So why exactly is marxism bad?

So why exactly is marxism bad?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=3SUWK_pWrbw
youtube.com/watch?v=04wyGK6k6HE&t=6641s
savageleft.com/poli/mbc.html
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

[COLLAPSE]

Jews.

It relies on human nature being something other than what it actually is.

Because it was responsible for the deaths of tens of millions of people.

youtube.com/watch?v=3SUWK_pWrbw

The purpose of ideology is not to achieve its end goal, but instead to justify the taking of power by one group of elite over another.

If you believe it will ever be implemented you are allowing yourself to be a willfully ignorant tool.

I don't really have a problem with Marxist tbqh.
I speak with old Marxist many times in school and most of them agreed with me in some issue like immigration, etc. In fact some of them believe in white genocide. If we look at the USSR, they were anti-immigration as well

I DO have a problem with Liberals and Neo-Marxist who never read Marx, just like I have a problem with people using the face of Che Guevara and the LGBT flag at the same time.

But if we are honest, there are also people who use Nazi flags full of tattoo and then commite crime like an average nigger.

So my opinion is that in the modern era all ideology are facing a decadence, that's why people like Trump, a bussinesman, win in Politic.

Marx was a fag lol

Not all. But almost all of it...

inb4 /thread

This guy was a faggot who had no friends. People who worship this guy are faggots and will die with no friends to mourn their passing.

it's inhuman

ids stubid :DDDD

It's basically just the New Jews become the Old Jews.

The Utopia it peddles is a mirage, despite how complex the theorizing, which is Jewish sociopathic lingusitic masturbation and propaganda.

Marxism purpose is to concentrate power in Jewish hands and create mountains of goy corpses, not a side-effect of poor implementatiom.

So why exactly is mass murder wrong?
So why exactly is mass starvation wrong?
So why exactly is living in absolute terror of vindictive commisars wrong?
So why exactly is everybody except the "party members" living in abject misery wrong?

Marx=jew
everything is bad at this point

Its based in fantasy. Sure if everyone could be equal and happy it would be great, but consider it like this, you are going to working class people, many whom has spent their whole lives trying to get a career, home, and family in order, and telling them to give up everything they own for their own benefit. It conflicts with society, human nature, and individuals. It cant work.

It divides people into the worker and the entrepreneur as if their was some sort of wall built there to prevent worker to rise above there station. The purist idea for an economic system would were a poor man can start poor but die rich while snorting crack of big boob whore.

Marxism is amazing. The Soviet Union was basically Nazi germany with marx propaganda. ALL WHITE IS ALL RIGHT

hitler looks like nige in your pic
I don't object to this

Because I said so you useless oxygen wasting worthless piece of shit

Read the Gulag Archipelago by Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn (all 3 vol's)

Listen to god Jordan Peterson: youtube.com/watch?v=04wyGK6k6HE&t=6641s

I like these for 500 $, Alex.

sorry m8 i misread your sarcasm

The biggest inequality of all is to make everyone equal.

>soviet union
>white
topkek

No incentive to work hard, i.e work all you can, while getting paid only for necessities.

Common property rights is outright retarded.

And, lastly, a planned economy is impossible to uphold, the economy and all it's subcategories is very complex, and should be controlled by the 'invisible hand' Adam Smith wrote about.

Lol he was basically being a rich liberal university student before it was cool...

Being a useless parasite making retarded arguments against the people and systems that pay his bills.

We're all equal in a mass grave...

The goal of communism is classless society.
Yeah let's just get rid of essential element of our nature that is dominance hierarchy.

under rated

Yes but that's different toothpaste.

A ton of Marx' work was incredible insightful and moving. I personally love his psychological analysis of feelings of alienation to the system that we all feel.

Of course, most of Sup Forums has a kneejerk reaction to his work because of the work of the damage his self-declared ideological successors have done.

In my opinion, Marx should be a part of any curriculum along with other philosophers. But if you reading nothing else but Marx, then your view will be skewed.

I have this in audiobook format. It's certainly interesting.

The problem is that old Marxism, primarily concerned with class and labor, was supplanted in the '60s by the critical theory driven ideas developed by cultural Marxist Herbert (((Marcuse))) and then later the Students for a Democratic Society in the United States who openly rejected class and labor in favor of race, gender and all the other modern SJW shit you see now. 50 years of that being the driving ideology of academia leads us where we are now.

