ULTIMATE REDPILL THREAD

ITT: Make your case for or against any given redpill, see if you can force down the redpill further or maybe you are against that certain redpill and want to force the redpill out. I will begin with a series of redpills

GENDER PAY GAP MYTH:
This one is probably easiest to swallow since it is fucking illegal to not pay a man and woman the same. This one is so easy to swallow you can simply use the same copypasta over and over.

No matter how many times this wage gap claim is decisively refuted by economists, it always comes back. The bottom line:
the 23-cent gender pay gap is simply the difference between the average earnings of all men and women working full-time. It
does not account for differences in occupations, positions, education, job tenure or hours worked per week. When such relevant
factors are considered, the wage gap narrows to the point of vanishing.
Wage gap activists say women with identical backgrounds and jobs as men still earn less. But they always fail to take into account
critical variables. Activist groups like the National Organization for Women have a fallback position: that women’s education and
career choices are not truly free—they are driven by powerful sexist stereotypes. In this view, women’s tendency to retreat from the
workplace to raise children or to enter fields like early childhood education and psychology, rather than better paying professions
like petroleum engineering, is evidence of continued social coercion. Here is the problem: American women are among the best informed
and most self-determining human beings in the world. To say that they are manipulated into their life choices by forces beyond their
control is divorced from reality and demeaning, to boot.

Other urls found in this thread:

centerforsecuritypolicy.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/150612-CSP-Polling-Company-Nationwide-Online-Survey-of-Muslims-Topline-Poll-Data.pdf
civitas.org.uk/pdf/ShariaLawOrOneLawForAll.pdf
cbsnews.com/stories/2006/08/14/opinion/main1893879.shtml&date=2011-04-06
webcitation.org/5xkMGAEvY
israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/193969
danielpipes.org/blog/2005/07/more-survey-research-from-a-british-islamist
dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1340599/WikiLeaks-1-3-British-Muslim-students-killing-Islam-40-want-Sharia-law.html
telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1510866/Poll-reveals-40pc-of-Muslims-want-sharia-law-in-UK.html
torontosun.com/2011/11/01/strong-support-for-shariah-in-canada
macdonaldlaurier.ca/much-good-news-and-some-worrying-results-in-new-study-of-muslim-public-opinion-in-canada/
news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/6309983.stm
dutchnews.nl/news/archives/2014/11/young-dutch-turks-radical-views-worry-mps-call-for-more-research/
bbc.com/news/uk-31293196
pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/12/07/muslims-and-islam-key-findings-in-the-u-s-and-around-the-world/
breitbart.com/london/2016/05/10/survey-reveals-aggressive-pro-sharia-attitudes-in-countries-providing-major-source-of-eu-migrants/
policyexchange.org.uk/images/publications/living apart together - jan 07.pdf
hln.be/hln/nl/1275/Islam/article/detail/1619036/2013/04/22/Zestien-procent-moslimjongens-vindt-terrorisme-aanvaardbaar.dhtml
pewresearch.org/files/old-assets/pdf/muslim-americans.pdf#page=60
people-press.org/2011/08/30/muslim-americans-no-signs-of-growth-in-alienation-or-support-for-extremism/
danielpipes.org/blog/2005/07/more-survey-research-from-a-british-islamist.html
pewglobal.org/2013/09/10/muslim-publics-share-concerns-about-extremist-groups/
comres.co.uk/polls/bbc-radio-4-today-muslim-poll/
youtube.com/watch?v=52Mx0_8YEtg
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kyoto_Protocol
thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/politics/6758207/1-in-5-British-Muslims-have-sympathy-for-jihadis-in-poll.html
thetimes.co.uk/tto/news/uk/article4730825.ece
people-press.org/2011/08/30/muslim-americans-no-signs-of-growth-in-alienation-or-support-for-extremism/
partisanlines.com/threads/al-jazeera-arabic-poll-49-9-support-osama-bin-laden.712/
forbes.com/2010/02/15/iran-terrorism-al-qaida-islam-opinions-columnists-ilan-berman.html
pewglobal.org/files/pdf/268.pdf
mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/muslim-leader-isis-supporting-brits-disenfranchised-6018357
clarionproject.org/analysis/isis-has-least-42-million-supporters-arab-world
france24.com/en/20151214-two-thirds-palestinians-support-knife-attacks-poll
trust.org/item/20160112154230-7c2sb/
newsweek.com/16-french-citizens-support-isis-poll-finds-266795
algemeiner.com/2015/06/30/adl-poll-shows-more-than-half-of-western-european-muslims-harbor-antisemitic-beliefs/#
meforum.org/blog/2015/08/islam-prison
washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/04/28/AR2008042802560.html
bbc.com/news/uk-31794599
who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs266/en/
who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs310/en/
thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/6884172/One-in-five-danger-lags-is-a-muslim.html
dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3532355/More-half-Muslims-want-gay-sex-outlawed-nearly-quarter-support-areas-UK-run-sharia-law.html
bbc.com/news/world-europe-36348389
web.archive.org/web/20070305160236/http://www.wnd.com/news/printer-friendly.asp?ARTICLE_ID=30147
littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/?entry=5079
worldpublicopinion.org/pipa/pdf/feb09/STARTII_Feb09_rpt.pdf
washingtonpost.com/blogs/checkpoint-washington/post/arab-worlds-views-of-us-president-obama-increasingly-negative-new-poll-finds/2011/07/12/gIQASzHVBI_blog.html
imgur.com/a/XsNO1
ose.utsc.utoronto.ca/ose/story.php?id=2135
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frank_Salter#Diversity_research
journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0095660
msutoday.msu.edu/news/2013/study-asks-is-a-better-world-possible/
boston.com/news/globe/ideas/articles/2007/08/05/the_downside_of_diversity/?page=full
city-journal.org/html/eon2007-06-25jl.html
thealternativeright.com/2016/02/29/ethnic-diversity-and-social-cohesion/
books.google.com/books?id=fAdR6ufr8NsC&pg=PA261
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2007.00176.x/abstract
sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/12/131212100225.htm
sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/10/121018162205.htm
bjp.rcpsych.org/content/201/4/282.abstract?etoc
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2566511/pdf/nihms-69295.pdf
medicalxpress.com/news/2012-05-infants-year.html
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1448064/pdf/0931865.pdf
ucdavis.edu/news/biracial-asian-americans-and-mental-health?id=8732
census.gov/hhes/socdemo/marriage/data/sipp/interracial-instability.pdf
ncb.org.uk/news/challenges-face-mixed-raced-children-and-young-people-in-the-uk-today
theguardian.com/society/2014/feb/23/mixed-race-children-mental-health
eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2008-08/uoc--baa081108.php
blogher.com/latest-statistics-divorce-rates-among-interracial-marriages
youtube.com/watch?v=5aYFC_7ZIn4&t=0s
johnstonsarchive.net/policy/abortion/abreasons.html
amren.com/the-color-of-crime/
2kpcwh2r7phz1nq4jj237m22.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Color-Of-Crime-2016.pdf
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minnesota_Transracial_Adoption_Study
youtube.com/results?search_query=stefan molyneux race
heraldtribune.com/news/20150326/fbi-denounces-own-report-linking-sarasota-family-to-911
theantimedia.org/28-pages-us-ignored-saudi-ties-911/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Alex Jones dropped the ultimate redpill last night the Joe Rogan podcast

ISLAM (AKA RELIGION OF PEACE) REDPILL

Islam is a conqueror / collectivist ideology that demands conversion and 100% loyalty on pain of death.

