>Four decades of evidence finds no link between immigration and increased crime
>buffalo.edu
So all leftards are raving here about this. Did you read it, anons? I can't right now, but I would like to know where is the truth. Last time something similar was published, it quickly came out that it only reviewed white/first world immigrants.
Other urls found in this thread:
jstor.org
tandfonline.com
researchgate.net
onlinelibrary.wiley.com
archive.boston.com
twitter.com
saged
>Legal immigrants
I sure do love cherry picking statistics. Let's see racial sub-categories and the specific areas they went to live. I bet the study was taken in specific areas that received wealthy immigrant families.
Legal immigrants are not illegal immigrants.
Stop being typical (ie: stupid as fuck) leaf and help me to debunk this shit.
Even if crime didn't increase, that doesn't say much.
If people change their behaviour because of the higher risk, there's not neccessarily an increase of crime.
Or mathematically:
f: environment x yourbehaviour -> risk
what they should prove:
f(normal, x) = f(more immigrants, x)
what they did prove (? haven't checked the sources):
f(normal, x) = f(more immigrants, y)
Yeah, I have same thoughts now.
Well obviously crime does increase, but still this study says otherwise.
But a very good thinking with the rest.
SHILL PLS
Yes user, a ((( study )))
>Article talks about a study
>Doesn't link to study or even put in a searchable citation
Fake news
I mean it literally does...just show them "the colour of crime". Unless they're referring to White or Asian immigration.
immigrants->more avalible workforce->more unemployment->more crime
that's how it works
I also think the crime increases and the study is fake, as usual.
But I just wanted to point that even if they were right, it would ultimately be irrelevant if they can't prove that the behaviour of the people didn't change significantly.
Good point; if your neighborhood is swamped with migrants chances are your behaviour is going to change and become more cautious.
I know it is just a shill shit, but I would like to know on what specific basis.
Shit, that is true. And those retards still praise it.
I agree. And also this study seems to be US metropolitan-areas only anyways.
raise your hand if you agree
100% of illegal immigrants are criminals, by virtue of being illegal immigrants
This study is trying to confuse people by pretending there's no difference between legal and illegal immigration
liberals should move into high immigrant areas
>clean air
>no trash on the streets, recycle bins everywhere
>quiet, calm, and peaceful
>0 guns, 0 violence
a true multicultural paradise, do it libs do it
The left's tactic is misdirection by claiming any opposition against illegal immigration is against all immigration
Tell that to Germany, drowning under waves of crime. Germans had to create new terms for the crimes that had never before been committed.
Suck a dick, commie.
Notice leftists never use the word "illegal", it's because they want to convince the masses that there is no difference between legal and illlegal immmigrant
Illegal immigration increases crime. How do I know this? The first clue is in the name "ILLEGAL immigration"
This is literally because blacks commit such an absurd amount of crime in the US. If it was immigrant vs White there would be no comparison.
Does someone have a link to the study?
OPs link only points to a bullshit article.
I have tried googling it and it shows some redditards whining about Trump, but no study itself.
Corollary: Illegals are subhuman
Give it 3 generations: those mexican kids will grow up alienated from society and will chimp out just as hard as the blacks are doing now.
Yes, I found the same shitty /r/politics "discussion".
That sub is literally shit.
>Four decades of evidence finds no link between immigration and increased crime
it took them four decades to produce a conclusion that is debunked by just taking a look at the data?
Its all the immigration from asia bringing the average up. There are a lot of well behaved Chinese people who immigrate.
If you exclude them, you get a different picture.
...
Niggers are as smart as humans and jews are honest.
Also diversity isn't a codeword for white genocide.
Let me explain what's going on here:
>TLDR let's leave out confounding variables
Rundown:
>1aCrime in the west in general and across the world has been decreasing due to education, removal of lead from water paint and air, better policing? Birth control, and mating practices that value education
>1bBlacks and Hispanics still commit more crimes than the host population of whites on the U.S., and Arabs and Africans still commit more crimes than the host population in Sweden
>1chowever, at least in the U.S. It's not enough to appear as a spike or shift in the overall trend line
Two other factors are at play
>2. Focus on first generation immigrants, who tend to be better off? But not their (technically non immigrant, but still a result of immigration) second and third generation progeny, who typically revert to the mean of NOI , e.g more violent, more radical
>3. Excluding which TYPE of immigrant. Chinks and Poos have their issues, but they're not mugging people
Conclusion :
Shitlibs can't into multiviarable analysis
Of course it increases crime.
You mean to tell me if we let in, say, 10000 people none of those iwll end up comitting a crime?
Dumb study. It's for all immigrants, not adjusted by race.
Let's say your neighbourhood gets 40 new beautiful, pure Japs into and crime rate decreases. Bam. I just proved there is no correlation between immigration and crime. Doesn't matter that every-time a city gets 50 new Somalis, the rape rate goes through the roof because the study is considering immigration as a whole.
Wouldn't be surprised if this was written by (((them)))
>all those retards jacking each other dickos with their "Trumpkins will never understand S C I E N C E"
>No one actually asks for the study itself.
