Neo-nazis will defend this

>neo-nazis will defend this

Fuck off leftypol austist

ID ID ID ID ID ID ID ID

Kek has blessed on this fine day, gentlemen. Anything the ausie nigger says now is invalid.

There is credible evidence. For example, the non-Jewy aspects of Western civilisation, repeated IQ test differences, suck my cock. I could go on.

...

>no evidence
Nobody will ever achieve what Nazi Germany did in 10-15 years. Transform a nation with hyperinflation and the 8th weakest army in Europe into and economic giant with a military so strong that it takes the entire world to take them down.

...

Tbh i dream about being Hitler this is not a lie i want my country to be strong at all cost

...

>hard working immigrants
Kekes

Let's play spot the Abo

>hard-working immigrants
fucking lmao

...

national socialism always ends in either civil war (internal conflict) or war (external)
because an ideology based on superiority will always bring destruction to its people

good luck trying it again, civil war is my prediction in most western countries because of high % of leftists
while some other countries will use the oppertunity to strike

its a shit ideology, not to mention that the leader aspect might work one generation, but as soon as he dies, there is no guarantee the next one will be good

direct democracy solves both probelms, but it does not guarantee a pure national ideology

>no credible evidence
>while writing in a language created by white people
>on the internet, which was created by white people
>on a computer that would not have existed without white people
>from New Zealand, which would not be a civilization with building and internet infrastructure without white people
wow.. realy makes yuo thing..!

Nice baseless claim there, brev

Abo Jew detected.

>from romans to arab niggers where inferior
>suddenly we're all da same, goy
really makes your hard drive spinning

just history i guess, should have made an infographic so you would have believed me :^)

but like i said, feel free to try again, its only the collectivists who will die anyways, on both sides.

As they identify with their respective ideas of a state

I'd rather have one generation of an incredible leader who brings prosperity to my country than 1000 years of choosing between two gangs of grubby kikes ready to open the gates for the caliphate.

>hard-working immigrants

>he spent hours making atleast more than 9 of these

God, kiwiland is an even bigger shithole than I originally thought

Wow. You making that cheeky cunt reply has really made me rethink my whole outlook on politics and life. I can finally see the light.

>when you believe this
it's just a talking point dumbass and most of us don't even use it

are you saying that feminists genuinely believe all men are racist

FUCK OFF YOU MAORI FAGGOT
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

>because of high % of leftists
You suddenly realize that those leftists vote that way because they still think Social Democrats actually look after the nation's people and that the parties haven't been hijacked by the neo-socialist retard who thinks being fair skinned means you're responsible for all of the world's bad things.

i can feel my almonds activating

Kiwiland is good.
It's just that theres too many niggers.

"No credible evidence"

nothing a quick little race war can't fix

>hard working immigrants
the only thing i like about immigrants is that they're workshy

I'm looking to have a small farm one day when I save up, after investigating NZ for a good location fit, I've found that your guys politicians will be turning it into a migrant breeding ground within the next coming decades.
Enjoy m8

I think you guys have a Vermin problem aswell.
But a Race war could fix your problem also.
Thanks for the advice Neighbor.

WAIT WHAT.
fuck this I'm coming to 'murica.

...

You can fuck off with him.

...

>no evidence

Sure bud.

The fact that white, non-jewish men are the only people to have walked on the moon never stops getting old.

a-actually user that's a kiwi jew.

You can try to counter it, any politician over there that promises to bring industry to NZ means bringing in foreign workers and just using up the farmland for factories.

well go for it, trust a daddy figure as much as you like, its just a shame that you have to drag a whole nation with you

but inorder to see the consiquences, imagine if you where forced to have one of those ((kikes)) as leader for one generation? Thats the control you want, and thats also the control you want to bring about onto other people

its a shitty idea, soceity is made up of diffrent opinions, and if you don't like it, im sure you and the feminists would love to make their own special snowflake place where everyone agrees.
(im being optimistic, im sure that wouldn't be enough anyways, considering superiory breeds war and expansionism)

there are two types of people, those who think politics is a tool for power, and those who think its a science to figure out the best arrangement for society (taken disagreement into account)

im sure all ideologies are fantastic if everyone agrees, we can even make facism and communism work by working together. Its just a shame that reality does not work like that. Wishfull thinking and pseudoscience won't help

humans disagree, we are not cells connected to a body (the state) and ouer survival isn't based on that state either. Patriots and nationalists might die for their country, but they also want their country to fit their ideals, rather then dying for people who disagree and democracy

like i said, good luck , civil war or war, its always the collectivists who die in battle, while indviduals either remove themselves from the conflic, or get caught in the blow
or they get forced by people like you to do their bidding

but the funny thing is, you would feel like a "resistance fighter" just like a feminist would, despite your diffrent nerratives, because everything is "sexist", everything is "marxist"
in the eyes of those who make the analysis, because they don't use the scientific method, but rather a bunch of biases ,selection, interpretation and grand truths

