>Fair assessment. The 50s could only exist because we all shared the same beliefs.
To an extent, sure. But the fact that we were, in many senses, still a patriarchal society helped quite a bit.
>It's hard to believe you don't hate them...
I really don't, though. I talk to plenty, I know girls that I consider to be friends, I've never really had a problem with them as individuals, I'm just capable of looking at general trends (voting patterns, historical track record of matriarchal societies, etc.)
In a way, it's sort of like minorities. I was fortunate enough to have been born in a relatively wealthy family. In my area of town, and the schools I've attended, I really only ever ran into "the best of the best" when it came to nonwhites. I've gotten on well with most of the ones I've met. But crime stats, IQ data, and the Putnam studies exist regardless of my own skewed anecdotes, so I'd prefer as few of them in my country as possible.
>but I genuinely think just talking to more of them, regardless if theyve had the completely natural act of sex before, would help to alleviate some of your concerns.
I mentioned before that I talk to plenty. I don't automatically "hate" any woman who's had sex, I just write them off as a potential girlfriend.
With regard to the naturalness of sex, so what? There's literal data detailing the objective downsides to relationships with women who aren't virgins.
>They're not as bad as you make them out to be
I wouldn't go that far. Sure, not every one of them is an obese, neon-haired bulldyke, but compare women nowadays to women a little over half a century ago. They've gone downhill as a group. Really, society as a whole has gotten worse in most regards since women's liberation.
Do I hate them? No, but their role really isn't to hold the reins of culture. They've made a mess of it every single time they've been allowed to do so. I'd rather appreciate women for being proper women, than cheap imitations of men.