Requires a lot of thinking

Requires a lot of thinking....

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgism
youtube.com/watch?v=H1y_0NfhF9c
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Socialist scum Indians

>No one owns the land
False

>No one owns the sand

I agree with this one only. Abbo-only beaches can suck a fat cunt I'll walk wherever I please thankyou. And if you DARE let them eat a turtle and not me I'll round up me mates and we'll hunt the whole fukken species extinct.

as for the rest, check the title agreement. but private beaches, they incite murder in my heart.

>enjoy your diarreha
>land isn't going to cultivate by itself
>fish isn't going to fish itself
>silica isn't going to harvest by itself

poor boy, you don't even know how to tie your shoes

Indians fought a lot of wars with each other over land for being the hippies that modern media attempts to portray them as.

Sup Forums will deny that the Indians are actually right and our belief that the World exists for humans to exploit is going to poison most water and destroy 98% of the planets life forms within the next two centuries

And that's why they got rekt

>loose the war
"wars are irrelevant mah nigguh"

This is the losers' ideology. Because once their ass is conquered then the winners own the land and the losers cry for peace saying how you're such a bad person

I've never heard of private beaches especially not for fucking boongs, you a territorian?

Retards who didn't give us schools, universities, supermarkets, roads, observatories, books, etc...

And BTW, I've actually worked on a Native American Reservation before.

In the next two centuries we will have completely mastered manipulating DNA. We can recreate what we kill en mass.

why cancel natural selection?

I love how everyone wants to pretend indians did not bash rival tribes brains in with rocks and rape their women because one of the other tribes dared step foot on their buffalo hunting grounds

So if no one owns the land, why do the Redmen talk as if they own the land?
Maybe Mother Earth only rewards those who git gud

Natives slaughtered buffalo almost to extinction, leaving carcasses by the hundreds that they didn't even harvest for food or other materials.

>'muh property'
>I take it
>REEEEE MUH PROPERTY
Nice spook nerd

No one owns the oceans, it's international water.
It does make you think...

CHINESE COMMUNIST PARTY OWN SOUTH CHINA SEA NO NEGOTRIATE. ONE CHINA POLICY. YANKEE GO HOME

Fuck off nigger! Who is going 2 blow up the asteroid? Watch Armageddon!

lol this.
horses too. they are such a noble people.

>no one owns the land
>you stole our land

Really gyrates my garbanzos

>trade your land for shiny beads
>white man takes the land and develops it for his own purposes, building a modern nation
>realize you made a shitty deal and now want the land back
>um, uh yeah, we Indians believe everything comes from Mother Nature therefore it's all free, yeah that's what we always believed!
And people wonder where the fuck the term "Indian giver" comes from? Someone let Chief Squatting Horse know that when you give something to someone you can't just take it back.

Bears and wolfs will fuck you p if you step into their territory.
Indians will fucking circumcise your scalp if you enter their territory.
But noooo, a fucking white face, much greed, give me back my land I'll sue you.
Me Big Puff build casino there, its Big Puffs constitutional right.
Gimme back whaaaaaannndddd *in angry smoke speech.

Now head out to my Casino,
Give all that money to me!

The natives didn't believe this, this is some Disney propoganda bullshit, tribes waged war with each other over territory resources and slaves long before the white man came.

Okay if this is true then you'll stop protesting the keystone pipe line since you don't own it.

>REEEEEE MUH PROPERTY
>Get stoned to death and lit on fire by fellow tribesmen

People take their spooks pretty seriously my dude

I'll start paying attention to that when native band leaders don't hoard their government gibsmedats instead of distributing it to their members.

Bunch of hypocritical faggots.

you're right but my guns say you definitely don't own it

That would violate the NAP

>he doesn't violate NAP

Theft is a violation of the NAP which is also a spook.

The consequences of causing butthurt to a person's spooks can quite easily lead to consequences that are most definitely not spooks.

I wish we would live in a sorld where companies replaced the gubmit, I hate it when people post this kind of shit, as long as you are allowed to do it and can bring the resources it's okay with.

How are we supposed to be free without stirring up a few spooks? How to avoid those consequences?

What an adorable picture

you kinda have to respect other peoples' spooks

i'm projecting here but we're too aggressive and curious not to do so more often than the normies - to the point of not caring where we start to run into trouble

and I suppose people will get pissy when it comes time to actually GO OUT and harvest these materials for themselves?

Is each person gonna do the hunting/fishing/water collecting/planting/farming/services by themselves?

Society is build the way it is for a reason. It won't work if everything is free unless we have a Star Trek replicator

Then how can they tell me I can't run a pipeline?

kek

Only time you see a native's picture is when a liberal faggot is exploiting them for their agendas. They don't bother to know who they truly were or even the tribe they're talking about.

who /georgian libertarian/ here?
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgism

what do you think about a system where businesses pay a tax for the right to commoditize and distribute national resources?

Said the fucking losers, on behalf of their Jew masters, who would absolutely love for us to give up all ownership of things. More for them that way.

