Did the Left kill science?

Did the Left kill science?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=x7Q8UvJ1wvk
youtube.com/watch?v=hDhs1qaJKlA&list=PL36EBEA94FD3DC659&index=8
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Shockley
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Luther_Pierce
youtube.com/watch?v=7nnVQ2fROOg&index=6&list=PL82yk73N8eoX-Xobr_TfHsWPfAIyI7VAP
thelastpsychiatrist.com/2013/01/no_self-respecting_woman_would.html
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Yes. But not because the left understand or appreciates science but because scientists are welfare queen always looking for grants, easiest way to get grants is appeal to lefties.

youtube.com/watch?v=x7Q8UvJ1wvk

They're only killing themselves.

at least she admits diversity is anti-white.

>Steven Pinker
>scientist
ass

Ass

Steven Pinker is jewish supremacist. He is right about SJWs, but you can't trust him. He is a full on tribalist. Not objective at all.

Ha, i love steven pinker, actually ordered one of his books recently.

yes. video not related.

youtube.com/watch?v=hDhs1qaJKlA&list=PL36EBEA94FD3DC659&index=8

>mfw a jew is now bitching about a machine he personally helped mobilize

> Psychologist
> Actual Scientist
Wouldn't you trust a Jew who at least admits to race realism and differences in intellect more than one subversively lying and pushing forth the idea that we're all equal and that society will function perfectly fine very diverse and that it won't cause problems?

Yes. Because while we're arguing about Jewish sociology theories regarding race and gender and having our countries flooded with the Third World, the Chinese are engineering super humans because they believe in hard science.

Conservatards who deny evolution are still retarded, but they have no institutional power, unlike the Left who believes that evolution just stopped at a certain point. It's baffling.

>Wouldn't you trust a Jew who at least admits to race realism and differences in intellect more than one subversively lying and pushing forth the idea that we're all equal and that society will function perfectly fine very diverse and that it won't cause problems?
If those are my options of course. He still teaches at a school that is well known to give jewish students a tremendous edge in admissions. He is still associated with a field that is known to give jews preference in hiring. He isn't principled.

based negro scientist dropping in the redpills.

...

They destroy everything.
They walk around chanting "I fucking love science", praising individuals like Sagan, black science man, and Bill Nye. If you dare mention the strong correlation between race and intelligence they'll call you a racist bigot.

>trust
>a Jew

...

the scientist is a jew and the illustrator isn't

being redpilled means agreeing with the illustrator

>ass
ass

Literal scientist here. Why didn't I get an invitation to this march?

The problem with this climate is that it implies that climate change is real because race is a determinant of intelligence. The true redpill is that human influenced climate change is bullshit and niggers are dumb as fuck, even the "smart" ones.

At least a lot of scientists are/were surprisingly based.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Shockley

Just go to personal life and find out how fucking based this guy was, one of the most important physicists of the 20th century, the guy that discovered/invented the transistor, was basically a NatSoc.

Pinker is the man desu

it wasn't a science march. It was a Leftism march. Just like the women's march wasn't a women's march. it was a Marxism march. These people steal labels to cover up their insidiously subversive agendas.

Another thing people don't know is that possibly the most famous American National Socialist White Nationalist, William Luther Pierce, was actually an accomplished solid state physicist who worked for many years.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Luther_Pierce

>NIGGERS
>BASED

kill yourself roach

Hmmmm i saw it was Pinker and assumed he was going to say something gay, but he is right this time around

scientist need gibs to do their job. they cant really go against the grain

Why it always has to be a Buzzfeed "journalist"?

Not gonna lie, former Trump voter here. This is fucking hilarious watching Trump crash and burn. But in all seriousness we can't let this guy get the nuclear codes.Not gonna lie, former Trump voter here. This is fucking hilarious watching Trump crash and burn. But in all seriousness we can't let this guy get the nuclear codes.

The March for Science is going the same way as all the other leftist protests, it's being invaded and diluted by PC bullshit and moral purity tests. Pic related.

The saddest/funniest part is that half the time these "issues" are brought up by counter-protesters in an effort to divide the movements, and it works. Every. Time.