In other words, "convert and stay converted, or die." (Islam does have a "protection racket", that is,
if a non-Muslim pays jizya, he will be allowed to continue as a non-Muslim and not die.)

Islam uses every means at its disposal - for example, a god, a religion, and rules for living - to achieve
the end of conquering. It maintains 100% loyalty by intimidation and threats.

It not only conquers nations and peoples, it conquers individuals, turning them into slaves. Islam and Muslims
are the greatest and most effective slave-making machine this world has ever known.

I could not care less what kind of label is applied to it - religion, ideology, etc. All I know is that it takes

that which does not belong to it, both nations and individual lives.

Muslims consider themselves superior to all other peoples, nations, and ideologies. As a result, they grant
themselves the right to deal with, or dispose of, non-Muslims as they see fit. You, me, and every other non-Muslim are inferior to the Muslim.

"Allahu Akbar" means "Allah is greater," (i.e., superior, better) meaning that it competes with existing gods.

Islam conquers. Death is a critical component of its modus operandi along with violence and threats of violence.

centerforsecuritypolicy.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/150612-CSP-Polling-Company-Nationwide-Online-Survey-of-Muslims-Topline-Poll-Data.pdf

I heard that shit was great, what the hell happened?

...

Policy Exchange: 51% of British Muslims believe a woman cannot marry a non-Muslim
Only 51% believe a Muslim woman may marry without a guardian's consent
civitas.org.uk/pdf/ShariaLawOrOneLawForAll.pdf

Policy Exchange: Up to 52% of British Muslims believe a Muslim man is entitled to up to four wives
civitas.org.uk/pdf/ShariaLawOrOneLawForAll.pdf

Policy Exchange: 61% of British Muslims want homosexuality punished
civitas.org.uk/pdf/ShariaLawOrOneLawForAll.pdf

NOP Research: 62% of British Muslims do not believe in the protection of free speech;
Only 3% adopt a "consistently pro-freedom of speech line"
cbsnews.com/stories/2006/08/14/opinion/main1893879.shtml&date=2011-04-06
webcitation.org/5xkMGAEvY

Vancouver Sun (2015): 42% of Canadian Muslims agree that Islam is "irreconcilable" with the West.
israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/193969

ICM Poll: 11% of British Muslims find violence for political ends acceptable
danielpipes.org/blog/2005/07/more-survey-research-from-a-british-islamist

Civitas: 1 in 3 Muslims in the UK strongly agree that a wife should be forced to obey her husband's bidding
civitas.org.uk/pdf/ShariaLawOrOneLawForAll.pdf

Center for Social Cohesion: 40% of British Muslim students want Sharia
dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1340599/WikiLeaks-1-3-British-Muslim-students-killing-Islam-40-want-Sharia-law.html
ICM Poll: 40% of British Muslims want Sharia in the UK
telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1510866/Poll-reveals-40pc-of-Muslims-want-sharia-law-in-UK.html

GfK NOP: 28% of British Muslims want Britain to be an Islamic state
civitas.org.uk/pdf/ShariaLawOrOneLawForAll.pdf

NOP Research: 68% of British Muslims support the arrest and prosecution of anyone who insults Islam;
cbsnews.com/stories/2006/08/14/opinion/main1893879.shtml&date=2011-04-06
webcitation.org/5xkMGAEvY

...

MacDonald Laurier Institute: 62% of Muslims want Sharia in Canada (15% say make it mandatory)
torontosun.com/2011/11/01/strong-support-for-shariah-in-canada
macdonaldlaurier.ca/much-good-news-and-some-worrying-results-in-new-study-of-muslim-public-opinion-in-canada/

BBC (2007): 28% of Muslims in the UK prefer Sharia (37% for those younger).
news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/6309983.stm

Motivaction Survey (2014): 80% of young Dutch Muslims see nothing wrong with Holy War against non-believers. Most verbalized support for pro-Islamic State fighters.
dutchnews.nl/news/archives/2014/11/young-dutch-turks-radical-views-worry-mps-call-for-more-research/

BBC (2015): Following the Charlie Hebdo attacks, 27% of British Muslims openly support violence against cartoonists. Another 8% would not say, meaning that only 2 of 3 surveyed would say that the killings were not justified.
bbc.com/news/uk-31293196

The Polling Company CSP Poll (2015): 24% of Muslim-Americans say that violence is justified against those who "offend Islam" (60% disagree).
centerforsecuritypolicy.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/150612-CSP-Polling-Company-Nationwide-Online-Survey-of-Muslims-Topline-Poll-Data.pdf

The Polling Company CSP Poll (2015): 29% of Muslim-Americans agree that violence against those who insult Muhammad or the Quran is acceptable (61% disagree).
centerforsecuritypolicy.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/150612-CSP-Polling-Company-Nationwide-Online-Survey-of-Muslims-Topline-Poll-Data.pdf

Pew Research (2015): 40% of Palestinians, 39% in Afghanistan, 29% in Egypt and 26% of Muslims in Bangladesh agree that violence against civilians in defense of Islam is sometimes justified.
pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/12/07/muslims-and-islam-key-findings-in-the-u-s-and-around-the-world/

Arab Observatory of Religions and Freedom (2016) Only 39% in Egypt condemn religious extremism.
breitbart.com/london/2016/05/10/survey-reveals-aggressive-pro-sharia-attitudes-in-countries-providing-major-source-of-eu-migrants/


ICM Poll: 20% of British Muslims sympathize with 7/7 bombers
telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1510866/Poll-reveals-40pc-of-Muslims-want-sharia-law-in-UK.html

NOP Research: 1 in 4 British Muslims say 7/7 bombings were justified
cbsnews.com/stories/2006/08/14/opinion/main1893879.shtml&date=2011-04-06
webcitation.org/5xkMGAEvY

Channel Four (2006): 31% of younger British Muslims say 7/7 bombings were justified compared to 14% of those over 45.
policyexchange.org.uk/images/publications/living apart together - jan 07.pdf

16% of young Muslims in Belgium state terrorism is "acceptable".
hln.be/hln/nl/1275/Islam/article/detail/1619036/2013/04/22/Zestien-procent-moslimjongens-vindt-terrorisme-aanvaardbaar.dhtml

Populus Poll (2006): 12% of young Muslims in Britain (and 12% overall) believe that suicide attacks against civilians in Britain can be justified. 1 in 4 support suicide attacks against British troops.
danielpipes.org/blog/2005/07/more-survey-research-from-a-british-islamist

Pew Research (2007): 26% of younger Muslims in America believe suicide bombings are justified.
35% of young Muslims in Britain believe suicide bombings are justified (24% overall).
42% of young Muslims in France believe suicide bombings are justified (35% overall).
22% of young Muslims in Germany believe suicide bombings are justified.(13% overall).
29% of young Muslims in Spain believe suicide bombings are justified.(25% overall).
pewresearch.org/files/old-assets/pdf/muslim-americans.pdf#page=60

I really don't get how there are SJW's fighting for gay rights and women's rights and fighting for Islam at the same time. And how the leader of the woman's march was a god damn Muslim woman that follows Sharia law

...

