Proof 9/11 was false

Today I tried and failed to explain to a few friends that theres more than meets the eye to the September 11 attacks

I showed them gif related, but they apparently though it was logical for all the supports to give out at the same time, and that top of the building would fall and crush the rest of the building, floor by floor.

I asked them why the FBI would confiscate all footage of the pentagon attack and still not declassify it, but they said it made sense for the government to keep information classified.

I showed them footage of WTC7 collapse and they didn't say anything, but I think they still think I'm crazy.

Why would people so blindly accept what they're told without looking into it themselves? Or am I really crazy? Share your 9/11 graphics, I've created a folder so I can show people more next time I try to redpill them.

Also, what are some good questions to ask people to get the thinking?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=5d5iIoCiI8g
youtu.be/kyLyGXQUIo0?t=3m23s
youtube.com/watch?v=Rml2TL5N8ds
youtube.com/watch?v=gORu-68SHpE
vid.me/Zzkk
vid.me/FMPf
vid.me/xKBl
vid.me/Tl34
youtube.com/watch?v=T1NbBxDGSkI
youtube.com/watch?v=n3xgjxJwedA
youtube.com/watch?v=CG7I4UnoBnA
youtu.be/DoE8Uz2ia3M
youtube.com/watch?v=nqbUkThGlCo
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Fuck off with this tired ass shit.

...

The building collapsing upon itself floor-by-floor is logical and makes perfect sense, you fucking moron.

It's the same reason why you can rip a phone book in half with the same force you use to rip a single piece of paper in half.

Heres a gif of the wtc7 collapse

Get them to watch this video. Probably the biggest red pill on the topic.

youtube.com/watch?v=5d5iIoCiI8g

Fire damage should not have been able to take down the building

Good goy!

This literally proves the opposite.

If the bombs were planted in the bottom of WTC, the lower parts would collapse just like he building on the right.

the wtc was the first building to be designed with a central load bearing structure. its the reason why it failed, and failed differently than other buildings. please try to stop being retarded.

Seriously, man. Look at pic related. How could an airplane fully loaded with fuel crashing through the center of the building and igniting a blaze that weakened an already damaged steel structure cause the single interior structural support to fail?

Try it. I have. It can be done. But it's not as easy as a single piece of paper.

If you bend it so that the pages are separated even slightly, you are literally just ripping hundreds of single pieces of paper at once.

Exoskeleton

Just watch this.

Israel attacked the USA on 9/11 now the proof: youtu.be/kyLyGXQUIo0?t=3m23s

It's important. I understand your fatigue, but it's important.

who says the bombs were planted on the bottom?

47 reinforced steel core columns.

youtube.com/watch?v=Rml2TL5N8ds

youtube.com/watch?v=gORu-68SHpE

The Jews did 911 to start the "war on terror" (war on Muslim countries needed by the Jews for Greater Israel) to begin the "Greater Israel" project which will ultimately be home base for the communist World Government NWO to rule planet earth.

vid.me/Zzkk
vid.me/FMPf
vid.me/xKBl
vid.me/Tl34

youtube.com/watch?v=Rml2TL5N8ds

youtube.com/watch?v=T1NbBxDGSkI

youtube.com/watch?v=n3xgjxJwedA

Don't click on the thread jackass

Take 5 coke cans, now take the top coke can and smash it as hard as you can on the tower of coke cans. Try to make all coke cans smash into themself and not fly across the room.

How can something thats mostly air just fall like that

>coke can = steel framed buildings

literally kill yourself for the greater good fuckwit
you must be a gender studies major

don't be mean, I never went to college

We really have some good goyim àround here loll
But really you some kind of nigger that tought santa clause Was réal tilleul your 18 birthday?

There is an emergency 'self-destruct sequence' installed in every tall skyscraper that is surrounded by smaller buildings.
They are implemented in case a major fire or disaster like this, to avoid toppling over and killing even more people.
Im done with this debate.

You are fucking retarded beyond belief.