> no credible evidence
> I guess the entirety of western civ doesn't count
> inb4 we wuz


Sage

it takes time to change ones mind, thats why flat earthers can exist despite the evidence

and you wont be presented with counter evidence in an echochamber

What you're missing is that he achieved it all by amassing debt. The Third Reich had to go to war cause they couldn't pay any more.

So that thing with South Asia Sea, it's coming before 2020

socialists have ofthen been very globalist in their thinking, the confrontation with reality has changed many peoples minds yes, because people didn't seem to choose an ideolgy after thinking of the worse case scenarios (as always)

but i never said there is something wrong with national interests or any form of ideology that is arrived at by democratic systems, because a real democracy should take peoples opinions into account, authoritarianism might sound like a good ide because you happen to agree with the person who is in charge, but as soon as you disagree its shit. So the system is lacking in representing more people, and what is a state then not "more people" coming together?

and if they agree on boarder control fine, just as a commune might agree with certain politics, a country can too, The limitation should be based on what affects you, this means that both the rules of democracy are based on amount of people it effects, and if or if not it effects you. AND if it effects the place you live, who gives a fuck if a community in the north of norway decides to invite refugees? The only people who hate those things are those who want to control who humans breed with, and have an idea of race thats both simple and very much authoritarian.

Good luck with telling people what they can and can't do, im sure it will work out fine this time.

...

Jews are clearly more verbally intelligent, but they're morally vile and whites are superior to most things south of Europe.

I agree there. I don't think NatSoc is a sustainable form of governance, though I don't actually know of any that IS permanently sustainable, it's easy to see why NatSoc could burn out quicker than most other types of government.

I will defend it. But really only because I hate leftists more than anything else.

CREW got the leaf boys, we must fight

>abo
LOOK
AT
THE
FLAG

Someone pls post the spurdo with text that goes something like "When your whole nation gets rangebanned from krautchan"

WE HAVE A TRAITOR IN OUR MIDST

democracy does seem to be "the best" of the ones tried so far

but there is nothing wrong in trying, im just saying that even if one wants another system, one should go the democratic route, (as germany did) because that will legitimize the government you try to argue for. As many people will agree ect.

to me it seems like the ideal version would be direct democratic communities rather then a country (for neutral nations) and direct democratic countries for nations that want bigger collectivs (which also means less local control, but more power)

so its about either controling your own life, and arguing within the community, or going for less control and more centralized power within a big country

but im willing to hear arguments of course, which is the whole poing of advocating systems like these

there a plenty, just open your eyes, thats why collectivist ideologies fail

they have no regard for human identity

>Bridge
What did Kojima mean by this?

(white) western civilization > every other civilization

Yeah that is my evidence.

Everybody talks about employment but nobody talks about the massive amounts of people that they had to kill to free up jobs, or wages, that too
>no guise the Holocaust totally is a myth created by da jews

>The only people who hate those things are those who want to control who humans breed with, and have an idea of race thats both simple and very much authoritarian.

You sure try to present yourself as an intellectual, but that sentence ruins it. There's much more to "refugee hating" than hurp durp they fuck our women. I hate EU's and by extension Finland's refugee policy on the grounds that my neighbourhood has become a violent shithole thanks to them. I hate it because it has made my life objectively worse. I hate it because they take the fast lane when it comes to open housing, leaving more deserving people without a home. I hate it because students, the elderly abd sick get worse benefits and funding cuts because of these leeches.

All of this is thanks to social democrats, which I was too 10 years back.

funny how the statistical difference accounts for just under 6 MILLION

he's New Zellund
He's right though, so I guess you still do have a traitor

>Good luck with telling people what they can and can't do, im sure it will work out fine this time.
Forgot to add that this applies to socialists more than to any other political party, at least in Finland. They are the ones who support a total gun ban, they support limiting bars and night clubs and alcohol in general, they support erosion of free speech and they can do this because they know every public office has a lot of socialists who think like them.

