Checkmate

Checkmate

Other urls found in this thread:

pandora.cii.wwu.edu/vajda/ea210/siberianoriginsna.htm
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Big difference from takeing land from savages then letting people with nothing to offer ruin the civilization you have built.

>conquer =/= immigrate

My dad post this everyday. I want to tell him that he's an idiot and he should go too but I don't want to strain our relationship

To what country did the immagrant illegally immigrate to chief? What sovereign nation did cross?

Americans did buy land from indians though

We have no home to move back to. We came, we conquered. We should be hesitant/wary of others who want to come and do the same to our own.

As a native American I can say this is retarded as fuck

...

We conquered their land, it was not uncommon back then

It's is our country now, unless we let the Muslims and mexishits take over

I always find it interesting that racist liberals attempt to take a huge shit on white folks in the USA and tell them that they should "...go back to Europe".

NATIVE AMERICANS ARE IMMIGRANTS AS WELL!!!!!!!!

It's like...."Do you even Anthropology bro?"

The Siberian Origins of Native Americans

Virtually all scholars agree that the aboriginal populations living in North, Central and South America at the time of Columbus' voyages originated from small groups of prehistoric immigrants from North Asia.

No sober anthropologist would defend the notion that Pre-Columbian Native Americans sailed across the Atlantic from Europe or Africa or that Native Americans have lived in the Western Hemisphere from time immemorial.

There is less agreement, however, regarding the time of the first migration across the Bering Strait into North America. And there is less agreement still on the number of separate migrations. Did the first migrants arrive tens of thousands of years ago, before the onset of the last Pleistocene cold phase 25,000 years ago? Are all Native Americans descended from one immigrant group or many? And if there were more than one migration, then exactly how many separate migrations took place?

The most likely answer to these questions is that the first people to cross the Bering Strait into Alaska did so toward the end of the last Ice Age, about 14,000 years ago. Also, there is mounting evidence that this first crossing represented only one of at least three distinct migrations from Asia into North America.

soon as they walk across the bridge back to Siberia

land was legally purchased by SETTLERS not immigrants

this land was settled, there was nothing here until europeans built it. Immigrants are people who come after a society has been established

The First (Amerind) Migration (earlier than 10,000 BC)

The earliest indisputable evidence of human habitation in northwestern North America dates from nearly 12,000 years ago (about 11,700 BC). Some South American sites (Monte Verde on the Chilean coast, have recently been date to more than 12,000 years ago). Arrow points and other artifacts from this period found in Alaska and parts of northwestern Canada have been labeled the Paleo-Indian tradition. These are the so-called Clovis fluted arrowheads. No direct evidence of such a culture has come to light in adjacent parts of North Asia, although a possible prototype has been found on Sakhalin Island. Most likely, the people who developed the Paleo-Indian culture crossed over the Bering Strait (the land bridge had by that time already been submerged by rising seawater) into Alaska earlier than 14,000 years ago and there developed a new culture. Another possibility is that the prototype of this culture is to be found beneath the waters of the present day Bering Sea. Whatever the direct origin of their fluted arrows and other technology, these Paleo-Indian big game hunters quickly spread southward into a land teeming with game as a warming climate opened gaps in the ice sheets covering northern Canada. Within 1000 years of the first evidence of human habitation in Alaska, the same Paleo-Indian assemblages of tools appeared in all habitable parts of North and South America, from the Canadian plains to the tip of present day Chile. It has been estimated that if a group of a few hundred humans entered the Americas and moved at a rate of only eight miles per years, their natural increase, as the first inhabitants of a rich land, would have led to a population explosion (for hunter gatherers) and spread throughout all of the habitable portions Western Hemisphere in about a thousand years. This is exactly what seems to have happened.

Even if humans did cross the Bering Strait earlier than 12,000 years ago (or lived between 20,000 and 16,000 years ago on the cold tundra plain that is now the Bering Sea floor), it is very unlikely that the could have penetrated the ice sheets south of Alaska. If they had, they would have likewise populated an enormous area in a relatively short time. There is no evidence that anything like this occurred (isolated, controversial claims of human habitation in Pennsylvania's Meadowcroft Rock Shelter, Brazil or coastal Chile 17,000 or 30,000 years ago must be erroneous). It is possible, however, that earlier finds will come to light in Alaska itself, as people from North Asia could have crossed over to Alaska a few thousand of years earlier than is now believed and there developed new cultures before the melting ice allowed them to travel south. There is evidence of human habitation in Pacific North Asia dating back at least 17,000 years (15,000BC).

