Communism general

Hello Comrades. This general is for the discussion of Marxism-Leninism, the ideology of revolutionary socialism and communism.

Communism is the next stage of humanity following the capitalist stage.

What exactly is communism according to Marxist-Leninists:

>Communism is a stage of society in which the productive infrastructure is socially owned, and goods are produced not in order to sell for profit, but in order to meet a social need.

>Communism in it's full form is a stateless, classless society that follows the maxim "From each according to their ability, to each according to their need."

>To acheive such a society Marxism-Leninism teaches us that we must replace the capitalist state, which is controlled by the capitalist class, by a socialist state, which is controlled by the working class. Then, a period of class struggle follows in which the capitalist class is liquidated by the working class. When the capitalist class has been completely vanquished, there will be only one class, the working class, and eventually the functions of the state will become indistinguishable from the functions of the society as a whole, and the state as such will 'wither away' as Marx said.

marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1847/11/prin-com.htm

marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1848/communist-manifesto/

ML uses a philosophy called dialectical materialism, see here:

marxists.org/reference/archive/stalin/works/1938/09.htm

It is reccomended that you read some of the critical works of Marxism-Leninism so you can make an informed assessment of the ideology.

Resources:

marxists.org/archive/marx/works/sw/

marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/sw/

marxists.org/reference/archive/stalin/works/decades-index.htm

marxists.org/reference/archive/mao/selected-works/

marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1884/origin-family/

marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1914/mar/11.htm

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=Jqv1out48E4&t=1053s
youtube.com/watch?v=CmOUDMAtRt4&t=1172s
discord.gg/swp3YFF
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tanda_(association)
youtube.com/watch?v=U06jlgpMtQs
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

My 18th century ancestor once was a crew member on a pirate ship.

He killed hundreds of Spanish sailors.

Communism is a death cult

He didn't kill enough.

...

...

It certainly is a cult at least. They're always ranting on about how stuff isn't "real communism", but then if you ask them to tell you what capitalism or fascism is they'll give you some propaganda version that Marx came up with. You can't really talk to commies, you just gotta kill them. It's only self defense, after all.

How is this relevant to the discussion?

PURGE THE HERETIC.

LET NOT ONE COMMIE SURVIVE.

Only logical way of making a wealthier society:
>allocate resources better
or
>work harder

How commies plan on doing it:
>abolish the only method of properly allocating resources because it doesn't allow for a gibsmedat society
and
>work less
D E L U S I O N A L

That makes no sense.

Hi comrade nice to see you again

Trotskyism is Marxism-Leninism?

>That makes no sense.
You subscribe to a particular viewpoint, refusing to see things in any way other than through that viewpoint, and killing anyone who disagrees with your way of thinking, then your system leads to you and your followers all dying of starvation.

Sounds like a death cult to me senpai.

>inb4 NUT REEL CUMUNISM!

The difference is that he rejected the socialism in one country and also it's critical of the bureaucracy that developed under Stalin.

youtube.com/watch?v=Jqv1out48E4&t=1053s
>debunked ideology
into the trash it goes

...

Anything with communism in the name is real communism.

You may now bend the knee to the superior ideology as us communists take credit for China's success.

Did you know that in the '70s North Korea was the second most industrialised country in Asia, only behind Japan?

Makes you think...

...

>Did you know that in the '70s North Korea was the second most industrialised country in Asia, only behind Japan?
Wow, so communism is really good at turning industrialized nations into 3rd world hellholes then. Who would've guessed?

...

I dunno ask the Union of "From Feudalism to Superpower In Twenty Years" Soviet Socialist Republics or the People's Republic of "Fastest Industrialisation in History and Also Singlehandedly Halved the Global Poverty Rate" China.

>Cuba was once richer than Japan
Let that sink in.

>cuba still has a higher quality of life compared to most of its hypercapitalist neighbours despite being cut off from global trade and being a shitty island with no resources
Makes you think...

So feudalism is a crappy system? Who would've guessed it!

The USSR out-competed the vast, vast majority of capitalist states as well, cuck.

