/Fsg/ Fascism General

/Fsg/ - Fascist General

Thread for discussion of Italian Fascism, and other forms of fascism, Mosley, Codreanu, Falange, etc. Also for sharing fascist literature and information.

A Fascist general for Fascists and those interested


conservapedia.com/Fascist_Manifesto,_1919

worldfuturefund.org/wffmaster/Reading/Germany/mussolini.htm

reakt.org/fiume/charter_of_carnaro.html


uploadmb.com/dw.php?id=1389982155

Be respectful and please try to keep conversations relatively "intellectual"


Good fascists/similar or influential people to get an introduction

Oswald Mosely
Jose Antonio Primo de Rivera
Benito Mussolini
Adolf Hitler
Stepan Bandera
Corneliu Zelea Codreanu
Salazar
Ramiro Ledesma Ramos
Ettore Ovazza
Gaetano Mosca
Friedrich Nietzsche
Charles Maurras
Enrico Corradini
Filippo Tommaso Marinetti
Johann Plenge
Alceste De Ambris
Gabriele d'Annunzio
George Lincoln Rockwell
Juan PerĂ³n
Giovanni Gentile
Julius Evola
Konstantin Rodzaevsky
Francisco Rolao Preto
Dimitrije Ljotic

Types of Fascism

Italian
Falangism
National-Syndicalism
British Union
National-Socialism
Strasserism
Meme futurism
Clerical Fascism
Brazilian Integralism
Peronism

"[Fascism] was an explosion against intolerable conditions, against remediable wrongs which the old world failed to remedy. It was a movement to secure national renaissance by people who felt themselves threatened with decline into decadence and death and were determined to live, and live greatly."~Oswald Mosely

Other urls found in this thread:

conservapedia.com/Fascist_Manifesto,_1919
econlib.org/library/Columns/y2015/Samuelsfascism.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

>philosophic conception
Fascism is thought and action. It is action with an inherent doctrine which, arising out of a given system of historic forces, is inserted in it and works on it from within. It has therefore a form co-related to the contingencies of time and place; but it has at the same time an ideal content which elevates it into a formula of truth in the higher region of the history of thought.

>spiritual conception
To Fascism the world is not this material world which appears on the surface, in which man is an individual separated from all other men, standing by himself and subject to a natural law which instinctively impels him to lead a life of momentary and egoistic pleasure. In Fascism man is an individual who is the nation and the country. He is this by a moral law which embraces and binds together individuals and generations in an established tradition and mission, a moral law which suppresses the instinct to lead a life confined to a brief cycle of pleasure in order, instead, to replace it within the orbit of duty in a superior conception of life, free from the limits of time and space a life in which the individual by self-abnegation and by the sacrifice of his particular interests, even by death, realises the entirely spiritual existence in which his value as a man consists.

>ethical conception
This positive conception of life is evidently an ethical conception. And it comprises the whole reality as well as the human activity which domineers it. No action is to be removed from the moral sense; nothing is to be in the world that is divested of the importance which belongs to it in respect of moral aims. Life, therefore, as the Fascist conceives it, is serious, austere, religious; entirely balanced in a world sustained by the moral and responsible forces of the spirit. The Fascist disdains the "easy" life.

The think I like the most about fascism is how everyone has to do what the bureaucrats say.

Dear bullies,

See that girl you just called fat? She is starving herself. You know that girl you just called ugly? She spends hours putting on make-up hoping people will like her. That boy you just tripped? He is abused enough at home. See that old man you made fun of cause of the ugly scars? He fought for our country. See that young boy you must made fun of for always being sick? He has to walk home in the snow cause his family is too poor. That guy you just made fun of for crying? His mother is dying.

Re-Post this if you are against bullying. I bet many of you won't, Your life is probably not as harsh as theirs plus you're probably a douche bag.

>religious conception
Fascism is a religious conception in which man is considered to be in the powerful grip of a superior law, with an objective will which transcends the particular individual and elevates him into a fully conscious member of a spiritual society. Anyone who has stopped short at the mere consideration of opportunism in the religious policy of the Fascist Regime, has failed to understand that Fascism, besides being a system of government, is also a system of thought.

Hey wait a second this just sounds like communism for the right!

Made me think

...

...

Daily reminder

>I know nothing about both ideologies besides authoritarianism

Wrong thread, but sure, no bully.
Tnx for the bump.

Wow, the bitcoin maximalist to the left is really annoying. Does he really thinks that btc will be the main thing a couple of years from now?

w-what

the first few paragraphs literally describe socialist policies you dumbass

I just think the name recognition of Bitcoin and its huge user base /adoption rate isn't going anywhere in two years unless a major technical failure sweeps in.

...

Wrong thread.

What are you talking about

Corporatism has its similarities, but it is not the same.

