Citizens of U.S.A. I have a Question for you, please be honest

If your country was a paneuropean reality, without minorities (no latino, blacks and maybe even asians) would you still be against the public healthcare?

I believe that you guys are aware that minorities would just abuse the system, and prefer not having it at all before getting your pockets cleaned by free riders who would abuse the system, please tell me your position on the subject

even here it doesnt work m8

If the system was not abused, then I would prefer that someone not need to worry about a medical condition or accident any more than they need to. I've worked in healthcare in some fashion for every job I've ever had, I would like people to have the best care they can at the most affordable prices.

The question becomes whether universal healthcare as a concept would lead to that even with a non-abused system(not like white people don't abuse it as well but besides the point) or if it makes it less efficient in the long run.

Socialism is why Europe is bending over for immigrants. It's effects vary from race to race... But the end result is the same for each nation that practices it.

In Eurpoes case it breeds weak cucks who have no will to fight, and watch as their communities, culture and women are blackened by "refugees".

as long as we limited it for people with destructive habits, I'd be ok with it.
I'm fine for paying a bit of my taxes for Jimmy from down the street recover from a carcrash, but fatsos, drug-addicts, and cutters can go fuck themselves

no, everything should be privatized

also funny you use that image, because unlike Trump who will likely implement some form of mixed model healthcare replacement to Obamacare, Armstrong, being an anarcho-capitalist, would want the entire thing left up to the free market

probably, but then again since we actually work and have IQs above 10, everyone would have healthcare anyway.

Honestly, yes.

It's also why the US is so okay with guns and self defence. We have to live with two legged animals so it's a big factor in all of our decisions.

Armstrong shares some interesting personality traits with Trump. In one occasion, at the end of the game he literally says ''they will Make America Great Again...''meme magic

MAGA was Reagan's 1980 campaign slogan, it's been used before in American culture

the only real similarity between the two is their anti-PC stance

I prefer free market competition with minimal regulation to lower prices and increase quality. I would be less skeptical about whites abusing a safety net though, I'll admit that. Sort of a NatSoc model, ironically.

The fact is that if the culture means working hard for yourself, your neighbor, and your country, there doesn't end up being many who actually need help

Ask anyone here in the states if they want the same people who run the DMV managing their healthcare.

Consider the following: Untill the 2000 Italy used to have a very good health care system, which was universal and was consider to be the second best system, (first being France)
We spent the 9% of our total expendiure in that and people were quite fine. It wasn't like the stuff that you see in american movies(for instance you had to share your room with other people, usually for a total of 4) Unfortunatelly the aging of the country and the imigrant influx are fucking us over, but I believe that in a stable Ethnostate a public healthcare system is a better solution. Of course this is not the case of U.S.A, unfortunately.

Beyond interesting.
I am not in anarchocapitalism myself, but he was the good guy of the game.
Ideally I would have prefered a system similar to the one we had with Mussolini, but without him being the leader(maybe someone like Dannunzio would have fit us better)
I am not too much in capitalism.

Healthcare is complete anarchy here.
>No down payment, pay upfront or out on the street you go.
>Funds ran out? Here enjoy this morphine injection.
>Bedsores because of bad treatment? Not my job.
>Somebody died due to negligence of the doctor and nurse? Enjoy losing your house and life in our massive counter lawsuit.

Socialism requires a homogeneous society with shared values that include an altruistic view of humanity. If you live in a place like that its possible to create supportive programs that care for the disadvantaged and promote the welfare of the group. If you do not then attempting too institute these programs will ruin you, create violence and poverty, bankrupt your economy and reduce quality of life for everyone. Europe's drive for multi-culturalism then is the end of socialism through bankruptcy of the private sector. The only real issue left is whether mankind can again escape feudalism, or did we really ever escape?

Yes i would be against it still. Doesn't matter who uses it, it's about who's forced to pay for it that i'm against. You shouldn't be robbed for stuff you don't use nor want to support.

This is why socialism works for Amish and Mennanites; small, tight knit communities with shared religious values, who depend on one another directly to meet their survival needs.

You know, for as bad as America may be when it comes to diversity. I can always take solace in the fact that I don't live in South Africa.

Seriously though man. American crawls, I can't imagine how bad South Africa would be.

I think you're lying, there is no health in Africa so why would you care for it?

no healthcare, survival of the fittest in Ron Paul's America. That's my preference being honest.

Not only Amish and Mennanites but in Denmark. As a social experiment I suggest importing 5 million niggers from detroit, baltimore and chicago to denmark, extending them full citizenship and watching the country burn to the ground. Or just watch the live stream of the riots in Paris today.