It's the left's Achilles heel: they won't settle, or accept anyone who isn't as ideologically pure as them. This cripples their ability to organize like the right can. It's what screwed them during the election and it will destroy their ability to resist the Trump administration's coming reforms.

what kind of science are they talking? shit science or stem?

It's just the No True Scotsman in real life.. everytime

>entrepreneur looking for investors
Hardworking businessman

>researcher looking for grants
Welfare queen

Do I understand this correctly?

everything touched by universities have been infiltrated by the left so both

this interpretation of the iq study is stupid because it implies ability to score on an arbitrary test is proof of genetic intellect and excludes possibilities of things like environmental factors affecting childhood development, on top of that it takes more than one study showing a mere correlation to be conclusive of such things
white people who grow up in ghettos tend to turn out retarded too

The left are killing everything.

> tfw the richest, most well off blacks completely away from the ghetto perform as well as the poorest, worse off whites in standardized tests

>Implying right-wing climate deniers aren't guilty of the same dissonance, only in reverse
"Social science" is largely pseudoscience, and IQ statistical data is actually much easier to massage and game. Most of it was funded by white supremacist think tanks, which, if we follow the logic espoused by this thread, guarantees that the results were fixed to secure further funding.

It's true desu. They kinda need government funding or else they'll be labelled as biased. In ye olde days, it would have been church funding.

Businessmen have more freedom with regards to investors but everyone knows they are slimy bastards.

>low intelligence predicting racist tendencies
so what? that doesn't imply racist tendencies predict low intelligence

The march started originally in support of science, mainly climate science which is denied by Trump and ignored by his administration, and also as a general rebuttal to recent anti-vaccination and creationist movements, as well as a response to Trump's planned defunding of some science/humanities programs.

However, without any clear leadership, it soon started to degenerate into an identity politics-ridden "March Against Trump". As of right now there isn't even a determined date - the March was originally supposed to be non partisan, but now partisanship may kill the idea altogether.

It's very easy to pick out once you start looking for it. Remember during the election cycle how young voters enthusiastic about Bernie refused to settle for Hillary, but voters on the right who preferred Ted or someone else mostly settled for Trump?

It's often said that Democrats fall in love, while Republicans fall in line. This has been and will continue to be fatal to the left in America: they can't stand up to the right if the right turns out to vote AND controls all branches of government AND the other branches won't check Trump. And they put themselves in this situation.

>It must be cautioned that these findings are preliminary, and more research is needed to determine whether the California data reflect a broader national trend.
californians are just retarded is all that says

>he doesn't know about climategate

Shockley was a shithead though, read up on Fairchild Semiconductor

...

Also stopping this before it becomes another copy paste Race Realism vs Denial Thread

Blame racism for everything even do we use actual facts and do not blame racism for everything.

Ideology and science rarely mesh well and the left is obsessed with it's ideology even more than right. Fuck, at this point left turned into religious right from few decades ago. In the '80 and '90 it was right trying to ban d&d, metal, comics and videogames. Now left does the same.

>STEM
we STEAM now

>native rights
"Fuck white people"
"Open borders for Europe"

you mean those less than 5 emails that when taken out of context appeared incriminating even though they weren't at all if you had a brain and looked at them for yourself?
youtube.com/watch?v=7nnVQ2fROOg&index=6&list=PL82yk73N8eoX-Xobr_TfHsWPfAIyI7VAP
come on dude thats way too much data to look at and analyze over 1 thread, though i bet if i gathered up all those studies they would imply something other than 'races are inherently less intelligent'

>Arts

Stop them

>Wouldn't you trust a Jew
No.

The left hijacked science. The thing is this, you ask people "How do you know X?" and they'll probably reply by saying something like "Well, because it's in my science books." or "Well, because it's been peer-reviewed." or "Well, because it's been agreed upon by a majority of scientists.", but these are flimsy defences, because unless YOU can verify for yourself whether something is true or not either by OBSERVATION or by doing an experiment about it BY YOURSELF, you are relying essentially on external sources for your information and it is naïve to think that those sources don't have agendas.
What people call 'mainstream science' has been hijacked by politics, religion and corporations. So-called 'peer review' these days is usually nothing more than a circle-jerk. Just as people support the separation of church and state (and RIGHTFULLY so), I support the separation of SCIENCE and state. We owe it to our innate intelligence to QUESTION EVERYTHING.

