Okay Sup Forums. Do you think Fascism will ever make a comeback...

Okay Sup Forums. Do you think Fascism will ever make a comeback? And by comeback I mean it becoming a mainstream political opinion and possibly creating Fascist governments.

Other urls found in this thread:

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fascist_symbolism
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operación_Ogro
youtu.be/-o0Ucaqzw2I
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Pease define "fascism" in terms a computer could understand (hint: avoid terms like "good" and "bad")

Fucking NBU
Ordered a badge from them and they still haven't sent it

My computer can understand those terms. Update to TAY.AI 2.0 :)

what kind of autistic axe is that?

The NBU are a fucking joke

Fascism in its real, 30s meaning, probably not.

But there is big possibility some national orientated, anti-globalist ideology can.

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fascist_symbolism

Enjoy

It's a faggot. Just like the people that use it.

Fasces. Read Roman history idiot

3edgy5me

Shut up Prison Colony

I don't doubt that we'll see a major western country or indeed multiple major western countries under fascism by 2050. Everything seems pointed towards a nationalist revival and with the death of taboos about racism and nationalism it wouldn't a surprise me at all to see fascism examined once more as a legitimate political ideology.

We live in interesting times lads.

Phone up GCHQ and ask them what the delay is.
Actually just speak those words into your mobile phone. They are recording everything heard on it.

>Spot the pleb
It's a faces. If you use the word fascism, you should know what that is.

name One (1) fascist nation that did not end up with a brutally killed leader or a shithole

It already has, it's just leftwing fascism, not right wing.

I learned the hard way.
Never trust a organisation that can't get you a badge on time

Like Trump, the younger generations love memeing fascism and Hitler. While this doesn't mean that people will love them, it does mean the emotional barrier could be lifted soon. This means that people will be able to look more objectively at the two without having to deal with people screaming DATS RACISS. This will lead to a slippery slope from "I wonder what fascism is really like" to "You know, fascism isn't as bad as I was taught" to full blown 1488.

tl;dr Yes

Spain

Give it another generation. The baby boomers (and maybe gen x) have to all die first.

The baby boomers have a bizarre variation of Stockholm syndrome from their daddies beating the shit out of them all the time. Daddy dearest was a war vet and he fought duh naht-zees, and the booze-fueled beatings were totally necessary after fighting all dem naht-zees!

totalitarian, imperialist, nationalist, racially supremacist, social darwinist, a blend of traditionalist values and radical revolutionary ideas, economically pragmatic but anti-free market and anti-socialist.

Fits both criteria sorry
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operación_Ogro

False, utterly false. Mosley was not authoritarian nor anti-democratic.

Pinochet opened up the markets, ensured private property and ended up democratically getting out of power.

Italian Fascism might be the way you describe, but fascism is simply an umbrella term for all violent anti-communist populist movements.

What is happening now with Trump is, from a historical perspective, fascistic.

Chile
Portugal
USA (we put nips in camps and had insanely fascistic anti-communist tendencies post WW2)
Spain

Aun seria mejor que comunismo

Chile, Portugal, Spain, South Korea, Philippines

>Imperialistic, nationalist, traditionalist values and radical revolutionary ideas, economically pragmatic
correct
>totalitarian
Isn't that imperialistic?
>racially supremacist
Nazi Germany is the only example
>social Darwinist
That's like, EVERY society that isn't European right now
>anti-free market
so it's not pragmatic?
>anti-socialist
That's pragmatic

It already has, friend. I will march with my people. God help any who stand before us.

>>anti-free market
That's such bullshit it's insane. Anti free market? The anti free market is why the spanish and chilenos went to war against the communists who had ruined their country through central planning bullshit.

Fascists freed up their markets except for the case of Germany, but all were united against the concept of total neoliberal capitalism we live under now, that is, let the banks completely dominate your country and fuck your workers over.

I doubt you will see a government like that.
Imperialism and anti-free market don't seem to mix.

>Aun seria mejor que comunismo
Seguramente
However, it's still a shithole AND the fascist era ended with the brutal assassination of the appointed leader

>However, it's still a shithole AND the fascist era ended with the brutal assassination of the appointed leader
What if Franco had freed up the markets more, and was more of a Pinochet who willingly gave up power?

But then notice, both countries started becoming socialist after Pinochet and Franco left office or died. What's up with Spanish people to make them so naturally prone to communism without a Strong Man to violently force the issue?

As much as I would like it, definetely not from Europe.

is deciding maybe not all americans should have their second amendment rights the first step towards fascism

>racially supremacist

I can't think of any fascist state which did not espouse their race's superiority

>totalitarian

means the state wants total control over citizens thoughts, it's a very important distinction between average dictatorships and totalitarian states: regular dictatorships mainly want to control people's actions, totalitarian states (like Stalin's USSR/Nazi Germany) want to completely run every aspect of the citizens' lives and drench their lives with state ideology while censoring anything contrary to it in order to gain control over their minds. the only real totalitarian state today is north korea imo.

>economically pragmatic

pragmatic in the sense that economics don't matter that much as long as it benefits the state. fascism can be corporatist or it can be a sort of stalin-esque system where everything is directly state run.

>Imperialist

Am fash and strongly anti-imperialist

The difference between Fascism and National Socialism

youtu.be/-o0Ucaqzw2I

it's an expansionist ideology, social darwinism extends to countries: powerful countries must subjugate the weaker ones, that's just nature.

maybe you're just a white nationalist?

Fuck Fascism

Only National Socialism

>I can't think of any fascist state which did not espouse their race's superiority
Italy
Chile
Spain
England

>means the state wants total control over citizens thoughts, it's a very important distinction between average dictatorships and totalitarian states: regular dictatorships mainly want to control people's actions, totalitarian states (like Stalin's USSR/Nazi Germany) want to completely run every aspect of the citizens' lives and drench their lives with state ideology while censoring anything contrary to it in order to gain control over their minds. the only real totalitarian state today is north korea imo.
See above, Chile was a dictatorship but not totalitarian. England was to continue to be democratic.

>pragmatic in the sense that economics don't matter that much as long as it benefits the state. fascism can be corporatist or it can be a sort of stalin-esque system where everything is directly state run.
Again, you are describing Italian Fascism or National Socialism.

>it's an expansionist ideology,
False. Chile and Spain.

Israel is a good counterexample, as they are a racialist ethnostate with a militarized society and have expanded militarily half a dozen times in their history.

Nothing of the early 20th century is making a comeback. Just look at orthodox commies, it's cringeworthy.

But of course some modernized version is on the way.

To be honest, I would contend that Italy and Nazi Germany were the only real fascist states. Chile and Spain were not fascist countries in my opinion, even though they had certain elements of it.

I take it you're pro-China and anti-Trump, then? He literally stated in his inaugural speech that he will use protectionism.

Homophobic

>I take it you're pro-China and anti-Trump, then? He literally stated in his inaugural speech that he will use protectionism.
You can still be free market within your society and be against predatory bullshit from outside of it. I am fully behind protectionism.

I'd say propaganda but we really don't have a reason for being leftists when A FUCKING LEFTIST ruined this country beyond belief.
Honestly, the bluepilled leftist spaniard is 50x worse than the bluepilled leftist american.

If the left instigates a civil war in America then there WILL be a fascist government.