Reminder that it is scientifically established fact that the earth is unequivocally warming...

Reminder that it is scientifically established fact that the earth is unequivocally warming, and that this is largely anthropogenic

ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/wg1/WG1AR5_SPM_FINAL.pdf

Other urls found in this thread:

climatechangedispatch.com/97-articles-refuting-the-97-consensus/
youtube.com/watch?v=WB109lhkAyk
youtube.com/watch?v=yTTaXqVEGkU
wattsupwiththat.com/2014/04/02/the-big-list-of-failed-climate-predictions/
youtube.com/watch?v=rIgHK5x-4fY
ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/wg1/WG1AR5_SPM_FINAL.pdf
m.youtube.com/watch?v=DrWznOFq38s
youtube.com/watch?v=LOyBfihjQvI
dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-4192182/World-leaders-duped-manipulated-global-warming-data.html
zerohedge.com/news/2017-02-03/un-official-admits-global-warming-agenda-really-about-destroying-capitalism
m.phys.org/news/2017-02-rapid-north-atlantic-cooling-21st.html
youtube.com/watch?v=Gh-DNNIUjKU
youtube.com/watch?v=xlk4Lt__Sn0
youtube.com/watch?v=pat3K_65tyw
nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2016/carbon-dioxide-fertilization-greening-earth
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

science is for faggots lol

anything too complex to be put into a simple sentence is a fraud anyway.

>No it's not
>Kys OP

wtf i hate co2 now

Reminder that Op is a fag and alarming looking graphs are bullshit.

reminder that reality doesn't give a fuck about your opinions, and that the earth is unequivocally warming

Reminder that no reasonable person would support such a claim. Reminder that this absurdity can only be supported by lying about historical data. Reminder that climate is always changing and that we are damned lucky to be living in a warm period instead of huddling in caves and starving to death because ice and snow is not very nutritious.

TIL 99% of relevant experts on climate change are not reasonable people, but user here is
What's it like, being too smart for the science?

Oh malarky. 99% of Catholic priests say Jesus is real. 99% of crackheads say crack is wonderful 99% of commies say communism is great. 995 of niggers say they wuz kangs. 99% of germans say faggotry is normal.

those people aren't fucking experts who have fucking QUALIFICATIONS
also theres no real consensus
it'd have to be 99% of politicians say communism is great
or 99% of religious people say jesus is real
which would be false

Oh it's global warming again now? I thought (((they))) changed the phrase to climate change because ice caps started growing instead of melting?

>priest don't have to get qualified by the church
Retard

Here's a convenient list of 97 articles debunking the "97%" claim. It's patently false. One man even took the time to review every major article and paper published in the field of climate change and the result is that 0.5% of them make any claims that generally support the idea of man made climate change.
climatechangedispatch.com/97-articles-refuting-the-97-consensus/
Included is an image that will make people angry so that they are more likely to see my post.

The terms can be used interchangably

Consensus isn't science, marxist user. Consensus is politics. Take your global warming bullshit and circle jerk with your marxist friends, your kind isn't welcome here. Only climate rationalists are welcome here, we don't take kindly to you hysterical little alarmist faggots shitting up our board with your aids.

>FOX NEWS
>NEW AMERICAN
>PATRIOT POST
Thanks, this is too fucking good to be true, had a good laugh

>largely anthropogenic
no it's not, go look at vostok ice records

>unequivocally warming
youtube.com/watch?v=WB109lhkAyk

>muh 99% of experts
logical fallacy detected: argument to authority
youtube.com/watch?v=yTTaXqVEGkU

Consensus among experts is scientific fact
That's just how it is

>argument to authority
You mean appeal to authority, which is only a fallacy if it's outside of their field of expertise. Look it up

you got conned
wattsupwiththat.com/2014/04/02/the-big-list-of-failed-climate-predictions/

now educate yourself and stop spreading propaganda designed to steal everyone's rights and property to control everyone's lives
youtube.com/watch?v=rIgHK5x-4fY

>97% of scientists who agree with me agree with me.

I don't know why you don't just shoot for 100% if you're just going to exclude anyone who disagrees with you.

>if a web site or group I don't like reports on a paper or statement that's othweise being blacklisted for being against the current narrative then I get to ignore and mock it!

I don't usually say this "user" but you should actually kill your self. Like for real. Either I'm right and you're a terrible shill/unrecoverable retard, or you're right and that's one less evil magical human making magical earth melting evil rays.

like the EXPERT consensus that britain would stay in the EU and that hillary would win?

have you actually listened to the points raised by prominent climate skeptics?

what matters more, real facts or opinions of people stuck in an echo chamber?

how many times do climate scientists have to be wrong before you consider they don't have a goddam clue what's going on

If there are scientists who disagree with anthropogenic climate change, then show me the fucking publications and the peer reviewed studies, not fucking media articles

Experts say it's one way

Some faggot on the internet says it's different

I'm gonna trust the scientists

ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/wg1/WG1AR5_SPM_FINAL.pdf

>OP still believes the Global Warming meme

Dude its 2017!