Thanks for the pic.
Good one. Thanks.
I'm of the same opinion.
Obviously
Leslie Williams Reid might not be part of the tribe, but she sure has a knack for working with (((them)))
What are the actual samples they are using?
(((Robert Adelman and Saskia Weiss))) are confirmed
Similar to how all migrants coming to Europe are now refugees.
This is liberal-tier conveniently twisted batshit science.
The question isn't if illegal immigration increases crime. That's misdirection. The simple fact is that you have a slice of the criminal population that has no business being present in the first place. If you remove them permanently, the crime rate goes down permanently.
Unquestionably.
This is especially true if there is a border wall and stricter immigration control barring their return and a second act.
There is no new rush of up and coming wannabe criminals on the bench waiting for coach to put them in the game. "MOM!! Where's my mask and my favorite sharp thing?? This is my moment to shine!!"
So they invalidate their study completely if they don't factor in illegals who by their very name are creating crime.
>(((STUDY)))): Immigration does not increase crime
that's because it's NIGGERS that increase crime
Charles Jaret may or may not e but he certainly knows a think or two about Jewish Research
Damn. Being an immigrant who has failed to commit crimes, I'm fucking up the statistics!
I'mma go feel bad now.
>WHITE Immigration does not increase crime
fixed
FPBP
Legal immigrants != illegal immigrants
And finally I don't know about Gail Markle but with research topics like
>“Can Women Have Sex Like a Man?”: >Sexual Scripts in Sex ...
Springer › link › article
by G Markle - 2008 - Cited by 46 - Related articles
>Jan 16, 2008 - Abstract. The television series Sex and the City became an instant international hit from its 1998 ...
You know she's (((pozzed)))
but you're still adding in more people. how did they weight this?
Legal = here to stay, better not start shit = safer
Illegal = whats there to lose?
The cherry picking is real, as expected from a cucknadian uni.
Yes. That is true.
But including aliens guilty of only illegal immigration is a bit pointless because they are simply not as much of a "threat". The point of this study was to alleviate the fears of the average citizen. But the average citizen is not afraid of a hard working illegal who works solely to send his paycheck home to Madre.
Probably with as much math as sociologists can muster
Someone get behind the (((paywall))) for me
>Robert Adelman, associate professor of sociology
that's a jewish name.
and where is the fucking source for this? (((Adelman))) sure talks a big game about facts and how we should use facts as a public policy instead )))fear(((. So where are these facts?
Send the blood sucking illegal Mexican scum back to Mexico.
we're getting something like 40k immigrants per year for the past 2 decades at least, thousands and thousands since the 1960's.
if you have a crime rate average of say 1 per 100 people, you add in ten people who commit no crime, that doesn't prove that crime decreased. I'm interested in how this was conducted. you can make data say just about anything you want given enough jewish genes.
...
its not about crime, its about preventing cultural decline of native countries losing their identity, canada is exempt, because its culture is based on multiculturalism, which is fine, but the rest of the world doesn't need to be canada.
>increased crime
Every person in the US illegally has committed a crime. Of course there is a link between illegal immigration and crime -- all illegals are criminals.
Molenbeek.
They still have to go back. This is no longer about crime. This is about making America American again.
>go somewhere illegally
>ILLEGALLY
illegal immigration IS a crime
Yep this
crime increases with illegal aliens - crime reports pour in from their neighborhoods - the News media hides this from you.
>take jobs
>drive down price of labor
>suck up social services
>shit up public schools with 75 IQ spiclets
No, we fucking hate them too.
If this study is based on 'X out per X people' simply adding more people can "lower" the rate of crime even if there is more crime than before. Statistics are dangerous things.
All of these studies comparing "immigrants" to "americans' are broken because they always include niggers in the native group.
"illegals commit less violent crime than Americans".... yes because "Americans" includes 40 million fucking niggers
When we compare "new immigrants" to the nigger bar, no one can fail
Give me an actual article title or link. I have university access to lots of things. I can't find one on the page or by googling.
Fun Fact: 100% of illegal immigrants have committed at least one crime.
>Multicultural cities like LA/NY/Portland all support immigration
>rednecks in Mississippi that have never seen a brown person in their life bitching about their jobs being stolen.
Your argument is moronic and doesn't have any thought put into it.
>rednecks in Mississippi have to deal with the highest density of niggers in the US
You're projecting and outing yourself is a shitlib. You're the one that's never dealt with niggers.
>The results show that immigration does not increase assaults and, in fact, robberies, burglaries, larceny, and murder are lower in places where immigration levels are higher
Wait... If most immigrants end up in cities, and crime is higher in cities, how can this possibly be true?
I found this with a google search:
>For the second year in a row, violent crime is up in Los Angeles. Through March, homicides rose 24 percent compared to the same period last year. Overall, violent crime – which includes homicides, robbery, aggravated assaults and rape – is up 13.4 percent, according to LAPD data
L.A. has the highest % of immigrants after Miami and San Jose
Need to be a joke in my country they do the same with Colombians,and they commit at least the 50% of country crime being a minory.
