There is literally nothing wrong with anarcho-capitalism

There is literally nothing wrong with anarcho-capitalism

Other urls found in this thread:

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_banking
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

No roads.

Who would build the damn roads?

Who needs "free" roads when you can have free helicopter rides ?

i prefer being in oppressed by the hierarchy and living a meaningless life. kthx

How are we going to get around without roads? Walking could work, but do you know how long I'd take me to walk to my nearby city?

Lol, forgot to pay for my parachute.

Helicopter rides shouldn't be free you should make them pay for half the trip

horses you urbanized cunt

It is the only social and economic set entirely ethical and logical.

If you can't afford to pay the police to protect you, you're fucked.

Who the hell prints the currency if it's an anarchy? What standard is that currency based on?

we start from scratch with shekels

Cuck beta male.

Except for all the really shitty times the masses had in the 1850-1930's.

If you trust Vanderbilt, Rockafeller, and Carnegie to take good care of you, then it works out fine.

There's also the question of inheritance.
The freedom inherit in A.C. is bound to lead to people leaving money to their kids, paying for their college, etc.
How does that jibe with the libertarian ideal of equal potential/opportunity for all? (or however you want to phrase it)

and what happens with criminality?

"Anarcho-capitalism" doesn't exist. Capitalism is when privately-owned property is protected by a state with its military and courts. If this system is not in place it's not capitalism.

you fucking misogynists nigger faggot bitch
ill fucking grab your pussy you alpha bitch

>money
....I know that there's supposed to be the "capitalism" part of this shit-turd of an idea.... but who enforces the whole concept of money?

Do they bust counterfeiters? Who is "they" in that scenario?

>1850-1930's
>anarchist
>not the golden ages anyways to anyone not retarded or Irish

Go blow a nigga and take a muslim dick in the asshole.

The only Community unit which pretty much doesnt Need rules is the Family unit. Everything bigger Needs rules and someone overlooking them. Everytime People come with their Anarcho shit, they cant explain who would solve more complicated Problems in Society. Tell me who investigates the murders ?

Or 99% of the WASP folk either. The "Industrialists" were a handful of wealthy families.

It was GREAT for them. But just like feudal times, most people weren't the nobility.

Late stage capitalism essentially IS feudalism.

Use gold or cryptocurrency

What? So I can fuck up my perineum and piss blood for months on end? No thanks.

>implying the local organized militia wont form a government

This happens all throughout history.

So you basically want to tell us that this Anarcho shit only works if we become Cavemen again ?
Didnt the Khmer Rouge tell the same shit to the Cambodians ? How did that work out ?

Should you trust Roosevelt, Clinton and Obama instead?

I am just discussing the Idea of Anarcho Capitalism and how it doesnt work on even the simplest of Levels
Of course you are right
And the local Militia could also start harvesting organs from children if they wanted to in this system

Ancaps are very naive. Don't you realise, that a lot of today's issued are because of capitalism. The market regulates itself, yes. And the market does what is best for the market, yes. But when people say this, they only thing of the positive outcomes for themselves, when for example a customer unfriendly company gets replaced by a friendlier one. What they don't see, is that the market only wants one thing, and that is to grow. A market grows in monetary ways, therefore it has to generate more and more money. The best way to generate lots of money is to have a monopoly in a field, and have dependent customers.
Now how exactly will AnCap deal with a big megacorporation that has a monopoly on something very essential let's say water. One big corporation in charge of the water. They own all of it. Who is going to stop them and how? They have more money than anyone else in the country and therefore more means of defense.
Please riddle me this Ancaps. The NAP cannot hinder to development of monpolies, can it?

Free Banking

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_banking

quick who's the best presidential candidate and why it's joao doria?

International oil companies and car companies lose customers because they don't have safe roads to use.
You seriously think no-one involved in the strategies of these billion-dollar industries would think of maybe keeping their customer base if they invested in the roads.
Then it's a huge race to build/buy as many roads as possible and there's a whole new competitive market of road tolling.
What are you, a commie or something?

He won't run, he's mayor until 2020 at least.

More on that point - have you ever had a job where you're involved in decision making for the financial future of the business?
Or is your imagination just that shit?

HAHAHAHA Ancaps are so silly, how can you wipe your ass without a tax funded government counsel on wiping and subsidized toilet paper?

Freedom BTFO'ed!!!111!!!!!

Roads stopping us from helicopter ancapistan

I don't want to turn into Brazil

What a surprise, the Dutch and German prefer being sluts of state (socialism-cuck) and shitskins

Never say never, I share your opinion but I remain hopeful.

If lula wins i swear to god i will beat breivik's high score

Why don't you just answer my question. What can anyone in an Ancap society do when Nestle owns all water supplies?

>There would be no murders

Always the same answer.

You English are to be congratulated. Already the Swedes, Germans and Dutch are to be pitied here in Sup Forums. Sissys commie.

roads, hmm, let's see. well, we could have some investors put up money to build it. they would have the incentive to invest because they would earn a return on their money. then every poor goy who wants to use the road to get to their slave job would have to pay .25 shekels for a pass, which would go toward maintenance and interest and principal payments to the road builders.
Am I missing something here?

Anarcho-capitalism is not anarchism, it's just bunch of fedora wearing neckbeards and pinochetposters

>subsidies
>ancap
lol

Somebody say AnCap?

>There is literally nothing wrong with anarcho-capitalism

Yes there is, the automatic nap without the need of contracts is against the point of anarcho capitalism

Sorry but still 91% White, Insults from shitskins are pretty inconsequential
Pretty much this

>Who the hell prints the currency if it's an anarchy? What standard is that currency based on?
This is easy, look at cryptocurrent and the extreme amount of coins out there.

