Why does national geographic channel blur white nudists' nipples...

Why does national geographic channel blur white nudists' nipples, but not black tribal womans' nipples in the same fukn episode?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=k06nZcn27XA
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

They only blur human nipples.

Being a fucking whore is part of their culture, user. Try and show some tolerance, okay?

blacks are humans tho

I want to suck on those and fuck her hard.

do you want them to censor cow nipples too? wtf man

animals aren't meant to be sexually suggestive to humans you degenerate fuck

Black tribal nipples aren't sexual

Same reason you don't blur out naked children in magazines. Because kids and black women aren't sexually attractive.

...

Nigresses are foreign. youtube.com/watch?v=k06nZcn27XA

/Thread

They're fucking penis nipples

Keep em tits coming.

No

The filthiness of it all only makes it more exciting.

The question is who owns NG?


>Its Rupert Murdoch

neither are nudists on a beach

You're worse than fags

And? Are you a faggot?

KEKKEKKEK

Theycdont want people masturbating to their shows.

Nobody masturbates looking at negro's.

I hope those nips are real

Her nipples look like fucking small dicks, WTF.

OMG FAMILY GUY! SO EPIC AND FUNNY. Can really relate to its humour as an edgy ten-year-old.

It's now queer NOT to suck penises

...

>he finds even that clip shitty
Australia everyone

EW GIRLS.
Canadian pottery.

>he's having sex with a fucking grease fire
Go ahead thirsty clammo

fpbp

/thread

fpbp

>handlebar nipples

Jesus christos, pew pew lazers.

Different species of humanoid.
(Not claiming they're not human).
I recommend reading about anthropology and racial differences pre 1960 when everything went P.C.