Hmmm

Hmmm...
Is she right, Sup Forums?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=6b0bIEMsHwM
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Little girl. BTFO!
Go read a better book.

Yes we do, little girl. Deport all non-whites.

It was either Voldemort or Dolores Umbridge

Why can't liberals go on 5 minutes without quoting Harry Potter/Star Wars/Game of Thrones?

They need to demonstrate the extent of their culture.

You will never live in a nation of cute redheads

Voldemort didn't do nothing wrong, not his fault he didn't have plot armour.

I'm pretty sure harry is the only one that can stop Voldemort.

What is it with liberals and decorative signs?
It's like they're all in elementary school.

I love how her cunt mother drew that sign and tried to pull it off like it was the kid who made it to stir the hearts of the masses

>hermione
>redhead

why are they so obsessed with harry potter

Hermione was a privileged white bitch, wut u racist ass fucks trying to say???

Why not men and women?
It's not like women do much other than whine

It's the only book they have ever read

I know right
Jk rowling said that she was black

He was. While anyone could technically destroy the horcruxes, only Harry could find the Diadem in the Hall of Necessity due to Harry's fate being to destroy Voldemort's horcruxes

Now one remains: Harry

You mean that prissy bitch that tried to "help" the house kikes/elves even when they didn't want to be freed and just wanted to be left alone? One of her was enough

People who use their kids as props in protests, regardless of what the protest is for, are pure garbage. Kid probably doesn't even know what the fuck that sign says. Besides, it was Harry who vanquished Voldemort, not Hermione.

Because they think everything is fun and games. They think signs like this or with catchy phrases on them will get them the (you)s of social media.

...

...

Voldermort basically was president.

And all they needed was 1 Hermione.

And Harry did most of the heavy lifting.

And only men died in the process.

Little girl I question your reading comprehension.

Just imagine a nation of people leaning in and scolding you with bullshit like it's leviOHsa, not levioSA, it's EEYRO not GUYROW, the fourth reich would happen in like a week

On her sign the white peoples have scared faces and the Browns are happy and ecstatic. The redhead is not white (Irish)

...

>so many great characters to choose from in HP
>choose the one that's closest to a virtue signalling femnazi

shit taste

because they are vapid children who want to live in their own fantasy world.

What do you expect from a group of "adults" who can't take opposing opinions and facts without needing playdoh and break rooms?

It was actually Neville Longbottom. Remember it was him that killed the snake, the last remaining horcrux.

youtube.com/watch?v=6b0bIEMsHwM

because people think in terms of narrative. In the past when someone fell in love they would talk about how the goddess venus had entranced them.

It is the same thing, only Christianity has fallen and people have replaced those symbols with symbols found in popular culture.

actually harry potter, he is the chosen one, this bitch needs to get her facts right

>I love how her cunt mother drew that sign and tried to pull it off like it was the kid who made it to stir the hearts of the masses

Any masses stirred by that are too stupid to be given a vote.

There really should be an intelligence test to vote, idgaf if I couldn't pass it but something must be done to stem the retard tide. Women shouldn't vote either.

can someone please tell me what that pink hat means

Hermione didn't do shit to Voldermort though, no woman could ever hope to have the power he had. do they even know their own favourite movies lore?

Shh. You'll make the piglet cry.

You mean "Is her parent right, Sup Forums?".
She did not write that. They are literally using children for political gain. Do you think that girl really knows what that even means?

where is : >?

It is a cat hat, you know pussy cats, you know vagina. something that Trump grabs

Lol, impotent little girls led by their mothers.

I can't think of 1 thing Hermione did in the last few books that was actually useful in stopping Voldemort.

but harry was the only one with the ability to destroy him i thought?

ya know... A WHITE MALE

This is the saddest thing about the modern left.

They really believe they're "cultured", but all they do is consume mass media.

It drives me up the fucking wall. The same people who mock heartland America for being low class think JK Rowling is a more significant author than Dostoevsky.

I bet goblins are behind this

Couldn't you machine gun him and repet unail he ran out?

Using these things against normies makes them really mad. We should get on to this.

That what I was thinking that too, was she just the token girl character or was she supposed to be a dick sleeve?

>yfw the only time the delusional lefties have power is in fiction

>implying we need mudbloods

where is the fucking logic?
why does my brain hurts so much from this shit.

I thought the Harry Potter series was supposed to be a gateway for kids to get into reading at a young age. Like you start with Harry Potter, then move on to more adult stuff and then eventually to the classics and high literature.

But millenials are like over 30 years old now and the only books they've read are STILL the fucking Harry Potter series, and the ones who do read still only read "Young Adult" bullshit.

If everyone in America was turned into Hermione, wouldn't the porn get boring after a while?

Dirty Potter > Harry Potter

She means when Bane is President.

