"Tanks" in 30, I mean now!

"Tanks" flying a Trump banner.

No wonder liberals are armed with dildo brand assault dildos

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/STANAG_4569
youtube.com/watch?v=GXDPIorxX1A
youtube.com/watch?v=Z2OcbeGqbpU
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hovercraft_tank
www-g.eng.cam.ac.uk/125/achievements/ricardo/page16.htm
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

That's a weird looking tank.

>tanks

> tanks

VICE YESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS

>tank

quite a strange tank, perhaps it's chinese?

My next vehicle is going to be military surplus and I'm going to plaster it in Trump stickers to trigger leftists.

An additional benefit is that they'd be too terrified to attempt to damage it.

I know they are obviously wrong, it has wheels and windows for Christ sake, but when does an armoured vehicle become a tank?

Daily reminder you must remember all 64 genders and their accompanying pronouns but when writing an article for the msm you can misidentify any and all military equipment because googling what a tank is takes time

>"Tanks"

what are the odds a women wrote the article??

If it's big and scary it's a tank. If it shoots bullets it's an ak 47. Keep up brit

Tracks and a turret, of course this gets the tread heads into heated debate over self propelled guns

that fucking picture
every time

Jewish woman

Tanks 4 dis mang, chu mayed my day.

Generally they need treads to be considered tanks. A large caliber gun is usually required as well but most interwar "tankettes" were only armed with machine guns

I think it was taken at a px

>a fleet of tanks

Literally just a Humvee.

they were probably wielding AK-47s too

that doesnt look like a tank

>fleet

>en.wikipedia.org/wiki/STANAG_4569

(can somebody explain the FAL amidst the small cartridges plox)

That tank looks like it has autism

>fleet
>tanks

youtube.com/watch?v=GXDPIorxX1A

>tanks

yeah its obviously a gaggle of tanks

I am a Kentuckyfag and I can confirm that this is the closest thing we could probably produce to tanks. It's really hard to make tanks out of coal and limestone ya'know

>humvee is a tank
>this is now journalism

yes it is you nazi

Nice played, Vice. Now you got a bunch of people commenting your tweet that would have otherwise ignored it.
Are they learning to play 4D chess?

No, It's called a murder of tanks

Why did you post that pic?

Tell me when it becomes a tank.

I need to know.

This is not an answer.

Thank you. Tracks and a size appropriate gun seems like fair definition. I want to say turret as well but that rules out many early tanks. I just don't know to be honest. When you throw in half-tracks their are just too many blurred lines. I'm not sure this question will ever have satisfactory answer.

Armour is a good definition.
But which level is does it have be?

>tanks

>a women

Its a squadron of tanks.

Or a fleet if its an exceptionally large number.

Murder is just a colloquial term.

High capacity assault vehicle right there... Does the military really need these sorts of vehicles? They only have one purpose, to kill. Our military needs to focus on spreading peace, NOT killing people!

lmao, that pic

>we can post whatever we want fuckboi

In this case the proper word should have been convoy, no?

>article

You're lying that is clearly a t-34.

If you look at the first world war as a baseline, we can derive that a vehicle becomes a "tank" at the point that it is tracked, has armor plating and either a fixed or rotating turret.

It is actually a degenerate faggot.

Yes, as they are in transit and not taking fire

>dildo brand assult dildos
kek

>fleet
>tank
>plural form of tank
>around
>weekend
>Trump flag

somebody say "tank"?

That's a very weird tank

>vice
>a FLEET of tanks
Wasn't it one van?

>clearly a t-34.

are you seriously that fucking retarded?

you've never seen a tiger2 before?


fucking hell man

It's actually called a parliament of tanks

>fleet of
>tanks
Libs don't actually know what words mean, do they?

F22 Jet fighter

I thought if it shot bullets it was an AR-15?

