Atheists will defend this

>Atheists will defend this

I'm not surprised. If their theory of Darwinism actually was true then Atheists will be the first to disappear.

Other urls found in this thread:

m.youtube.com/watch?v=zl0NXSbeeqg
m.youtube.com/watch?v=BL9S-TUikfg
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_human_evolution_fossils
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Not a few thousand but a few million years. And yes, we're probably going to die out.

...

>few thousand

the truth is too much for you.

i don think you can handle it

The matrix has you neo

Niggers are my evidence

wtf i'm a muslim now

Yeah we knew, sverige

That's quite literally not how it works.

We share a common ancestor. We aren't just the same species but much, much later. We took multiple different branching paths from something long, long ago.

Also
>thousands
Try millions.

...

THE PATH OF EVOLUTION IS NOT MONKEY => HUMAN, YOU FUCKING MONGOLOID.

It took much longer than a few thousand years, you mongoloid. Humans have existed for longer than a "FEW THOUSAND YEARS".

Humans originate from an ancestor which originated from monkeys. Humans DID NOT come DIRECTLY from monkeys. If you had actually read Darwin, you would know this.

People try this monkey "argument" over and over again. Christ-Stains can't read Darwin because it would burn them on touch.

Millions of years and different environmentd caused both to split from a common ancestor, but here I am replying to a leaf.

I now understand why sweden let all those somalian refugees get in, they just play it very long term.

We didn't evolve from Chimpanzees. We evolved with them from a common ancestor.
It didn't take a few thousand years. It took million of years.
You should get some education

m.youtube.com/watch?v=zl0NXSbeeqg

Go read a book

They look like finns.

White women are fucking ugly you tradcuck.

m.youtube.com/watch?v=BL9S-TUikfg

OK, now post pictures of Negroes or Abos next to apes.

>monkey just randomly turned into human XD

This is how you know Chirstians dont read books.

>we did this
>front something that we don't even know exists and have no proof of

OK

Here, start looking through fossil lists. You'll notice a lot of them look similar to both human and chimpanzee, but not quite the same as either. Then just go reading through.

If you don't want to educate yourself, then fine. But there's plenty of proof of human ancestors.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_human_evolution_fossils

Would you look at that. Without all that shit tehy even look human.

>flag
>

Actually the right one does look handsome. But still, it's like eating sugarcoatet poo.

Take a university biology course and you'll see there are fewer things we are sure of with more evidence than evolution.

You don't believe in it because you are a fucking vacuous husk that just parrots whatever other people want you to say.

You don't have your own opinions, your own spirituality, your own personality. You are a simulacra of a real authentic person.

You are beneath contempt. Now fuck off so real people can talk.

A monkey is fine too?

>something that we don't even know exists and have no proof of
how consistently is that standard applied

>it's complicated for me to understand therefore it's false

Implying modern science can satisfactorily disprove the theories of

>Panspermia
>The intervention of ancient intelligence or God in evolution
>God making man out of the same building blocks of all other earthly life

What are emergent/divergent features?