I'd prefer non-autistic/meme-tier replies here:

What exactly were the nazis all about? Why did National Socialism not work in Germany? Or did it work too well, and Hitler's ambitions too big?

Other urls found in this thread:

gen.lib.rus.ec/book/index.php?md5=1BEACEB3633178BF543F1096A513BAC9
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Rothschilds_(film)
m.youtube.com/watch?v=S35nMM65LdE
sott.net/article/298259-The-Americans-who-funded-Hitler-Nazis-German-economic-miracle-and-World-War-II
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

fuck you, retard
go read some history books you bluepilled little bitch

This tbqh famalam

read a book first, then construct a valid quesntion

it didn't work because economically national socialism doesn't make sense. the policies enacted by the nazi party were terrible for germany to the extent that after a few short years a switch to a war economy was necessary to prevent economic collapse as the nazis had done such a shitty job.

>What exactly were the nazis all about?
Make Germany Great Again and fuck commies.

>Why did National Socialism not work in Germany?
It did. Then the world declared war on them and left a smoking crater where Germany used to be.

>Or did it work too well, and Hitler's ambitions too big?
It worked too well - Germany went from a total basket case to probably the most powerful country on the continent and this had implications for the international banking cartels. So the (((Bankers))) pulled some strings and had them utterly destroyed.

Declaring war on everyone tends not to work out in the end.

britain and france declared war on us.

hitler was a jewish rothschild puppet, he had only 1 ball, was homosexual, had jewish and black ancestors & killed more white people than any communist in history

they sure did, ahmed

They had an alliance with Poland. You declared war on Poland, see?

Actually, it's more like if Russia and much of Europe declared war on America for starting the Vietnam war.

well, maybe poland should have done something about polish commies killing germans, then.

how did that "we take berlin in 2 weeks" thing work out for you btw?

Ty for demonstrating your vast knowledge on Nazi Germany, here are your (You)'s. Kys.

Then why this? Germany only declared war on Poland due to disputes over land disputes per result of the Treaty of Versailles. If Poland wasn't a bunch of faggots, WW2 wouldn't have happened.

>polish commies killing germans
no such thing
>how did that "we take berlin in 2 weeks" thing work out for you btw?
Lmao, you can't even reply to one post without spilling your butthurt everywhere

They were running out of money and annexing other countries to free them from the masonic influences while looting the houses of those masons was the logical best thing to do

I would like a non meme tier reply as to how nazi economics and taxes worked please.

If you really want to know what NatSoc is about, you need to read their manifesto. Accept no substitute.

Manifesto For The Abolition Of Interest-Slavery, by Gottfried Feder
>gen.lib.rus.ec/book/index.php?md5=1BEACEB3633178BF543F1096A513BAC9

It worked great. But they lost the war.

>get invaded by soviets, british, american, french, australians, newzealnders, canadians
>why didn't it work

It worked well but Hitler was a retard

>88

checked krautbro

homoerotism.

This. That shit was God tier.

this is the correct answer

But it did work. Really well.
That is until Hitler chimped out and started invading everyone and made the whole world fight against him.

national socialism worked great for for germany, better than any other system. issue is it was built on slavery and genocide, not unlike a lot of other great empires though.

That's why we had to fight against le evil nazis. The USA has ALWAYS been against slavery and genocide since the days of the first pilgrims. Dog bless the USA y'all

You shouldn't reply to such uneducated trolls

Anyways, germany was trying to trade clay with poland which meant profit for your country and he promised not to invade you.

Obviously trusting hitler was impossible in that situation but britains influence on your government made it even worse

Because he prevented the Germany from taking funds from Jewish interest post world war 1,when Hitler came he made it great again,seeing this uprising many of the Zionist got goy'd.

The only thing that bothers me is the trucks which some YT showed were from US,how did they got trucks from US when they were not having good relations? Remember US seized Germany accounts.

Either he was a Rothschild puppet and tried to create war economy machine or he was just a literal kike hater.

the Nazi economic model wouldn't have worked in the long term. the mass government spending created a bubble, and because a lot of what they were investing in would never be able to pay that money back, Germany would've been in the shit by 1945 unless it stimulated the economy through war spending and seizing new land. The income from it's new territories would've been able to keep the economy afloat, but Hitlers belief that he knew better than his generals cost him that as well.

Hitler demanding Danzig was justified. Other countries reacted out of alliance and cuckery. If anything, other countries chimped out per result of Hitler's actions.

killing Jews

Fpbp

>gen.lib.rus.ec/book/index.php?md5=1BEACEB3633178BF543F1096A513BAC9


is this the ultimate red pill?