>lumping Sagan in with Planetarium Nigger and Bill (((Nye)))
this is kind of triggering
I never pictured Sagan as a political shit-stirrer

There's literally no reason to not assume that some races would be inherently less intelligent on average than others, and the overwhelming amount of genetic + social evidence supports that hypothesis, but again, this isn't going to turn into a generic race realism thread, there have been times when they take up half of the entire fucking board and it's boring at this point.

>it's real

I feel like everyday, or at least every other day, for at least the past 3 years, I see something more crazy than what I had ever seen prior. It just won't stop.

Sup Forums, please make it stop. Make the insanity stop. For me.

>come on dude thats way too much data to look at and analyze over 1 thread
this is why trump won. we can do what you assure yourself you cant

How does an elementary drawing of an atom represent technology? That is still dealing with science.

The basis of the modern left is critical theory, which outright denies objective reality. In critical theory, reality is constructed by the individual, and any human exchange is reduced to an exchange of power, where reality is constructed on the basis of those power exchanges.

They literally think science is a social construct, and that, like any social construct, it is a narrative negotiated by power -- and therefore oppressive and patriarchal.

There is no debating these people.

>What is posterior probability

Social science. People like a girl i went to school with who has a PHD in social science and now works as clerk for .gov because there's literately zero jobs in it. She also reposts everything from buzzfeed, mary sue, the guardian, huffpo, IFL science and The Hack.

Whats his name again?

>scientists are welfare queen always looking for grants, easiest way to get grants is appeal to lefties

This is only because without funding they can't publish anything user. Blame the people and the government. No one is willing to fund things unless it appeals to them directly.

This could be a good platform to plug for the most based blog on earth

thelastpsychiatrist.com/2013/01/no_self-respecting_woman_would.html

I'm a history major, and even that pisses me off. Arts isn't a fucking science. Anyone who can't admit that is delusional.

Yes.

Similar to climate change scientists, they like to ignore the studies which contradict their narrative.

>After World War II, many American GI's (both white and black) fathered children by German women; these children were then raised in German society. The children fathered by black GI's had an average IQ of 96.5, and the children fathered by white GI's had an average IQ of 97 -- a statistically insignificant difference. (3)

>In another study of children raised in residential institutions, black, white and racially mixed children who were raised in the same enriched environment were given IQ tests. At four years of age, the white children had an average IQ of 103, the blacks had an average IQ of 108, and the racially mixed children had an average IQ of 106. (4)

>A genetic study took advantage of the fact that African-Americans genes are about 20-30 percent European, and that Africans and Europeans differ just enough in their genetic blood groups to determine the degree of "Europeanness" in an individual. If intelligence were indeed genetic and favored in Europeans, we might expect blacks with greater Europeanness to be more intelligent. However, a study of 288 young blacks found almost no relationship between Europeanness and intelligence: the correlation was a trivial and nonsignificant .05. (6)

i didnt say it wasnt necessarily true, i personally believe so myself, i also think both far-leftists and the far-right are morons when it comes to actual science but you do need to have strong, long term data backing such a serious claim
i never said said i couldnt, i implied i didnt want to spend 4 hours reviewing a dozen papers and their sources just to spread a little skepticism to one person, the conversation is over now though and also you are a retard

We could have told you that blacks and hispanics are much more racist than whites. No shit.

Well trump clapping down on H1-B visa's is a start. Hopefully he'll pump NASA's budget and we can start doing cool science shit again. #MaketheMoonGreatAgain

So basically the same progressive cancer that killed OWS?

ass

>Another genetic study examined the correlation between IQ and European blood groups (as opposed to the estimated Europeanness of individuals based on blood groups). In one sample of blacks, the correlation was a trivial .01, in the other a nonsignificant -.38, with higher IQ being associated with the more African blood groups. (7)

>Another study tested the hypothesis that if IQ were both hereditary and favored in Europeans, then blacks with high IQs should have several times the level of Europeanness than the black population in general. But a study of high-IQ black children in Chicago found that this wasn't the case; in fact, these black children were slightly less likely to have European ancestors. (8)