>Fascism solves the problem of unemployment and poverty by establishing the Corporate State, which will be divided into National corporations governed by representatives of employers, workers and consumers, operating under Fascist government. The State will not attempt to conduct industry as it would under Socialism, instead, the State will lay down the limits within which industry' may operate, and those limits will be the national welfare. Private ownership will be permitted and encouraged, provided such activity enriches the nation as well as the individual. All interests that operate against the nation will be rigorously suppressed. The function of the Corporations will be to raise wages and salaries over the whole field of industry as science, rationalization and industrial technique increase the power to produce. Consumption will be adjusted to production and a Home Market will be provided by the higher purchasing power of our own people. Fascism involves a corporatist political system in which the economy was collectively managed by employers, workers and state officials by formal mechanisms at the national level. This non-elected form of state officializing of every interest into the state was professed to reduce the marginalization of singular interests (as would allegedly happen by the unilateral end condition inherent in the democratic voting process). Corporatism would instead better recognize or "incorporate" every divergent interest into the state organically, according to its supporters, thus being the inspiration for their use of the term totalitarian, perceivable to them as not meaning a coercive system but described distinctly as without coercion.

i'm a bot

In an 100% white state, socialism works amazingly well. See nordic nations before the immigrant crisis for example.

...

Stop making these so late, REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

...

Does Corportatism allow for a kind of free market to exist where citizens are allowed to start their own business and competition is a thing within the marketplace? I believe government influence is required to ensure a fair and equitable situation for the consumers but I'm very skeptical of a complete government control or enforced monopolies.

that's not the question. that guy was answering someone who called fascism 'communism for the right', which essentially is what it was designed as. (more or less)
apart from that: socialism in nordic nations works great my ass. it stiffles their growth, and these nations live off of the success of liberal (as in adam smith) economic policies they had up to the 50s/60s. just because they get ahead, doesn't mean the can't do better.

>pol btfo
What do you do when the memes turn against you?

Yes of course, private businesses and ownerships are completely possible. The state intervenes mainly to regulate larger businesses from gaining too much power or dominance, and to make sure products are not going to be of harm to the state.

This might get a better reaction out of /r/the_donald?

Sup Forums is a fascist board we admit that

the thread 'if you don't do what I say I take away your company' is totally free market. OH THE FREEDOM

Please dont associate fascism with the alt right, its a group of confused conservatives and people who can't decide if they are gay or nazis. I do not want to be associated with those fags.

>implying pol is a single entity
Okay 9gag

It's more supervision and coordination than control or enforcement. Corporatism does allow for free market to exist, but companies would not be allowed to sell products that would have a damaging impact in the well-being of society.

...

>implying no gay nazis.
Ok phteven, here's your starbucks

>thread openly declares they are fascist
>meme implies that were somehow denying that they are fascists
Fucking leaves I swear.

So business is still allowed to exist in a regulated market much like it does currently in America?

I didnt say it was complete free market, just that private ownerships are allowed and encouraged. Products advocating or promoting degenerate type things, or anything else deemed harmful to the physical and mental health of the people, would not be allowed.

But we *are* facists... Nobody is arguing against that, you shit-gobbling autist

So how do yo explain me?
How can my presence and participation in this thread be possible if white supremacy is the central point of interest here?

>what is the night of long knives

>Does Corportatism allow for a kind of free market
the answer is no.

> private ownerships
also no, when you have to do with your property as someone else says, it's only yours in name.

Also another question

Is fascism always expansionist or aggressive in foreign policy? I read about how Hitler used the idea of Lebensraum as a defining point and reason behind his aggressions, but could a more isolationist and autarkic centered ideal be a possible goal of a fascist government instead, either wanting to get along with neighbors or simply just stay out of all external affairs?

the result of a power conflict between two competing para-military organisations.

Fucking fascists. I know nothing about the word or the people but fuck you, you're evil nazis

More or so yes, corporatism just brings about heavy, but necessary regulation.

Italians are super mega fascist nazis

Also ridding the party of degenerates, and people hitler deemed to be only "reactionary" instead Of "revolutionary"

You are taking things to the extreme, the kind of free market that your post implies does not exist anywhere, only an An-Cap "society" would permit a market completely free of restrictions or regulations.

Sure if the Nation has enough ressources to be autarkic.

But eventually ressources run dry and there is no other way but to expand.

Am I Italian?

Its a simple rule, could you really not create anything that could actually be productive for the people?

>quads
>double dub

Clearly this is a sign.

What kind of regulations are we talking about here though? Just simple protectionist policies and anti-monopoly/anti-trust regulations or is it something harsher?

I mean there's trade.

>flag
Are you so autistic you cant even recognize your country?

I got 88
Heil himmler, look guys im alt right

>Also ridding the party of degenerates
yeah, side effect from nazis beein degenerates. on the other hand goebbels was still around somehow ... that fucking gimp

Hitler was highly Autarkic but other fascists and natsocs weren't, like Strasser.

You are the one that called me Italian, I am Mexican, either you are drunk or a dumb troll, we will ignore you now.