Its the same fucking cunt every day, at least use a fucking proxy so it doesnt look like its only one guy doing it ya faggot

Well the word capitalism wasn't really used before Marx though, it was pretty much popularised because of Marx, so his definition is pretty much one of the original definitions of the capitalism.
There is nothing obscure in it, it's basically just a private ownership of the means of production.

You're a massive faggot.
Your autism is deafening.
Day in day out you start this same thread.
Why do you bother?
Get a fucking job you dirty wop neet.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Not even people in Brazil look at Cuba as if it was a nicer place to live.

>Cuban doctors fleeing to fucking Brazil
Really makes me think

>goes from better than Japan to one of the worst places in the west
Delusional commies actually defend this

...

Of course! In fact, the communists did so well, that they decided they were having too much success, and made it more fair by having all but 5 nations turn to capitalism. Heck, even then they realized the massive advantage they had, so 4 out of 5 of the communist nations adopted some capitalism, to even the playing field. How noble of them!

You can look up the figures yourself. Cuba has the second highest access to clean, running water in the world. Pretty remarkable when the only thing flowing like water in your country are the rivers of blood, monkey.

I'm not saying Cuba is a great place to live but it's far, far from the worst. And a lot of the countries worse than it have been practicing the "superior" ideology for decades.

And? There have been plenty of capitalist experiments that lasted for a much shorter time than the USSR. What the USSR achieved when it was around is unrivalled by plenty of capitalist countries today. France has NEVER achieved what the USSR achieved in its fucking millennia plus of continuous government.

Nothing lasts forever. Especially not in a politically unstable shithole like Russia.

>Nothing lasts forever
Or, in the case of communism, nothing lasts a century. But hey, you know what they say about burning the candle at both ends. Better a few decades of glory and hundreds of millions of deaths, than a lifetime of being a wageslave, am I right?

>you can look up yourself the Cuban government claims to have better hospitals than São Paulo!
>north korea claims to have 100% literacy!
>the data that comes from a communist dictatorship that doesn't allow private entities to gather data proves that communism is great
>Cuba litearlly second best clean water on planet earth
>gets cholera outbreak
My fucking sides.

>It's a "high ranking Cuban politician flies to brazil to get treated in the most expensive private hospital" episode

>when you come into a thread solely to spout memes
The USSR was a global superpower, one of only three or /maybe/ four in all of history. And there have been a lot fewer communist countries than capitalist ones.

Russia was at its most powerful, most relevant, more anything it has ever been, under the USSR. Communism has proven to be the single most effective ideology for mobilising Eastern Europe - far more successful than capitalism has ever been.

Cry more.

Like I said, you can look it up yourself. They aren't Cuban government claims, they're independently verified by various research organisations like the WHO.

You delusional autistic fuck. Private press and private information is illegal in Cuba.

>They aren't Cuban government claims, they're independently verified by various research organisations like the WHO.

The WHO doesn't gather data and just takes whatever the government claims, you idiot. That's why the WHO says North Korea has 100% literacy.

>The USSR was a global superpower, one of only three or /maybe/ four in all of history
It was a moderately powerful nation, but at no point did it even come close to the power of the United States. If the Soviet Union is what we're calling a "super"-power these days, then the USA was an ultra super power or something. Heck, even at its most powerful, the USSR had only 1/4 the GDP of the United States.

...

I agree but I also very much enjoy that image, have a cool dragon.

>Every time

...

Daily reminder

...

...

Are you really a Communist? Can you give me some cash?

youtube.com/watch?v=CmOUDMAtRt4&t=1172s
>failed ideology
Into the trash it goes.

...

>Private press and private information is illegal in Cuba.
But this is demonstrably wrong, as evinced by all the time the private press has gone to Cuba. If you're arguing that it's literally impossible to get accurate information about quality of life in Cuba you're wrong.

I was wrong though too, it's second highest in Latin America not second highest in the world. Which is kinda my point. Cuba is a second-rate shithole, but ALL of Latin America is a second-rate shithole. Cuba's just not the worst shithole.

>It was a moderately powerful nation, but at no point did it even come close to the power of the United States
Wrong.