>3. J.R. Flynn, Race, IQ and Jensen, (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1980), pp. 87-88.
>4. Ibid., pp. 110-111.
>5. L. Willerman, A.F. Naylor and N.C. Myrianthopoulos, "Intellectual development of children from interracial matings: performance in infancy and at 4 years," Behavior Genetics 4, 1974, pp. 84-88.
>6. S. Scarr, S. Pakstis, H. Katz and W. Barker, "Absence of a relationship between degree of white ancestry and intellectual skills within a black population," Human Genetics 39, 1977, pp. 73-77, 82-83.
>7. J. Loehlin, S. Vandenberg and R. Osborne, "Blood-group genes and Negro-white ability differences," Behavior Genetics 3, 1973, pp. 263-70.
>8. P. Witty and M. Jenkins, "The educational achievement of a group of gifted Negro children," Journal of Educational Psychology 25, 1934, p. 586. Levels of Europeanness in subjects were based on self-reports on their ancestries.

You haven't seen these studies on Sup Forums and they were all but ignored by social """"scientists"""" funded by Eugenics think tanks.

Almost anyone who seriously identifies either Right or Left tends to be influenced by agenda more than truth.

Science is the pursuit of truth and no one cares about truth anymore. It's all about earning political "points" for their "team" at this stage.

>calling out a Jew for being a white man threatened by an end to white supremacy

what the fuck even goes on in these people's heads??

ass
helo froom esfores!!! :DDD

kek
Didn't the NASA budget drop again during Obama's reign?

That tweet states everything that's wrong with the world as far as I've been paying attention since I was 12, 20 years ago

based.

I've seen them. They are cherry picked outliers mostly with very small sample sizes and none are done in any reproducible manner. The number studies that show the opposite is gigantic. Anyone can read wikipedia and post leftist crap. Blacks in America consistently score a standard deviation lower on IQ and standardized tests in America, no matter what the test makers do, and they have tried everything.

Re the pic, you realize blacks have a lower IQ by a standard deviation, and are all racist as fuck toward whites, right? Might explain the correlation you highlighted...

Yes, this killed Occupy Wall Street. And this phenomenon of the left isn't exclusive to the United States either; in Germany, France, and UK, the same situation exists. It's as if this is the only modus operandi of the modern leftists.

Previous Atheism/ Science conventions (like the 2016 reason rally) were hijacked the same way. This weird phenomenon is rather new though. Back in 2006-2007 this was virtually nonexistent.

I suspect the new SJW movement and Obama's presidency (let's admit, it was based on virtue-signaling to a point) had something to do with this political phenomenon.

Yes, I went into a lesson about darwinism in university and they told us "we are not allowed to learn it about humans in it's full display because it is not pollitically correct"
Don't get me wrong I was jappy to have ~50% less to learn but it wasn't science.

Leftists don't view blacks as people so he never thought of this blatant fact. This is why all IQ studies about political orientation do things like look at "socially conservative views". Blacks and hispanics hate gays so they get lumped in with "conservatives". All the conservatives that don't give a shit about gays are "liberals".

...

everything must be co-opted and used as a vehicle for their colonialism garbage

>just reading the abstract
>this for sure is top-quality unbiased science guys
>most research, and especially government-funded research is garbage tier from an experiment standpoint

This is a surprisingly interesting perspective.

that screenshot would explain why everyone else except for some asians has a burning hatred for the white man.

so it really was the jews all along?

>lower g score in childhood
>doesn't say how much development occured since adulthood.
I'd say racists are smart.

why dont they start a kickstrter for scientists and science projects? if theyre so smart...

Investors are typically non-government, while grants are from the government.

They're in the process of doing it. The process has taken some major steps lately.

Sexual, gender, and racial issues are wedge issues used by the ruling economic class to control normies. This is why Target acts like it does. This is why even missile making companies like Raytheon have diversity statements and directors of diversity.

The same goes for most leftist nonprofits like the SPLC, the ADL, etc. are overtly pro-globalist. They are set up to protected their donor class who are rich globalists. This is why all of the progressive organizations condemned Brexit as racist even though the working class and even most jews supported it. They literally got antifa to beat up union members arguing for economic security.

Progressive social causes are tools of neoliberals and globalists.

Globalists who are disproportionately jewish, yes. And by disproportionately I mean mostly.