How does it feel to be conned again Sup Forums?
newsweek.com
>Tiffany Muller, executive director of End Citizens United, a political action committee dedicated to reforming the U.S. campaign finance system, says the group’s more than 3 million members are prepared to contact their senators to urge them to vote against Gorsuch’s nomination
You're a dumb
The only people who are against CU are the hippies on the left.
who cares
The last 2 elections proved that money in politics dont mean shit. MEMES RULE THE WORLD
Sage and fuck off jewCREW
...
Citizen's united was justly decided, cuck a duck.
>The last 2 elections proved that money in politics dont mean shit.
Yeah bro you are full of shit, Trump got almost a BILLION dollars in his presidential campaign.
>HE'S NOT CONTROLLED BY THE SPECIAL INTERESTS GUIES HE'S A DIFFERENT KIND OF REPUBLICAN!
>Citizen's united was justly decided, cuck a duck.
So Trump's whole appeal of not being bought and controlled like every other politician was just a lie and Trump cucks will do whatever Trump tells them to do like sheep. Good to know.
cnbc.com
do you have any fucking idea what citizens united was about? No, you don't, because you're an insipid leftard concern troll parrot.
Not op, what is citizens united? In simple grey terms please if I can make sense of what everyone is arguing about
What? Citizens United was a constitutionally sound decision even if it does further potential corruption problems
>do you have any fucking idea what citizens united was about?
It created the whole super pac bullshit which allowed unlimited donations to candidate and which means most of our politicians do nothing all day but day people up to donate to them. It was our final step into full blow oligarchy. This is why I told you niggers to vote for Hillary because at least she would have appointed a judge to overturn citizens united.
Trump's just taking America into one of those former Soviet oligarchical shit holes.
>What? Citizens United was a constitutionally sound decision even if it does further potential corruption problems
If a corporation is a person with the legal rights of personhood hy can't I marry or kill one?
Sounds like they gave him a good enough reason why government involvement in drug prices would be a bad idea. Personally I always wanted to change the way the patent system worked in pharma mandating royalties rather than a long running monopoly where they can price gouge like mad because insurance pays for it.
A decision that ruled certain bans on electioneering advertisments to be unconstitutional. Because it was ruled in favor of a conservative group trying to run a film about Clinton's corruption, that means liberals have to call it bad.
Basically it overturned a law that said you couldn't by tv advertising for the purposes of electioneering within a certain number of days before an election
Koch's bitch
I also support Citizen's United. Why do you oppose free speech?
>Citizens United is destroying politics!!!
>SuperPACs favored Romney
still lost
>SuperPACs favored Hillary
Still lost
Don't care.
Yea despite the retarded lefty meme Citizens United didn't rule that corporations were literally people. It did deny the argument that people running corporations don't have 1st amendment rights
>a good reason
Yeah, lots of cash.
You've been duped again cuck boy.
He's just another corporate dick sucker.
Trump is using him to con the retarded alt-right into thinking he's some Jesus lover born-again.
But really he's just another fucking rich stooge who only cares about ensuring the profits of his corporate masters.
But all you fucking retards will cheer like fucking madmen because your abortion jimmys won't get rustled while the mega-corporations continue to fuck you up the ass.
Enjoy.
Just don't let Mr Brock near your kids user. Assuming you aren't a nerd virgin anyway. Just trying to help you here
How long you bet before the Trumplets realize they were conned, hard? Six months?
Trumpfags are defending this. No care for getting big money out of politics even tho their dear leader campaigned on as much
>ignoring all the Trump and Republican super pacs supporting Trump!
>Trump's SCOTUS pick supports Citizens United
Good. People do not lose their rights when they form groups.
holy shit, hill shills are actually this retarded
This post deserves to be rated more highly.
Free market for drugs will cause the prices to naturally lower
Do you believe the government should set prices for goods and services?
Trump's morphed into your standard cuckservative Republican on the model of GWB or Ronald Reagan. Anyone who believes a guy who receives 1 BILLION dollars from special interests an is gonna give government back to the people is either full blown retard or drain the Trump kool aid.
SO you think Trump is going to take away IP protections for pharma? Really?
Conservatives wanted to make a critical movie against Hillary in 08 and she brought it to court to destroy the film and silence the nonprofit group
Court decided against her
>holy shit, hill shills are actually this retarded
Holy shit you Trump shills need new talking points.
as long as he is a scalia clone in regards to the 2nd amendment im happy
>Free market for drugs will cause the prices to naturally lower
We have something very close to a free market and we have the highest drug prices in the world. Why is it the countries that adopt a mix of capitalism and socialism always seem to do better than us?
