Merkel will never be reelect-

...

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=0rrG3SKT3po
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

bump

>Islamic or Communist leader.
Excellent choices there Germany.

If she's re elected Germany can rot. A country that wants to kill itself this badly should have died long ago.

pic related their state assemblies

Bullshit faggot...
2/3 of Germany dont want her re-elected.

>2/3 don't want it
>as if majorities are necessary in germany

topkek

How did that work out for the last 40 years?

Holy shit Petry btfo

What people don't understand about the Germans is that they're a nation of automatons. They will follow whatever leader you put in charge of them to the death without issuing a single criticism.

The mentality keeping Merkel solidly in power and more popular than ever is the same mentality that some of you would have praised in 1944-1945: fighting on and not rebelling against Hitler's increasingly insane orders.

What messed them up so much?

Brexit will never happen....
President Trump will never happen....

I could see this going either way. Why at this point would anyone anywhere trust polls that say +90% anything?

not finishing what they started.

hillary was ahead by 25%!
Trump had no path to victory!

never underestimate the retarded krauts
AfD will be aound 10% i will give them both my votes even if they would only achieve 1%....but germies want a retarded chancellor like schultz or merkel

good luck getting petry to win the german electoral college

You are completly deluded.
Merkel will get reelcted and that is honestly a good thing, Schulz (the other canidate with a non-zero chance of becomming chancellor) is by far worse.

Afd is guaranteed to be under 20% and there is not one other party who would form a coaliton with them.

LIAR

>LUGENPRESSE POLLS!
>Ever being accurate.

Pick one and ONLY one.

Several different issues. For example:

- There is an innate psychological difference between white people in America and white people in Europe. Those who went to America were either boisterous, loud and violent enough to be expelled, or brave enough to venture out and seek a better life for themselves. The people who stayed behind in Europe were the passive, hesitating, insecure, loyal-to-authority ones. This translated to vast differences in views as early as the American Revolution, and it still counts for a lot. It's why Americans think the English are very quiet and reserved, while the English can't understand why the Americans are so loud and forward. It's why America is where most new technologies and megacorporations come from. It's also why Americans are more likely to take risks for political change, and why this "nationalist spring" in continental Europe that people love to talk about here isn't going to amount to anything. We're not Americans, we're going to elect the same "safe parties".

- Feudalism, especially in the case of Germany. While many other European countries had long ditched the economic model of Feudalism, the Germans kept it at least partially until fairly late in their history. Feudalism is as much a social system as it is an economic or governmental system. Almost every man has a man above him to obey, and some men have men below them that they can order around and get to do chores. Most men in Europe, and in Germany until more recently, went through life without even questioning this system. And the basic mentality still exists. Militarily, this cultural and social enshrinement of formal hierarchy translated to the Prussian army/societal mentality as well as the German army's inability to oust Hitler in 1944 (too many high-ranking officers remained loyal to their nominal superior). Politically, it means that Germany isn't awfully susceptible to political radicalism the way France or Italy is.

>- Feudalism, especially in the case of Germany. While many other European countries had long ditched the economic model of Feudalism, the Germans kept it at least partially until fairly late in their history. Feudalism is as much a social system as it is an economic or governmental system. Almost every man has a man above him to obey, and some men have men below them that they can order around and get to do chores. Most men in Europe, and in Germany until more recently, went through life without even questioning this system. And the basic mentality still exists. Militarily, this cultural and social enshrinement of formal hierarchy translated to the Prussian army/societal mentality as well as the German army's inability to oust Hitler in 1944 (too many high-ranking officers remained loyal to their nominal superior). Politically, it means that Germany isn't awfully susceptible to political radicalism the way France or Italy is.
makes sense

but
>Germany isn't awfully susceptible to political radicalism the way France or Italy is
What about the weimar period, with commies and nazis, and the same in Austria with austrofascists, nazis and commies?

The polls are probably accurate, though.

You have no idea how doggedly loyal the Germans are to their authorities and how autistic they are about their rules. When the Germans occupied my country during World War II, they actually shot their own soldiers who tried to rape or steal (even when the war was going badly), so the most-heard complaint in my town about the Germans was that they'd knock on your door at all hours to ask for directions because they couldn't navigate the polders for shit.

Isn't her opponent Martin Schultz, a Jew?

Do Germanistan even have valid alternatives?

>Düsseldorf covered in red
>Berlin is light red
How

Well, what happened then?
- Germany had an Emperor and was involved in World War I.
- Germany's allies were in serious trouble.
- Germany's economy was in ruins and supplies were extremely low (Germany may have been as close to famine or a complete breakdown of their armed forces as Britain near the end).
- Germany's government decided to quit and the Emperor fled to these parts.
- There were some abortive attempts at Communist revolution that had to be orchestrated by Jews from all over Europe, but those were quickly quashed.
- Most Germans aligned themselves with the moderate provisional government at the time, and many Germans voluntarily laid down their lives protecting that uninspiring bunch of bureaucrats from the Communists.
- Then came a period of slight instability - but nothing like France in the 1790s. There was political turmoil and social unrest, but in any country other than Germany that would have led to total collapse.
- Eventually, one man came out on top despite only having the support of one-third of Germans, and was allowed to basically become ruler-for-life.
- This man instituted a one-party state and ordered the Germans around, and the Germans loved it because they are indeed a nation of automatons.
- Contrary to the trend in nearly all other countries in the world, this man gained more popularity the longer he ruled and was followed by the Germans even when the war he started was all but lost.

Explain yourself bavarians.
Believe it or not CDU is our center-right.

If only we could elect leaders ourselves and not just the parties.

The German election system doesn't work that way (they don't vote for chancellors directly, so they don't have "opponents" in the election). But yes, Schulz is the only other figure with a non-zero chance of becoming chancellor. It basically depends on who is likely to be the junior partner in a coalition between CDU/CSU and SPD. If SPD wins more than CDU/CSU, Schulz is likely chancellor. If CDU/CSU wins more, Merkel is.

> Schulz is the only other figure with a non-zero chance of becoming chancellor
Oh

what about those blonde women who are Merkel's friends? Ursula von der Leyen or Julia Klockner?

Germany votes for parties not for candidates.

Merkel is the candidate for the CDU no other CDU member has any chance of becomming chancellor.

oh, I see.

I always liked Angela though. I think that she will do a better job in the future

just take your country back, aryan man

Don't be too sure about a Merkel victory, faggot

Schulz will become Göttkansler!

youtube.com/watch?v=0rrG3SKT3po

yay, Germany's first Jewish chancellor XD

AfD 9-11%

This

>spd 31%

HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHa

and AfD still around 15 +-1

This definition of Feudalism of a strict hirachy would better fit Absolutism. In practice Feudalism is defined by the competition of different authorites, because the ownership of a property is not defined sharply. (see conflicts between Emperor and Pope over the good of rule)