Pew Research (2011): 8% of Muslims in America believe suicide bombings are often or sometimes justified (81% never).
28% of Egyptian Muslims believe suicide bombings are often or sometimes justified (38% never).
people-press.org/2011/08/30/muslim-americans-no-signs-of-growth-in-alienation-or-support-for-extremism/

Pew Research (2007): Muslim-Americans who identify more strongly with their religion are three times more likely to feel that suicide bombings are justified
pewresearch.org/files/old-assets/pdf/muslim-americans.pdf#page=60

27% of British Muslims do not support the deportation of Islamic extremists preaching violence and hate.
danielpipes.org/blog/2005/07/more-survey-research-from-a-british-islamist.html

Federation of Student Islamic Societies: About 1 in 5 Muslim students in Britain (18%) would not report a fellow Muslim planning a terror attack.
danielpipes.org/blog/2005/07/more-survey-research-from-a-british-islamist

ICM Poll: 25% of British Muslims disagree that a Muslim has an obligation to report terrorists to police.
danielpipes.org/blog/2005/07/more-survey-research-from-a-british-islamist

Populus Poll (2006): 16% of British Muslims believe suicide attacks against Israelis are justified.
37% believe Jews in Britain are a "legitimate target".
danielpipes.org/blog/2005/07/more-survey-research-from-a-british-islamist

Pew Research (2013): Only 57% of Muslims worldwide disapprove of al-Qaeda. Only 51% disapprove of the Taliban. 13% support both groups and 1 in 4 refuse to say.
pewglobal.org/2013/09/10/muslim-publics-share-concerns-about-extremist-groups/

BBC Radio (2015): 45% of British Muslims agree that clerics preaching violence against the West represent "mainstream Islam".
comres.co.uk/polls/bbc-radio-4-today-muslim-poll/

youtube.com/watch?v=52Mx0_8YEtg

> You deny global warming? You are no better than flat earth proponents
> OK, you accept it? Then the only solution is our solution
> It involves making US and Europe paying poor countries in order to keep industrial production
> Wait, that's wealth redistribution? Pure coincidence!
> 1. To put a hard limit in the amount of greenhouses can be emitted, with hefty punishment for non compliance
> 2. To create the concept of "carbon credits", where the amount of greenhouse gases one can emit is allocated by the government, and companies that emit less than its share can sell its surplus to entities that want to emit more than its share.
This causes an obvious problem: there is no incentive to apply these measures at a national level, companies would simply move to other countries without the restrictions. To solve that for many years countries (spearheaded by the left) meet trying to agree on a common framework to reduce emissions globally and at the same time. These talks (look up Kyoto protocol) happened on *** the Bill Clinton administration *** and the agreed upon measures are very damaging for U.S. industry, to the direct benefit of China.

> The Protocol is based on the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities: it puts the obligation to reduce current emissions on developed countries on the basis that they are historically responsible for the current levels of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere.
> en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kyoto_Protocol

In short: developed countries (US, Canada, Europe, Australia) must reduce emissions while underdeveloped countries (like China, India, Brazil) gets a pass.

The crux of the discussion is the "anthropomorphic" (man made) cause of climate change. Some clarifications:

> climate is not weather. Weather is local and have a short cycle, climate is global and have a long cycle
> there are plenty of studies and a clear explanation linking certain gases to the greenhouse effect and a potential global climate change

Keep the thread bumped, I'll keep dumping my statistics

The Polling Company CSP Poll (2015): 19% of Muslim-Americans say that violence is justified in order to make Sharia the law in the United States (66% disagree).
centerforsecuritypolicy.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/150612-CSP-Polling-Company-Nationwide-Online-Survey-of-Muslims-Topline-Poll-Data.pdf

The Polling Company CSP Poll (2015): 25% of Muslim-Americans say that violence against Americans in the United States is justified as part of the "global Jihad (64% disagree).
centerforsecuritypolicy.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/150612-CSP-Polling-Company-Nationwide-Online-Survey-of-Muslims-Topline-Poll-Data.pdf

The Sun (2015: Following Nov. 2015 attacks in Paris, 1 in 4 young Muslims in Britain (and 1 in 5 overall) said they sympathize with those who fight for ISIS.
thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/politics/6758207/1-in-5-British-Muslims-have-sympathy-for-jihadis-in-poll.html

ICM (2016): 2 in 3 Muslims in Britain would not report terror plot to police.
thetimes.co.uk/tto/news/uk/article4730825.ece

Pew Research (2011): 1 in 10 native-born Muslim-Americans have a favorable view of al-Qaeda.
people-press.org/2011/08/30/muslim-americans-no-signs-of-growth-in-alienation-or-support-for-extremism/

al-Jazeera (2006): 49.9% of Muslims polled support Osama bin Laden
partisanlines.com/threads/al-jazeera-arabic-poll-49-9-support-osama-bin-laden.712/

Pew Research: 59% of Indonesians support Osama bin Laden in 2003
41% of Indonesians support Osama bin Laden in 2007
56% of Jordanians support Osama bin Laden in 2003
forbes.com/2010/02/15/iran-terrorism-al-qaida-islam-opinions-columnists-ilan-berman.html

Now, and here are the points of debate:

> 1. is the planet going to a process of climate change?
> 2. if so, is it natural and part of a natural cycle or is it man made?
> 3. also, if so is it detrimental or beneficial?
> 4. assuming it is predominantly man made, is it possible to reverse it?
> 5. also, if so, at what cost?

Point 1 is more or less uncontroversial. People that don't understand the whole problem and argue on "gut feeling" tend to argue against this point to base their objection to what I'll argue about later. That's is a mistake because data points to the reality of climate change and arguing against it is pointless.

Point 2 is arguable but, just like point 1 there is a very good collection of data that points that man made greenhouse emission is a powerful contributor to the current global climate change pattern.

Point 3: this is the point ideology takes over science. "Scientific consensus" (an oxymoron, science should never be an appeal to authority, it should always stand on its own merits) not only states categorically that climate change is predominantly man made but also for years it predicts its catastrophic consequences on short and long term unless it is reversed.

That brings us to point 4: assuming all the previous points to be as the "scientific consensus" says, is it reversible? If so, how and (point 5) at what cost?