>Hillary would overturn a prime source of her money and influence
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHSHAHSHHSHSHSHUDIHWBOSOXBBWOABVSJDBVRHEB
>as long as he is a scalia clone in regards to the 2nd amendment im happy
Ok so you are perfectly fine with the international kikes controlling all of your countries wealth and fiances as long as you got muh gun? Lol Americucks are such faggots.
I support Detsy DeVos. Why do you want to trap poor and minority students in failing schools with terrible cultures?
Citizens United was a PARTY LINE VOTE
5 Republican appointed judges voted FOR IT
4 Democratic appointed judges voted AGAINST IT
>Why do you want to trap poor and minority students in failing schools with terrible cultures?
You realize people like DeVos helped create said failing schools with terrible culture by stealing public funds and funneling it to private Christian schools?
The FDA creates artificial monopolies. Why do you support blocking competition with the iron fist of government to protect Democratic Party donors?
Proof? Where is the money? I see the interviews with people like Shkreli who is solely making a drug that isn't profitable but he continues to make it for the very few people who have the specific disease but you claim Trump was bribed
Where is the transaction between Trump and big pharmaceuticals?
money didnt do shit for politics, and i was in a teachers union and fully understand cit. united.
now if your boogey men get uppity id like to have plenty of guns to get my persuasion on.
>Ok so you are perfectly fine with the international kikes controlling all of your countries wealth and fiances as long as you got muh gun? Lol Americucks are such faggots.
So what's the answer fuckwit? What do you want us to do? You honestly think Hilary wouldn't have done any of this?
he isnt american, wouldnt understand.
>Trump doesn't get money from anyone
>Everyone throws money against him
>Start coming up for elaborate theories about how he's actually super owned guys
Yeah, nah. I think we just won, and now the only thing lefty cumdrinkers have left is to try and convince us that we got gypped somehow when we're getting everything we wanted.
>Why do you support blocking competition with the iron fist of government to protect Democratic Party donors?
Yeah bro Republicans are fighting for the people! They are the Marxists of politics!
Eat shit homo. Both parties are bought and controlled by big corporation, Democrats are sightly better than Republicans on economics. Acting like MUH FREE MARKET WILL SOLVE EVERYTHING is exactly why we are in this mess to begin with. We need things like what Sanders wants which is government controlling our healthcare system and not private for profit corporations.
>You honestly think Hilary wouldn't have done any of this?
Minor different in a giant system can have enormous consequences.
>stealing public funds
By encouraging students to attend better schools and encouraging states to allow it?
Vouchers were a response to failing schools. Failing schools came first. As such, your attempt at cause and effect completely fails, as it puts the effect before the cause.
>Everyone throws money against him
And throws money towards him as shows
>money didnt do shit for politics,
Are we still in the denial stage for the Trumplets?
>Republicans are fighting for the people!
>They are the Marxists of politics!
Marxists have never fought for the people. They fight for their own power to rule over the people with an iron fist in an attempt to mold them into their "perfect" New Man.
>Trying to bribe a billionaire
Well she def wouldve appointed a supreme court justice that would have overturned CU. And she did campaign on putting in a constitutional amendment for campaign finance reform, not that that would have been successful.
Hell if I know but it certainly would fall in line with everything else he has actually DONE, not said. I'm not claiming to be a seer but I see this problem dissolving along with Obamacare, when the replacement plan is finally tidied up
Just because you stick your head in the ground and deflect your partisanship for Hillary onto Trump contrary to reality doesn't mean he won't open the free market for drugs by lowering the lifetime patents
You claimed Hillary would repeal the same ruling that gave her $250m and created the propaganda machines like CREW and CTR. She wouldn't because, unlike Trump, she relied much more heavily on CU. Nearly 4x as much.
No, we don't. In pharmacology, to be relevant and not go down your poorly constructed red herring, patents last for ungodly amounts of time with minor chemical variations extending the patent's life time. Government "protects" the business from ever having to have competition.
Is this fbpb already
>And she did campaign on putting in a constitutional amendment for campaign finance reform, not that that would have been successful.
You don't need a constitutional amendment. They could just pass a law saying get money out of politics.
>Citizens United was a bad decision
You are against the idea of free speech and association?
>unlike Trump, she relied much more heavily on CU.
Yes Trump who received 1 billion dollars from donors and turned his cabinet into a subsidiary of Koch Industries didn't benefit from CU
i duno, who is acting president?
>You are against the idea of free speech and association?
Yes did I trigger you by saying that?
>i duno, who is acting president?
