On a scale of 1-10, how close is the US to a full scale civil war?

On a scale of 1-10, how close is the US to a full scale civil war?

Other urls found in this thread:

status451.com/2017/01/20/days-of-rage/
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

>baby's first election
>thinks America is going to fall apart
>wants to live out his racewar fantasies so bad

6/10

2/10

14/88

2/10
Civil war would require a vast amount of people willing to die for a cause. Only fringe radicals consisting of less than 0.1% of the population would die for any of the current "major" political issues right now (not counting military).

On a scale of 1 -10, what the fuck happened in your picture?

3/10

Maybe 4 or 5 at most.

Which is incredibly high for post-9/11 America, but not actually that close to real danger. We've been much closer even recently. Just look at the 20th century, when we had the "bonus army" march on DC, or the national guard mobilized to enforce de-segregation, or the Waco siege and Oklahoma City bombing.

If we start seeing acts of political terrorism or armed resistance to Trump, then there might be a risk. But right now it's just butthurt liberals whining in the media and protesting.

1/10
Libs are busy losing the current Online Civil War right now. Their Tiny Trumps offensive is floundering. None of them own guns though so they can't do shit aside from punching random people and running away. After one of them gets shot doing thisd they won't even have the balls for that anymore.

Looks like some Abu Hajar shit.

Actually looks like a Romanian AK so I'd say Iraq or Afghanistan... did they use any white phosphorus or some shit there?

jews, illegals, indoctrinated sjw"antifa" White twenty year olds still living off of mom and dad at home vs White America, I can only surmise jews are trying to get illegal aliens and pozzed young Whites slaughtered.

Did he died?

1/10

A ton of shit has to change before we could even think of something on the scale of a civil war.

We are FAR more sedated today than in the 19th century.

Breddy brutal.

2/10

France on the other hand 8/10.

Honestly probably a 4/10. We're definitely not close, but one retarded decision COULD start people at least entertaining the idea more seriously.

Truly, it's more like .

Only 2% of the population died in that war, and yet people still don't realize just how crazy the Civil War was. That's the equivalent of 6.5 million dead today.

Don't fall for the civil war meme, it's what (((they))) want. Resist non violently don't fall prey to polarization tactics

About -10/10, liberals are too cowardly to actually fight a war, and so are most conservatives.

Radical terrorist lib-groups though? I think we'll be seeing a lot of that in the coming years.

Like a 3?

The agitators/protestors are literally all paid shills. Liberals don't actually give a damn compared to the way the media is reacting.

he's just taking a nap

fpbp, oldfag detected

3/10

There is a definite left v right, but in all seriousness... It's not even close.

1/10

It won't happen.

trufax: after they pried off the mummified hand, the rifle was successfully fired

slav shit can take a beating

Not white phosphorus. WP reacts at 2760C, steel melts at roughly half. You'd expect the weapon to have holes in it. Also, it tends to leave behind an yellow-orange residue, not a thick white powder coating.

wat is that thing

3.

This ain't shit. In the late 60s - early 70s Leftest radicals carried out thousands of domestic bombings, in addition to mass riots and other bullshit. Outside of Ferguson and Baltimore things are still pretty tame in comparison.

>low level street fighting
>civil war

Maybe 4/10. There is unrest but it's very disorganized. People who are making the most noise online do not have enough real dedicated support to do anything in particular other than parrot whatever the topic of choice is. That is why the post election protests were so no energy and scattershot about what they were actually mad about. Civil war requires high unrest under a unified set of goals. No such thing at this time.

They will of course be more low energy temper tantrums and chimpouts but nothing local police can't squash on their own. Once you have riots that require the military to put down, then you're getting up in to 7/10 range.

This.

Based Data.

looks like a shipwreck

Stop being a bunch of faggots

10/10

The hull of a ship.

This. Actual civil war with battles between two clearly marked sides? No.

