I just realized today that (((science))) cannot be trusted. They mix in a few facts here and there to confuse us, but in reality it's all a cabal of leftists that want to change how we view the world. Just look at the climate change cooperation that they have been doing to trick us into stopping industrialization.
What do we do to replace (((science))) with something that is real and actually useful?
Research, experiment and write it all up yourself.
Charles Howard
Good post. Even the claim that the Earth is round is questionable.
Jayden Baker
That won't work. The whole scientific method is compromised. There needs to be something new.
Christopher Cooper
>The whole scientific method is compromised. There needs to be something new. We don't need "something new". We already have all the answers we need.
Angel Cooper
That's true for the mainstream science but there are many intelligent unbiased folks and there have been many geniuse in the 19th century that aren't censored but don't have the full answers anyways - just many hints and a lead into the right direction
Charles Kelly
There's a reason (((science))) doesn't look into specific "drugs" and will never tell you exactly everything about them and what they found.
(((they))) don't want you to know about the fucking crazy shit of the universe
Elijah Wright
Just take a look at psychology. A couple of faggot liberals become psychologists and suddenly being a faggot isn't a mental illness anymore according to the "experts".
Oliver Rogers
ITT: science is wrong but we can't prove it
Ryder Reed
To add to this, there's also a reason that they don't look into specific things in general.
Imagine creating a completely new virus and it accidently gets out of the lab. It will fuck shit up.
Joseph Baker
What's wrong with it?
Blake Jenkins
There is science and (((science))). (((science))) is fucking disgrace to humanity but science is white man's way.
Dylan Ward
this.fucking pathetic
Landon Morgan
Scientific method is a-ok. Just shills are out of control.
It's too easy for jews to manipulate for their own purposes. All this 'peer review' shit is too easy for (((them))) to take advantage of and create a consensus.
we proved it already and many people with knowledge, that were about to publish it or invent important things suddenly died or were imprisoned
Jace Davis
there are groups of people communicating and discussing technology and science over the internet and/or meet in different places and you can join them with some research.
it takes some research to find interesting scientists aswell, but most of the briliant people used to work with each other without giving a fuck about the public
tesla, schauberger are a good start to find further people they were working with or groups working partially on the basis of their work