Are you stupid or are you just trying to troll? Niggers were not mentioned at all, im just pointing out that people that liberal states tend to have to deal with immigrants while conservative states usually don't, so his statement about liberals never dealing with immigrants is grade-A bullshit. Niggers were never brought up at all and your just a retard.
>you said "brown people"
>niggers fall under that category
>southerners see the most brown people
Fpbp
You're welcome anons, i hope you're able to change your views of reality based on actual evidence. Also, unlock it with sci-hub.bz (in case you're interested in reading more)
jstor.org
"Common belief holds that immigration creates more crime and violence. This belief is
rooted in the notion that either individual immigrants have a greater propensity for violent
criminal behavior than natives or that an influx of foreigners disrupts existing mechanisms
of social regulation. While this belief has held firm in the public conscience, an accumulated
body of research has tested the idea that the foreign born and/or their offspring are more
involved in criminal behavior than natives. Findings on this question of “immigrant crimi-
nality” generally contradict the popular belief that immigrants are particularly crime prone.
In fact, much work suggests that first-generation immigrants engage in less criminal activity
than natives."
>El Paso, Texas.
>80% Hispanic
>Safest city of its size in the U.S.
I can cherry pick too =>)
I started reading it and skimmed the rest. Reads like soft social science with some shitty attempts at statistics. I'll believe it when I see it from an economist.
>Brown or brown people is a racial and ethnic classification. Like black people and white people, it is a metaphor for race based on human skin color. In racialist anthropology, the color brown and the term brown people were used to describe a series of hypothesized racial groups that included various populations from North Africa, the Horn of Africa, Western Asia, South Asia, Southeast Asia, North America and South America. In Brazil, brown people is a cognate term for pardo.
I've never heard of a single person that meant blacks when they reffered to brown people. Jesus christ you guys make worse arguments than fucking SJWS.
Except that immigrating illegally is a crime... and nobody is talking about legal immigrants... so... Right, you dumb. Got it.
>Another study
>Supports the claim that immigration does not influence crime
>Also concludes that natives engage in more criminal activity
>20 years long study
>Cities with a minimum of 100,000 population
>159 cities used
You kind of have to be an idiot to maintain your view on immigration after that.
would trump gain any support if he gave amnesty to all the "dreamers" immigrant children brought by their parents now stuck here illegally?
Illegal immigration brings higher poverty and crime.
Econ major here, hate to break it for you but virtually all economics majors favor immigration and diversity.
Its actually really interesting because people tend to abandon extremist views (both right and left) and end up a right-leaning moderate when they actually study economics.
Kind of explains why nobody on this retarded board understand any economic arguments.
Maybe it's because economists use a false model of human behavior which they mistake in their daily life for what people actually are like.
>Reads like soft social science
>I'll believe it when i see it from an economist
>Economy is a social science
You just made a fool of yourself on the internet.
I hope you studied scientific methodology for 4 years to stand behind that.
sci-hub.bz
you're welcome
Southerners deal with more coloreds then you will ever deal with in your "multiculti" heaven. You're caught in a lie and you're trying to weasel out of it.
Your prejudice against Southerners is retarded and it's time that you admit it.
I know economists generally favor immigration. This is for economic reasons and is only marginally related to the question posed by the study about crime.
What I want to see is a proper, rigorous analysis of immigration and crime coming from economists.
Obviously immigrants can commit crime at higher rates and still be a net good for society.
I said "soft" social science. Economics has hard statistical models.
Not the study, not event he same authors.
The garbage you linked, from reading what they cited, makes the same errors I posted here
Start mixing that mortar, Paco.
Sociology studies come out pro-immigration
>FUCK SOCIOLOGY ITS NOT AS GOOD AS ECONOMICS
Economics studies come out pr-immigration
>FUCK ECONOMICS
Sup Forums logic in a nutshell.
Look at germany and sweden
Taking in refugees is still immigration
Even if that were true, the ethnic diversity that mass immigration brings about still leads to decreased social sochesion and civic participation rates. It's not a healthy thing for society.
archive.boston.com
fpbp
>Sup Forums constantly ignores barriers between socioeconomic statuses for muh statistics
>I BET THEY CHERRYPICKED LEGAL IMMIGRANTS FROM WEALTHY FAMILIES
Make up your mind you drooling retard
We're different people, you may have noticed.
I'm not inherently against immigration, merely skeptical about a study done by sociologists. Immigration does have some known economic benefits.
DANKE!!
Full study will be up soon. Keep this thread bumped boys.
>I should be using my VPN desu but the worst that happens is they try to sue me and lock me up
>Southerners deal with more coloreds then you will ever deal with in your "multiculti" heaven.
You understand that NYC is the single most diverse city in the world right?
Jesus christ I can btfo you guys 1000x easier than i can btfo sjws.
>Your prejudice against Southerners is retarded and it's time that you admit it.
Hate to break it to you sweety but I think both you and the SJW retards deserve to burn in hell. Nice attempt ad hominem though
=>)
Statistically speaking it's impossible for crime to not go up with an increase in people.
It's clickbait at it's worse. More of this '''''fake news''''