Economic illiterate children of Sup Forums

Socialism leads to dependent fat niggers and losers who sit on their computers like most of Sup Forums and complain about parasitic jews owning the world. The jew is oppressing me imao Fucking fat lazy pieces of shit on here you can't take as real

I agree. Protectionism is kind of the same thing though, government intervention in the economy that destroys productivity and lowers the standard of living of a country.

So Trump supporters are economically illiterate too.

the problem wtih captialism is people hording money. I'm not opposed to someone making a billion dollars a year, but not spending it is the exact problem we have. put the savings cap on people with excessive welath to 1 million dollars a year and force them to spend the rest of the 999 million dollars, or how ever much over 1 million they make.

Capitalism gave the jews the power to push socialist agendas.
You don't know shit.

You do realize that his supporters don't agree with everything he does right?

sounds like something a trump loving nazi would say

>his supporters don't agree with everything he does

wew lad

shariablue plox

Kek

if you are bluepilled on economics read this

But you can't have a completely free market either now that globalism has enabled foreigners to undercut your business from their own country.

Yet we see the effects of not having a drop of government intervention does. Businesses going overseas for cheap labor while leaving the American economy to stagnate and drain away. The government was responsible for allowing it to become more lucrative to move your entire business overseas, they should be responsible for making it more lucrative to keep your business in America.

...

Preaching to the choir

delete this

Capitalism where the prices go up everyday

Capitalism where where the rich Jewish banker spend the people's money on wars in the middle-east

Capitalism where Miley Cyrus and her handlers are given a platform free of the hand of decency

...

Economic illiterates detected.

>capitalism where the prices go up every day
central banks aren't capitalistic. fiat currency isn't capitalistic. a state link with banks is not capitalistic.
large-scale interventionism can only occur with a large state

>hollywood
>capitalistic
nice joke

natsoc larpers are beyond redemption

There is only 1 ideology that works, the 1 ideology that is based upon the laws of the nature and biology..

And that is National Socialism...

Capitalists, Libertarians, AnCaps, Socialists, Communists etcetc, enjoy your Jewish overlords

kek

yeah, socialism and communism are so great. It's why the USSR needed the help of the entire world just to defeat 1 little nationalist country ;^)

It's why socialism needed to kill tens of millions of its own citizens throughout the 20th century with food requisition programs, mass starvation and outright purges and why all socialist countries today are 1st world envies.

hahahahaha

oh no consumer goods cost less resources to manufacture what about our low-wage low-purchacing power jobs i have a good idea i will put a 15000% tariff on all goods coming from people outside of my house and surely then i will be more economically prosperous

Prices wouldn't go up everyday if we didn't have crazy inflation from the Federal Reserve and our government enforced our anti-monopoly laws.

We wouldn't have rich bankers dictating what our country can do if they weren't allowed to own our currency.

Miley Cyrus became the way she is because she was a victim of the Hollywood pedophile sex ring and now spreads degeneracy because that's all she knows how to do after years of abuse at the hands of an industry that now pushes the agenda of the same people who own our currency.

And we all know (((who))) owns our currency.

anarcho-capitalism is the enshrinement of natural law

No its monarchy you fucking tard

globalist shill spoted, let the chinesse do the job I'll jew them

No it isn't. Not even close...

You're a traitor to your nation if you really mean this. Inherited power is good? Fuck off faggot

>If you don't agree with them, they win.

the logical conclusion of outlawing trade that undercuts domestic trade in productivity is each individual having his own state and attempting self sufficiency. protectionism is mathematically always conducive of lower prosperity.

>Look at what you can achieve with imperialism and slavery!
Russia was a backwards semi feudal state that turned into a world superpower in a few decades, Jerry cuck bastard.

>national socialism was tried once
>got btfo after nine years
>IT'S DA SUPERIOR SYSTEM
Go kill yourself socialist

Wow, I never thought about it like that. Maybe if more people thought like you, your country would be first world.

but u have to produce some basic shit all the countries do with agriculture and things like that, are u retarded? u need to have some basic things in ur country in order to no get fucked by others

national socialism is big state. big state will always be infiltrated by bad people. bad people with big state will always result in the death of good people.
not to mention that all socialism is a restructuring of the process of natural selection in favour of the weak and against the strong.