And Joao prefers to get anally raped by his roaming favela niggergangs who will then torture and kill him and all his family because his shit country is unable to keep itself afloat and working and lives in a perpetual state of fear and anarchism.

desalination. or war to take back the resources, which would relate to the "anarcho" part.
I agree it can devolve to oligarchy. I guess I prefer that to the authoritarian left.

A homocide occurs in an anarcho capitalist "state" (work with me here). The person is poor. Without a federally funded investigation group how do we stop the killer?

How does an anarcho-capitalist state deal with military invasion?

Libertarianism is the way to go. Government should be as small as conceptually possible, but should exist.

>and why it's joao doria?
He said he wont run again, even for mayor.

He is against second runs, and I am not talking about consecutive second runs, but runing again for the same thing, after you won once.

Stop them from what? Murdering the person?
The person is already murdered.
Governments cannot change history--they can only make you forget it.

Your third line there nailed it

Why don't you explain how they would do that before demanding everyone start jumping through hoops to respond to your retarded unrealistic bullshit lifeboat scenario.

There's literally days of lectures on youtube on why monopolies are impossible in a free market and require state laws and mandates in order to persist.

and btw, your precious state can shut down all water purification plant/bottling plants and have soldiers patrolling the street to shoot anyone seen with a bottle of water. But they don't because everyone sucks their dick and keeps handing over their money in the form of taxes.

So your worst case made up example against an ancap society is our actual situation right now under statism.

Nice get. I think the lesson here is that the person who was robbed should have protected their own wealth better. Survival of the fittest.

Power vacuum
It would turn into an oligarchy pretty fast.

People are against it because they're still addicted to dominator culture and power which ironically keeps us all enslaved. Ancap, Vegan, Armed this is the true redpill

So everytime a monopoly is emerging, a war has to be fought? On what premise? The NAP does not allow for that.

I don't think there's really a lesson, it's just meant to be a funny satire of an AnCap/Libertarian paradise type society. But whatever.

I heard those arguments and they just do not hold true. In fact many monopolies and rulers, emerged out of anarchy. AnCap will lead to Corporate Communism

Local militia would be a government, it would have means to extort money/food and would make a ruling class. If anyone want anarchy they best go live alone in some island.

So how exactly would we limit the governments growth if you start with handing over to them the power the justice system and the police/military.

If you would ask me what's the bare minimum the state needs in order to start getting it's claws into every aspect of society it would probably be those things.

The US constitution is basically the most radical attempt to limit state power and growth seen in the history of humanity and 200 years later it's the biggest empire on the planet since the Romans.

Is there a way to keep a government small and limited after you hand over the law and the monopoly on violence? I'm genuinely curious if there's any ideas out there that have never been tried or haven't failed miserably already?

>There is literally nothing wrong with anarcho-capitalism
Sure, if you don't mind being a peasant in feudal Japan

>muh roads

Roads fags don't understand that if we switched anarcho capitalism people would have flying cars in a matter of days and we wouldn't even need roads

...

EXPLAIN TO ME:


How ancaps, (at least internet ones) are ok with automatic naps, doenst this goes againt ancap?

What caused the customers dependance.. The company itself or water?

Consider the restraints to a monopolised water company in a true free market. What room is there for capital growth for a company like that?

It is impossible for a corporation to control a population in AnCap land, there is too much wider business incentive against it.

I posed a question. You did not answer.

If you're fine with serial killers getting away with murder, you're a fucking joke.

It's an ethical principle. Why would it not make sense?

It's inconsistent my friend.

How is it inconsistent?

It's ethical arguments are just determined based property rights and that's about it. A government banning drugs is bad, yet a man who owns apartments in ancapistan can ban drugs on his land. In ancapistan, you can silence free speech. In Ancapistan, you can force people to pay for things. All in the name of voluntary interactions.

None of that is inconsistent.

>Being forced to pay a landlord to fund guards who enforce rules such as drug raids

>Being forced to pay government to fund police who enforce rules such as drug raids.

It's okay to force people in a free market but not when the government does it.

>Being forced to pay a landlord to fund guards who enforce rules such as drug raids

you are inconsistent

How so?

You aren't forced to live at AnCap Heights.

>Don't like America? Then move
>Don't like Ancap heights? Then movie

You aren't forced to live in America. You can just move.

They have value in printed currency. You can sell them for real money. If you take that away they are literally useless.

Find me somewhere I can move that doesn't force me to pay taxes or adhere to laws.

You can't.

And Somalia is a warlord-run country before you try to use that.

>For real money
Do you mean the dollar or gold?

Ancaps don't look very patriotic to me.

Find me a place where I can move that doesn't force me to pay for things in general and abhere to their rules on that property.

You can't.


Every system is inherently coercive. It's pointless to obsess over it.

Who will force all banks to use gold?

how would that even work?

Except you can have your own private property and enter individual contracts.

"Who will force milka to put chocolate on their cookies?"

They will if there's a demand for it. And all through history gold has been demanded to be used as an exchanging commodity.

If Somalia was a white country, wouldn't it be an ancap paradise?

Every crime is handled by blood feud

Check em

But this still gives man to rule over others. A landowner will have more power over other people on his land. The people living on his land will not have the same rights. A landowner can ban certain types of speech, and control what information is said on their land.

Banks print their own currency.
Of course they would have to have something tangible and value to start with such as gold.

Because you are ignoring that your relationship with a landlord and a government is different.

All your doing is C is inconsistent because AC=BC.

Though this is untrue by all means.

Furthermore, voluntarism makes the whole difference.

It's the difference between rape and agreed sex.

So they are sandnigers?

Defend private prisons