Sup Forums, at this point, largely defends the sexual revolution, premarital sex, etc...

>Sup Forums, at this point, largely defends the sexual revolution, premarital sex, etc. Thinks settling down with a non-virgin is fine so long as she hasn't had one night stands.
>Sup Forums is also viciously anti-gay. Many posters always held Milo's homosexuality against him.

You guys are fucking retarded. By every observable metric unmarried non-virgins are worse for society than the gays could ever dream of being. We had someone who, despite being an attention whore, was actually useful in shifting the sociopolitical pendulum. And what do you people do? Complain that he's gay, complain that he advocates pedophilia (He really didn't, and modern AoC laws only benefit feminists anyway, congratulations you shilled yourselves), etc.

inb4

>hurrdurr we don't need a leader
Milo was never a leader, just a prominent voice. You're paying far too much attention to MSM narratives. How did the amorphous blob strategy work out for Occupy Wall Street, by the way?
>Sup Forums is not one person
Let's not pretend like there's not a large amount of posters who are okay with premarital sex and promiscuity, but think the gays are horrible degenerates. It's simply not true, and spending any time in a thread that even tangentially touches upon sexuality will show that to be the case.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/osFtCcpFrXI
youtube.com/watch?v=ywmd8kR-AmI&t=1s
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

t. Milo

Here's his response to all of this shit:

youtu.be/osFtCcpFrXI

Watch it you tards.

Great post, well argued my friend.

I'm not fawning over Milo, but he's always been far more useful than Donkey Kong Demeanor Man, Molymeme, and Mainstream Meateater.

Bannon, Trump and Pence are the leaders of the Right wing, and that's that.

My gf was a virgin before she met me but in many cases it's difficult to find a virgin in modern society, and many of us have to settle for them if we want to have families.

If you support pedos like Milo, you can fuck off and die.
He was never alt right, just alt lite pedo kike
Spencer all the way
alt lite has to go

>unmarried non-virgins worse than gays
In what way? Fags spread disease at much higher rates, engage in more deviant acts (pederasty for example), and have hundreds of partners on average. As bad as premarital sex is among normal folk it can never come even close to the heights of moral abnegation that a gay man can achieve in a public bathroom or at a chemsex party or whatever. The lefty argument against Christians of "you're a hypocrite for rejecting shitpushing while being soft on divorce/promiscuity" is bullshit for this reason.

>just a prominent voice.
He said nothing useful with his voice. Even Dicky Spencer has better talking points that aren't just outrage porn.

>spencer all the way

2/10, but at least you tried

>but think the gays are horrible degenerates. It's simply not true

>and modern AoC laws only benefit feminists anyway, congratulations you shilled yourselves

Tell us more about how everyone should be able to legislate their own age of consent. Nasty pedo fuck

#notmyfaggot

This retard does not represent the views / attitudes / causes and real world issues facing LGBT people. He is a bigot play thing for bored basement dwellers.

Part of the smear campaign huh? Try harder faggot.

I prefer Spencer, but Milo is the starter pack for normies. Nobody stops with Milo, they continue onwards. He's the gateway drug.

Plus, if you really want to stick it to the alt-lite, go bitch at PJW. He's actively tried to coopt the alt-Right and undermine the efforts of guys like Richard Spencer and Jared Taylor.

>in what way?

The more men a woman has slept with, the more likely she is to:
>Cheat
>Divorce
>Report lower marital happiness
>Report depression
>Report higher marital instability
etc.

Female promiscuity rips families apart. Whores don't make good wives and they cannot be reformed. Whether it's a whore that hooks up, or a serial monogamist with a casual view of sex, nonvirgin women harm society in the long run.

Nonvirgins divorce at higher rates, they then become single mothers. Children raised by single mothers are more likely to abuse substances, report mental health problems, experience difficulty in school, get pregnant out of wedlock, commit crimes, and divorce. Single motherhood also perpetuates the Welfare state.

Sexual promiscuity also lowers the birthrate overall. More and more white native children are being raised in disastrous household situations, but our birthrates are dropping overall. While we're hamstringing our own youth, we're importing more people like Jamal, Paco and Ahmed, to make up for the declining birthrate.

Aside from sexual abuse (Which is tragic, but small in the grand scheme of things), the problems in the gay community are limited largely to the gay community. Female promiscuity makes society worse for everyone and actively undermines civilization itself.

>he said nothing useful with his voice.
To people already on the right? Probably not. To younger people that are constantly bombarded with Leftist nonsense in High School and College, he's done wonders.