I suppose libya, iraq, syria, austria, vietnam and all those others chimped out aswell

Your country has absolutely no legitimate reason to interact in the conflicts of other continents, retard

nazis had good relations with usa for a long time
>tried to create war economy machine
of course, hitler wanted a global superpower. imagine how shitty the usa would be if its economy wasnt based on war

why are you telling people to kill themselves when you come to Sup Forums of all places and expect to be spoon fed like a baby? as if there isn't literally thousands of articles, pdf, videos, etc on a subject thats been around since the 30s. stop being a fucking entitled little faggot and fuck off

No economic model works forever. What the nazis did worked at the time and for their particular situation. Decades later no doubt changes would have to be made.

This is bs.
Germany had a great infrastructure and was able if necessary, to manage self-sustaining. Imagining National Socialism as an economic centric, market depending structure is a fallacy. You don't necessarily need money for people to be productive. And Germany was hellishly productive in the 1930s.

Nazis originally started as what the Naziboos claim they are but in reality Hitler hijacked the movement pretty early. Hitler's personal ethos was that the races are at war and competing against one another. He believed that expansionism for resources and arable lands is what determined Empire and he pointed to British colonialism and American manifest destiny etc. He made a plan for the long term longevity of the 'Aryan race' that involved capturing 'lebensraum' (living space) from the East of Europe. From slavs, who he believed were a mongrel breed and subhuman. He planned to depopulate Eastern Europe and push the Russians/slavs past the Urals and send out colonies of Germans to repopulate these fertile lands. It was easy to believe Russians were subhuman at the time because of the disparity between West and Eastern Europe. Russia was basically African tier and people were looking at them shitting in holes in the backyard and struggling to get food and people were saying "look how hopeless they are".

On paper National Socialism is something different. Hitler basically hijacked it as Stalin did with the newly founded communist state. The Nazis got pretty popular after several years of controlling Germany but they debt financed everything to they point they were bankrupted until they pilfered the banks etc of the countries they invaded and confiscated the wealth and assets of several million people (Jews, communists, trade unionists, etc)

>I'd prefer non-autistic/meme-tier replies here

can't always get what you want

>seizing new land...keep the economy afloat.

That was the point. Hitler desired a productive German ethnostate, not a vast empire.

Hitler was a Judas Goat sent to lead the Aryan people to their destruction by our true enemy, Satan, via Demons/Thule/Vril etc.

KEK
send in the polish cavalry vs tanks

Rothschild was heavily funding him in the early stages and many other less known americans supported him the whole time

Infact he was using the 'usefull idiots' to gather money in the beginning and stopped when he revealed his real plans to get rid of all masons

holy kek. Yeah I'm sure the """Third Reich"""" was about having his little ethnostate and not emulating the Reichs of the past. /s

Hitler planned to take Eastern Europe for Germany - far extend the boundaries past current German peoples. He was expansionist and was obsessed with lebensraum. You can't discuss the Nazi ideology without discussing lebensraum.

>Contributes nothing to the conversation

Back to pls

>Decades later

Sad that it didn't last for decades though. Realistically speaking, national socialism seems about as close to ideal as an economic model can get, close 2nd to true capitalism.

Victors write history, so good luck reading any truth in the mainstream.

Fuck off mason goyim

NatSoc worked in Germany. It wanted to wake the sleeping forces of the dead Civilization of the second Reich. But like before - it got beaten by the weak masses. You have to know that Communism is a prophecy that will come true - because the nature of our world is decay. everything dies. everything gets weaker and weaker. especially the human character. Marx saw this and thought it was a good thing - Nietzsche saw this and thought it was a bad thing. Hitler wanted to solve this problem of constant decadence and decay once and for all by creating a society that is in eternal struggle with nature and always at work for a better future - prolly because it is basic physics that you need to apply energy if you want to stop a stone that rolls downhill and turn it into another direction/roll it uphill. Camus for example said that Sisyphus must be the most lucky person on earth - because he never gets to ask existential questions since he is in constant struggle/always rolling the stone uphill. he didn't realize that Hitler had the same idea and wanted to turn it into reality. He wanted a sisyphuseque Society - because they stay strong and don't become weak due to laziness and too much wealth.

National socialism is legitimized by war. It is an organisation for war. This is why Hitler was spending so much by taking constantly loans, because he knew he has to go to war. National socialism is the example of how vulgar, primitive and dumb people can be

you are human, it is part of your nature

eat my dick. how's about the fact that ww2 was the product of the third time western civilization nearly had its entire core conquered by a single political unit (NSDAP)? if that stupid kraut had won the US would have swooped in to kick his ass and assume power over the universal empire until the west finally decayed and died. fuck that charlie chaplin looking faggot and fuck your gay thread. read tragedy and hope since you're such a fucking genius you cunt nugget shit stain ass fuck cunt ass fuck dick wjuhsdkjgsdf

>hey Sup Forums redpill me on x

Fuck off

Maybe the Polish should have stop massacring Germans in their borders. Hitler warned them to stop and they refused.

