The Western Slavs

What's the general consensus on the Western Slavs versus the Southern and Eastern ones? Or no difference?

They're all horse archers to me

its all the same, the east ones have some mongol blood in some of them and the south ones have some turkish blood in some of them

they are working hard to improve their culture and race after being commie-cucks for 50 years

The west are far superior due to germanic admixture

There's only one consensus - slavs are not white.

Look at all the great accomplishements of Poles vs Russians. Myah

Russians are honorary mongols. We are not white cucks.

East Slavs = Original slavs, Sarmatians and fenno-ugrics
West Slavs = Germanics, Balts and Celts
South Slavs = Illyrians, Thracians and Celts

Mongolian admixture doesn't even matter.
Slavs racemixed with Sarmatians before migrating all over the place.
We are steppe people.

The most pure slavs are belorussians and russians from north-west of the country.

We are obviously the best Slavs.

WestSlavs: Roman Catholic cucks, Latin alphabet, generally more Roman culture due to Italo-Germanic influence

East Slavs and Serbs: Eastern Orthodox, Cyrillic alphabet, Byzantine culture influence

...

western - they're logocentric, roman people

eastern are byzantine with all that follows - gnosticism, neoplatonism, zoroastrianism, syncretism and all orthodox sects that arise from this

Slavs are the children of the god Rod and the true steppe-dwelling Aryans.

Op, your map is bullshit- there were no Slavic tribes in Latvia

it's normal that map made by slavs will gib more land to slavs, and map made by baltics will gib land to baltics, we cant say how it really was

West: Poles are the best Slavs, have great history and are the most based nation in Europe, Czechs are cowardly backstabbing cucks who should have choked on German cocks centuries ago, Slovaks are decent but suffer from an identity crisis due to being basically a non-country.

East: Russians significance culturally and historically is undeniable and they have a lot of exceptional individuals - and unfortunately a very high ratio of subhumans as well. Communism was the worst thing in their history, and trying to force it down on our throats for 40 years was even worse, but other than that, they are alright. Belarusians are a tricky subject, because they are basically Russians in a different country with a different dialect, but I guess they are all right. I've only know a half-Belarusian girl IRL and she was an unsufferable feminist cunt, but she grew up in Hungary so I can't blame the country. Ukrainians have an identity crisis even worse than Slovakia, and while Slovakia could be a land for more based Czech-speaking people, Ukraine has no such purpose. It should be split between Russia, Poland, Hungary and Romania, and there should be an indepent/autonomous land for the Ruthenians, because unlike Ukrainian, they are real.

South: Slovenes are the most unnoticeable Slavic nation, I even forget they are our neighbours half the time. They are nice, have a beautiful country and make great refrigerators. Croats are based, OG Slavic kebab removers, would be in the same country again with them. Bulgarians seem cool, and they are similar to us in many aspects. Country founded by nomadic conquerors, check, was big and relevant in the past, check, had lost most of its rightful clay, check, hated and hates most of its neighbours, check. Serbians have great food and are alright people if your country is not neighboring them, because they have some genocidial tendencies. The other Balkan countries are either non-Slavic or non-necessary.

Latvians are Slavic.

No.

are armenians white