What would it take for you to vote for a democratic candidate?

What would it take for you to vote for a democratic candidate?

Other urls found in this thread:

wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/3599
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

To start with, a candidate that publicly stated from the outset that Islam is a dangerous death cult and that transgenderism is a mental illness.

I'll vote democrat in the future when the republican party gets too bloated and starts acting against my interest. It's going to be a very different party, ideally close to what the GOP is now.

enough money so i could leave the shithole

They'd have to actually put the people's welfare first. They're physical welfare. Not their emotional welfare.

They would have to be the candidate most in line with my beliefs and the one I would believe would be best suited for the job. That seems very unlikely, though, as the Democratic Party is a shit show, and I don't want them in charge.

Jim webb

How would you feel if they dropped progressive politics altogether and tried to appeal to left-of-center voters instead of the far-left?

Jim Webb vs John McCain

>Democratic party appeals to the far left
What the fuck is wrong with you? The Democratic party are centre-left, and could even be called right-wing in some Countries.

This.

jimm webb

How would you target the center left?

For Ron Paul to run as their candidate.

hmmmm, not so sure about that one

no. the west is thirsty for blood and everyone knows it. this will not end peacefully.

What the fuck is wrong with you? American politics is about culture, not about economics. You're Left if you like fags getting married. You're right if don't. You're left if want abortions, you're right if you don't. It's a two way street and only two ways. Anything else is too complicated.

No, they're not. This entire election and probably during Obama's second term they have been composed of vocal far left democrats, see Bernie Sanders. By disavowing center-lefts they lost the election.

Well, look at this election at what turned them away. They were too far on the left. In short just be more open-minded and bipartisan, not far-left looney liberals that are edging on being communists

But the right/left terms come from generally come from redistribution of wealth, which the Democrats do believe to an extent. why you are right in the fact that Democrats are pretty socially left wing, referring to them as "far left" is misleading. Politics is not one-dimensional.
>This entire election and probably during Obama's second term they have been composed of vocal far left democrats, see Bernie Sanders. By disavowing center-lefts they lost the election.

While you might be able to state that Sanders is a far-leftist, He did not win the nomination- Hillary got in, who wouldn't have done things like raise tax highly or start a universal health care system, which are staples of the left. Why she might have been socially "progressive" doesn't mean she is a far Leftst, or the Democrats in got.

Sure but the social progressiveness was a big point in this election, and the moderate democrats that she would have otherwise got were turned away by it, economics didn't come into play very often.

Step 1: Not rigging primary elections.

Sanders (alt-left) vs Bush (neo-con globalist)

For them to clean house and prosecute anyone involved in Pedogate and illegal activities of Clinton Foundation/Initiative

Stop treating people like votes. Stop treating people like an idiot mass they try to bend to their will.
Take a look at this letter to Podesta:
wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/3599
The whole email is interesting, but this part always stuck with me.
>we've all been quite content to demean government, drop civics and in general conspire to produce an unaware and compliant citizenry.
>The unawareness remains strong but compliance is obviously fading rapidly. This problem demands some serious, serious thinking - and not just poll driven, demographically-inspired messaging.

Yeah, our compliance is fading rapidly to all political bullshit.

social conservatism mixed with moderate-to-aggressive keynsian policies/investing in lower-to-middle class

Republicans really have only the culture wars as a reason for people to vote for them. If they couldn't scare up a specter of "gays in your bathrooms" I would find it hard to think people would vote against getting larger paychecks. Dems were and are stupid to think that a vocal minority of tumblrinas speaks for most of the country.

Promote a smaller welfare state

a giant sum of cash

Not that I can vote, but
>1st and 2nd amendment rights
>free market support
>legalised drugs
>declaring Islam a death cult
>defunding doctors who recommend/perform gender-altering surgeries and procedures
>supports states rights on gay marriage & abortion

So yeah, no, not happening