>hard working immigrants

Toppest of Keks.

im not sure why you would focus on that quote if you didn't feel effected by it, as it was obviously refering to those people who think that because refugee are within your country and DON't effect you

soo im not sure why you would feel triggered about something if you don't agree with it?

>they support limiting bars and night clubs and alcohol in general,
would support this, you Finnish fuckers drink too much

wrote this much crap without making any point

I have a really hard time trying to understand what the fuck you just said.

IT"S FUCKING NOTHING!

Why is this even something that needs to be proven

If white suck so much just go live in some brown society, I dare you

>oooh that assburn
>Sup Forums explain yourselves

Huemonkey > Abo tbch

>Sup Forums
>using facebook
We aren't one of your scum, sheepfucker

>says the German
I'm fucking dying.

same as the other quote, im not sure why you would focus on it if it does not effect you/your country

i hightly doubt the fact that the right wing does not want to apply its authoritarian policies, as both sides want their country to look a certain way, but if it happens to be true that finland supposedly has a "pro-freedom" party, that isnt like the netherlands fake one, then go for it.

Its just that most people think its okey for them to ban certain aspects of culture because they happen to disagree

just go the direct democracy route, and if everyone around you agrees, then fine, everyone around you agrees. If not, just move, a smal group can't force a bigger one to move

this is also why direct democracy applied at the local level is better, because its easy for communities to leave to another community, rather then move from one country to another.

The problem seems always to be entitlement, just like with the left. The right feels entitled to their "homeland" or community, despite not feeling at home there
either run for office and try to inspire people to agree, or just move.

...

>SAGED

hmm, something something democracy, but im sure you wouldn't notice estonia


sorry,
hmm, im not sure why you would feel obliged to comment on that last point if you didn't agree with the statment about choosing who can breed with who. Because if you disagree with that authoritarian thinking, then im obviously not refering to people like you, but rather others on this site.
But if you are triggered by it, im not really sure so to why, because i clearly stated "the only people" who care about who breed with who ect.

>lol man if you hate it just leave XD
>hey man jus try direct democracy LMAO
>lol dude who needs a homeland or a country we need a hella ebin bordeless world x----DDDDD

I guess you don't object to it when I come to squat in your home and declare it my property with direct democracy since I brought my friends too?

Choosing between
>definitely kikes forever
>maybe not always kikes
hmm hard choices!
>different opinions so you've just gotta put up with them no one is allowed to be happy. compromise is the only solution
>bolitigs is a for dwo beeble, one for bowa n one bor siense
>nuthin personal --- reality don't work like that, kiddo :)) pseudo aint sience
>beble aint cells, we's peoble. nod gob die bor dmograsy
>collegdivits is ded, invidules gon be not conflic
>heh nice try kid but marxism isn't the real problem...it's just sexism for nazis...ur too dumb to realise there is no real problem! checkmate, Sup Forums BTFO once and for all... :^)

>a person can choose for himself
>a person isnt equivlent to a cell in the body of the governemt, because humans arent physicaly linked to the government, and they wont die if they remove themselves from it
>a governemnt is therfor based around people who choose for themselves

so in conclusion, direct democracy is the way if you want hitler back, and if they don't agree, move or run for office and inspire them to agree

Local versions of direct democratic systems are better, because people will be able to move to communities who agree with them easier

Well who do you think declared property a thing? You yourself, or the collective?
Who inforces it? You with your guns, or the police?
Sure you can go full ancap, too , but neo feudalism isn't the anwser
Im talking about collectives both having positive and negative sides. If you want to turn it into a strawman, go for it

cool strawmen

>mfw when community that you want live in gets bombed by US(jews) government and declares your state undemocratic

nise benis

>Credible Evidence

You mean like 2000 year old history of Africa?

