I would like to schedule a 15 minute phone meeting with [Representative/Sentator] [Insert Name] to discuss proposing legislation to increase the penalties for attacks on fellow citizens when they are expressing their political views as per their 1st Amendment Rights.
In the current political climate, there have been an increasing number and severity of violent attacks on citizens by citizens when expressing political views. These attacks have been praised on social media, celebrity statements and even statements from politicians within the government. These attacks rob the individual of their 1st Amendment Right and instill fear into the community. A clear message needs to be sent that attacking others for expressing opposing views are unacceptable. Such egregious acts are an attack on basic American rights enshrined in the United States Constitution. It is a form of political terrorism aimed to suppress the voices of their fellow Americans.
Increasing the penalty and classification of these attacks will help bring civility to political discourse for ordinary Americans. It will reinforce the notion that we hold the freedom of speech to be sacred and that no one has the right to silence another through violence. I feel that this proposal would have bi-partisan support.
I would like to schedule a 15 minute phone conversation with [Representative/Sentator] [Insert Name] to express the need for such legislation. I would like to hear [his/her] thoughts on the issue and ask for advice as to what I can do as an ordinary citizen to further this goal.
Please let me know what would be a good time for this conversation to occur.
I thank [Representative/Sentator] [Insert Name] for [his/her] outstanding service to [his/her] state, country and to the United States Constitution.
Thank you very much,
Dominic Hall
bump
Isaac Peterson
If you are too spaghetti to know what to say when you call the office, just take this part from the email to the scheduler.
>In the current political climate, there have been an increasing number and severity of violent attacks on citizens by citizens when expressing political views. These attacks have been praised on social media, celebrity statements and even statements from politicians within the government. These attacks rob the individual of their 1st Amendment Right and instill fear into the community. A clear message needs to be sent that attacking others for expressing opposing views are unacceptable. Such egregious acts are an attack on basic American rights enshrined in the United States Constitution. It is a form of political terrorism aimed to suppress the voices of their fellow Americans.
>Increasing the penalty and classification of these attacks will help bring civility to political discourse for ordinary Americans. It will reinforce the notion that we hold the freedom of speech to be sacred and that no one has the right to silence another through violence. I feel that this proposal would have bi-partisan support.
Noah Evans
Also in this thread, post attacks on people for expressing their views.
Example: Last night's attack on a Trump supporter in the Airport.
fuck off, everyone knows that the majority of political violence is by antifaggots. Time for them to get BTFO when attacking conservatives as "ebil Naughtzees"
If anything violence is a good thing, it gives an excuse for the new brown shirts to form and for the 4th Reich to come about.
Samuel Ortiz
bump
Brandon Moore
>literal nazi salutes during his speeches >"hes not a nazi this is different!"
haha brainwashed idiots want to be a part of something so bad. sad.
Levi Robinson
Cool so this means that whenever Sup Forums burns down a mosque or shoots up a protest the penalties will be worse.
Henry Kelly
Where exactly is this happening
Dylan Hernandez
...
Carter Parker
>muh constitutional rights
Noah Anderson
Yep. And in the 1 out of 100 cases of political violence that is right vs left, they'll deal with the consequences.
the 99 out of 100 instances that are left vs right, they'll deal with a consequences.
BI PARTISAN ISSUE THAT BOTH SIDES BENEFIT FROM AND ENSURE THE SAFETY OF PEOPLE EXERCISING THEIR FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHT!
Jackson Campbell
i'm actually TOTALLY against this - we need to have ALOT more fight-fights in this country. you realize you can get years in prison just for a bar fight right now?
Brayden Brooks
Why do we care about plebs?
If you're going to contact your senators make the conversation about the media...Debundle the providers so we can cancel our CNN subscriptions
Logan Hall
TRAITORS GET THE FUCK OUT
Samuel Baker
Bar fights are different than assault to suppress the right to free speech.
This would target assault based on being triggered by opposing views.
Levi Brooks
How does it feel to know that you can't just chimp out at political opponents without suffering the consequences, antifags? Must suck, doesn't it?
Leo Price
>Thinks racism and genocide is a 'political view' in the same way as free healthcare or tax reform.
LOL
Charles Miller
>just for a bar fight right now? if you both agree to fight it should be legal barring excessive force
Jose Richardson
So every Trump supporter is Nazi? Because I could give a fuck less about this Spencer mother fucker he aint paying my bills. But what I hate is being called a fucking racist and bigot because I voted for Trump. Now people are getting beat up because they support Trump? Naw you pieces of shit out there marching, vandalizing shit are the real Nazi's.