(continues)

Pew Global: 51% of Palestinians support Osama bin Laden
54% of Muslim Nigerians Support Osama bin Laden
pewglobal.org/files/pdf/268.pdf

MacDonald Laurier Institute: 35% of Canadian Muslims would not repudiate al-Qaeda
torontosun.com/2011/11/01/strong-support-for-shariah-in-canada
macdonaldlaurier.ca/much-good-news-and-some-worrying-results-in-new-study-of-muslim-public-opinion-in-canada/

The Polling Company CSP Poll (2015): 33% of Muslim-Americans say al-Qaeda beliefs are Islamic or correct. (49% disagree),
centerforsecuritypolicy.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/150612-CSP-Polling-Company-Nationwide-Online-Survey-of-Muslims-Topline-Poll-Data.pdf

The Polling Company CSP Poll (2015): 38% of Muslim-Americans say Islamic State (ISIS) beliefs are Islamic or correct. (43% disagree),
centerforsecuritypolicy.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/150612-CSP-Polling-Company-Nationwide-Online-Survey-of-Muslims-Topline-Poll-Data.pdf

Global warming also helps domestic companies, in a roundabout way. It's like litter.

In the 60s we started having lots of disposable packaging and people got concerned over how much cheap plastic crap we were throwing away. So plastic manufacturers hired a marketting firm to help their image, and the result was a distraction tactic -- LITTER. Suddenly, all that trash didn't matter; only the trash that didn't make it in the trash can was worth caring about. Nevermind the landfills filling up and incinerators releasing toxic chemicals, LITTER is now the only thing people care about.

Global Warming is similar -- no one cares about the ozone hole, or acid rain, or asthma from smokestacks. Now it's all about GLOBAL WARMING. And it's really hard to comprehend a global problem, and even harder to fix it, especially as just a single individual.

So a series of concrete, obvious and easily understood problems, have been replaced with a single confusing global clusterfuck that no one can fix. And now no one gives a shit about the 20,000 kids a year who get asthma because they live next to smokestacks on factories and coal power plants, because the issue isn't "the real human beings getting sick and dying" but "the vague concept of climate changing slightly over hundreds of years."

It is clearly detrimental to the U.S. (and to Europe) and it clearly benefits China even if the later economy (and consequently industrial output and emissions) will reach and maybe surpass the former in the next decades.

Even conceding all the 4 points enumerated above (it's happening, it's man made, it's detrimental and it can be reversed) the solution proposed by the left and so detrimental to the national interests of the U.S. that no national politician in its right mind would consider supporting and implementing.

ICM (Mirror) Poll 2015: 1.5 Million British Muslims support the Islamic State, about half the total population.
mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/muslim-leader-isis-supporting-brits-disenfranchised-6018357

Clarion Project Study (2015): 11.5% of Arabs support ISIS, or about 42 million.
clarionproject.org/analysis/isis-has-least-42-million-supporters-arab-world

Palestinian Center for Policy and Survey Research (2015): Two-thirds of Palestinians support the stabbing of Israeli civilians.
france24.com/en/20151214-two-thirds-palestinians-support-knife-attacks-poll

Social Trends Survey (2016): 21% of Turks says ISIS 'represents Islam"; 10% would not categorize it as a terrorist organization.
trust.org/item/20160112154230-7c2sb/

ICM (2014): 16% of all French Muslims support ISIS, including 27% of those aged 18-24.
newsweek.com/16-french-citizens-support-isis-poll-finds-266795

Anti-Defamation League (2015): 55% of Muslims in Europe are anti-Semitic - approximately three times higher than Europeans in general.
algemeiner.com/2015/06/30/adl-poll-shows-more-than-half-of-western-european-muslims-harbor-antisemitic-beliefs/#

Middle East Forum (2015): Muslims comprise less than 1% of the population in the United States but 9% of prison inmates.
meforum.org/blog/2015/08/islam-prison

Middle East Forum (2015): Muslims in France comprise 12% of the population, but 70% of prisoners.
washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/04/28/AR2008042802560.html

Middle East Forum (2015): Muslims in the Netherlands comprise 4% of the population but 20% of prisoners. Muslims in France comprise 10% of the population, but 70% of prisoners.
meforum.org/blog/2015/08/islam-prison

2015 (BBCbbc.com/news/uk-31794599

So, why does the left tries to push it with all their influence (monetary, political and mediatic)?

The answer, my friends, is because the whole proposal is an attempt to implement wealth redistribution, at a global level, from the richer countries to the poorer ones.

(continues)

By allocating carbon credits not In the proportion of current industrial output but based on the fact that "on the basis that they [the developed countries] are historically responsible for the current levels of greenhouse gases" the left creates the perfect mechanism to force richer countries, if they want to keep at their current levels of productivity, to buy these "carbon credits" from poorer countries.

WEALTH REDISTRIBUTION. At a global level. From the developed countries and productive countries to the underdeveloped ones.

With China counting as underdeveloped.

Civic Nationalism is the only way to create an eternal society. If you can manage multiculturalism with a strong core philosophy (The Roman Pantheon, Ottoman's Sharia lite, American Consumerism/Capitalism), then you can yield the benefits of the disruptive technologies that arise more often from an open exchange of ideas.

The Right rejects the benefits of multiculturalism out of fear of the loss of their own culture, largely due to the trend of the Left to welcome multiculturalism as an end in of itself, without managing the inherent differences that come with conflicting cultural identities isolating people and making enemies over minute issues.

Ethnonationalism makes us vulnerable to disruptive technological changes abroad by driving a view of traditionalism and certain dogmas as being the core of society. Ethnonationalism protects us from the barbarian hordes but not the next big empire to benefit from the next big technological change.

bump

> do you believe man contributes as much as the left says we do

I don't need to address this point in my reasoning and actively avoid doing so my personal opinion cannot be used to discredit my argument.

I simply treat as an assumption that it is man made, that it is detrimental and that it is reversible and argue that the remedy being proposed is a ploy.

Think about it: according to the World Health Organisation itself: [1]

> Between 2030 and 2050, climate change is expected to cause approximately 250 000 additional deaths per year, from malnutrition, malaria, diarrhoea and heat stress.

Heart disease killed 7.5 million people in 2012, being the leading cause of death (also according to the WHO [2])

Reducing that by only 5%, something that is probably achievable for instance by attacking obesity as a worldwide epidemic (instead of treating it as health at every size) would net 375 000 fewer deaths by year, more than offsetting the predicted deaths caused by climate change.

Now, and here is the 100 trillion dollars question:

why is the left so concerned about climate change and its hypothetical death toll to the point that they are willing to sacrifice the whole western civilisation

but

the same left is not the least concerned about people eating themselves into a heart attack?

[1] who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs266/en/

[2] who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs310/en/

Women are retarded?

Nothing will exist forever?