Marxism relies on a false dilemma for its power between the 'haves' and the 'have-nots'.

Once people accept this vile bifurcation, all other options are marginalised. People then self-victimise and this leads to the creation of a new identity. When confirmation bias steps in, every perceived difference is a reslt of victimisation by someone 'punching down'.

Marxism, Communism, Socialism, feminism, political correctness and 'progressivism' all have this rude corruption at their cores.

The false dilemma that bifurcates everything into imagined opposites oppressor:oppressed, male:female, 1%:99% etc entirely subverts the truth.

The truth is that all opposites are complements, light and dark are both necessary. Good and evil are both necessary. Male and Female are both necessary.

Though each side may be poles apart, they are of one magnet, though each view may be the side of a coin, there is but one coin.

Power by division is the oldest and most fundamental form of mind control. Marx simply defined it for the post-industrial age.

Because Marx's logic falls apart within Marxism. If your own ideology refutes itself it doesn't have much hope of accomplishing anything beyond mass starvation and genocide

Marxism as a prescriptive system goes against human nature and runs into the calculation problem.

Marxism as a descriptive system provides an interesting look at the nature of capital, which I thank Marx for providing, but made assumptions which were outdated even for the time, and out of place (e.g. Eurocentric view skewed by Feudalism and subsequent systems, e.g. not realizing that labor will work voluntarily and comfortably for bosses if their quality of life goes up, and not realizing that almost everyone will end up being the petit borgeois via 401(k)s, home ownership, stock ownership, small businesses, side hustles, etc.

stateless, classless societies are an impossibility. Marxism necessarily requires enormous suffering for an impossible goal. it's silly from premise to conclusion.

But real Marxism has never been achieved

(|:/\m

Initiation of force is the ultimate immorality, and Marxism requires heavily upon it.

Marxism =/= communism
idiot

>promotes working less hard to be rewarded
>is proven to fail AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN
>why is it bad?

Marx wrote and covered so much.
In short his analysis was insightful (even if not perfect) and some of his predictions surprisingly accurate but he also made many mistakes which was demonstrated in practice.
Keep in mind Marxism-Leninism (USSR) is different from Marxism.
There's a reason he's still studied. If you want real discussion about Marxism you won't find it here. Here "people" (illiterate human waste) think that memes = facts and that he was a Rotschild agent who wanted to destroy Aryans and shit like that.

if you really live in Lithuania you should know

>marxism is the base support of thinking that has the end goal of communism.

Oh and Marx wrote about industrialized Western Europe. He didn't write about semi-feudal Russia where Bolsheviks seized power. He saw capitalism as a necessary stage in societal evolution.
All this is very rough and simplistic explanation. Keep in mind Das Kapital alone is some 2500+ pages.

>Why is a theory without any supporting evidence bad?
Because it was made up by an autist who himself abused working class people, and every time people tried to put it into practicem they failed.

...

>little Albania calling anyone illiterate human waste

And most famous representatives of Austrian school and libertarians never owned any business. Some were even government officials.
Ad hominem is dumb. You're taking Marx as some prophet and Marxism is a religion, which is exactly what idiotic commies most often do.

Are you fucking serious?

savageleft.com/poli/mbc.html

If the guy didn't live by his own teachings, why should anyone else?

...

>best of Sup Forums 2017 finalist

People who do own businesses find the theories that actually work and guess what communism doesn't.

Marxism doesn't = socialism/communism you absolute retards

Are you fucking retarded, nigger?

That's not how it works. You're talking about philosophy.
And I'm not a communist or a Marxist. How about reading instead of jumping as soon as you see communism mentioned?
My point is you don't even know what Marx wrote. Very few of you do.

it isn't

Eternal Montenigger shilling for Marxism again.

>say that Marx is wrong about many things
>shilling for communism
Are you retarded?

Still, nowhere near the death toll caused the the Cucktalism.

Helicopters have rights too.

^Allende

I said Marxism. I thought Marxism wasn't communism, Montenigger? -Thank God your reading comprehension and in-fighting in the left is so bad, that there is still hope, you will collapse under it.

he was a fagit.

I'm not going to buy a diet book written by a fat man. End of story.

>100 million indians
99.9% of that is from desease

>1 post by this ID
>burden of proof

Most of the people responding haven't even read the "Communist Manifesto"

If you want the answer just open up a history book

...