Newsflash: Anyone that uses their holy texts as political arguments is probably also a retard.

Yes

no, because cunt wrote the books
Harry Potter was beginning of an end of fantasy books
it was followed by all kinds of furfaggotry, vampire romances, and other bullshit
Fantasy should be about adventures, killing dragons and fuckin nice girls, not some bullshit drama about fucks who live under stairs

JRR Tolkien would disavow that bitch Rowling

FUCK LEFTISTS AND FUCK HARRY POTTER!!!!!! WHY THE FUCK DO THEY REFERENCE HARRY POTTER LIKE IT'S A GODDAMN HOLY BOOK?!?!?!?! AHHHHHHHHHHHH

Her parents qere wrong to introduce her to one of the dullest franchises in history. Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

I think it is absolutely disgusting that adults use their children to push their own political ideology

Their minds were probably too numb to notice considering Harry Potter has been one of the dullest franchises in the history of movie franchises? Each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though r-right
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

There is a difference between using religion as justification and using the symbols of your culture as metaphor. I am sure they could have spoken about Nebuchadnezzar, a king who went mad, but not everyone would get the reference.

The symbols of pop culture have replaced in many respects the symbols of religion. That is what people use to communicate.

wew lads

Dullest mind

what the fuck

>religion has the same cultural relevance as children novels
*tips wizard hat*

Dead eyes, she's already sold her soul to the Jewish cause. No saving her.

D U L L E S T
U
L
L
E
S
T

now this is actually autism

That doesn't really work because magical blood isn't a good indicator of potential to use magic. Hermione came from two muggles who can't even use magic at all and was shown to be one of the most magically proficient of the trio of heroes. Both Harry and Ron came from pure bloodlines and both show much greater difficulty in using and learning new spells. Hermione in fact learns spells faster than almost any other student on her level, be they half blood, pure blood or other mudbloods.

The pure blood thing was just discrimination based on pedigree in the same way the noble families of Europe discriminated against the "lesser" families of Europe who often had much healthier genes than the ruling class due to the inbreeding and limited gene pool even when direct cousinfucking didn't come in to play.

It's a dumb comparison.

>pic
FUCK YOU, LITHUANIA; USA.
THOSE ARE AWFUL LISTS
THERE IS SO MUCH GENRE-FICTION SHIT, THAT IT ISN'T EVEN FUNNY

REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

DIE DIE DIE

REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

I HOPE I FUCKING HOPE THAT MUSLIMS BEHEAD AND RAPE YOU AND YOUR DAUGHTERS BECAUSE YOU HAVE NO TASTE, SWINE!!!

REEEE

Yeah

But Hermoine didnt do shit against Voldemort.
It was Harry "A FUCKING WHITE MALE" Potter that beat him and his muslim hordes.

>it's actually a straight white male who is the chosen one that can stop voldemort
>hermione herself isn't actually important to their success, it could have been any smart witch or wizard who wanted to help Harry
why do leftist attempts at metaphors or allegory always collapse when exposed to basic scrutiny?

>Hermiones
>Her minions

Opinon on the rime of the ancient mariner

Intelligent posts, completely unlike how intelligent Harry Potter is as it´s one of the dullest franchises in history. Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

Wait until the invetiable Harry Potter remake with Harry being made into a nigger

>But Hermoine didnt do shit against Voldemort.

No, but you still got the core of her message right? When a bad person is in power you need an army of good people to combat evil. She used the symbols of the story to convey a powerful message in just a few terms.

Harry Potter is popular culture and everyone would understand what she says. It makes perfect sense.

Let me hook you up with the real list.

because those are their secular myths. they're not in touch with their nation's culture or history.,hollywood trash is all they have.

Arrested development

Nerd/faggot

This is just another picture in a disturbing pattern of lefty larpers getting their kids involved... of which are too young to understand or even care.

Why yes. We need more hot brit girls of legal age.

KYS YOUR'E ARE SELF ABDUL

A dull message that is. As dull as the dullest franchise in history. Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

dem digits doe

Harry Potter is one of the landing zones for those on the spectrum

Jesus

And there are peoples who believe this kind of shit isn't the exact same kind of shit Hitler Youth was, and even worse imo.

>he cant appreciate Crablegposting
straigt out of Sup Forums

so a middle aged nigger mixer that shits her pants daily then magics it away?

>using children

this is why the only ppl who take /pol srsly are the ones who dont know how much of a joke it is

They're children's books written by some coked up single mom on welfare, it's not her fault millennials treat the book like high literature

>Brave New World below 1984

kys

But if they referenced arrested development people might actually think they were funny

But we have Maisie!

They treat them like high literature because they have never been exposed to.bettwr books. Serioisly, Harry Potter is one of the dullest franchises in history. Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.