>Jewish overlords are bad so lets replace them with white overlords
How about we get rid of the spoopy overlords?

>Thinks Socialism in National-Socialism is the same
>Thinks losing a war proves a ideology didn't work

"Nazi" Germany thrived retard. And Socialism in National Socialism is NOT the same as Socialism. Read more, fap less

what are you on about? of course your own country will produce food. it's not very efficient to transfer quick-perishables from australia to the united kingdom. each country has land, each country has patches of very fertile land. this land will almost always be used for growing food.
if someone were to settle on antartica, do you think it would be a good idea for them to use their resources to grow food in ice, or to sell penguin skins overseas in exchange for very cheap food produce?

Yeah they "thrived" because uncle Addy said fuck the treaty of Versailles
You know when the German people Thrived, even more, pre WW1 when they had Gott, Kaiser und Vaterland.

also you didn't even attempt to refute my point

If the Soviets didn't have nuclear weapons no one would have considered them a superpower. They had little actual force projection and the Russians still have none, outside of Europe.

Woo they launched a monkey into space.

And a small state leads to private individuals screwing over a nation for personal benefits instead of benefiting the folk. And comparing Socialism to National Socialism is retarded. Read more

National Socialism is for every race, not only whites...

Ofc they said fuck that treaty, it is an insane treaty. Spare me this, please. You are a nord and should know better..

>screwing over a nation for personal benefits instead of benefiting the folk
you have no fucking clue what you are on about. "read more" is not an argument. the only ways by which someone can get rich is either providing resources to the desires and values of your fellow men or plundering resources from your fellow men against their will. capitalism is the conclusion of the former, statism is the manifestation of the latter.
voluntary trade by definition benefits the folk. what are you even on about? stop fucking larping and actually understand the systems that you're attempting to refute.
if you want a nationalist system, great, whatever, i don't really care. just make it nationalist, patriotic and capitalist. your country will fail otherwise. i absolutely guarantee it. you will be utterly and entirely doomed to failure. it is mathematical and praxeological certainty.

This dude got so butt hurt about me defending socialism in a different thread that he had make a new one after getting his shit kicked in.

Ancap plebs are all the same, you do realise you have oils likely be one of the plebs that has to suck dick 18 hours a day shitting in a bucket in a slave labour style factory just so you don't end up starving to death.
Although from the level of fag opinions you are displaying you would probably enjoy it.

Then look at the Mexican drug cartels. Good working enviroment? Benefits the worker, or folk? Mexican drug cartels is the prime example of organic capitalism, and why/how it screws over as many it can to benefit the few.

The only larpers here are the AnCaps. Complains about me not giving any arguments, spews out I'm a larper. Good job goyim

Hitler will stop me being a degenerate

This. Ancaps are just as fucking bad as commies and should also be thrown from helicopters.

>mexican drug cartels is the prime example of organic capitalism
BRAVO
R
A
V
O
has nothing to do with the sale of drugs being illegal, does it? i can't believe capitalism made those things illegal and forced inefficient state police to not enforce the law. i bet capitalism was to blame for alcohol prohibition causing violence in america too

what does it mean that i have oils
why would me entering into voluntary contracts for my own benefit result in a hundred fold decrease in my prosperity and reduce to to working 18 hours a day and shitting in a bucket?
britfags are mostly socialist nhs-hugging cucks. shameful display from the prior leader of the free world

If people weren't godless degenerates, no one would listen to her shitty music

>b-but m-muh money is the root of all evil.
Tard

>i'm a national socialist fuck degeneracy
>this made-up silicone-injected std-riddled mixed-raced 1800-cocks-ridden porn star degenerate scum is so fucking hot i will post her in all of my images

>the problem wtih captialism is people hording money
Why would you hoard money if the currency keeps devaluing because of inflation? And why hoarding a bad thing? If you don't spend any of it increases the value of everyone else's spending power.