You specifically stated
>The limitation should be based on what affects you, this means that both the rules of democracy are based on amount of people it effects, and if or if not it effects you. AND if it effects the place you live,

I demonstrated how I as an individual, my family and my neighbourhood got demonstrably worse as a result of these refugees. They shouldn't be here because they have worsened my quality>Local versions of direct democratic systems are better, because people will be able to move to communities who agree with them easier

You stupid fucking retard. There are realities like owning a home at a community that gets fucked by stupid retards like you who think I have no right to live in an area that isn't full of multiculturalism.

yes i said that, and how does it contradict what i explained to you?
If it effects you, then you are in the right, and if not, you are not
you got mad about this
>the only people who hate those things are those who want to control who humans breed with, and have an idea of race thats both simple and very much authoritarian.

so are you one of those "only people who"
no? fine then, it does not effect you , and you are not mad yes? why are you mad at something that that does not effect you?

as you did comment and did get triggered, i assumed you where one of those, simple

>next question
Yes, but they didnt steal your house, you can still live in it, there is no force here, only the fact that you dislike how the community has turned out , so either you live there and deal with it democratically , "who else agrees?", run for office ect.
Or you move

no need for chimping out all authoritarian

the problem is entitlement, and both the left and right are entitled, and therfor they became authoritarian

like i explained before, if you want a country, that works too, just make sure the people in it agree , If not, you might have the problem of the USA when the military bombs places you don't agree with, and the public has to pay the consiquences ;^)
wouldn't happen with direct democracy, i choose, i pay the price

im thinking of linking the old posts, because there seems to be forgetfullness
which is what happens when you are used to strawmen and your own bias

here is the one
"to me it seems like the ideal version would be direct democratic communities rather then a country (for neutral nations) and direct democratic countries for nations that want bigger collectivs (which also means less local control, but more power)"

you just have to know what you win and lose with both forms of government.

as for finlandand if they agree on boarder control fine, just as a commune might agree with certain politics, a country can too, The limitation should be based on what affects you, this means that both the rules of democracy are based on amount of people it effects, and if or if not it effects you. AND if it effects the place you live, who gives a fuck if a community in the north of norway decides to invite refugees? The only people who hate those things are those who want to control who humans breed with, and have an idea of race thats both simple and very much authoritarian.

as you can see, its still consistant with the view of communities being made up of more people

here comes the voting block for your direct democracy

Not an argument

>t. Juan

>so are you one of those "only people who"
>no? fine then, it does not effect you , and you are not mad yes? why are you mad at something that that does not effect you?
BUT IT DOES YOU STUPID FUCKING CUNT.
I give no fucks if someone wants to have a brown baby, but multiculturalism has made my life worse. It has destroyed my once peaceful community. Violence and crime has skyrocketed which me and my friends have been victims of.

And no, I can't "just leave", like the more affluent native Finns have done. I cannot afford a second mortgage. Why is it that you don't understand this you fucking troglodyte?

>strawmen

>implying a community can, and can't do what it wants, one needs a leader to see why this is a bad idea!

>authoritarians

i suggest a community that wants to survive should think about who they let vote ect.
its not like i imply >oh an estonian is on holidays in norway, well guess we have to give him a vote too!"

if your brain is this limited, i suggest you move away from this site and learn how the real world works, humans aren't sheep, thats why theres always conflict whenever an authoritarian tries to do their usual thing

>humans aren't sheep, thats why theres always conflict whenever an authoritarian tries to do their usual thing
This is why more and more peiple hate the EU for its redugee faggotry.

you fucking idiot

you fucking mongoloid, read the text, you cant claim i said something i didn't i gave you an option to choose

>I give no fucks if someone wants to have a brown baby

multiculturalism is a big term, we arent talking about the whole thing, crime can be part of it, ect.
I SPESIFIED if someone breeds with someone else OR decisions that DON't EFFECT YOU. you simply want to get triggered for no reason

>humans aren't sheep
>theres always conflict whenever an authoritarian tries to do their usual thing
authoritarians don't let the conflict prosper in the first place, he just sends governent death squads execute anybody who's going against his will

yeah, as i explain earlier, you aren't talking to one of your strawmen leftists
here was my anwser:
and if they agree on boarder control fine, just as a commune might agree with certain politics, a country can too, The limitation should be based on what affects you, this means that both the rules of democracy are based on amount of people it effects, and if or if not it effects you. AND if it effects the place you live, who gives a fuck if a community in the north of norway decides to invite refugees? The only people who hate those things are those who want to control who humans breed with, and have an idea of race thats both simple and very much authoritarian.
>and if they agree on boarder control fine, just as a commune might agree with certain politics


SO to sum up: You are an idiot if you want to chimp out like all authoritarians do

yeah they do chimp out, we can agree on that
too bad they don't last very long, i wonder why that is ;^)