Bannon, Kochs, Pence, Jared
I am against the idea that a corporation is ruled to have the same rights as a person.
holy shit you are a child
But SCOTUS ruled on citizens untied, it would be overturned if simply a law was passed. But yeah, if the balance of the supreme court were changed, then a law would suffice
HE WENT TO JARED
how butthurt are you about gorsuch?
>Government "protects" the business from ever having to have competition.
Again you forget who's running the string for government. It's not the people, it's big corporations writing these laws. The answer isn't GET RID OF GUBMIT! It's expand government.
Alright, we've got an open advocate of tyranny here. Good to see some honesty from our would-be tyrants.
Did you know that when you promote tyranny, you don't always get the tyrant you want? Maybe you do, maybe you end up on the firing line. And even when you do, things always get worse when liberty is destroyed?
>how butthurt are you about gorsuch?
Not as butthurt as you all will be once he turns America into a subsidiary of Koch Industries.
>make more govt established monopolies
a tiny tiny child
>Conservatives wanted to make a critical movie against Hillary in 08 and she brought it to court to destroy the film and silence the nonprofit group
>Court decided against her
And get this: If the court decided in favor of her, THEN THE FCC COULD HAVE and **WOULD HAVE** LITERALLY **PUT PEOPLE IN JAIL** FOR SHOWING A MOVIE CRITICAL OF HILLARY CLINTON.
In short, the Citizens United decision was 100% correct -- it struck down a leftist law that was absolutely REPUGNANT TO THE CONSTITUTION.
Leftists who want to overturn Citizens United are anti-First Amendment. They literally want to throw people in jail for showing movies that are critical of Democrat candidates.
>Leftists who want to overturn Citizens United are anti-First Amendment. They literally want to throw people in jail for showing movies that are critical of Democrat candidates.
Leftists who want to overturn Citizens United are anti-First Amendment. They literally want to throw people in jail for showing movies that are critical of Democrat candidates.
>Leftists who want to overturn Citizens United are anti-First Amendment. They literally want to throw people in jail for showing movies that are critical of Democrat candidates.
>But SCOTUS ruled on citizens untied, it would be overturned if simply a law was passed.
Not necessary. Congress has the ability to regulate Congress. They could pass something that says Congress can't strike this law down.
I don't understand what you're trying to say. All that picture shows is that Trump raised far less money than Hillary.
>if we give government more power they'll stop abusing their power
I will literally eat shit if Trump goes after pharma IP rights and gets it thru congress
a tiny infintile baby. a zygote, nigger mothers wouldnt think twice about coat hangering you.
>a tiny tiny child
Single payer healthcare gets rid of those monopolies you fucking autist.
>if we give corporations ore power they'll stop abusing their power
Cant tell if trolling or retarded
AAAHHHHH AHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA
HOLY FUCK WHAT SHITHOLE ARE YOU FROM???
>. All that picture shows is that Trump raised far less money than Hillary.
1 billion dollars
So user you got 1 billion dollars on hand? I didn't know average joe's go around with that kind of money on hand.
Didn't Scalia vote for Citizens United? Anyways, as Trump's (600 million budget) victory over Clinton(budget of 1.2 billion dollars) shows, money and Superpacs aren't the be-all, end all.
>Cant tell if trolling or retarded
Look it up you fucking idiot. It's part of checks and balances.
Not gonna lie, former Trump voter here. This is fucking hilarious watching Trump crash and burn. But in all seriousness we can't let this guy get the nuclear codes.
AHHHHHHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHA
>29 posts by this ID
shareblue please go
A group of people voluntarily associating are no different than individuals associating.
>Anyways, as Trump's (600 million budget) victory over Clinton(budget of 1.2 billion dollars) shows, money and Superpacs aren't the be-all, end all.
It was close to 1 billion dollars and it shows absolutely that both sides are controlled by money. Obama in 2012 got less than Romney and yet he's a cuck of wallstreet like Trump.
thats why we pool our resources together via superpacs, just like unions do. you little amoeba.
Gonna need to change a law for that
Why are laughing at a fact you dumb nigger?
I guess Jeb is going to be president now.
>leftypol
Does anyone have screencaps of them during election night? Does faggotchan have an archive? I wanna know what their honest reaction to selling their soul to Hillary so they "can win the important fight" and then realizing that if Sanders didn't cuck out and followed his beliefs like Trump they might have had a shot.
But PACs work for presidential campaigns too retard. And campaign finance prolly isnt considered 'regulating congress' depending on which judge you ask
by your singlecell organism logic hildawf should have won with so much more money.
you tiny little miniscule bacteria
But you could reach that amount by many people donating smaller amounts. I'm not entirely sure what your argument is.
uh oh guise the tiny little virus used a naughty word!
brock thread