What is the point to life other than a never ending replication of a series of codes labelled dna? >In the duel slot experiment, it's accepted that without observation, particles behave differently. >As well, what is time if there is nobody around to perceive it? Simple revolutions around the sun? Water weathering a rock? Perhaps time and the universe cease to exist without an outside observer. >This would also suggest that there is a god, since particles require an observer for them to behave in a predictable fashion, in otherwords physics would not exist.
Why is life not as abundant as we thought? >The universe is a huge place, and it is suggested that the universe is expanding outward. This would mean that the chances for life are higher at the outer rim of the universe. >Gamma bursts from dying stars would also inhibit life because getting bombarded with radiation isn't pleasent and tends to shatter "dna". Why do we have a "consciousness"? See point one, an outside observer is required for reality and time to "flow". What is reality? >Reality is space-time measured by an observer, if there is no observer, then there is no reality. >this would also imply that if the simple act of expanding our observation capability expands the universe.
Everything is God's will. Just enjoy life as much as you can and ask for forgiveness
Jason Evans
k, thnx for reading atleast.
Grayson Lopez
>its a dumb leaf without a degree misunderstands quantum physics episode
Logan Gomez
Oh I forgot, sweden is smart, that's why their country is doing so well.
>population the size of a Canadian city which is half muslims and niggers.
Elijah Cruz
Not an argument
Christopher Parker
>implying your argument was any better.
So what I'm hearing is that since particles behave differently without observation, you assume that this means that the observing comes from a God?
Time is a meaningless concept, as is the universe. We gave it meaning to make life easier. Time doesn't 'exist', we created it to label our days. You cannot manipulate time.
Or perhaps, particles are always acting unpredictably, and we just make up patterns as we see fit? Much like how people glance at the sky and see shapes in clouds?
Perhaps there are no "Laws or Constants", but rather "Things that say close enough to this point, with little deviation".
>implying God gives a shit. It's like booting up a Sims game. For the first few generations you really want them to succeed. But as the game goes on, you turn free will on, more and more. Then you sort of settle in and watch the mayhem, enjoying what happens.
The better way to imagine God is a creator who doesn't quite have the will to destroy the thing he has made, but has no desire to actively maintain it, either.
James Nguyen
Neither is your point. You are supposed to explain why you disagree.
Also just so you realize, europe is a fucking shithole that doesn't even matter. Get your shit together. A population of 7 million isn't going to have very many outliers.
>you are all gay tards
I can't even comprehend how small and tiny and shitty each one of your countries is. Because as I said, most of them are city states.
Kayden Clark
Wow, thank you. I enjoyed that.
Hudson Miller
oh look another retard misinterpereting the double slit experiment