>Why would people so blindly accept what they're told
people still watch CNN, MSN, and, BBC

this is good bait for anyone who doesn't know what physics are

Makes more sense to me than concrete steel framed building falling at freefall speed

Empty the cans to simulate rooms inside of the building then see what happens

>who says the bombs were planted on the bottom?


so..you are saying its nothing like a controlled demolition where explosives are almost uniformly ignited bottom first...

still would be hard to make them collapse on their own footprint

The madrid building wasn't even remotely similar construction technique you flaming imbecile.

>and that top of the building would fall and crush the rest of the building

what is gravity for $1000 Alex?

No, but a huge fucking hole in one of the sides might do the trick

Read the statistics. The only building that reached free fall speeds was WTC 7.

argument from incredulity - logical fallacy.

Not if you use the weight of a fucking skyscraper

>falling at freefall speed

failed meme.

youtube.com/watch?v=CG7I4UnoBnA

except you have no evidence, the video shows it falling at freefall speeds. I don't need some chicken neck intellectual to lie to me.

Even if they didn't do you believe they wouldn't?
That's the core problem.

redpill me on this then, how was it not at freefall speeds?

This one really makes you think.

That ones clearly CIA

>the video shows it falling at freefall speeds.

Ur a retard.

So I'm no professional in the matter, but I did go to a top tier engineering school and my structural engineering professor is an expert. He said 9/11 truthers have no idea what they're talking about and there's nothing suspicious about the collapse of the building. I'm gonna take his word over all the internet sleuths, but that's just me.

i present evidence
you present ad homs

what was him endgame Sup Forums?

>on their own footprint

another failed meme- 43 other buildings were damged by the collapses- debris for blocks- huge pieces of facade falling out and way from the building as the floors sheered off...it looked nothing like a controlled demo.

Why did buildings that didn't get hit collapse

your only argument your a retard. big deal, at least I'm not a NWO shill

Shitty American engineering

Sheep are sheep

Wolfs are wolfs you should be in a wolf pack

it makes me think why they didnt include the collapse of the penthouse in that gif which started many seconds earlier...what are they trying to hide?

you have five (5) seconds to tell me right now if 9/11 was faked or not and you have to provide evidence supporting your claim or else ill shoot you

These are retarded because so many people took videos with cameras and shit of the second plane hitting, and one video of the first plane. If ONLY the media had the footage I could maybe see the "hologram" theory but so many other people saw it too. I believe there was a conspiracy but the "no planes" angle is just autism.

I'm not an NWO shill. You're just mistaken about the freefall speeds of the twin towers. They reached near-freefall speeds. The only tower that acutally reached free-fall speeds was Building 7.

Oh god I finally forgot about 9/11 now you bring this ol raggedy ass bullshit up again user.

the one building that didnt get hit and collapsed got hit by the collapse of WTC and burned for 8hrs...and we all know fire can make a building collapse.

That radio tower disappears, as does most of the concrete into dust. There should be a thirty story pile of rubble and a flooded Manhattan, not a neat pit and undisturbed bathtub.

No seismic signature of the buildings hitting the ground mean it didn't.

Pools of molten granite, swiss cheese and taffy steel, fireman's boots melting without heat and fire that didn't burn paper are not common.

The impossible frame of the keyed jet appearing out the other side of the tower. The woman standing in the 'entry' hole that doesn't malform the keyed jet.

This is just like there being no entry holes for the engines at the pentagon.

Larry Summers talking about pulling it.

The impossible disintegrating projectiles.

Kurt Sonnenfeld video showing fireman complaining about ongoing explosions and the blown out lobby & marble fascia.

Bus probably got hit with a shitload of debris that came down when the towers went

Why does it rotate

...

You didn't watch the video evidence. You bully me to take your opinion. You are a shill.

9/11 is just as relevant today as it was on the day of the attack. We still don't have the truth, yet the state of emergency that's been extended still affects us.

How do we know some of the people in the WTC weren't assholes 5 secs go

9/11 really happened

the redpill is that Hillary worked with the Saudis to do it to coverup bill's pardon investigation in WTC7

watch how they react to this in an attempt to save their disinformation thread

and my countersource www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/aug/9/kuhner-who-betrayed-navy-seal-team-6/

and some extra fun
www.mintpressnews.com/fema-investigator-claims-world-trade-center-vault-contents-emptied-attack/218111/

...

