"Cultural Marxism" debunked

youtube.com/watch?v=YzeYKPLgRtA

Sup Forums won't be able to refute this. Face it, "cultural Marxism" doesn't exist, and what Sup Forums calls "cultural Marxism" (i.e. large-scale immigration, multiculturalism, the breakdown of the traditional family) is mostly the result of late CAPITALISM, not some conspiracy by Marxist academics to infiltrate the west. The Frankfurt School were actually social conservatives who mourned the loss of western culture under capitalism and modernity, something you'd know if you actually READ.

Other urls found in this thread:

newyorker.com/culture/cultural-comment/the-frankfurt-school-knew-trump-was-coming
marxists.org/reference/archive/adorno/1944/culture-industry.htm
marxists.org/reference/archive/marcuse/works/1969/essay-liberation.htm
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

>"communism seeks to strengthen western civilization."-said by no one ever

Really makes me ponder.

>The Frankfurt School were actually social conservatives who mourned the loss of western culture under capitalism and modernity, something you'd know if you actually READ

Simply not true. You'd know this if you just bothered to read their work.

But instead you link a YouTube video.

Lol

>/leftypol/ production
unironically kys

Capitalism, yes--but it's the ACADEMY which spreads the Cultural Marxist memes, educating the Brahmins to accept radical relativist morals and to be critical against their own civilization and the privileges thereof
Capitalism doesn't enforce in people the POV that all values are relative--only the University does

Unironically its the product of both Marxism and Capitalism. The only solution is Fascist economics.

A capitalist will create free trade deals that hurt a nation's working class by outsourcing jobs overseas just to have more money.

Japan reached this "late capitalism" stage a long time ago and it is pretty much immune to cultural marxism.

>tfw we're the real marxists

Yuri Bezmenov
Watch his documentaries etc.

it's true because B L A C K E D

>say something is debunked
>the presentation or argument doesn't debunk the thing AT ALL

every time

Communism seeks to CHANGE civilization.

What the fuck are you talking about?!
I read a lot of the Frankfurt School texts and I can tell you exactly where Horkheimer is talking positively about religion, especially Christianity, why it is wrong to abolish religion and what are the consequences of growing atheism.
The text is: "Theismus - Atheismus" in "Zur Kritik der instrumentellen Vernunft".
What now?!

So you're telling me the reprogramming of the youth by far left professors to support altruistic causes and completely ignore logic isn't true? All this weird shit is just natural? Hmm really makes me think. Guess we should just let it happen then. Thanks Mr. Jew!

>Simply not true. You'd know this if you just bothered to read their work.
I have, and can tell you their views were generally much, much closer to Evola than tumblr.

He's not credible. Also, the Frankfurt School began before the KGB was even a thing.

weak b8 david brock
t. ex gay frankfurt school marxist

>israeli
That's why.

>the originators of critical theory
>social conservatives
>you'd know if you actually READ
This is one of the dumbest things I've ever heard a neo-Marxist claim. Kill yourself and your entire family...

Thank you for finally telling the truth. I don't know who started this shit with linking the term "Cultural Marxism" with Critical Theory but it is just beyond bullshit. It seems like someone just looked for a group of jews that have sympathies for the Communist idea and told everyone that they are responsible for the downfall of Western civilization - exactly the issue that Adorno and Horkheimer wrote about in "Dialectic of Enlightment".
But they don't want to destroy the civilization. They want to rescue it, by showing why the Western civilization is starting to destroy itself.
It all looks like the classic "Kill the Messenger"-game.

MORE LIKE DRUMPF AM I RIGHT GUYS?! GEEEETAR SOLO! IN YOUR FACE AND EXTREME! IT WAS HER TURN DOODZ!!!! FUCK YEAH!

>critical theory advocates social conservatism
Are you seriously fucking retarded, or is this the pitiful level neo-Marxist shills have to stoop to these days to promote their poison?

Then fuckin read at least one text from them. You are the one who is claiming shit.

They were social conservatives. Adorno hated pop culture and viewed it as being degenerate. Fromm saw capitalism as destroying human relationships and said people were much less alienated in pre-capitalist times.