2016 (Sun News): Muslims comprise 5% of population in Britain but 20% of High Security inmates
thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/6884172/One-in-five-danger-lags-is-a-muslim.html

ICM Poll (2016): 31% of British Muslims believe polygamy is acceptable. 18% believe homosexuality should remain legal.
dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3532355/More-half-Muslims-want-gay-sex-outlawed-nearly-quarter-support-areas-UK-run-sharia-law.html

35% of prisoners in Belgium are Muslim, compared with 6% of the general population.
bbc.com/news/world-europe-36348389

More than one-third of American Muslims believe that the U.S. war on terrorism is really a war on Islam, according to survey information released yesterday by researchers at Georgetown University.
Thirty-eight percent of American Muslims polled said they believe the U.S.-led invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, and the tensions with Iran and Syria, reflect a foreign policy that is targeting Islamic countries and Muslims themselves.

An additional 33 percent of Muslims interviewed said they believe the United States is fighting a war on terrorism, and 29 percent said they were not sure.

However, 11 percent said they believed further attacks against the U.S. by al-Qaida or similar groups would be justified, and 8 percent said such attacks would be justified against Britain.
As reported by the Associated Press, the survey asked: "President Bush and Tony Blair say that the war against terrorism is not a war against Islam. Do you agree or disagree?"

Seventy percent said they disagreed, 20 percent said they agreed and 10 percent said they didn't know.

Asked whether they believed the U.S. and its allies were justified in blaming the Sept. 11 attacks on al-Qaida, 17 percent answered 'yes' while 56 percent replied 'no.'

Also, 64 percent said al-Qaida should not have been blamed for the October bombings on Bali that killed 192 people and similar terrorist attacks.

Yet 44 percent said attacks by al-Qaida or similar groups are justified because Muslims are being killed by the U.S. or allies using American-made weapons. Forty-six percent said such attacks were not justified. The survey question did not say where Muslims were being killed.

web.archive.org/web/20070305160236/http://www.wnd.com/news/printer-friendly.asp?ARTICLE_ID=30147

littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/?entry=5079

We have plenty of land.

Actually, that's one of the other myths propagated by the left in order to implement their ploys: that we are overpopulated.

We could fit the whole 7 billion people in the United States alone with the density of a little higher than that of New Jersey. There is enough land.

As for availability of food "consumers in industrialized countries waste almost as much food as the entire net food production of sub-Saharan Africa (222 million vs. 230 million tons)"

There is enough food.

The left is tricky and tries to convince guillibe people from the developed world "no, we are full, stop having children, think about mankind" while the people from the underdeveloped world reproduce like rabbit without a single recrimination by the left.

World Public Opinion: Attitude toward Osama bin Laden:
Egypt: 44% positive, 17% negative, and 25% mixed feelings
Indonesia: 14% positive, 26% negative, 21% mixed feelings (39% did not answer)
Pakistan: 25% positive, 15% negative, 26% mixed feelings (34% did not answer)
Morocco: 27% positive, 21% negative, 26% mixed feelings
Jordanians, Palestinians, Turks and Azerbaijanis. Jordanians combined for: 27% positive, 20 percent negative, and 27 percent mixed feelings. (Palestinians 56% positive, 20% negative, 22 percent mixed feelings).
worldpublicopinion.org/pipa/pdf/feb09/STARTII_Feb09_rpt.pdf
World Public Opinion: 83% of Egyptians approve of attacks on American troops.
26% of Indonesians approve of attacks on American troops.
26% of Pakistanis approve of attacks on American troops.
68% of Moroccans approve of attacks on American troops.
90% of Palestinians approve of attacks on American troops.
72% of Jordanians approve of attacks on American troops.
52% of Turks approve of some or most groups that attack Americans (39% oppose)
A minority of Muslims disagreed entirely with terror attacks on American troops.
About half of those opposed to attacking Americans were sympathetic with al-Qaeda’s attitude toward the U.S.
worldpublicopinion.org/pipa/pdf/feb09/STARTII_Feb09_rpt.pdf

The Polling Company CSP Poll (2015): 33% of Muslim-Americans say al-Qaeda beliefs are Islamic or correct. (49% disagree),
centerforsecuritypolicy.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/150612-CSP-Polling-Company-Nationwide-Online-Survey-of-Muslims-Topline-Poll-Data.pdf

The Polling Company CSP Poll (2015): 38% of Muslim-Americans say Islamic State (ISIS) beliefs are Islamic or correct. (43% disagree),
centerforsecuritypolicy.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/150612-CSP-Polling-Company-Nationwide-Online-Survey-of-Muslims-Topline-Poll-Data.pdf

ICM (Mirror) Poll 2015: 1.5 Million British Muslims support the Islamic State, about half the total population.
mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/muslim-leader-isis-supporting-brits-disenfranchised-6018357

Clarion Project Study (2015): 11.5% of Arabs support ISIS, or about 42 million.
clarionproject.org/analysis/isis-has-least-42-million-supporters-arab-world

Palestinian Center for Policy and Survey Research (2015): Two-thirds of Palestinians support the stabbing of Israeli civilians.
france24.com/en/20151214-two-thirds-palestinians-support-knife-attacks-poll

Social Trends Survey (2016): 21% of Turks says ISIS 'represents Islam"; 10% would not categorize it as a terrorist organization.
trust.org/item/20160112154230-7c2sb/

ICM (2014): 16% of all French Muslims support ISIS, including 27% of those aged 18-24.
newsweek.com/16-french-citizens-support-isis-poll-finds-266795

The red-pill is old news.
The gold pill is the way forward.

RED PILL OVERDOSE. best thing on the internet

Zogby International 2011: “Majorities in all six countries said they viewed the United States less favorably following the killing of the Al-Qaeda head [Osama bin Laden] in Pakistan”
washingtonpost.com/blogs/checkpoint-washington/post/arab-worlds-views-of-us-president-obama-increasingly-negative-new-poll-finds/2011/07/12/gIQASzHVBI_blog.html

In a survey of newly naturalized citizens, 90 percent of Muslim immigrants said that if there were a conflict between the United States and their country of origin, they would be inclined to support their country of origin, said John Fonte of the Hudson Institute.

That's it, I could dump my other redpill shit if asked

saved it all, appreciate it man. What else do you got redpills on?

Gonna have to check it out, not sure if true but someone said they got Alex high

what is this gold pill you speak of?

I got this shit

imgur.com/a/XsNO1

Still looking through my docs for everything

damn I can't imagine having been raised with lesbian moms

Racepill

ose.utsc.utoronto.ca/ose/story.php?id=2135
"Previous research shows people are less likely to feel connected to people outside their own ethnic groups, and we wanted to know why,"
says Gutsell. "What we found is that there is a basic difference in the way peoples' brains react to those from other ethnic backgrounds."

