What would be the worst WW3 scenario?
Most parties involved/highest casualties possible
Can be 3 sides.
What would be the worst WW3 scenario?
Most parties involved/highest casualties possible
Can be 3 sides.
Other urls found in this thread:
books.google.com
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
bbc.com
phys.org
tass.com
dailystar.co.uk
technologyreview.com
ecfsapi.fcc.gov
google.com
twitter.com
Worst scenario or most probable?
Worst scenario based on current alliances
Everyone uses nukes and all life on earth is put to an end. Are you really that fucking stupid?
Probably India/Pakistan just because the shear density and number of people coupled with shit infrastructure and nukes. If China/America/Russia got pulled in it would just escalate further.
That sounds pretty good bb, I want off this rock
And straight down to hell's abyss with you
China vs Russikya vs NATO
NATO wins but with heavy losses
alright maybe not that bad, nukes barred shear force wise
May 2017: Greet Wilders wins Dutch elections, so does Le Pen in France, Martin Schultz is killed in a false flag incident by Merkel, who uses the incident as a way to outlaw the AFD and establish an autocracy.
October 2017: Civil war in Syria ends with Assad winning, Kurds are given indipendance in order to annoy the Turks, who withdraw troops from Syria as they deal with a border conflict with the Kurd.
Cont'