Look, I gave you a citation from an actual text. You are just insulting me... Give me just one quote from a text of the Frankfurt School. Just one. You can't.

The entire point behind Critical Theory is to "challenge" the social order, because the neo-Marxists believe that it's antithetical to their retarded ideas of "freedom". If you can't even acknowledge this much, then you are a literal fucking moron who doesn't even have the slightest idea what Critical Theory is.

>But they don't want to destroy the civilization. They want to rescue it, by showing why the Western civilization is starting to destroy itself.

This.

Which one of them is the true genius?

>we don't want to destroy anything! we're just trying to do the right thing!
... said literally every cancerous cult in the history of mankind, from Mussolini to Pol Pot. The fact that you would say something retarded like "they supported social conservatism" shows how deeply deluded and clueless you are, because Critical Theory is inherently against it.

Yes, but is the current social order good and does not need to be changed? Is global capitalism the perfect system? If you're thinking that "freedom" is retarted then you're the fucking moron

Probably Walter Benjamin since he was the most radical (and also religious). He was also the only Frankfurt School member to live in the USSR.

In my opinion, Adorno was the one who has the stronger point on arts, aesthetics and culture.
Horkheimer often wrote much more political and sociological texts.

I already told you, the Frankfurt School rejected modernity on the basis it was cancerous and lead to society's downfall.

Read Horkheimer and Adorno on the culture industry if you don't believe me, or Benjamin on progress, or Fromm on love.

Marxist idiocy

But you were fucking claiming 5 minutes ago that they advocated for social conservatism. You fucking cretin. They were decidedly against it.

>If you're thinking that "freedom" is retarted then you're the fucking moron
I think their concept of freedom is retarded, because the freedom they seek is not freedom from active coercion, but rather, freedom from one's circumstances. In the neo-Marxist's mind, if society refuses to treat mentally-ill trannies as women, then society is violating their "freedom" to be women.

Privilege Theory has nothing to do with Marxism. If you're going to blame any philosopher for this garbage, blame Martin Heidegger (you know, a fucking fascist).

Literally not an argument. They were against social conservatism specifically (because it limited human "freedom"), and they were against all ideologies (conservatism being one). Just stop fucking lying. You clearly have not read anything by them. Probably just watched some retarded YouTube videos made by a cretin like you.

Karl Marx never had a real job lol

Checkt

So?

Perhaps you can point to me where the Franks called for the destruction of the west, rather than making vague appeals?

>Make it seem like what they're actually doing, is just an absurd conspiracy theory
Uh huh. Hi shareblue.

Socialism is state capitalism, and Marx was pretty fucking clear about things like the destruction of the family unit. Having lived though Soviet hell I can speak form some experiance.

The Marxist ideals that infiltrated the west though academia were soviet funded, and if you spend any time looking at the 1960s starting with UC Berley and spreading like a plague you could see it was very very obvious.

Soros approves!

>Marx was pretty fucking clear about things like the destruction of the family unit.
False. Marx merely said the family makeup would change as the relations of production chance.

>Perhaps you can point to me where the Franks called for the destruction of the west
Can you show me where I said they called for the destruction of the West, you lying piece of neo-Marxist shit?

>rather than making vague appeals
Pointing out how fucking retarded you are for saying that they supported social conservatism isn't a "vague appeal". It's based on two very central aspects of their philosophy, and it shows just how fucking clueless you are. There's literally no point talking to you because you have no idea what you're talking about. You are a lying shill.

Soros has nothing to do with the Frankfurt School.

Look, social order and social conservatism is not the same.
You can live in a democratic society and still be religious, there is the difference.

And where do you got this definition from? Look at my picture, Horkheimer is writing that, "Some dark activities are necessary to preserve society, like the running of prisons and the production of weapons; to reject it would mean self-exposure."

The breakdown of the family is the cause you dunce. One of them anyway. Capitalism reflects society. Its the godless degenerates that are the problem. If you think communism is the answer, you are a complete fud

My bro :)
You don't even see someone who is defending (early) Critical Theory and despising Post-Structuralism and its roots.

...

Agreed. Here in France it's pretty obvious what's "behind" SJWs: post-structuralism, specifically AMERICAN interpretations of Foucault, Barthes, Kristeva, Derrida, etc.