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frank_Salter#Diversity_research
"More ethnically homogeneous nations are better able to build public goods, are more democratic, less corrupt, have higher productivity
and less inequality, are more trusting and care more for the disadvantaged, develop social and economic capital faster, have lower crime
rates, are more resistant to external shocks, and are better global citizens, for example by giving more foreign aid. Moreover, they are
less prone to civil war, the greatest source of violent death in the twentieth century."

journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0095660
"Our analysis shows that peace does not depend on integrated coexistance, but rather on well defined topographical and political
boundaries separating groups"

msutoday.msu.edu/news/2013/study-asks-is-a-better-world-possible/
"Policymakers have attempted to create communities where a diverse group of residents not only live close to one other but also
interact freely - in other words, neighborhoods that are both integrated and socially cohesive."
"The most integrated a neighborhood is, the less socially cohesive it becomes, and vice versa."
"It's not that local leaders and policymakers aren't trying hard enough. Rather, we now think it's because the goals of integration
and cohesion are just not compatible with each other."

boston.com/news/globe/ideas/articles/2007/08/05/the_downside_of_diversity/?page=full
"...the greater the diversity in a community, the fewer people vote and the less they volunteer, the less they give to charity and work on community projects.
In the most diverse communities, neighbors trust one another about half as much as they do in the most homogeneous settings... virtually all measures of civic health
are lower in more diverse settings."

city-journal.org/html/eon2007-06-25jl.html

Putnam’s study reveals that immigration and diversity not only reduce social capital between ethnic groups, but also within the groups themselves.
Trust, even for members of one’s own race, is lower, altruism and community cooperation rarer, friendships fewer. The problem isn’t ethnic conflict or troubled
racial relations, but withdrawal and isolation. Putnam writes: “In colloquial language, people living in ethnically diverse settings appear to ‘hunker down’—that
is, to pull in like a turtle.”

thealternativeright.com/2016/02/29/ethnic-diversity-and-social-cohesion/

"In conclusion, the totality of evidence clearly shows that ethnic diversity damages how well people get along,
how much they trust one another, and how satisfied they are with their lives. These findings should be kept in
mind when thinking about any form of racial diversity, regardless of the races involved."

"It has been shown that across Africa, areas with the highest concentrations of different ethnic and religious groups tend to be the areas with a history of the highest conflict, this being one of the classic pieces of evidence for 'realistic group conflict theory' (Sherif and Sherif, 1953; Struch and Schwartz, 1989)."
books.google.com/books?id=fAdR6ufr8NsC&pg=PA261

This paper looked at diversity and social capital across 40 regions in the US. After controlling for poverty,
crime, ect, it found that the more diverse a community was the less trust residents reported having in their
neighbors, the less people trusted local government and media, the less people voted, the less people gave to
charity, the less people worked on community projects, the fewer friends people had, and the less happy and
satisfied with their lives people were.
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2007.00176.x/abstract

This study looked at 75K people across nearly 400 congregations. It found that being a member of the dominant
racial group of the congregation predicted a greater sense of belonging in the church, having more friends in
the church, and participating in more church activities.
sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/12/131212100225.htm

This study looked at over 5000 African american and Latino seniors and found that those seniors who lived in
areas with many people who shared their ethnicity were much less likely to have cancer or heart problems.
sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/10/121018162205.htm

This study looked at "own group density" and mental health. It found that a 10% drop in own group density
(the proportion of the population that is a person's race) was associated with a 7% increase in psychotic
experiences and an increase in social adversity.
bjp.rcpsych.org/content/201/4/282.abstract?etoc

This study showed that 3 months olds, but not new borns, strongly prefer to look at faces of their own ethnic
group.

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2566511/pdf/nihms-69295.pdf

By 9 months babies can tell faces apart more easily when they are of their race and can empathize with faces
more easily when they are of their own race
medicalxpress.com/news/2012-05-infants-year.html

According to a study of 80 US schools, mixed-race children are worse off than single-race children in terms of physical health, school performance and discipline, drug use, and suicide rates (1). And for most variables this was true no matter what combination of races the children were. Another study of biracial Asian Americans found that they are at a heightened risk for psychological disorders like depression and anxiety (2). And the problems with race-mixing don't end with the children. Research shows that interracial marriages are 40% more likely than same-race marriages to end in divorce—even after controlling for differences between single- and multi-race couples in the number of past marriages they have had, whether or not the marriage produces kids, how religious the spouses are, whether or not the spouses come from two-parent homes, and whether or not they cohabited before marriage (3).

Race mixing is bad for couples and it's bad for children. Any reasonable society will discourage it.

1. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1448064/pdf/0931865.pdf

2. ucdavis.edu/news/biracial-asian-americans-and-mental-health?id=8732

3. census.gov/hhes/socdemo/marriage/data/sipp/interracial-instability.pdf

More evidence on race mixing:

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1448064/pdf/0931865.pdf

census.gov/hhes/socdemo/marriage/data/sipp/interracial-instability.pdf

ncb.org.uk/news/challenges-face-mixed-raced-children-and-young-people-in-the-uk-today

theguardian.com/society/2014/feb/23/mixed-race-children-mental-health

eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2008-08/uoc--baa081108.php

blogher.com/latest-statistics-divorce-rates-among-interracial-marriages

do you got any shit on climate change or global warming too?

Isn't that that antifa chcik?
What a waste of good flesh.

The gold-pill is the path away from Utopian and totalitarian ideologies.

She's rubbing her nipple through her jacket.

Anarcho Feudalism:

Anarchy: The state and its laws absolve us of needing morals. When alcohol is prohibited, that's when we drink the most; when weed is prohibited, that's when we smoke the most. When something becomes law, it ceases to be immoral. The state therefore exists in constant moral decay. The only time, conversely, when it doesn't decay, is when a dictator comes to power and imposes an unchangeable law. When law exceeds its moral function, it becomes. The only way to eradicate immorality is to eliminate the state.

Feudalism:
Feudal societies have existed for thousands of years. Without the force of law, only the rule of man exists, the rule of honour, and his relationship with his people. The goal is therefore not to impose monarchy or a fiefdom, but to let man's honour, unwavered by the force of any man's law, to usher in a morally progressive society, one based not on individualism, but one based on real human relationships.

To attain this, we need to end hatecrime laws. "Free speech" isn't free if you don't have the freedom to physically retaliate, otherwise that gives one man legal precedence over the morality of the people; therefore, murder must eventually be legalized. When the state become unnecessary, it becomes abolished. Men will live unhindered by economic interests (another form of law), and they will sustain themselves by their own peoples and the land in which they inhabit.

S-should I swallow it?

So basically the Indians lifestyle

thank you for that dump.

extra appreciative if you put it together.

very agorist/mafiosi senpai

no problem man, just keep this bumped

I'll check

woman redpill

youtube.com/watch?v=5aYFC_7ZIn4&t=0s

Trump didn't mock disabled reporter

Ethnic nationalism is the only way for a country to progress into the far future. Without a common culture and goal societies quickly collapse. Multiculturalism was the downfall of the Roman Empire and will be the downfall of the USA no matter what Trump does unless there are actions taken now to stop immigration from Non-European countries or promote traditional western culture and stop immigration all together.

Sister recently stopped talking and blocked me because of this, I can't change my position because I know the realities of race and I know the effects they have on the homogeneity of a culture. She kinda raised me as my Mother has always been distant when it come to nurture. Feels really bad man.

Feminism/wage gap/general retardation taking precedent over established biology:


So there is this really crazy fact that comes into play here: women are child bearers. I know, even liberals don't quite understand it when they talk about the alleged wage gap, but let me break it down.

