WW3

What would be the worst WW3 scenario?

Most parties involved/highest casualties possible

Can be 3 sides.

Other urls found in this thread:

books.google.com/books?isbn=0231518137
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Novichok_agent
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tectonic_weapon#Reports
bbc.com/news/world-europe-34797252
phys.org/news/2016-01-killer-robots-late-scientists-davos.html
tass.com/defense/902921
dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/476182/Russia-developing-star-wars-space-weapons
technologyreview.com/s/423871/cell-phones-microwaves-and-the-human-health-threat
ecfsapi.fcc.gov/file/7521095727.pdf
google.com/patents/US6506148
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Worst scenario or most probable?

Worst scenario based on current alliances

Everyone uses nukes and all life on earth is put to an end. Are you really that fucking stupid?

Probably India/Pakistan just because the shear density and number of people coupled with shit infrastructure and nukes. If China/America/Russia got pulled in it would just escalate further.

That sounds pretty good bb, I want off this rock

And straight down to hell's abyss with you

China vs Russikya vs NATO

NATO wins but with heavy losses

alright maybe not that bad, nukes barred shear force wise

May 2017: Greet Wilders wins Dutch elections, so does Le Pen in France, Martin Schultz is killed in a false flag incident by Merkel, who uses the incident as a way to outlaw the AFD and establish an autocracy.

October 2017: Civil war in Syria ends with Assad winning, Kurds are given indipendance in order to annoy the Turks, who withdraw troops from Syria as they deal with a border conflict with the Kurd.

Cont'