The only places where the Frankfurt School and post-structuralism overlap is Benjamin's early writings on language.

Let me repeat, you fucking retard: first of all, social conservatism is an ideology, and they viewed all ideologies as a huge problem. Secondly, Critical Theory advocated for challenging the social order. This is decidedly against social conservatism. Social conservatism seeks to PRESERVE the social order. Thirdly, they considered socially conservative ideas (e.g. the role of women, the status of homosexuality etc.) to be against human freedom.

newyorker.com/culture/cultural-comment/the-frankfurt-school-knew-trump-was-coming

Here's the New Yorker literally acknowledging the Frankfurt School

>Secondly, Critical Theory advocated for challenging the social order.
Challenging capitalism, liberal democracy, and modernity, yes.

You literally did not address any part of the argument, subhuman.

Only somebody who went to college could be this much of a fucking retard.

It.... It can't be....

Adorno lemented the destruction of western values by instrumental reason, something alt-right cucks that just repeat memes don't know about.

Change class with gender/race in Marx and you have yourselves cultural Marxism. Can you do the same with capitalism?

Explain.

No. I've read the works of the Franks and know full well the conspiracy theory is complete garbage.

You're talking about post-structuralism, or "post-Marxism" which has nothing to do with the Frankfurt School.

Cultural marxism is a term used to describe an observable phenomena. Whether it is manufactured or not is debatable, even at that the debate would be a stretch.

Privilege theory is literally just applying marxist theory on class relations to other group identities.

It has happened long time ago.

It's not. Privilege Theory is mostly idealist.

The post you were responding to contained 3 points. You only responded to one, and your response literally confirmed it to be correct (you acknowledge that they advocated challenging the social order. This is obviously the opposite of social conservatism, which seeks to preserve the social order).

>calls for drastic reforms
>social conservative
Threads like this make me realise commies are probably reptilian. No warm-blooded humanoid can utilize this form of double-think as shilling tactic and still sleep well at night.

So is class theory.

Exactly, I've been arguing this for ages. "Degeneracy" as pol views it is the natural outcome of capitalism. The only thing that matters in a capitalist economy is profit. If people can make a profit by promoting two men fucking or men chopping their dicks off to become 'women', then they have incentive to do it.

There's a reason why the ex communist states are the most racist, nationalistic, and based. Because the economy, and consequently values, were strictly controlled. You cannot control the values of a society with a capitalist economy. Degeneracy sells, and everyone is buying.

>>calls for drastic reforms
Explain. Adorno never called for cultural revolution.

"Cultural Marxism" shilled*

>mah nigga

This. Marxism takes the comfy position of criticizing capitalism not by comparing it to any other existing systems, but by a theoretical, completely made up utopian one. It's infantile.

>as long as you're not out right calling for a revolution you're probably a conservative
Are you people braindead? Do you even understand what conservative means? Hegel must be a monarchist to you.

The ex-communist states are nationalistic and based because they've seen the fucking mess that occurs when the state controls everything.

Thus Poland recently crowned Jesus king of the land

Could you explain how you relate Adorno's writings to the current SJW manifestation?

Could you explain who with a functioning brain could possibly describe the Frankfurt school as "socially conservative"? Is anyone who isn't promoting a violent revolution right-wing to you faggots?

Reminder that I've demonstrated your absolute lack of understanding and you still have not addressed it.

"capitalists" ship jobs overseas because people like your glorious fascist overlords who magically know better than everyone else ruin the labor market structure with things like minimum wage laws.

minimum wages create an artificial surplus in the domestic labor market, but because this doesn't actually eliminate most jobs, employers demanding the labor are forced to turn to either international markets or the domestic black market (illegal immigrants) to fill those jobs.

tl;dr "fasicst economics" is code for "hurr durr I'm a retard adam smith was a witch"

>he is not credible
wrong
>the frankfurt school is older than the KGB
No fucking shit.
Commie jews already existed before stalin and they were already infiltrating schools

marxists.org/reference/archive/adorno/1944/culture-industry.htm

But to clarify, the frankfurt school isn't all to blame for the current sjw culture, just for keeping marxism alive and sunversive. It's your other marxist friends, the post-modernists, who are more directly responsible for the state of the modern left.

change doesnt mean good user.

