Convince me why I shouldn't be a Conservative Communis

Tell me why conservatives aren't better fit for Communism than cosmopolitan hipsters. Conservatives have family values, trust and kinship that is required for a community that looks after each other. Conservatism at it's core and even at it's most hierarchical is about the cultivation of community.

I'm sick of hearing about Naruto Communists in New York who set up a Communist bagel shop that falls apart after a week because none of those people know what the hell a community is. Only those same hipsters that hate their parents project selfishness and "bad" pathologies onto us.

For real though I am really interested in how labor works under Communism. You (the worker) get to haggle and come to an agreement with your fellow workers on how much you work and how much you get paid. This means you support others by putting in a little more work than usual to balance out production but that is all agreed to prior. Conservatives already understand this mindset as charity and sharing. Conservative families do this shit all the time so why not expand it to all labor. Obviously this means that either we do it globally by eliminating demand, corporate deadlines, manufactured scarcity and such. Or by isolating ourselves from the global market or whatever.

Also if we truly believe niggers are inferior and can't compete with us then we literally don't have to interact wih them at all. Under this kind of Communism you technically HAVE TO work (but only as much as you want). If niggers are lazy we do not have to support them. We don't have to interact with them or share anything with them since they're not sharing anything with us. We could even wipe them out if we wanted to.

*Communist

>You (the worker) get to haggle and come to an agreement with your fellow workers on how much you work and how much you get paid. This means you support others by putting in a little more work than usual to balance out production but that is all agreed to prior.
>Or by isolating ourselves from the global market

This is literally what the Amish do.
Sounds... Christian.

#TradNation

>pic related
Join us brother to battle fascism.

We are the REVOLUTION and we are the future!

Conservative Communism would be more like Fascism but with balls.

Please reply to my thread bro's

For communism family values and kinship to a certain group rather than to the whole of humanity is a sign of belief in hierarchy and oppression fueled by capitalism. (even if they themselves admit kinship and family existed before capitalism)
USSR under lenin was very liberal to do away with Tsarist mannerisms. It took stalin to return to old values.

Under communism much of what conservatives love about certain values is deemed oppressive as a whole. I could see some form of cooperative or socialism work, however outright associating with communists might not get you far as a socially conservative person, unless you start your own workers' party on socialist basis, where the only goal is the workers' ownership of the means of production. Despite that, I do not see how hierarchical order based on merit cannot reach the same goals.

Why don't you discuss the protocol of rain dances OP? Or how you could make a craniectomy increase IQ with the "right" surgeon?

There's the same empirical evidence that you'll be successful pursuing that line of thinking than with this horseshit.

>associating with communists might not get you far as a socially conservative
That's fine what I'm saying is more like Fascism but with the balls to stick with real socialism not corporatism.

Please make an argument any time.

>Yank flag
>Associating Bowden with Communism.

" No, because I’ve always believed in human inequality. I believe that human inequality is the basis of life, but also the basis of morality, because I believe that inequality is a moral force. The real division between the left and the right is not about people who support socialised medicine or even much more, sort of harsh measures if you like, the divisive measures like ethnicity or abortion or whatever, the real division philosophically is those who believe that equality, enforced or otherwise is a moral good, broadly the general left. Those who believe and are often too frightened to say so that inequality is a moral good which is what the philosophical right really believes in, even the most moderate centre-right figure, the John Majors of this world, talk about freedom, opportunity. You’ll have opportunity, you’ll have inequality, even in a market system. So, although they’re frightened to mention the “I” word, if you like, all rightist movements from the most moderate to the most radical, right across the spectrum, believe that inequality is inescapable, is a fact, has to be lived through, has to be dealt with, and is actually the way things should be."

Because someone who believes in the free market cannot believe in a system that enforces equality

I only posted Bowden because he said that the USSR conserved Slavic culture better than Capitalist Western Conservatism conserved Western culture.

Thats just a prety way of saying national socialist.

It's National Socialism. You're asking for National Socialism, sir.

Were Nazi German factory workers allowed to work out their hours and pay?

There is strasserism for that, or National Bolschevism.

However I think a meritocratic hierarchy takes away the possibility that those at the top mistreat those at the bottom and instead just do their job of management for the good of the community without getting fat on the others' work.

I seem to remember him saying the culture was in "permafrost" not that it was nurtured by the Soviet state.

Soviet people were too poor to be decadent. I'm not sure that's ringing endorsement?