It's not about the science user, It's about somali cock sucking faggots using a word they don't understand (science) they don't understand to signal their willingness to suck cock.

>Implying that this is bad.

Remember that in ancient times Scandinavia used to have the weather of modern central Italy.

Here's Lord Monckton fag.

m.youtube.com/watch?v=DrWznOFq38s

>It's not about the science user, It's about somali cock sucking faggots using a word they don't understand (science) they don't understand to signal their willingness to suck cock.
This is how you faggots react to your fragile, pseudoscientific worldview being challenged

Is denying facts really so much fun?

>ignoring a list of literally 97 cited articles.
I can't learn for you "user" if you really are a legit user. If you're a shill enjoy your .04 shekels you got 2 replies out of me.

To the guy that signs her checks, I don't think she should get paid for this one. This one is just me laughing at her dumb ass.

If you are going to trust scientists why do you keep reposting a report prepared by marxist politicians? Come back with some real science faggot, you are just embarrassing yourself by continually posting proof that you are an idiot and a faggot.

>that bending of the facts

Climate change is real.
Human-influenced climate change is not yet proven.

[spoiler]Its probably true but fuck you, I bet you're a lefty piece of shit.[/spoiler]

he is right in that it is warming but it probably has little to do with us, but pollution is bad and poisonous so we should go green either way - unless there's something i'm missing?

Yes

With the fucking clickbait thumbnail
Classic

You haven't posted any facts, you have only posted the same tired old dated propaganda that has been endlessly debunked, therefore you deserve only ridicule and laughter.

You missed the part that big oil wont let you till it runs out.

(((peer reviewed)))

there are climate experts who don't agree with the consensus and have raised lots of good points that (((scientists))) keep dodging, they all resort to "muh 97%" as if that determines reality

there was once a consensus that smoking, radiation and asbestos were safe

you really trust the ipcc?
youtube.com/watch?v=LOyBfihjQvI

NOAA whistleblower exposes manipulated data used in study
dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-4192182/World-leaders-duped-manipulated-global-warming-data.html

now fuck off until you realise the climate change crap is entirely about creating a global socialist government where you will have no rights

zerohedge.com/news/2017-02-03/un-official-admits-global-warming-agenda-really-about-destroying-capitalism

m.phys.org/news/2017-02-rapid-north-atlantic-cooling-21st.html

Here's a link to the IPCC themselves bricking it again.

You do know the IPCC has never got any of its predictions right right?

ok, ENOUGH, let's gas OP!
with his favourite CO2 gas

GAS GAS GAS!!!

>global warming is real gais!
>we're all gonna die in a thousand years!
>muh Al Gore hockey stick, muh Bill Nye the Science Guy! muh 97%
>muh sea levels, muh oceans of acid, muh mass starvation, muh unequivocal warming, muh droughts muh floods! muh global carbon tax for the good of mankind! muh children, gais!

meanwhile, more people live on earth with a higher standard of living than ever before, so much food is produced governments pay farmers not to grow it.

yeah, pollution is bad, so they should actually do something about fukushima, the oceanic garbage patch, contaminated farmlands, out of control GMOs, and toxic foods

they should do something about overfishing too, which is far more urgent than co2

but you hear only crickets, they don't give a fuck about real environmental problems

This.

How does one rebut the proofs of data manipulation?

youtube.com/watch?v=Gh-DNNIUjKU

CO2 ain't shit

bill nye the totalitarian fucktard with the pedo bowtie who's never done any real science
youtube.com/watch?v=xlk4Lt__Sn0

no dissent will be allowed
youtube.com/watch?v=pat3K_65tyw

>scientific fact
Stop pushing your white agenda onto me. Science is just a way for white males to dominate all other races into doing what they want; not industrialize and become wealthy. They don't want any other countries to pollute with coal and thus create industry and wealth.

You anthropogenic warming faggots get BTFO every single thread. Kill youselves.

this too

I wanna find out whats in antarctica and grow pineapples in greenland

Carbon Dioxide Fertilization Greening Earth, Study Finds
nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2016/carbon-dioxide-fertilization-greening-earth

I say burn more co2, food will grow quicker
and maybe we can dodge or weaken the ice age that is due

i agree that we should go green anyways, but the fact of the matter is, that billions of $ are wasted for climate change research. only a small part of that research is directly aiming towards efficient use of renewable energy sources.
had all this money gone directly to renewable energy research, we might be a lot closer to efficient use of solar energy.

If only all the money that has been spent on carbon reduction was instead spent on reducing air and water pollution. :-/