Go look up Operation Unthinkable. The USSR eclipsed the USA in the 1940s and it took the USA several decades of jockeying to build a reliable edge.

People like you, who know nothing about the Cold War and weren't even alive during it, read the memes on the internet today and retroactively apply them all the way back to the 1950s. In fact people in the 1950s were shitting themselves over the USSR. It was the single greatest threat to US foreign policy and an extremely credible one, hence the necessity of the Cold War in the first place.

It's easy to stand on an enemy that's already dead and proclaim how easy the fight you never fought was.

This

...

SAGE
Wrong board, fag

...

...

Greetings comrade! come join us on the glorious motherland discord! discord.gg/swp3YFF

Down with capitalist pigs!

>turkey was never communist
>lower than east germany and poland
What are you trying to prove?

...

Which is why it still exists.

Oh wait.

...

...

Can you give me some cash? I want to play the new World of Warcraft expansion. Prove that you're a communist.

...

...

There are a lot of capitalist states that don't exist anymore too, buddy.

...

>The USSR eclipsed the USA in the 1940s
>USSR didn't have nukes in the 1940's
>USSR relied on USA lend-lease to fight WW2
>USSR didn't have to fight Japan thanks to USA
Honestly senpai, we should've gone after the Soviets right after we beat Germany. We could've just nuked them into oblivion, especially since they were running out of soldiers to throwing into the meatgrinder around that time.

The failure rate is nowhere near close. You're delusional if you genuinely believe otherwise.

>muh nukes
Guess how many nukes the US had at the start of the 1950s?
Just under 300, and only 30 planes that were capable of delivering them.

You didn't really have nukes either - not in anywhere near the numbers to win the war. You can't bomb Moscow from Berlin with no fighter escort, and even if you could what would it accomplish? Russian industry was dispersed behind the Urals by '45.

As late as 1957 the American planning staff agreed that there was no way to hold Western Europe against the Russians. You can TRY and argue otherwise but the actual generals who were there at the time think you're wrong, and I think they're probably right.

>muh lend-lease
Russians used American tanks for training and gunnery practice. Hate to break your heart.

What Russia REALLY needed were trucks, and by 1945 their army was fully motorised or just about. They were well on the way to self-sufficiency.

>USSR didn't have to fight Japan
Japan suffered 600,000 casualties in Manchuria when the USSR entered the Pacific theatre.

You're wrong on all counts.

>The failure rate is nowhere near close.
Neither is the success rate. Capitalism has one, maybe two successful countries (the USA and Britain) on par with the USSR. Communism has the USSR and maybe, eventually, possibly China. Proportionally speaking, communism is more successful.

>Communism has the USSR
No it doesn't.

>capitalism has one, maybe two successful countries
D E L U S I O N A L

Are you saying its...

NOT
REAL
COMMUNISM?

Hello comrade.

Successful as in on-par with the USSR.

China is communist, with a strong prosperous economy.

The USSR was never communist, and no actual communist ever claimed it was. Read Bordiga.

Hi

>China is communist
Come ooon…

>Just under 300, and only 30 planes that were capable of delivering them.
>300 cities being nuked wouldn't have crippled the Soviet Union
Whatever you say senpai.

>You can't bomb Moscow from Berlin with no fighter escort
>Implying we wouldn't have achieved air superiority

>What Russia REALLY needed were trucks
>United States sent 400,000 trucks to the Soviet Union

We also sent 1.75 million tons of food, which isn't really helping the starving commie meme.

>Japan suffered 600,000 casualties in Manchuria when the USSR entered the Pacific theatre
>Enter the war after Japan has been beaten to near death by the USA
>Kill some Japanese and claim Soviet Superiority
If you say so, user.

Cool.

Then communism has never been tried and thus the endless "MUH COMMUNIST DEATH TOLLS" shitposting can stop.

Doesn't work, China became capitalist in 1971 after their economic reform.

>Then communism has never been tried
A mode of production isn't "tried", be it communism, capitalism, feudalism or whatever. It doesn't make sense.