His ideas were unrealistic

Reminder that the US had no involvement in WW2 until Pearl Harbor, and even after that we decided to side Russia because FDR was a closet Commie.

I've already linked it once:

So wait Hitler was a controlled opposition at first and then he declared war on Mason? How does that sums up? if Hitler got support by the people he could have easily passed a law and allow his own currency.

>he unironically believes FDR was a communist
you should really read tragedy and hope, do yourself at least that favor. the west acts exactly how you airhead right wing tards think le commies act because they have no allegiance to anything other than power.

you didnt even refute anything i said, just stated some stupid irrelevant and unverified factoid that you pulled out of your ass

hitler was the product of petrified vested interests and WALLSTREET helped fund him to break those interests up and start a new cycle of expansion that guess who ended up benefiting from?? if i recall correctly the US had a small economic golden age right after the great war. gee, really makes ya think

go back to reading vigilant citizen you inbred hick faggot

>tfw Sup Forumstards know more about your precious closet case leader than you do

WHAT THE FUCK.

>In most civilizations the long-drawn agony of the Age of Conflict finally ends in a new period, the Age of the Universal Empire. As a result of the imperialist wars of the Age of Conflict, the number of political units in the civilization are reduced by conquest. Eventually one emerges triumphant. When this occurs we have one political unit for the whole civilization. Just at the core area passes from the Age of Expansion to the Age of Conflict earlier than the peripheral areas, sometimes the core area is conquered by a single state before the whole civilization is conquered by the Universal Empire.

>By 1930 it was clear that Western Civilization was again in an Age of Conflict; by 1942 a semiperipheral state, Germany, had conquered much of the core of the civilization. That effort was defeated by calling into the fray a peripheral state (the United States) and another, outside civilization (the Soviet society). It is not yet clear whether Western Civilization will continue along the path marked by so many earlier civilizations, or whether it will be able to reorganize itself sufficiently to enter upon a new, fourth, Age of Expansion. If the former occurs, this Age of Conflict will undoubtedly continue with the fourfold characteristics of class struggle, war, irrationality, and declining progress. In this case, we shall undoubtedly get a Universal Empire in which the United States will rule most of Western Civilization. This will be followed, as in other civilizations, by a period of decay and ultimately, as the civilization grows weaker, by invasions and the total destruction of Western culture. On the other hand, if Western Civilization is able to reorganize itself and enters upon a fourth Age of Expansion, the ability of Western Civilization to survive and go on to increasing prosperity and power will be bright.

you're welcome

>FDR not a communist
>establishes UN
>based on communist ideals
>now at the ass end of another pro-nationalist uprising

Right.

>This radical Right fairy tale, which is now an accepted folk myth in many groups in America, pictured the recent history of the United States, in regard to domestic reform and in foreign affairs, as a well-organized plot by extreme Left-wing elements ... This myth, like all fables, does in fact have a modicum of truth. There does exist, and has existed for a generation, an international Anglophile network which operates, to some extent, in the way the Radical right believes the Communists act. In fact, this network, which we may identify as the Round Table Groups, has no aversion to cooperating with the Communists, or any other group, and frequently does so. I know of the operation of this network because I have studied it for twenty years and was permitted for two years, in the early 1960s, to examine its papers and secret records. I have no aversion to it or to most of its aims and have, for much of my life, been close to it and to many of its instruments. I have objected, both in the past and recently, to a few of its policies... but in general my chief difference of opinion is that it wishes to remain unknown, and I believe its role in history is significant enough to be known.

t. Quigley

this is exactly why this board has become a joke. you stupid arrogant fucks think you know everything

actually national socialism was going quite well in germany. the economic system it employs (economic cooperation) insures the owner class makes money while the worker is paid enough to thrive.

this allows for a more vibrant, better moving economy. his purge of the scum from german everyday life opened up the door to prosperity for many germans where they didn't think it was possible.

it was a system where to benefit one was to benefit all, and where all were supposed to help benefit each other.

here's a shocker hitler would have wanted free state provided medical care for all german citizens.

that and he really wanted the caucuses, his own oil supply would've made him damn near unassailable

National socialism ruined fascism. Mussolini and the fascist movement had nothing to do with biological race nor the Jews. Not until Hitler poisoned his mind.

Fuck yourself, kike.

>antagonize literally everyone
>everyone is either a jew or brainwashed by a jew
>send threats to Britain
>invade Poland
>then try to make peace with Britain expecting them to cease fire and turn the coats on their previous allies
>threaten america until they decide to be agaisnt you
>have a marine general go to south america attack civilian ships for no reason to and get south america against you
>have a reckless military policy that strictly forbidden the retreat from conquered territory
>march all the way to Stalingrad, so far that controlling the troops from the homeland becomes problematic

Basically this.

