because of the difficulty of this achievement, the founder of the family will instil conservative values in the second generation. The second generation will spend the money. They have the ambition, wealth, and mentality needed to become doctors and lawyers. Generally, the family loses some of its wealth, but everyone holds a good job and works hard; however they have a different mentality than their forefather because they grew up with greater privilege. Their children, however; the third generation, will almost always reject the bourgeois values of the second generation, which do not come off as genuine as that of the grandparent who founded the family. They will be brought up in a wealthy environment, with access to expensive artistic equipment like grand pianos, oil paints, and free time. In an act of rejection of their parents, they will choose to express themselves through this medium, rejecting the 'good jobs' of the second generation in favour of a life committed to the seemingly more pure aesthetic pursuit of art or music. Naturally, they reject the value their parents and grandparents put in money because they have never been exposed to scarcity. They grow up in an ideal environment for getting 10,000 hours of practice, so they end up being very good at their craft. These are the great performers of our society.

Dostoevsky points this out in many of his books, namely The Brothers Karamazov. Art and music are always the pursuits of the third generation of a wealthy family.

because art and thought are all they are good for

I've never watched his videos. Mind to give me a quick run down on his overall philosophies? Is he a libertarian, a neo-nazi, an "alt-right"ist?

It's because modern art and music were dumbed down to appease the vast majority of people, regardless the race, nationality or any other thing that makes humans unique.

Modern songs are all about universal things, without anything to "spice them up". When you listen to the old songs from 19th and 20th century, they are almost always have something unique going for them, pointing to the time and culture they were born in.
Nowadays? It's all about some silly stuff, like cute girl in a cute dress running around the city, or feelings of loneliness that is familiar to anyone who doesn't have a loved one, or a sterile and cold stuff about death and grief.
Universal, perfectly understandable to anyone and... completely flavorless. Boring. Identical.

not a mistake. You have no real good argument against contemporary ethics.

However; people take the good arguments passed down from the French revolution and use them to argue for stupid things. People should have equal rights, but it should be understood that people are different. The French Left from back in the day wouldn't have wanted open borders either.

Most who read economics and follow their mind over their hearts will always vote conservative. Modern day liberalism is for idealists and fantasists who choose feelings over facts.

alt right ethno nationalist. I would put him between ramzpaul and varg. for me he is the "deepest" alt right thinker out there.
does mostly analysis of events, commentary and streams.

>Great
Your opinion
>thinkers
Liberals are more prone to yelling about their political opinions and talk down on people. They use art to get the message across.

open borders are not a philosophical idea but literally the manifestation of low testosterone in a society.

(((great artists and thinkers)))

>great artists and thinkers
>Bono
I think I'm having a stroke.

Artists? Maybe. Thinkers? What thinkers? If you're a current liberal you're generally not what I would call a thinker.

You have to be a retard to ask that question, it's to maximize their fan base, that's marketing 101.

OK.

That's a pretty simplistic argument, but sure. There is a great problem with chemicals that fuck with testosterone these days. The problem is that the estrogen receptor has more degrees of freedom at its active sites, so there is a greater range of possible compounds that will act as xenoestrogenic endocrine disruptors. It's simply a consequence of the evolution of the protein structure. Eventually we will have to either reversibly block the active site for men through some sort of drug-therapy, do genetic engineering on the next generation, or put into action environmental protections that block the production of chemicals predicted to act as xenoestrogens through some sort of computational model. Our chemists really need to be taught more toxicology in school.

excellent bait

I consider it a mistake to build up a philosophy on such restrictive premises. Of course, if you came to these conclusions by yourself and actually have a though trail to back up the idea we are or should be all equal, be my guest and have a blast.
However, most leftists, or extreme leftists have never had the thought process of "Are we really all equal and should we be?"
But you're right to say French ideals have been twisted and are now being used wrongly.
I could argue "Égalité, fraternité" would actually mean equality in our brotherhood, thus equality among men, not equality with every fuckwitt wanting it.
I'll check it out then.
I'm not claiming he is trash, but the issue I have with youtube "thinkers" and bloggers, such as Molymeme is the fact they don't need any credentials to set up a youtube channel and claim to be a philosopher. So you can get a lot of trash or half-wits pretending to be "deep" thinkers while, in fact, their ideas are total garbage and not well thought through.

Hmmmmm. I wonder where hollywood is located

I met Bono at a gig in Limerick many years ago. He was wearing a disguise and pleaded with me not to announce his presence at the venue.

We later went to a club and I offered to buy him a drink. He accepted and then we retired to the toilets to discuss current affairs, as we couldn't hear each other speak with th loud music playing.

He told me his "world peace persona" was all an act because it gets him coverage and is basically free advertisement for U2's commercial work.

We took turns snorting cocaine off a toilet cistern and ended up shifting each other outside the Chicken Hut until a group of scobes pulled us apart, called us "steamers" and demanded money for a dinner box.

>celebrity whores
>((people))
liveleak.com/view?i=44e_1406655216

every breaking wave on the shore tells the next one they'll be one more
youtube.com/watch?v=jpZgpeFsDmk&ab_channel=BBC

>no one named molymeme as greatest philosopher yet

ofc it is simplistic. but the idea of letting in foreign men is so detrimental to concept of manliness that one has to assume that there is no manliness anymore. it says 'I have lost my balls please fuck my women for me' -> cuck

molymeme calls himself philosopher. he is a meme. you will not find any of such thing with mw

>shifting
you maed out with Bono?

Because they are clever
/thread

Just tongues, yeah.

Catholics hate christians

more examples :
youtube.com/watch?v=Ooq23i-QGBM&ab_channel=franzferdinandVEVO

>Catholics hate christians
Christians hate Catholics

A lot of Christians hate Christians

Here's a thought - because liberalism is, to a point, a sensible ideology.

The main tenet is that all people are born equal, have equal rights and that government should have little business into what people do, including what they think.

If you think these are bad ideals, you're an edgelord.

Liberals are attracted to fields of in-action. It's why you see them all the time in academia, journalism, and the arts. They aren't go-getters because they'd rather talk about problems than solve them.

Conservatives are people who work and take action. Look at Trump, he's already done more in his first week than Obama did in his first 100 days.

>Canada in charge of having a valid argument

Kids have a great imagination.

...

that leaves out that those things can only always exist in a system. else you end up with nwo bullshit we have now.

Because the neocons in America banked all of the party's social capital in anti-liberty christfaggotry after they took control

yes but only the irish kill over it

well we should let in foreign families. It would be best to let in an equal proportion of men and women.

In some cases it makes sense to let in young men though. What if you have a really good scientist who wants to come to your country to do research for one of your institutions for a few years? Often this guy will end up staying in the country. Think of all the Hungarians that emigrated to America to be physicists. It's basically because of them that America was able to nuke the Japanese and win WWII.

Interestingly, I'm a young male and I'm planning to move to your country in the next few years if they let me in. It's fucking hard though. And I certainly won't be staying there all my life. The Swiss have it right. You guys only let in people you want, and they don't even get to stay forever unless they have some sort of ultra-valuable assets.