Well then here are my sources:
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
bbc.co.uk
Off you go.
Well then here are my sources:
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
bbc.co.uk
Off you go.
>everyone talks about Brave New World and 1984
>never a single mention of Harrison Bergeron
If anything we're far more in touch with Harrison's world than anything.
>ask for an academic source
>get wikipedia and the same study I posted
Ok, you're just trolling now.
You can't show me a study, can you?
Does even one person in this thread understand that culture/language has nothing to do with genetics?
Celts were people who spoke a Celtic language and had a Celtic culture, not a genetic phylum. There were Celts all over Europe and into Asia.
Did you bother to read the thread?
Normies don't read
That's what I tried to argue but apparently I am wrong despite posting academic research pointing to the contrary.
>You can't show me a study, can you?
And you can neither read nor search for shit, can you? You need to be handheld for fucking everything. Grow up or stay retarded, I said pretty much everything there was to be said about it in this post: The rest is arguing about numbers, founders effect and the usual shit.
>culture/language has nothing to do with genetics
The two are quite often related, actually.
>still deflecting
>still won't post a study
I mean I know why you won't post it.
Because it doesn't fucking exsist, does it?
>posting a source is hand holding
God forbid you ever actually enter an academic institution or real debate, you would get laughed out of fucking town.