I think it's ok for natural resources to be taxed. It's the most ethic way of taxing. You should be entilted to the fruits of your labor, but natural resources are not there because of you. You should also have the legal obligation to conserve those resources to the point of sustainability, as a legacy to future generations.

Plain old capitalism acts as a parasitic destroyer on our resources, encouraring a mindset of "get as much as you can, fuck future generations". Leftist socialist policies are also harmful in a diferent way though, even if they conserve land, they destroy civilizations and harm mankind's morale. They have also appropiated enviromentalism and mixed it with with their own insanity.

So I think georgian libertarianism is a fair position.

are you saying "no one" is replacable with "the state"?

Yeah and the Jack Daniel's isn't going to drink itself.

Is anyone else going to point out that the impossibility of owning land justifies the theft of native American land by colonial Europeans? You can't say that nobody owns land whilst saying that Europeans stole America. Theft doesn't exist unless property does.

Native faggots are the most territorial pieces of shit

I'm pretty sure Indians fought and warred over territory and resources all the time

OP when will you be rolling out the Soros Open Society (SOS) yard signs/door badges?

This will inform your neighbors that your home is an open one.

I think a padlock with a redline through it will help non-English readers know you do not lock your doors.

Enjoy your cultural diversity OP, you deserve it.

>no one owns the land
>said by native that would scalp anyone setting foot in his tribe's lands

That's logically invalid. If you agree with the OPs assertions, then it implies that all have equal right of access. Therefore, sharing the land would be okay, but depriving somebody else of the land would be unethical.

To expand upon the foundational principles, an ethical pragmatic standard would be "If nobody else is using it, its yours, unless you use more than you actually need." Eg, if theres a spare 100 acres, fine, build a village on it for you and your extended family. However, if one man wants to "own" 100000 acres because of paper money whilst 100000 others must live in concrete boxes and be wage slaves, that is not acceptable.

This is very basic ethical calculus, and those incapable of it tend to be ignorant, slow or brainwashed via fear. We all live in a state of occupation by the dominant class.

>This is my tribe and this is our land
>Gets land stolen by Europeans
>No one can own the land

Top kek

put a picture of buddah there instead. natives killed eachother all the time over rightful lands.

And that's why they lost their land, bunch of retards.

It can't imply equal right to access because ownership doesn't exist. If OP said "Everyone owns the land", then what you have said would be correct, but OP said "No one owns the land" and therefore taking the land is not theft because ownership hasn't changed since it doesn't exist.

Impossible.
Genetic variation is needed to make a species viable.
One two or a hundred samples isn't enough to recreate lost species.

Besides most species that will be lost will be lost unknown to us.
Millions of insect species have already gone extinct and with them a million secrets of the universe.

Mammals are a bigger tragedy.
They require living space but we destroy those places they can exist.

The NAP is literally a spook

>no one owns the land
>no one owns the water

why the fuck have they been preventing DAPL/Keystone then?

the gov paid them for land and built a water filtration system for them

Trail of Tears II soon?
Let's send them to Canada.

water filtration no firewater you gibs firewater, big chief need his firewater oh and Dollars definently needs the dollars gots to pay off his SUV.

Humans like to parse the material world into categories to make it easier to manage. Nothing wrong with saying you own something, it's just a concept that helps keep us all fed and happy. Mother Nature doesn't give a shit about no one. Owning her keeps us all happier.

>genocides other tribes because they hunted in your forest and fished in your river

shiiiiiieeeettt nigga thats just something you don't do come drink fire water with us and come play counting coup.

Might makes right, if you can't defend the land it will be taken by the ones that can

Well, it works until people started making really cool shit from stuff on the land and then wanting something in return.

Give and get back something, is something little kids know about.

>No one owns the land
This is why European explorers were so successful.

>Goes on to murder the women and children of The British in unannounced attack

The original Savages / Muslim Terrorists.

/thread

Wrong.

>a hundred samples isn't enough
Literally fucking wrong. Do you even know what a cheetah is? I'm lmao'ing at your life right now.

t. person who whines about muslim immigrants taking his land on an anime website

>They require living space but we destroy those places they can exist
Unfortunately, cockroaches can live pretty much anywhere.

>two centuries
within two decades. and that's being optimistic.

You guys should really check all the native american traditions and principles, it was more tribal type with a teaspoon of bushido (same stuff respect and be respected)

youtube.com/watch?v=H1y_0NfhF9c
youtube.com/watch?v=H1y_0NfhF9c
youtube.com/watch?v=H1y_0NfhF9c

Native Americans BENT THE FUCK OUT.

Mother nature also gave us brains to devise systems of property ownership. Thanks nature!

>red pill

Correct. Bless you OP keep posting redpill.

No one owns the land...

But people took their land?

Pick one

Bobby Ray's history lesson

>no one owns the land
so why am I being taxed for living on it? fucking hell democrats are stupid.

it's worthless relative to engineering.

If no one owns the land, guess we can build those pipelines huh.

Checkmate nativists.