Carter Miller
It seems so small...How do we go from the presidency to faggot protesters?
It should be all hands on deck to attack the media
Adam Gray
No matter how triggered you are, doesn't give you a right to attack people or destroy property.
It would be a lot better to destroy the propaganda arm that gives the protesters a voice and then doesn't report the assaults
Jason Moore
This is good. Thanks for making this thread. I will post it again later. pastebin.com/pMLAMsV2
Alexander Baker
Very against this for the same reason I'm against classifying things as hate crimes.
Assault is assault, trying to say there are "good and bad" assaults is anti-ethical and is just more needless government intervention. And that's ignoring all the bullshit that will come along with people trying to game this for their own selfish interests.
Bentley Carter
>shook.txt
Thomas Bennett
>back in my day.. >Pretending to be 90 years old on Sup Forums Stop LARPing as great grandpa lefty you're not fooling anyone.
>increase penalties for Assault when someone is expressing their political views.
How about no.
When passing any law, one must think of how it can be abused. You get in some stupid bar fight, one small enough that even if any cops get called they tell you to just fuck off and go home for the night, or just let you sleep in the tank, no big deal, right? But the person who "lost" is a bitch, or his girlfriend is a bitch, or he's got a friend that's a bitch. Point is, some bitch runs their shitty little mouth and says it was all over political views instead of sports or dogs or whatever stupid shit people fight over in a bar. Now nobody wants to call their friend/girl out on bullshit, because that could be serious for them. Suddenly, one of you jackasses is getting more than a simple slap on the wrist that you deserved, all because new laws obligate officers to escalate it further and now your ass has a court date for violating someone's first amendment rights or some shit. It'll be false rape allegations all over again. So to reiterate, how about you fuck off.
Justin Nelson
This assault does more than just physically injury the individual. It sends a message to all who have different opinions "Express yourself, and you could be attacked just like this person" It violates the Freedom of Speech.
It IS different. You are attacking much more than a human body in these attacks.
Sebastian Torres
This is great work, user... Keep it up. IMO, this is something that can be taken care of with the Patriot Act...
So should I punch you or what? You seem fascist to me.
You're not protecting rights. You're destroying them. You want to take away gun rights so no one can defend themselves legally. You want guns to be made exclusive by the criminal underground, so only people that shouldn't have them will. You want people that freely speak their minds to be assaulted and assassinated. You are justifying actual genocide, the destruction of our First and Second Amendment Rights while citing them as just cause, and would enable political violence in the name of higher ethics? You are a treasonous dog and should be locked away with the rest of your family.
Something to think about: Everything you've written, everything I've written, you chose. You choose to read. I choose to read. Everything Spencer says, you're free to agree or disagree. If you silence him, no matter how you do it, you only make him a martyr and expose yourselves as the intolerant fearful fascists. Allow him to speak so people might draw their own opinions and make up their own minds.
Would you ban/censor anyone you dislike? Why? You could always just ignore them. When did "agree to disagree" stop being an option? Even if Spencer said something like "Kill all Jews", if he never killed a Jew, then he's not to blame. You are to blame for following orders. Is that not the same rhetoric used in support of dissent against Trump?
You should have better sense than to justify violence against your fellow Americans. Especially after you've worked so hard to paint them all in a negative light. How dare you.
Levi Ortiz
Some would argue that attacking a black guy sends a message to all black people "Be black, and you could be attacked like this person."
I disagree with your assessment of it violating the first amendment, and it doesn't matter -- assault is already violation of law.
It is absolutely not any different.
Zachary White
The government needs to take action, re: SAG-AFTRA.
They are clearly disloyal, and un-American. They are also an illegal monopoly, and should be broken up.
Get rid of SAG-AFTRA.
Nicholas Bell
Antifaggots need to do minimum jail time. Misdemeanor Assault is a slap on the wrists for their political intimidation
Samuel Turner
Nice try Richard, we know it's you. Not your personal army.
Julian Cox
...
Bentley Gomez
I don't support this as it castrates any possible civilian resistance against "peaceful" rioters in a hypothetical future where leftists have retaken control of the executive branch. It forces us to rely on the police being willing to clear the streets of Black Bloc anarchists when they disrupt our lives and opens the possibility for people like that guy who broke through an antifa blockade and slugged one of them in the face having the book thrown at them by a hypothetical future Marxist government, because he violated their 1st amendment "right to protest". It means anytime some hot head patriot tries to stop a subversive from burning the flag it will be the patriot that receives a heavy sentence.