I think whether we like to agree with it or not, the globalist left made a good attempt at trying to divide the line between Milo and the alt-right, and thus the line between the supporters of Trump, if we should allow it to happen.

Also, whether we like Milo or not, we should always keep in mind that Milo is for Trump. He has been under the radar/under attack of/by the MSM since the incidents at Berkeley. And the MSM are trying to demolish faith in Trump. They are picking things apart and portraying it as a case against him, and therefore, Trump.

In order to strengthen our movement (anti-globalist), we must unite against the common enemy: the left and the globalists. This includes defending Milo.

They will keep doing things like this, so saying we should disavow Milo won't do a damn thing. It will only weaken our cause.

TL;DR We must not let their divide and conquer strategy work. They did it rather successfully with left vs. right, and the cucky leftist faggots fell for it. Don't let it happen to us. This is what they want.

Kek warns against Spencers heresy

If digits Moldbug and Bronze Age Pervert are only true prophets

I want to be the little boy

Nice datamine kek, only newfags and morons would have relied to your obvious shilling anyway

digits, but fuck that kek is our leader, and Trump.

>By every observable metric unmarried non-virgins are worse for society than the gays could ever dream of being.
No matter how much you try to ally yourself with the right wing, we're still gonna clamp down on your sick fuckery, better just eat that bullet now that we're gonna prevent you freaks from raping our boys.

>Fags give each other a lethal STI
>Whores rip families apart, ruin children, vote Left, and undermine society.

Wow, those gays sure are destroying the West!

Promiscuity and partner count only matters for heterosexuals.

Fags can't have children and two gay men in a "marriage" aren't a family.

>raping our boys
>imlying your boys didnt want to experiment

>the problems in the gay community are limited largely to the gay community
Then why do these faggots invade our institutions, push their degenerates on our children and force us to accept their abominable deathstyle? Fuck off "limited largely to the gay community" yeah faggots are never trouble makers that's why 3 percent of the population forced their way into forcing 97 percent of the population to accept the farce that is "gay marriage"

>Female promiscuity makes society worse for everyone and actively undermines civilization itself.
Female promiscuity at least creates life, homosexuality produces nothing but horrible wasting diseases, now kill yourself before you waste even more taxpayer money taking aids cocktails

>This includes defending Milo.
Do you realize there is a bigger number of people you want to keep around who hate faggots, then there are of people who hate the left?

Do you realize that the people who hate the left and globalism but love sodomy are not the kind of people you want sticking around in a conservative future?

I said prophets, not leaders, I am in agreement, Trump is the avatar of Kek on earth

There isn't a gruesome enough death for you, degenerate.

>Fags rip boy's anuses apart, push for normalization of their sick perversions, leech onto whatever political party will assure their continued debaucheries and undermine society.

Wow those breeders sure are destroying the West!

You fucking sodomites and sodomite enablers will never gain any significant support on here or in the real world because people are born hating the depraved and the sick.

>He really didn't, and modern AoC laws only benefit feminists anyway, congratulations you shilled yourselves
Original charter for gay rights called for the complete abolition of age of consent


You're not fooling anyone sodomite, the only people who benefit from not having an AoC are homosexuals who want to prey on children.

Jesus Christ, user, you're fucking retarded, your priorities are all wrong and your perspective is skewed.

Gay marriage isn't going to destroy society. Gay promiscuity statistics have already been posted, these people aren't interested in marriage anyway. Give marriage to them, it's a meaningless victory.

Yes, gays are flamboyant attention whores generally speaking. Attention whores aren't wrecking society. I fully support the right to discriminate, but the world doesn't end because a baker has to make a cake that he doesn't want to.

As far as STIs and promiscuity goes, yes those things are limited to the gay community. I'm not going to get AIDS because I don't fuck men, or blacks, or women with any sexual partners. You're probably not going to get AIDS because you probably don't fuck men, or blacks, or women who sleep with blacks.

Stop moving the goalposts, you dishonest nigger.

>Female promiscuity at least creates life.

Yes, it creates life. It also creates single motherhood, Welfare States and destroys marriages.

Homosexuality spreads diseases that largely kill homosexuals, with some black and degenerate casualties. Why is that somehow a bigger problem? We shouldn't care about mortality rates in these communities anyway.

This is the kind of shit I'm talking about. You're defending whores, and bashing those icky gays, because you're fucking retarded and are incapable of looking at any issue objectively.

Don't get me wrong, I don't like Milo, nor do I listen to him. I think he's a degenerate faggot.

But he does support Trump, is anti-globalist, and triggers liberals. And that's the main thing I'm going for. What he is is a means to an end.