>put the savings cap on people with excessive welath to 1 million dollars a year
good job, now they spend it on stocks, bitcoin, gold, or some other liquid asset that's just another version of money. You sure showed them

Ancaps, commies, socialists and storm commies should all be hanged for treason.

it's like you don't want all of your wealthy entrepreneurs investing their capital-productive savings overseas instead of in your local economy or something, user

Never said I was a national socialist in the way that you are implying.

It doesn't matter if the product that is sold is legal or not. Doesn't matter if it is, Coka Cola, Prostitues or drugs. The example is to show how organic capitalism works, as it is organic which you can't refute. Pure capitalism in any way, sense or form is made to benefit the few, not your folk. Which you can't refute either. Organic capitalism in any, way, sense or form needs threats, violence and slavery like conditions to sustain itself. It will never benefit your folk unless they actually are a good person at heart. There is no limit to how powerfull you can become, thus you can become more powerful than your whole folk combined.

To sustain your nation, race and folk this can never work. A mild form of capitalism(private ownership) is acceptable, under a certain set of rules. Among those rules, and most important of those rules is that any business interest should be, and must be to benefit to the nation and folk

OP, it's apparent you don't understand how Capitalism works...

In Capitalism there are shortages everywhere ALL THE FUCKING TIME, but, you don't notice because the shortages aren't reflected in the absence of products. The shortages are reflected in the price.

Understand?

of course it matters if the product sold is legal or not. if it is not legal then the state doesn't recognise its right to exist and thus finds it legitimate to engage in violent conflict with those in the trade. this is as "organically capitalist" as the state sending armed forces to blow up every shoe store and then watching the cobblers take to a shoe black market.

> Pure capitalism in any way, sense or form is made to benefit the few, not your folk.
Explain how economic freedom is the best possible indicator of economic prosperity and economic equality. explain how all economic advances have been a product of the introduction of the market and property rights.
explain how voluntary interaction between two individuals which must, by definition, appear to benefit both individuals will result in more centralised wealth than a society in which action is dictated by a state which must, by definition, appear only benefit a single individual out of the two in the transaction (the state)

>There is no limit to how powerfull you can become
are you certain? this limit is how many resources your fellow men are willing to give you in voluntary trade for the resources that you are giving them. the limit to your power is the benefits that you can incur upon your fellow men

you're confusing scarcity with shortages

>Clearly don't understand what "organic" capitalism actually means

Anyways, as I said. A mild form of capitalism should exist, I never said anything else. If you read the statement you actually answer to you will see I write it there as well.

I try to formulate it in another way since you didn't understand me. The biggest problem with AnCap capitalism, or Libertarianism is that often it will not benefit your folk or nation in the end. It is just to look at big business. To earn most money you take shortcuts. Either buy steel from another nation than your own even though your own nation has that resource. Using ingredienses in food that are unhealthy to your people. Switching out your own nationals workes to foreign workers to spare some money.. These are just a few examples.

Now, I don't argue again market and property rights. But this has to be regulated to never exploit your folk or nation. There has to be a cap on how much wealth you can own, in all ways(property, gold, currency.. whatever. A total cap)

There is no limit to how powerful you can become in a AnCap or Libertarian society(by no limit, it means that in all nations you can achieve to have more power than the whole of your nation combined.. not like you can become the master of the universe..).

Capitalism has a way for going for the cheapest, and easiest solutions. There will always be "fellow men" willing to voluntarly give you a cheaper blowjob than another "fellow man". Ending up exploiting the weakest..

No.

I'm not talking about "scarcity" at all.

a scarcity in a product can imply a scarcity in demand, or not being able to keep up with an overabundance of demand. its a word that works 2 ways.

>dependent and fat niggers
>fat
>waiting on breadlines
>fat
>no bread
>fat
this is where it gets interesting
>no bread
>fat

>Diogenes
>Ancap precursor

Shit you guys are delusional.

>If X did have thing that gives them power they wouldn't be powerful
>Every other country needed to rely on them for the bulk of the war effort against Germany, look at how silly they are

How could I win against you people?

Sorry but repost where you kicked my shit in please?