Women spend 9 months in gestation. Somewhere along the 7 month mark, life can get pretty hard for a pregnant woman. Less energy to get through the day, aches n pains, all that. So then at some point they have the kid. Now, women have these things called tits and also a greater sense of nurturing than men. Tits give milk to baby, nurturing attitude helps foster development. These things are hard to do to the degree that they did be done while also working, certainly if you have a job where you're on your feet or chained to a desk. So they get some time off. But even after that, baby need tit right? Baby need to learn his morals? Baby need to be kept safe? Shit I'm a grown man and still need tit.

Anyway, used to be that during this insanely and hugely important part of a childs' life, the man was out earning and providing for his family back home nursing. However, in the 1960s, Cultural Marxists decided it would be neat if they memed the country into pretending like none of the above is true and instead both men AND women should be working (more tax $$ for us, goy!) and the child...Well the child can be handled by a babysitter who doesn't give a shit about it or the government who doesn't give a shit about it. Whatever, baby doesn't matter. But of course nothing can take away that mother's instinct, so women take half days, their brains are half at home and only half involved in their work, etc. AND RIGHTFULLY SO! This whole set up is fucking unnatural. Baby needs mom at home, growing toddler needs mom at home. But no, we've been memed by Marxists to believe they should be... Working. Slaving away while baby rots.

So that's where we are now.

Abortion redpill

so murder is illegal but murdering babies is legal?

Do you think that life, that has as much as a right as anyone else to live, wants to be killed because
it isn't convenient to you to have it? all because you couldn't have protected sex?

own body own choice?
Well the baby has its own blood type.. own set of dna

"just a clump of cells"

regardless it is the start of life, so why exterminate it? Is it justifiable to go up to a birds nest and crush the eggs?
Well it seems like animals like birds have more respect for their young than a human being does so they will actually be heartbroken.

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimates that 66 percent of legal abortions occur within the first
eight weeks of gestation, and 92 percent are performed within the first 13 weeks. Only 1.2 percent occur at or after 21 weeks (CDC,

the babies heartbeat begins at 6 weeks

• By 7 weeks, pain “sensory receptors appear in the perioral [mouth] area.” [New England Journal of Medicine]

• By 10 weeks, “All components of the brain and spinal cord are formed, and nerves link the stem of the brain
and the spinal cord to all tissues and organs of the body.” [Encyclopedia of Human Biology]

By 12 weeks, “the fetus sucks its thumb, kicks, makes fists and faces, and has the beginnings of baby teeth.” [Human Genetics: Concepts and Applications]

How your baby's growing

Fingerprints are forming on your baby’s tiny fingertips, her veins and organs are clearly visible
through her still-thin skin, and her body is starting to catch up with her head – which makes up
just a third of her body size now. If you're having a girl, she now has more than 2 million eggs
in her ovaries. Your baby is almost 3 inches long (about the size of a pea pod) and weighs nearly an ounce.

johnstonsarchive.net/policy/abortion/abreasons.html

don't got nothing on (((globalist))) warming. But, I do have more on race!

On Race and crime see
amren.com/the-color-of-crime/

Online pdf version

2kpcwh2r7phz1nq4jj237m22.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Color-Of-Crime-2016.pdf

Heavily sourced from government statistics and other reliable sources such as PEW research (gold standard).

For nurture vs nature the Minnesota transracial adoption study is a good source.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minnesota_Transracial_Adoption_Study

Also the bureau of justice, or any other reliable source has good data on social class in relation to crime (see pic), among others these statistics are sourced in the Color of Crime pdf above.


For IQ and economic/social class, the left tend to put the cart before the horse. It is rather that if you have a high IQ you are more likely to be of a higher economic status and social class, not the other way around.

For videos I highly recommend Molymeme's videos as they are heavily sourced, these are reliable sources also such as PEW and Bureau of Justice, not some meme shit (he puts all his sources in the info bar). If you search him on youtube with the relevant terms you will find good videos on the topic. There are other people I can point you to also who have good presentations if you wanted.
youtube.com/results?search_query=stefan molyneux race

>For IQ and economic/social class,

Though it is true that having the proper nutrients early on and being in an environment that is not awful will have some effect on IQ, your IQ potential is pretty much set in stone from birth. This is why you can have such quick growth in a place like China, from a baseline of peasantry (where people were starving on mass, and mostly eating rice etc) to an exponential growth of a middle class in a relatively short period, but Africa struggles to attain high standards of living and self sufficiency after a long period.

You can't redpill everyone bro. Usually that sort of thing happens by itself, but women in general usually don't think about such things, but I will say that they DO exist out there.

Your sister blocking you is just a natural reaction. Don't try and push redpills into others, that's something I didn't learn early on. I can guarantee you'll be talking with your sister again in a week if you're as close as you say you are

this is some good shit, thanks man.

Global warming and climate change is annoying, you can't say anything against it because "b-but its backed by 97% of all scientists! It can't be refuted!" such dumb bullshit, when the temperatures didn't match what they were saying they made up new excuses. Fuck Al Gore

Cont'd

Warning: This is very controversial, but it's super redpilled.

Depression isn't a "Random disease"; of course, some are more likely to get it than others, but it's FAR from a disease.
Wildness isn't the null state of an animal; wildness is a state of an animal living to be sustainable in its environment; the wild state of humanity is also our domestic state, just as a lion is wild yet is domesticated by his pride.
All wild (domesticated by its own kind) mammals have a capacity for depression. Depression isn't a vestigial organ; it has a purpose, and we don't see that purpose, because we live in a cage; just like the lion who is fed steaks and is deprived of his natural bloodlust; we too are deprived of our nature. Depression is a utility. When the rule of law tells you to love everyone unconditionally, you lose the capacity to develop meaningful relationships; you have no capacity to develop honour. The very word "honour" in our vocabulary is a vestigial left-over from an earlier time; we think it means "the right thing" or "Being honest", but you can do neither of those things and be honourable. Honour utilized depression. We ostracized the undesireables, and the undesirable people killed themselves out of despair, and that was good for society. But because we're forced to be altruistic to one another by economic and political means, we lose the capacity to shame or dishonour someone. We now ostracize ourselves, because we have no sense of "who we are", because we conflate our identities with multiculturalism and diversity.

that was amazing

just watch it, it'll change your life. Search Joe Rogan Alex Jones on youtube.

Problem is she's changed drastically in the last few years. She started dying her hair unnatural colors and started being a virtue signaling brain dead lib after she finished college and moved out(Somewhat ironic since being at Uni is what usually brainwashes people). She used to be fine with people havong differing opinions and I wasn't trying to change her mind but she still insisted that I have no right to defend my opinion because it is so drastic.

Is she full on Tumblr?

Alex Jones got drunk and stoned with Joe Rogan on his podcast and ranted for 3 and a half hours straight about how trump personally promised him he was going to reverse years of globalist rot on washington and bust up the worldwide pedo networks.

