CODE RED: TRUMP HAS BEEN STUMPED

CODE RED CODE RED.

FACIST DEMOCRAT JUDGE HALTS TRUMPS EXECUTIVE ORDER:

politicaloutsource.com/2017/02/federal-judge-halts-trumps-travel-ban.html?m=1

THIS IS NOT A DRILL! The fascists are winning! Currently 60,000 visas have been granted since yesterday!

Other urls found in this thread:

law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1152
youtube.com/watch?v=rd0AdArPjqU
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

>democratic system prevents head of state doing whatever he wants
>HELP ME!!! FASCISM!!!!

drumpftard logic

Shill

>prevents head of state doing whatever he wants
Except it's a power specifically granted to him. It's not even inferred, it's explicitly stated and has never been an issue until feelings were hurt 3 months ago.

Why hasn't he taken it to the 9th?

both side are fascists

libertarianism is the only non fascist political ideology

>a small part of the ban is temporarily halted until the judge is charged for blatantly disregarding the word of the law to push his agenda

All it does is allow travel with a valid visa. It doesn't

>require they issue new visas
>prevent them from canceling your visa
>allow travel without a visa

Most muslims with valid visas are already in the US and weren't affected by a travel ban anyways. This maybe affects a few hundred people, who probably don't want to return to America since they'll just get deported in a few weeks anyways.

Explain how republicans are fascists edgelord

that judge will be hanged for treason

t. obese Tumblrina

Cant wait for the next Isis bombings

...

>Except it's a power specifically granted to him

Actually it's not. The immigration and nationality act specifically prohibits discrimination in issuance of immigrant visas based on amongst others nationality.

TRUMP JUST GOT STUMPED

law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1152

>Except as specifically provided in paragraph (2) and in sections 1101(a)(27), 1151(b)(2)(A)(i), and 1153 of this title, no person shall receive any preference or priority or be discriminated against in the issuance of an immigrant visa because of the person’s race, sex, nationality, place of birth, or place of residence.

there is no law the US has to give ANYONE a visa.

your point just failed.

just you wait

youtube.com/watch?v=rd0AdArPjqU

>The immigration and nationality act specifically prohibits discrimination in issuance of immigrant visas based on amongst others nationality.
Why didn't you feel this way in 2011? Also, you're wrong.

...

Does it?
>The new law maintained the per-country limits

Most people who were aware of it did take issue with it. MSM sweeped it under the rug for the most part though.

The issue is that the list of countries that Trump banned (obtained from the Obama administration) weren't countries that were thought to be liable to send terrorists to the US. Any terrorist that wants to come to soil here from ISIS or Al Qaeda is more likely to go through Saudi Arabia first.
The list of countries Trump banned were just likely to be unstable or destabilizing in the coming years, not countries likely to send terrorists themselves.

The other issue is that what Obama did in 2011 with Iran was not a full ban but a slow down of a single type of visa application from Iran only. He didn't ban all immigration from Iran (Iran themselves did that mostly) and he didn't actually stop people who already had Visas from coming in, nor people who were applying for Visas in general.

Actually he is a Republican. James L. Robart was nominated by President George W. Bush to be a federal judge in the Western District of Washington late in 2003 and confirmed by the U.S. Senate in June 2004.

>constitution gets suspended during war time
give it time bro

So if a persons place of residence is an ISIS training camp that's not grounds for denying them entry?

>in August 2016, Robart presided over a 2012 consent decree requiring the Seattle Police Department to address federal allegations of police bias. During the hearing, he said "black lives matter."[3]

>In January 2017, Judge Robart blocked an Amherst student's request to subpoena text messages from a person who accused him of rape because it would "would impose emotional and psychological trauma" on the victim. The Amherst student's request was part of effort to disprove the allegations made by his accuser. Those allegations lead to him being expelled from Amherst University in 2012.Court decision
HOLY FUCKING SHIT,what a fucking scum bag

FUCK OFF SHAREBLUE