No, they are nationalistic and based because the soviet union was an extremely conservative society (minus abortions, but even then they were frowned upon socially and many women did them illegally) and were kept away from the influence of Western society and media. They were shut off from western media and culture for 70 years. It's only since the collapse of the soviet union that these societies are slowly becoming as degenerate as the west.

In the soviet union being a homosexual warranted a prison sentence, women were expected to be women (despite women's rights), and so on.

And you completely avoided the fact that capitalism promotes degeneracy by its very nature.

>marxists.org
This is adorable. It's like a libertarian linking me to mises.org to reassure his own talking points. Sorry pal, I'm not clicking that. I don't want my browser history to catch aids.

>marxists.org/reference/archive/adorno/1944/culture-industry.htm

>For you to discuss my perfect ideology you need to read countless worthless books, that base theyre origins in the doctrine of a jew neet

marxists.org/reference/archive/marcuse/works/1969/essay-liberation.htm

Marxists will never understand the underpinning of reality as game-theory.

Marcuse actually detested hippies.

The frankfurt school did not promote revolution, you clown. Faggots that don't know anything, shut the fuck up for 10 minutes, and learn something.

What does it matter the label we use? It is the underlying concept that matters.

German's call the head 'kopf'. We call the head 'head'. Does the fact the German's label the head 'kopf' change the underlying concept behind what kopf is from head? No. Whether we call it cultural marxism or acjdgdjgj'ism, doesn't matter. The parasitic dispossession of the white patriarchy still occurs under it. It still pushes racial and gender communism. It still destroys white people and white societies and western civilization. It is still what it is and it still exists, despite what label we use.

so why do you love them?

...

This is all a splitting of hairs over terms; when people here talk about Cultural Marxism, they are really talking about the emergence of several modern far left schools of thought that is taught in our universities and transforming the minds of our youth.

The truth is different leftists professors are into different sub-groups of leftist thought and teach their own perspective which overtime alters the collective far left perspective in which the most appealing ideas come into the forefront.

When we talk about "Cultural Marxism" its a short hand term for the influence of Post Marxist schools of thought like Frankfurt School and Critical Theory, Gramscianism, along with relativist philosophy like Post Modernism, and Post Structuralism among other ideas. We don't care about the OCD nitpicking of which sub-sub group of post-marxist thought about this one minor subject at this one time. We care that it help continue to carry the torch of broken leftists thoughts like Marxism and Egalitarianism whether directly or indirectly with their bullshit theories.

Read this fucking essay and then tell me with a straight face it's socially conservative. Fuck, man. You have not the slightest clue what you're talking about...

Do you have zero reading comprehention? Of course they didn't you dumb fuck, that's exactly what I said. They promoted heavy reforms. What I pointed out is that it takes a special kind of retard to affirm that radical reformists are actually socially-conservative.

Whoah, communist states are the most racist? Wow I want to live in a totalitarian police state where everyone is poor now.

You keep using your libcuck buzzwords as if they actually describe anything in reality. Your communist bullshit is a modern phenomenon having existed for less than two centuries. Yet le ebil capitalism you hate so much has been the default mode of operation for every naturally evolved society. Exchanges of goods and services, quid pro quo. Everyone has their own share of wealth and deal with as they see fit, instead of having everything administrated by an elite intelligentsiya where you can only hope that they act in your best interest, which they never do.

You make the mistake of rigidly tying a moral state of things to an economic system. What is at fault here is the decay of virtues and morality which are independent from economic systems. And this decay of moral virtues is another result of marxist subversion. You people are all about subversion, because when there is no morality you can substitute your own, where there is no order you can substitute your own, where there is no law you can substitute your own, where there are no ideals you can substitute your own.

The only mistake our society did was to give you shits a platform.

thats why we need fascism. Let the free market rule, but restrict them for doing a-moral things.
Capitalist liberalism is the cancer, not capitalism itself. Go away commie shill

You need to achieve balanced trade. The rest is all just asterisks.

The result of globalist immigration policies will be socialism turn communism turn starvation and mass death. It will become the dominant ideology.

Nice strawman, retard.