Later in the day, the White House published a list of attacks "executed or inspired" by IS...

>Later in the day, the White House published a list of attacks "executed or inspired" by IS. Before the list was published, press secretary Sean Spicer said there were "several instances" of attacks that had not gained sufficient media coverage (without specifying which fell into that category).

>We have reproduced the list that was subsequently produced below, and explained what happened in each case and whether we reported on it.

bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-38890090


>four incidents got no coverage and were basically and bumfuck nowhere locations like Chad

Trump BTFO again.

Why is Spicer and crew such terrible PR saps? He's really not going to make it to 2018 a this rate.

Other urls found in this thread:

bbc.com
washingtontimes.com/news/2017/jan/29/isis-finds-success-infiltrating-terrorists-into-re/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Thanks for informing the normies about the Muslim threat.

45d transdimensional hyperspace double slit blind chess. Trump does it again! MAGA!

Complain terrorisms not reported. Trick media into reporting terrorism all over again.

Trump 1
Media 0

You don't get how this works do you?

That would be brilliant if the media wasn't concurrently reporting that the vast majority of terrorist attack victims are in Muslims and the Western world has far more serious issues we face...

So what you're saying is that liberals only care about America and don't give a shit if innocents are murdered in bumfuck nowhere countries like Chad?

Thanks again, GRTS!

Yeah, they reported on it but didn't cover it

Gonna be honest, I spend my time on a politics board and am constantly browsing news sites and I didn't even know that many had happened
Yeah, the ones coming here

I'm saying that Americans in general don't care.

Liberals care but not enough to do anything concrete.
Conservatives don't care and are at least honest about it.

???
>Trump takes a shitime
45d dimension chesbd

You should go PWN some Drumpfs at le safe space.

Why would a terrorist attack in a rural area not be seen as important? Go fuck yourself you dumbass liberal. A shitskin killing 6 Americans in LA is not worse than a shitskin killing 6 Americans in a tiny town in Iowa. If anything, I would find it more terrifying if even small towns aren't safe from savages. Fucking liberal parasites assuming everyone else is shitskin tier subhuman.

Make yourself look incompetent and stupid day in day out in front of the whole world?
What a great plan!

He'll get impeached for this, right?
Hopefully he'll make the transition for the Hillary administration quick and painless.

He didn't act like an Aussie though.

Please, Sven, please pay attention to your own politics. This ignorance hurts. To impeach an elected official in America is to bring them up on charges. If Trump walked outside and started shooting shitskins with a 12 gauge shotgun, we'd have to impeach him before he could be charged for murder. If Trump were to be removed from office Mike Pence takes over and begins shocking gays straight. The only way Hillary becomes president is if she wins an election in 2020, or every single other American on the planet died except for her. Only two scenarios.

just because the swedish gov says your swedish dosent mean your are achmed

He'd have had the bullshit knocked out of him if he grew up in this country..

Yes. The gays will impeach him and then get zapped straight by Mike "Electrocute the queers" Pence.

>bbc.com

FAKE NEWS

The list includes the attacks in France, both Charlie Hebdo and Bataclan.

This whole list is bullshit. Trump makes it more and more difficult to take him serious.
Is he trying to get impeached? Did he get in over his head?

Yep, straight from the White House.

These cunts can't lie straight in bed.

>are in Muslims

Yeah, the U.S. should have more of what the Muslims are having obviously. America YES.

it'll be done by July 4

Victims escaping terrorism are not necessarily terrorists.

That's like preventing the Cubans, North Koreans or Ruskies from defecting to America because they were escaping Communism. Since, you know...they might be Communists.

It still sounds like a rationalization.

Trump has succeeded in doing two things with this controversy:

>call attention to the lefts knee-jerk protection of Muslims
> called attention to lesser-known attacks

I used to think that 4D chess was just a meme, but now I'm really starting to believe in his abilities.

>Thinking four doesn't qualify as "several"
Are you a dumbass that thinks several means seven?

Weren't they?

Or did our democratic party radicalize itself into full on rampant degeneracy and the modern US antifa problem?

>Inb4 Jews. No shit it's kikes. But who made communism? Oh right... kikes.

>Inb4 muh Russian immigrants. Fuck em. They're pale pooinloos as far as assimilation into America goes

"Victims escaping terrorism are not necessarily terrorists." True, but when you have many Muslims who sympathise with terrorist and Islamic fundamentalism, and when you have some countries like Afghanistan where 99% of people (according to Pew) believe in Sharia, it's ignorant to pretend these people don't pose a threat to the West.

"That's like preventing the Cubans, North Koreans or Ruskies from defecting to America because they were escaping Communism. Since, you know...they might be Communists." No its not. Muslims from the Mid East are escaping war, not the ideology of Islam. Citizens of communist nations escaping communism didn't proceed to spread Marxist propaganda in the countries they resettled in, whilst many Muslim refugees do spread their religion and backward ideology in Western countries instead of adopting and accepting Western ideology.

>antifa

Break down this new buzzword for me. Is it like the new CTR or something?

but did they call them terrorist attacks? did they quote the person yelling "allahue snakcbar"?

did they find one early report from an "unnamed official" that said the "motives were unclear" and then never took that quote down when it became clear?

just b/c media makes mention of some attack doesn't mean it isn't buried on the last page or in a 12 sec segment.

>being this new

anti-fa = anti-fascist; a terrorist organization with deep ties to Communist promulgators and infused with Marxist thought that hides behind morally ambiguous justifications to attack people or instigate crime and violence.

Have they actually done anything yet? What are their numbers? Haven't seen anything trending about them.

>grew up
>in this country

They're literally the Red Guard.

...

>Stalin not a jew (georgian)
>Lenin not a jew (ethnic background unclear)
>Bubnov not a jew (russian)
>Dzerzhinsky not a jew (polish even considered being a priest)
>Shaumian not a jew (georgian)
>Ursitsky (jew)
>Muranov (ukrain)
>Krestinsky disputed ethnic russsian whos family convertet
>Milutin jew
>Kollontai not a jew cosack and finsih
>Sergeyev unclear
>sokolinkov jew
>Bucharin not a jew (russian)
that pic is fucking bullshit

>Victims escaping terrorism are not necessarily terrorists.

washingtontimes.com/news/2017/jan/29/isis-finds-success-infiltrating-terrorists-into-re/

>Spicer said there were "several instances" of attacks that had not gained sufficient media coverage

>four incidents got no coverage

seems pretty accurate to me