Some hysterical lefties taking the "resistance" meme too seriously and setting off a bomb or two? More likely by the day.

your mum in the bath LOL

0/10. It's just a bunch of snowflakes and dinndu crying and the media giving them all the attention they want. If they were actually stupid enough to start any sort of real violence we would then all get to watch and laugh as our glorious US military mows them down in the streets

>you were born in time to fight in an American civil war
>the military, police, most of the intelligence agencies, the executive branch and the gun owners are on the same side against manchildren, celebrities and bankers

We don't deserve to be this lucky.

0

2-3

Media is just trying to start trouble. Majority of people do not give a shit and either support Trump or think we just have to deal.

11, but it's a cold war.

don't forget that the majority crying are in fact liberals, if they started shit the conservatives, most of whom own guns, would easily wipe the floor with them. The spics and dindus would be a bit harder since they probably have some guns, but they can't defeat the military.

The coming american civil war will be a world war....

1/10

3/10 and barely that. Had Trump lost the election we would be sitting at a 7/10. Pre-election was far closer to a civil war.

no matter which side you are on in this election, anyone over 30, who has seen a few elections, will tell you this is very different than anything we've seen before.

2 tops. military, law enforcement and gun owners vs liberals/sjw, queers, media and niggers. I really don't think they are stupid enough to actually turn this physical.

California secession by 2018.

no shit sherlock, the US wont have the resources to protect their allies, enjoy being invaded by russia

Something like a 2/10. The Marxists are upset they are loosing control but they don't have the ability to mobilize a military force. They are pretty much limited to random mob violence and vandalism.

Lefties will have Soros PMCs/CIA, maybe even UN involvement because anyone that isn't a communist is a nazi.

0/10. The civil war would be between a bunch of white second amendment supporting good ol boys who probably have military experience or grew up hunting vs. a bunch of gamma-tier white knight faggots who expect the government to do everything for them.

the final boss of a JRPG

fpbp

Not really, however this is probably the worst shilling the media has ever done. Which might explain why you think this is very different.

it's not gonna happen. Liberals literally don't have the balls for any meaningful struggle.

Far right groups did the same shit.

I think we are much closer to world war III, a nuclear exchange, or nuclear "accident" or some other huge happening rather than a civil war.

The shadow government and any traitors within the government dont want a civil war. The government cannot win a civil war. It is their biggest fear.

They would sooner trigger WWIII or let off some nukes or some other crazy distraction than allow the people to revolt into an all out civil war.

For that reason it is extremely unlikely anyone will survive to see another civil war, you'll be obliterated first.

The military, police etc aren't all on the side of Trump.

Why do people put those ugly foregrips on aks?

They lack the balls AND the reason to fight. 2/3rds of them don't even know what they're fighting for, the remnants only vaguely have some sort of retarded idea.

That's demonstrably false. The north and south were convinced to go to war under the premise that it'd be a short affair. Civilians packed lunches and brought wine to manassas.

But once it started both sides were stuck and it spiraled downward. Nobody in 1860 would have dared think it would have gone so far.

One or two Flashpoint skirmishes would cause history to repeat itself.

Id say 1/10 for civil war and a 4/10 for world war. They want to scare us and intimidate people but there would have to be a perfect storm for there to even be a world war.

0.

Anybody that think's it's happening has no clue of the logistics involved. Trucking industry would be the default victors in less than a week.

4.

0/10, they have plans in place to prevent civil unrest, we are close to a paradigm shift though...

From their inception up until somewhat recently, Democrats represented the far right.

5. Because of demographics we will continue inching our way towards 10 over the next decade or so until it finally happens.

It's calcium carbonate aka lime. It's a way to deal with corpses if you have too many to bury before they'd rot and cause disease.

2/10
>the people with the most ability to conduct a serious insurgency generally just want to be left alone

>On a scale of 1-10, how close is the US to a full scale civil war?

1, stop watching RT. Russians would love nothing more than their military competitor to disappear.

what happened there?

Closer than any time after the last civil war.
It actually is a possibility now.

Altho you need to define civil war. To me it is a bit larger than gang wars.

The country is a lot different than it was 150 years ago, user.

0
right are cowards,
left have no weapons

Bow of the USS Arkansas. We tested a nuke on it.

>zero

Our national guard could shut down anything that randomly pops up.