Then why did they arrested the Rothschild and confiscate their wealth?
Why did they make a anti-Rothschild movie?

>I have totally read these super secret documents that prove everyone else but me is crazy

Kill yourself

I would be totally open to the idea of free healthcare if we didn't live in the land of fatfucks, sluts and degenerates who all think I should pay for it

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Rothschilds_(film)

m.youtube.com/watch?v=S35nMM65LdE

You could very well have an IQ of 90 with a knowledge of history like yours.

: National Socialist propagandists publicly acknowledged the contribution
of liberalism. Writing in Die SA (The S.A.), the weekly magazine of the
party’s storm troops, Dr. Theo Rehm cited liberalism’s decisive role in
leading Germany into the modern age: “Thanks to the triumph of liberal
thinking, the middle class and other social strata experienced a major
spiritual and economic impetus. Many valuable elements that would
otherwise have lain fallow and undiscovered were unleashed to the
benefit of all and put into action. It should also not be forgotten that
after the wars of liberation (against Napoleon), the best representatives
of German liberalism stood at the vanguard of the struggle for Germany’s
unity against the interests of the egocentric princely dynasties." 6
Rehm nevertheless condemned the basic premise of liberalism: “The
absolute freedom of liberalism will ultimately jeopardize the benefits of
community life for people in a state. Attempting to place the individual
ahead of the nation is wrong. . . . For the individual to live, the nation
first must itself live; this requires that one cannot do what he wants, but
must align himself with the common interests of the people and
accordingly accept limitations and sacrifices."

Democracy failed because it was a product of liberalism. Focus on the
individual led to “self-idolatry and renunciation of the community, the
unraveling of healthy, orderly natural life,” according to the German army
brochure Wofür kämpfen wir? (What do we fight for?).

>Stalingrad
One of the worst decisions during the 2nd world war.

>Hurr lets split up my army
>lets capture this city cause i dont like the name
>oh 600.000 men getting captured? well good luck then bois.

even the most perfect political system cannot withstand a war with all other countries, it is not feasible for anyone

the fact that germany withstood the weight of everything being thrown at it for so long is truly remarkable, and goes to show how well they would have done had they not been at war with the entire world

If you think there's anything wrong, then say it.

Also, you don't understand how IQ works.

what a pushover lol

>What exactly were the Nazis all about?
they wanted to take a debt riddled irreverent shithole (Germany) and turn it into a superpower
> Why did National Socialism not work in Germany?
one half conquest one half jews

that's where this idea of collective ideology comes head to head with the american centrist one.

he wanted to make a germany for germans where germans would in turn work to make germany better. everyone doing their part for the cause because it means a better life for all if we all pitch in.

true national socialists aren't the skinheads running through town making a mockery of what was, we're here and you can't recognize us.

National Socialism was unsustainable in Germany. The economy was fueled by preparing for war and loans from jewish banks.

However Germany lost the war before they essentially had to feel the consequences of nazi economic policy. I'll remind you that nazis were socialists and the economy had the same problem any other socialist economy had, fast development in the early stage and pulling out of workers from poverty with government offered job and housing but bankrupcy at the late stage.

>literally distorting what was said
>what is a straw man?

and then he posts
>I would be totally open to the idea of free healthcare
>free

weeeeeew. for the most intellectually stimulating conversations always come to Sup Forums cus it's full of real deep and critical thinkers

back to the trailer, cletus

>hungarian lies.
>jewish lies.
>jewish propaganda.

nazis were aesthetic autismos

>western civilization

You germanics are amazin and very pathetic

You destroyed the western roman empire then adopted their customs, culture, language, religion, etc

Hahaha then call yourselves western civ

Rockefeller funded Hitler's campaign:

sott.net/article/298259-The-Americans-who-funded-Hitler-Nazis-German-economic-miracle-and-World-War-II

>was able if necessary, to manage self-sustaining.

"could have" and "did" are not the same thing, invading other countries for resources would have been completely unnecessary if the economy of germany was healthy. the fact of the matter is if national socialism was a viable form of governance, there would have been no world war.

also these

wouldn't expect naziboos to think logically about any of this though, sadly they seem to be one step away from full-blown communists in terms of critical thinking ability

>he's unwilling to accept the real redpill: that semite elites in the new world willingly funded the destruction of the old world to secure their global powerbase

after all what's a few gorillion lives if it means your descendants control the world?

Nikolai starikov champions a revisionist view on joseph stalin as an effective leader.

>JEWS

no one sees the world for what it really is, and where we're headed. it is a sorry state of affairs.

The winners get to write the history books... at least until the internet was invented.

So was Deutchland getting more lebensraum or was Poland ethnically cleansing Germans (with the full support or Britain and France)?

I wonder what happened to that folk band "Prussian Blue"?