>2 collapsed buildings looks like they collapsed
im not saying what side im on but this doesnt prove anything

lol, whatever dude XD

You obviously don't know the facts.

tell them about AE911truth.org
over 3000 architects and engineers have brought their studies into one place

YOU said hologram nigger
I suggest that they inserted to "planes" into the live TV feed (similar to the tech used in live sports for the 1st down marker, scores, etc)
>inb4 but muh witnesses!
>inb4 but my dad who works at nintendo was there!

official narrative, or any narrative involving planes is falling apart m8

Squibs clearly racing ahead the collapse

It always follows the retard card.

yet they all focus on "planes"

IT IS CONTROLLED OPPOSITION

He's right, though. WTC7 is the only building that reached freefall speed, which still screams controlled demolition. The other towers were very close to freefall, though not freefall.

Arguing from authority is not a valid argument user.

close to free fall. Why quibble over it then

>KIKE DETECTED

Nine eleven has everything to do with the madness on the last few current years.

It was a black magic ritual which succeeded in ushering in an age of double-think, it was literally responsible for Anita sarkisijew.

>Kurt Sonnenfeld video showing fireman complaining about ongoing explosions and the blown out lobby & marble fascia.

They were giant office buildings with major structural damage and huge fires...why wouldnt you expect to hear explosions?

We know jetfuel traveled elevator shafts and blew out the lobbies, we know that severed elevators crashed to floors below...we know people jumping from 7o floors up came crashing down like "bombs" ....what other materials in a modern office building explode when on an inferno? Oxygen tanks, fuel tanks? anything else?

none of the accounts of explosions being interpreted as bombs are in any way consistent with the sounds of a controlled demolition-

>jet fuel
>we knew

do you hear yourself?
literally commit suicide

Both theories are dumb and also I wasn't referring to eyewitnesses, but, like, the actual people who took videos of what happened:

youtu.be/DoE8Uz2ia3M

There WERE planes involved. Could have been charges too, but two aircraft definitely did hit those towers.

I've studied fire science, building construction, and had a personal interest in learning about that day.
Not a single one of the theories "truthers" show make sense.

They are all based on debunked claims, poor quality images, or doing like and showing only part of an event.
In that specific case Just showing what was by that point the exterior of 7 WTC. collapsing.
Here's the FULL clip. No commentary, no cropping.
youtube.com/watch?v=nqbUkThGlCo
Collapse starts at 3 seconds with the roof failing and by that point the interior is going. What's effectively the shell of the building collapses after.

>doesnt prove anything

it proves that steel office building can collapse soley due to fire...which is what happened to the plasco building....just so happens to look suspiciously like the WTC 7 which supposedly coudnt happen without being a CD

What's about this building?

yah it probably is by now. I haven't been to that site in years, but they used to really get into the physics of the buildings falling.

>but two aircraft definitely did hit those towers

you're not even trying now desu

Jokes on you! Already fought 2 multi trillion dollar wars so what the fuck does it matter? Still fighting one of those wars

cuz its a claim troofers make and its false. like many others.

show them webm related

>planes were just CGI
>there was thermite
>some device that turns most of the buildings somehow into DUST that burns cars but not paper

if you want to ignore the facts thats on you...just dont burden us with your ignorance.

>Why would people so blindly accept what they're told without looking into it themselves?
Because you can only see that something is fake if you look for themself, but there is no reason to research for yourself if you believe something is true

I heard an argument once that said that the WTC had the largest freon-based air conditioning system in the world at the time it was destroyed. Apparently, the jet fuel was hot enough to ignite the large amount of freon(which typically contains fluorine, a highly explosive chemical) circulating through the WTC, which was the primary source of the explosions. Think about it, it's circulating throughout the entire building.

HELLLLLLOOOO BASED GERMANANON

i was wondering when you'd show up

bitch, you don't even know about smactane.
fag, you don't know about the high speed elevator shafts sound proofing.
You're a basic bitch, coming to my Sup Forums talking shit like you know anything.