More --> pandora.cii.wwu.edu/vajda/ea210/siberianoriginsna.htm

The stupid is so powerfully pathetic when comes to liberal logic.

...

The only reason any Indians still exist is because we got bored of killing them and decided it would be funny to let them live in some parks.

>buy Manhattan for beads
>"B-B-BUT IT'S NOT FAIR! THEY DIDN'T UNDERSTAND THE CONCEPT OF OWNERSHIP!"

I don't understand liberals when they use this argument

>Native Americans got fucked by mass immigration
>therefore mass immigration was bad
>therefore we need mass immigration

It is an argument completely bereft of logic and the common sense of two wrongs don't make a right. Can hardly be surprised though, these are Leftists. They don't even know why they believe what they believe.

Cuck doesn't know his history.... What's new?

came to post this

There were no laws saying it was illegal

Oh, you're still here?

what is like to have a western Dad ?

SHINY BEADS
H
I
N
Y

>illegal Immigrants
this triggers my autism

>illegal immigrants are dangerous and will rape your women, murder your men, enslave your children and take over your land

Seems a solid reason to keep them out.

Booty blasted cooked Prairie Niger please. We bought and traded for land from the Indians the Indians didn't understand the concept of land ownership and came back and tried to retake lands that weird rightfully purchased from them we got into Wars with them we pushed them back took more land from them during the colonial period decided what the French during the French and Indian War during the war of 1812 they sided with the English now to me it just looks like a group of people who continually gambled on what National power they were going to support in the name of trying to get there land back that they sold or they are pushed off of when they acted the fool they can build they lost f*** off booty blasted Prairie n****** now the white man will come your casinos in you can take his money that way you know longer bitching about owning s*** anymore

come and take it

>implying they didn't fight to prevent conquest
Why shouldn't we fight?

where did all the cute blond girls go
theres only beaners around me
they make awful girlfriends
ree
get out or something

>Conservatives say that immigration is dangerous
>Progressives point out that whites were immigrants in the Americas
How the fuck is that a counterpoint? White immigration FUCKED the Native Americans. They should have stopped it when they had the chance with non-stop midnight raids on the first colonies.

it's not immigration that's the problem
it's immigration from specific cultures

You just gotta go out and find them.

Which government sanctioned the laws of citizenship for the region of the United States of America, making it illegal for foreigners to enter the nation without proper vetting?

Pro-tip: none

Plus, most natives sold it for beads and shiny trinkets.

exactly. "native were there before colonialists, but certainly didn't spawn out of thin air. Are they asked to move back to the Siberian steppes so that everything is fair and square?

that's a good point. who's we?

The ones living in former yuro colonies

all of them? so basically ww3. not unlikely

Fuck you, Geronimo. Should have thought about building a civilization capable of battling back insteading of eating bugs and bark and shitting in the fucking woods.

Read my post again, I was talking about fighting illegal immigration

>implying the injuns themselves did not immigrate to America from elsewhere, genociding a bunch of megafauna while they where at it
>implying arriving first somewhere somehow gives a group a ius primae noctis of sorts
>implying ten thousand years even matter in the grand scheme of things.

Fuck the indians. They're a conquered people

haha wow you Sup Forums retards really take the bait

What gave us a right to invade?

>Native Americans had laws
lol, nope

literally no problem with conquering people

in fact killing other minority races should be legal again

Being good at it.

Power

...

I was born here

Look what happened to the indians. They'd still be around if they smartened up and kicked out all the settlers.

Can someone link the immigration policy that was in place that the settlers broke?

...

Might. Might makes right especially back then I just wish we killed all those mongoloids.

What do you think Mexicans in the USA do? Even illegal ones work. Mexicans are not Muslims you Britshit, they don't go to other countries to leech welfare and behead people.

so basically
>refugees welcome (see Thanksgiving etc.)
>immigrants bring diseases, settle down
>children of the immigrants genocide the original people

Gun powder

Well someone is doing the raping

Can I see the plains-nigger lawpapers that declared Europeans as illegal immigrants? No? Well then..

yeah, natives really underestimate vetting process

Because back then it was "right by might", and us Europeans were much more powerful.

Manifest Destiny™.

The concept of rights is stupid to me. Rights don't stop somebody from putting you in chains, taking your freedom, your possession, or your life, the only thing that stops them is that you directly, or indirectly, have the power to stop them from doing so. There's no rights, there is might, and might is always right.

These nuts, bitch.

...

You do realise this proves our point.
Go away Jew Crew.

SHINY BEADS

Kek

this and the baby one are my favorites.

the laws of the universe allowing it.

acquisition of territory via warfare was the norm of pre-dubya-dubya-2 history