The suppression of the TRUE REVOLUTIONARY NATIONAL SOCIALISTS

a free market is being defined by being free. there are very few things fascism is clear about, but about the market being not free it's very clear - mostly because it was born out of disappointment with capitalism after the great depression.

And what exactly are you gonna trade if your own resources run out?

You can trade to a certain point yes but eventually turning to conquest is inevitable.

Same issue with overpopulation. You either force birth control or you expand.

It varies in fascism, from interventionism to isolationism, personally and usually the most agreed on policy is isolationism.

>implying the altright doesn't trigger the majority of Sup Forums already

A free market that allows monopolies and trusts to exist is not a free market but a controlled economy under oligarchs and plutocrats.

What exactly did goebbels do? Besides his personality and confidence issues, I dont recall him doing anything very degenerate.

people can perfectly decide for themselves what's good for them. they do not need no office clerk to decide for them.
your 'proposal' just leads to poverty

What are the main ideological differences between Italian Fascism and National Socialism?

Name favorite politician or political philosopher

Mine is William Pierce

Hitlerite National Socialism loads on the racial science and isn't as big on corporatism.

Mainly racial ones.

>What exactly did goebbels do?
he was just a cripple in a body-cult-regime ...

>poverty
Wrong, and absolute free will is what has gotten us in this terrible state of society today, it appeals to some attributes of our nature, greed, the want for more. And this applies to certain movements nowadays, one degeneracy becomes accepted, and then the pushing for the next starts. We are on the brink of a near social collapse, and the way things are going, it is going to happen.

>conservapedia.com/Fascist_Manifesto,_1919

sounds like a bunch of sjws ran the place

why do Italians come up with the best and worst shit in the same breathe?

Italian fascism has no socialistic aspects and inherently nothing racial or anti semetic policies, national socialism has the socialistic aspects such as healthcare for the elderly and disabled, and then racial and anti semetic policies.

erm, your point being? I don't get what exactly you think I have said ...

oh, and he was a fatty. that's degenerate by default.

econlib.org/library/Columns/y2015/Samuelsfascism.html

how does it feel living your dream?

What? I think you have him and Rohm confused

Sup Forums =/= alt-right =/= fascism

fuck, your right ... in my defense: it's already morning here and I haven't slept yet ...

The Italian fascist had a wonderful conception of hierarchy, but they were too weak in these areas: Blood (Nazi Germany), Honor (Japan), and Spirit (Falangists and the Iron Guard).
The material element, none of them were perfect at, but the blooded element was closest.
The material element needs to be subjugated to all of them, or it will subjugate you.
A pure conception of Fascism is Traditionalism, valuing all of those disparate elements.

A synthesis of Blood, Honor, Hierarchy, and Spirit, all valued above the material reality.

Okay and? Most of this article is typical BS, "fascism was actually inspired by marxism" You going to tell me the good ole hitler was actually Jewish one next? Fascism on the political compass is best described as center right, it would be kind of contradictory if fascism was inspired by marxism and then, went and kicked out and killed and banned the Marxists? And put a complete hatred Of marxism into the state?

...

...

>"fascism was actually inspired by marxism"
it was. a lot. if you doubt that, maybe realise that the whole idea of an 'scientific approach' to politics and the economy is actually a socialist idea. to be clear, by this I mean the idea of being able to 'design human action'.

> political compass
that shit isn't worth shit. both fascists and socialists want to control and plan the economy. they shouldn't be apart.

>best described as center right
that's funny, because ... that's what the article is saying. it's alot about how modern economic policies have their roots in fascism - and gues what? they're considered centre right.

>it would be kind of contradictory if fascism was inspired by marxism

you think a man that was the leader of the italian socialist party is not gonna be inspired by socialist ideas?

accept it: you're ideology is an ancient meme

teach me about mosley senpai

>tfw I have webms of Mosley speeches
>Sup Forums doesn't allow ebms with sound

fug

That's too bad, Mosley is probably the Fascist leader I've seen the least of in terms of speeches.

The article described fascism as being more of a leftist marxist ideology. And
>people can't change meme
After world war one Mussolini said himself he realized socialism was a failure

Great speaker. If he wasn't so LARPy he probably would have been more successful.

Also Mussolini was an ex-commie

Did Mussolini wanted to create a New Rome?

...

...

...

Yes, Mussolini aspired to restore the glory of the Roman empire to Italy.

hi guys I want to get de-spooked please help

What happened to you?

>After world war one Mussolini said himself he realized socialism was a failure
you think this negates the possibility that socialism inspired Mussolini? Don't you think it might be likely for him to say something like 'socialism is wrong, but that one thing there it got right'? ... after all he spent several years finding right things in socialism before ...

>The article described fascism as being more of a leftist marxist ideology.

don't you think it's possible for it to be about both? like ... the author writing about it for a reason? ... especially since he introduces it with the following sentence:

"the economics of Italian Fascism is often ignored or trivialized because so much of it is found in today's world economies. "