Tomorrow I will be partaking in a debate at my school.
>inb4 underage b&, last year of school, I'm 18
Now the topic being discussed is "Trump's cabinet is unfit for its purpose".
I've been able to get a good defence going and I've thought of all possible arguments that could be made - that his cabinet is full of people with no political experience (I'll compare it to Reagan's cabinet which was similar, and argue the point that Reaganomics worked), about how James Mattis, Steve Mnuchin and Wilbur Ross have the experience they need for their job, and maybe bring up how Rex Tillerson's ties with Russia is a good thing.
Here's where the problem lies. I don't know how to defend Betsy DeVos.
I would greatly appreciate any help on how to defend her, and if there are any other points I could bring up.
Also I only have 3 minutes allocated for my speech.
Thanks Sup Forums!
Jason Hernandez
bump
William King
Easy. Explain that Betsy Devon fits the purpose of fulfilling the conservatives goals with respect to education. That goal is radically different than "more of the same traditional school structure" and thus she is similarly qualified in ways to meet those goals. Essentially the goal is a privatization (and state regulated) education system. So it makes sense to have someone who is t qualified as being a teacher or superintendent, but rather someone who has experience in the private education system which she does.
Logan Mitchell
Sweet, never thought about it that way. Thanks user.
Hudson Russell
Anyone who didn't support Hillary is a rural and suburban retard and your life is pretty much worthless because you don't live in the real world.
Connor Sanchez
fuck off leaf
Hudson Watson
Reminder that only suburban and rural retards voted Trump. The American people chose Clinton
Christopher Johnson
>18 >still in highschool I hope you already have a job. Otherwise your life was over before it began.