Our military is obedient of leadership and the only reason why the civil war happened back in the 1800s is because we where very fragmented.

Trump is gonna do 4 years and another 4 if his plans work.

No conversion camps.
No womyns losing rights.
No dindus losing rights... etc..

We have a generation of retards who are doing their first election, and the media is abusing it for stories.

3.

Liberals fucking hate Trump, but they also believe they can win in 2020 (reasonable; they nearly won in 2016 despite a weak candidate) or that Trump will get impeached any day now (wishful thinking).

As long as each side believe it's *possible* for them to win democratically, there won't be much violence even when they lose. Liberals will be butthurt at Trump's victory, and Sup Forums would be butthurt if he lost in 2020, but it would be peaceful, funny butthurt, not war.

If demographics change so that one side no longer feels they can win, that will break down (the way the right became less democratic as they were more and more afraid of a declining share of the white electorate), but we're not there yet.

bump

2/10

As long as the bread and circuses keep going full steam most Americans will barely life a fat finger to give themselves and insulin shot.

Actually they are, that tends to happen when the Left has been telling you to stand down while our "allies" betray us and forced to watch helplessly as terrorist groups operate.
Being blamed and called racists every time you have to kill a criminal in self-defense.
You're out.

I'd say there is about an 80% chance we'll see a decade worth of widespread ethnic violence.

What the everloving fuck is this.

2 things need to happen before we're even close to having a civil war

1, the internet needs to be cut off permanently or become extremely limited

2, television needs to be cut off permanently or become extremely limited

Until both those things happen Americans will be too lazy and complacent to do anything

3/10, libshits won't do shit

Honestly 7/10 up until Trump won the election

0

Trying to be tacticool.

9/10

It only takes 20% of the population that is willing to fight to start the war. (10% each side)

After that it comes down to which side is willing to fight more. Usually it's a landslide which leads to other countries getting involved to help the side they want to win.

The pure hatred between the left and the right is real.

0

>Civil war would require a vast amount of people willing to die for a cause.

War doesn't require people to be willing to die for a cause. It just requires them to be willing to kill for one.

>tfw 13% of population becomes .3%

white phos, the white shit caked over the trigger is human fatty tissue liquified and combusted

Intradasting fact:
America has never had a civil war.
A civil war is a war fought for control of the government.
We had a war between states. A fight over leaving the control of the government.

>Far right groups did the same shit
Negative. Some Commies might've gotten beaten up in the streets by other citizens occasionally, but it was nothing even close to the scope and scale of the Left. Educate yourself. And inb4 Muh Jim Crowe because that was also State Enforced Leftist bullshit, it's why Democrats ruled the South for generations.

status451.com/2017/01/20/days-of-rage/

We're just lucky firearm freedom is winning right now.

17/76

I'd say the internet makes a civil war far more likely. Everyone's both in an echo chamber and also has the ability to co-ordinate like never before.

Besides, stuff like this can happen by accident. Imagine, if, say, there was another women's march in Washington. It starts to turn into a riot, and there are so many people there that they can't easily disperse. A big violent riot in front of the white house can easy turn into hundreds of thousands of rioters storming and burning the white house. Even a big police force could easily be overrun if the whole crowd went forward, and big crowds can have a mind of their own.

Or imagine if it turned rowdy, and wouldn't/couldn't disperse, so police fired into the crowd and killed a bunch of people. How do you think THAT could play? Would it be another Kent State, or another Boston Massacre? What if half the country is in an internet bubble calling it a massacre by Trump supporters?

1776/10

8 / 10

Over the past few years America has experienced race riots and ethnic massacres. Our population has heavily armed itself and talk of a civil war is conducted openly on both sides of the partisan divide. We're really close to a major breakdown in civil society. The conflict won't be like the War Between the States in the 19th century, rather it will be an escalating pattern of widespread ethnic violence which will grip the country for a decade or more.

1/10

There is division, but it is cities vs rural. The military is on the side of the rural.


If the military was on the side of the cities it could happen. If there were division between large contiguous geographical areas it could happen. But the cities cannot stand alone and without military support cannot impose their will undemocratically upon the countryside.