They talked pizzagate, chemtrails, fake moon landing, secret space missions, HAARP weather control, JFK/Eisenhower being aware of the NWO, bohemian grove, aliens, bigfoot, secret societies, the usual stuff.

Oh and alex jones said that satan is talking to the wealthy elites and commanding them from a different dimension to keep us enslaved so only the best humans will be the ones to merge with computers to start the new oppressive technocracy

It was all over the place really. But super entertaining all the way thru

Seems like it at this point, lives with her faggy beta boyfriend that lacks any sort of spine and doesn't work. She told me a few weeks back that UBI is a good idea because life shouldn't be about working... The more I think about it the more I'm baffled by how different she is. I thought family is supposed to be about unconditional love

I went through the same exact thing with my cousin. I wouldn't worry too much, but you might want to adopt a subversive attitude. Dont contact her and tell her she's right, but definitely signal that you may believe as she does, then drop subtle redpills rather than go full retard, which is what I'm assuming you did.

DAILY REMINDER:

The wage gap still exists in the form of unpaid domestic labor.
>The wage gap still exists in the form of unpaid domestic labor.
The wage gap still exists in the form of unpaid domestic labor.
>The wage gap still exists in the form of unpaid domestic labor.
The wage gap still exists in the form of unpaid domestic labor.
>The wage gap still exists in the form of unpaid domestic labor.
The wage gap still exists in the form of unpaid domestic labor.
>The wage gap still exists in the form of unpaid domestic labor.
The wage gap still exists in the form of unpaid domestic labor.
>The wage gap still exists in the form of unpaid domestic labor.
The wage gap still exists in the form of unpaid domestic labor.
>The wage gap still exists in the form of unpaid domestic labor.

Politics is not something worth losing family members over, user. Even if she is hard headed, i would try to reconcile and find common ground

For example, she is technically right that life shouldnt be all about work. Maybe try reasoning with her that she is half right, and the key is finding work that doesnt feel like work and that youd be happy to do. Because at the end of the day, having a career isnt about surving a capitalistic purpose, its about being able to build something of your own and having something to pass on to your children.

Not when you account for hourly security services, therapy, male domestic labor, etc. etc.
> Not when you account for hourly security services, therapy, male domestic labor, etc. etc.
Not when you account for hourly security services, therapy, male domestic labor, etc. etc.
> Not when you account for hourly security services, therapy, male domestic labor, etc. etc.
Not when you account for hourly security services, therapy, male domestic labor, etc. etc.
> Not when you account for hourly security services, therapy, male domestic labor, etc. etc.

Elaborate please

Women usually mimic their boyfriend in political views. You might want to fuck your sister if you want her to think like you do

You mean cuz guys usually mow the lawn and fix everything around the house?

Weird but controversial redpill: drugs are an integral part of human/social evolution. None of the popular uprisings of the 18th nd 19th cetury could have been done without coffee shops. LSD was in the mainstream for less than a decade and it almost topples the US (then CIA did the Manson false flag, check it).
And that's why they're forbidden right now. The elite knows we're in the brink of an evolutionary jump and they want it all for themselves exclusively (just search how many richfucks microdose on LSD every day)

don't go sellin on my turf esse

were hippies the most redpilled?

...

Actually no, the most redpilled were the ones that founded informatic companies. Almost all of them stem from somewhere in the 60s (both Steve Jobs and Bill Gates did LSD).
Being a hippie is disgusting, most drugs should be for recreation and occasional use only, not a way of life. How can you apply what you learn while you're high if you're always high?

>Be a woman
>have a career
>have a job in good career
>have good productivity
>get raises yearly based on productivity
>get married to man with identical productivity and identical time at job
>have kid take maternity leave
>go back to work
>Have 2 kids
>Take two years off work to raise kids
>go back to work
>retire at 62 same time as husband
>Be mad you make 10% less at retirement than husband
>husband smiles and agrees
>you suck his dick that night.
>his 62year old dick is weird. Hard but still wrinkly, like a pencil shoved into a baloon.
>then you realize you actually worked 10% less than him
>you werent underpaid
>You happily make him cum and it tastes like salty olives.
>Get idea for tomorrows salad.

Saudi Arabia funded 9/11 and the US covered up their involvement.

heraldtribune.com/news/20150326/fbi-denounces-own-report-linking-sarasota-family-to-911

theantimedia.org/28-pages-us-ignored-saudi-ties-911/

They were willing to kill thousands of their own citizens to start an imperialist tirade on behalf of neocons, israelis, saudis, western bankers, oil tycoons, and defense companies. They wont stop till Iran is done, and even then they might march into the Eurasian Balkans for its resources. They already have a foothold in Afghanistan to invade from, why do you think we're still there? We arent leaving for when shit hits the fan and we can logistically get into the backyard of one the the most resource rich places on earth.

Only problem is China, Pakistan, Russia, India and all the stans will be doing the same thing. It'll usher in the apocalypse probably with so many nuclear states competing.

Everything you see happening in the middle east has been preplanned including the refugee crisis to subvert europe from rising again.

The US is hellbent on hegemonic domination of the world. It will result in a world war.

Shut the fuck up. As if we didn't know it was Mossad. Also, what does that have to do with anything?

...

What do you think about climate change Mexibro

That's a tough one. I think it's due to the sun more than anything. And that ultimately traces to the revolution of our solar system around the galaxy (the much-famous Aquarius age). See that's a cylce most scientists won't mention, but we're bombarded by energy coming from the center of the galaxy. A simple change in cosmic position is all what's needed (that would also explain Earth's somewhat cyclical ice ages)

You're missing the huge part of this statement.

We could fit all 7 Billion people of the world with a population density a little higher than New Jersey IN AN AREA A LITTLE LARGER THAN TEXAS.

Now, if you want to talk about usable land (ie, land good enough for agriculture, water sources, etc.) and also producing enough food for everyone, we can talk.

But the same people who say we are over populated say we produce enough "wasted food" to feed the childruns of Africa eleventy billion times older if we just cut all our military spending.

hmmmm

Ultimate red pill. Mongoloids will rule the world. Whites are too cucked to do anything about it.

It was netanyahu and the Israelis you faggot fuck, go look up Chris Bollyn

The Word of God is the only true "red pill".

it wasnt mossad dumbfuck, it was saudi arabia through and through, you know, the largest supporter of islamic (sunni) terrorism in the world.

I explained what they're doing and why they would be so depraved to kill 3000 americans and ruin an entire region of the world killing millions in the process.

read the 911 28 pages you cuck, clearly mentions a saudi money trail, and shows the fbi/cia didnt investigate because saudi arabia is an "ally"

israel didnt have to do anything when they are allied with the largest state-sponsor of terrorism in the world

Christianity is a Jewish false flag to keep the goyim down.
There is nothing more bluepilled than Christianity.

Link? Youtube gives me multiple different vids and Im not sure which is right

What the fuck does domestic labor have to do with employment

Communism is a Jewish operation to enslave the goyim.

>domestic labor
Who built the house, anyway? Of what gender was the person who built it, may I ask? Fucking roasties, seriously

No, baby JIDF