Answer me this comiefags, in a communist society what is the insentive to work to your full ability other than you getting more for your work?
If there isn't any insentive then wouldn't everyone just contribute the bare minimum to society regardless of their capability?
What kind of society would that kind of laziness produce with everyone doing the absolute bare minimum?

>Then communism has never been tried
Communism has never existed, but there have been attempts to get to communism.

It sill is ruled by a communist party. Stop trying to meme your failed system.

Exactly.

>the single most effective ideology for mobilising Eastern Europe
Christianity, actually.

A communist society would free individuals from long working hours by first automating production to an extent that the average length of the working day is reduced and second by eliminating the exploitation inherent in the division between workers and owners. A communist system would thus free individuals from alienation in the sense of having one's life structured around survival (making a wage or salary in a capitalist system), which Marx referred to as a transition from the "realm of necessity" to the "realm of freedom." As a result, a communist society is envisioned as being composed of an intellectually-inclined population with both the time and resources to pursue its creative hobbies and genuine interests, and to contribute to creative social wealth in this manner. Karl Marx considered "true richness" to be the amount of time one has at his or her disposal to pursue one's creative passions. Marx's notion of communism is in this way radically individualistic.

>300 cities being nuked
You mean 30. If you're lucky. And then 15 the next week as you start losing bombers. And then fewer as your bombers drop like flies.

And they're all Western European cities (aka irrelevant to the USSR) because you can't get a fighter escort over Russia.

Nukes would have been strategically irrelevant, and the details of Operation Unthinkable show this.

>air superiority
Over fucking MOSCOW? From which fucking airfield will you be launching your fighters you fucking moron? They don't have bottomless fuel tanks.

Completely leaving aside the fact that it would be a hell of a fight, you can't even get to the fight in the first place.

>>Enter the war after Japan has been beaten to near death by the USA
You mean "fight an army of 700,000 Japanese renowned for their ruthlessness, highly experienced and well-equipped, over a theatre the size of the entirety of Europe, thousands of miles from Moscow, and take them all prisoner or killed in less than a month."

I'm through debating this. You're a fucking armchair general who thinks he knows better than the actual generals who analysed the feasibility of war with the USSR full time for 1945 to 1957.

You're fucking wrong. You are on every conceivable level as wrong as it is possible to be and there are declassified military documents from 1945 through to 1957 explicitly detailing every facet of your wrongness. Plans from YOUR OWN ARMY say you didn't have a chance in hell of holding Europe.

lel that's retarded. Russia was getting blown the fuck out consistently from the date it formed until 1941.

The only thing Leftist thing I'm interested in is how labor works and looks. In a socialist factory you can haggle and come to an agreement on how much you work and how much you get paid for it right. It's like the principles of a tanda en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tanda_(association) but applied to work.

You know why they became capitalist?
Because capitalism works, as opposed to communism.

I will tell a secret: the more you work, the more you produce, no matter the mode of production.

Here is your incentive.

Uh, no, you idiot. It was precisely when communists ideologues claimed to be taking a step towards communism that millions died.

Fuck Commies!

Basically it's envisioned as an industrial democracy. Workers vote on pay scales and the level of managerial prerogative. In one organisation maybe the CEO makes 40 times as much as the workers and appoints all managers. In another maybe the CEO makes the exact same and all managers are elected. The specific organisational structure doesn't matter - those that are competitive in the economy will succeed and those that aren't will disappear.

The point is that workers consent to the level of managerial prerogative that managers exercise.

Trading shares would also be illegal. Pay would be determined by council and vote, but dividends would be paid equally to all employees.

youtube.com/watch?v=U06jlgpMtQs

That doesn't sound like communism so much as what will ultimately follow the process of automation, you can't force it to come early and trying to will ultimately delay it.

The same incentive there is in capitalist society.

All the reasons to work hard in capitalist society still exist in communist society.

>but i don't get paid any more
Yeah, and you don't get paid any more in capitalist society either. I am a lazy dumbass slacker at my current job and I get the exact same hourly rate as all my colleagues.

>but you won't get promotions if you slack off
Yeah, and you won't get promotions if you slack off in commie society too.