>fleet
>tanks
They just fucked up on everything now didn’t they.

the vehicles you see in the article are more along the lines of an apc, more mobile than a tank but with obvious vulnerabilities

>fleet
>tanks

kek pic

Can someone give me a quickrundown on the C.I.A?

"A tank is an armored fighting vehicle designed for front-line combat, with heavy firepower, strong armour, and tracks providing good battlefield maneuverability."

that is a lightly armored support vehicle

...

Damn I love America

Also "long gun" and "assault style rifle" cover all firearms.

>fleet of tanks

>Tanks

Tracks, armor and cannon, almost always a turret but not strictly required, especially for early models.

Self propelled artillery? No armor.

Wirbelwind AA? No cannon

Quad 50 halftrack? No tracks on the front.

>>Armour is a good definition. But which level is does it have be?

No strict definition, but it's expected not to lose badly to rifles and MG's, and be in front line combat. So those tiny italian metal slug tankettes probably don't count.

If they had mistaken a bradley for a tank, it would be one thing, but that's just embarrasing.

I've always wanted to make it a blitzkrieg of tanks.

120mm freedom gun

They're a large organization

...

Christ some people are dense.

That one even has wheels and loads of doors which is a big give away that it's an armoured personnel carrier and not a tank.

Don't SPG's shoot with an arced trajectory while a tank fires direct?

One thing for sure: personnel carriers are not tanks

What about my hipoint 9 gat pistol nigger?

Tank (n): A heavy armored fighting vehicle carrying guns and moving on a continuous articulated metal track.

It fails the Heavily Armored and Track definition.

which european country is that?

lol...tank...libs - "but russia, we need to invade them"...libs can't tell the difference between an aircraft carrier and a landmine.

>Self propelled artillery? No armor.
>Wirbelwind AA? No cannon
>Quad 50 halftrack? No tracks on the front.

Those aren't tanks
You just mentioned Artillery, and AA. Those are a separate category.

Right idea, but it goes a bit deeper than that.

A SPG is designed for artillery fire, so most of it's fire will be indirect. A tank is designed for front line combat, so the tank will have heavier armor, and the ranges will be closer.

You're not talking about the OP's pic, are you?

>tanks
>clearly has wheels

either scaremongering or just plain stupid

Meant for

Tanks are determined by armor, tread (size too), turret (armored and caliber)

Typically SPGs do not have the battlefield mobility of MBTs but have large fun calibers, also they are generally also less armored than MBTs because SPGs do not to actively engage an enemy targets at less than optimal range, they're practically tank artillery.

>tanks

lol, libtard IQ

No, that's when the bullets are shot at a school, silly.

Exaggerating a little much vice

At the very least it's an AFV.

It's a fleet because the SEALs are sailing them

>liberal soldiers
youtube.com/watch?v=Z2OcbeGqbpU

>VICE

You say Nazi like its a bad thing.

Tanks can have wheels instead of treads. Those aren't tanks though.

God damn Vice sucks

Tanks has threads on it plus a 120mm smoothbore barrel
also 50 cal proof

A gaggle of tanks were caught swimming above the road around Kentucky
more news at 11

It doesn't even have a machine gun mounted on top. It's just an armored car painted in scary tactical tan so it's scares the shit out of vice.

And to think I really liked vice when they were doing front line war coverage like during the Ukraine civil war

What happened to VICE? They used to do cool shit like sneak hidden cameras into North Korea and interview citizens.

Now they only do this shit

>tank fleet

This is worse than calling magazines "clips".

That defines the difference between an SPG and a tank nicely.

I think the real answer is to define everything armoured that carries more people than just it's crew as an APC.

Everything else with decent armour can be a tank so long as isn't either of the other two armoured vehicle types.

But what about theoretical tanks without tracks, or with fixed or sponson guns like some of the very early tanks?

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hovercraft_tank

www-g.eng.cam.ac.uk/125/achievements/ricardo/page16.htm

They are pushing the liberal propaganda even here in Serbia.