If there's one thing our Nationalist friends can learn from our Libertarian posters, is that it's better to rely on yourselves than to demand the government pass a law. Better for you to found bodyguard corps than to demand that something as capricious as the democratic state protect you with new laws.
Owen Sanders
So as soon as someone shouts "Nazi" at the top of their lungs, the hive mind kicks in and everyone just believes it immediately? What the fuck is happening?
Elijah Richardson
When you contact your representative, let me know so I can color it in.
Julian Jones
Anyone that would seek to destroy democracy should see the inside of a jail cell.
Blake Cruz
The media is the opposition party
Stop caring about soro's golems and go after the real issues
Benjamin Nguyen
Trigger my ass. I don't think anywhere near all Trump-supporters are fascist or even racist, just for the record. But Spencer is. His particular ideology should be considered a threat of violence and reacted towards accordingly.
Easton Rogers
Hurt fee fees doesn't make assault legal.
Luis Clark
Noone said it was legal.
Jason Morales
You don't walk all over the American machine and get away with it.
Lucas Scott
Lock up those violent leftists
Matthew Davis
but let the Marxists in our colleges poison the minds of our youth unrestricted though, after all they deserve freedom of speech unlike those nasty fascists right?
Oliver Diaz
What part of his ideology constitutes a violent reaction?
Logan Ramirez
>and instill fear into the community.
Consider change up with "and has a chilling effect on people expressing their views" so the lawyer ones will get it.
Henry Gomez
Nope, you should carry if you're anywhere near a protest and shoot the antifaggot if he starts attacking you in self defense. It's not even political intimidation, they're just cry babies who let their emotions get the better of them and get butt flustered when someone doesn't agree with them.
Not sure why you deleted your reply to yourself. They definitely should be punished, but I think that's more of them not getting caught/tried than being let go; making stricter laws isn't going to change that.
>it's better to rely on yourselves than to demand the government pass a law. Agreed.
Nicholas Russell
Thanks man. I've said these posts in txt format for easy posting.
Shills think these threads will go away.
They WONT I'm autistic as shit. This is going to go on as long as there is one district not contacted.
Carter Russell
Assault is assault. Nonsense like this paves the way for 'hate speech' legislation, selective enforcement and censorship.
Brayden Sanders
I've Saved* these posts
Dominic Nelson
>Nonsense like this paves the way for 'hate speech' legislation, You mean like we already have?
We aren't getting rid of hate speech laws, so we might as well BTFO of leftists while we have the precedent to discriminate between simple assault and politically motivated assault.
Logan Allen
I don't see a problem here.
Justin Torres
Never gonna come down
Jason Mitchell
>tries to Sup Forums troll IRL >gets punched
Ryan Sullivan
>punches someone to rob them of their right to free speech >lol just a misdemeanor :^)
Thomas White
He's basically a nazi. I know he's too smart to really come across as one, but he quotes Hitler, is central in a movement that openly argues for genocide, allows sieg heil'ing at his speeches, etc. etc. etc. I personally hope someone kicks his Joy Division haircut right off of his head.
Carter Martinez
>the government is turning a blind eye to leftist tyranny and using it's power to fuck us over >clearly the answer is to give the government more power to fuck us over No.
Adrian Perez
People like you who chimp out over political differences and can't beat him in terms of debate, reason, logic, etc. Are the reason why we need these laws.
Either ignore him, or win in the arena of public debate, or shut the fuck up.
You have no right to attack or to incite attacks on people for their political views.
Evan Allen
This, bring back supervised brawling, would resolved a lot of shit
Xavier King
t. Marxist subhuman
Logan Turner
Don't assault people and there won't be a problem.
Don't assault people for expressing their political views and specifically this legislation won't be a problem.
Christian Smith
>BTFO of leftists while we have the precedent to discriminate between simple assault and politically motivated assault.
Then we'll have won the battle but lost the war. It's easy to lose sight and see this as "us versus them", but keep in mind it's "freedom versus communism". Our goal is to further America, not to punish pissant liberals with mental deficiencies.
Wyatt Reyes
Nazis used to be so tough. I guess dem Hugo Boss duds gave them more confidence.
Michael Wood
Gee I wonder who this would be used against more...
Knee jerk reactionary legislation is exactly what we need more of.