But we've seen this divide and conquer strategy before. This is their attempt to get it to affect us, as Trump supporters. They will always discredit Trump and Trump's supporters. And it won't stop. The only question right now is if we let them... that's all.

>Killing one of your best propaganda pieces on the chess board because you don't like who he fucks.

Jesus Sup Forums is retarded. I stand by Milo. Cernovich, PJW Alex Jones, Trump, and Richard spencer. They are our only leaders until others stand up.

>media creates alt right
>media makes milofag face of alt-right
>MILO IS A PEDO
>YOU LIKED MILO BECAUSE WE SAID YOU DID SO YOU LIKE PEDOS

Come on shills, we saw this the instant you threw him up. Just because you were patient doesn't mean we didn't see it coming, fuck off

>fags rip boy anuses apart
Of course because every fag has a 2 foot horse cock ready to literally destroy anuses.

The cruelest punishment would be to let me live.

And the AoC as it currently exists only benefits women who ride the cock carousel and then want some man that they can settle for, who will provide for them and clean up their trainwreck of a life.

Financially stable men in their 20s should be able to go get themselves a proper girl in their mid-late teens, when they're at peak attractiveness (data backs this up) and peak fertility.

All the AoC does is artificially inflate the value of whores, grant women way to much power to dictate culture and sociopolitics, etc.

>breeding
>the only thing that matters.

I mentioned it before, you moron, promiscuity lowers birthrates overall and ensures that many of the children that do get born are raised in disastrous conditions.

Are you seriously this disingenuous?

The media didn't create the alt-Right, you dumb nigger, Richard Spencer and Paul Gottfried did. Did you not do any browsing of the Far-Right online?

>these people aren't interested in marriage anyway.
Funny how they seem to shill and lobby for it really hard even though they apparently don't care about it, hmmm I wonder why?

>Give marriage to them, it's a meaningless victory.
>Yes destroy the fundamental value that marriage represents goyim it doesn't matter!

>but the world doesn't end because a baker has to make a cake that he doesn't want to.
Jesus fucking christ you want to live in a world where faggots of all people can bully you into doing whatever the fuck they want you to do, get fucked and take a poz load you leech. You don't support the right to discriminate if in the same sentence you advocate for sodomite bullying of the "bigoted breeder scum" you're such an enemy of.

>As far as STIs and promiscuity goes, yes those things are limited to the gay community.
Yeah because fags donating blood didn't massively fuck normal people up during the AIDS epidemic. By the way why don't you research how much money went into AIDS research versus cancer research. Apparently you think homosexuals aren't a drain on a normal, functioning society

>I'm not going to get AIDS because I don't fuck men, or blacks, or women with any sexual partners
I seriously doubt that, sodomite.

>Homosexuality spreads diseases that largely kill homosexuals, with some black and degenerate casualties. Why is that somehow a bigger problem?
Because you're fucking letting it persist as if somehow faggots live in a vacuum and their sick shit will never spill over into anything, this coming from you in the current year of 2017 is beyond hilarious and just goes to show you have a clear agenda of pushing sodomy in the right wing

>Doesn't actually counter the point that sodomites want the AoC abolished
Nice moving the goalpost you freak of nature

>This is the kind of shit I'm talking about. You're defending whores, and bashing those icky gays, because you're fucking retarded and are incapable of looking at any issue objectively.
I'm not defending whores you faggot, I'm shitting on your invalid deathstyle that only produces misery, death and suffering. You're the one who can't see any issue objectively because you're a reprobate who's pushing for the passive acceptance of abominable behavior.

>I mentioned it before, you moron, promiscuity lowers birthrates overall and ensures that many of the children that do get born are raised in disastrous conditions.
Homosexuality lowers birthrates overall and ensures many of the children that do get born are violated by caring "older men" and end up broken people who try to normalize it on internet podcasts.

I just know that accepting a woman has had sex before is better than dying alone and childless.

The only irony here is that actual Sup Forumslacks don't realize the left wants to justify pedophilia and is currently defending a gay jewish nigger lover to cover their own asses.

That's the only raid currently happening and takes the form of people pretending to be "conservative" and "libertarian."

Literally any other expression of heterosexuality is better than willingly advocating for a lifestyle that is a biological dead end, a moral abomination and an abhorration of nature. Even a whore will bear you a son. A homosexual can bear nothing except death.

>muh narrative muh Sup Forums muh gamergate! muh pizza@

He should off himself

LOL Faggot this is all gamergate faggotry. always has been neckbearded virgins here larping as nazis

"our" kys

kill faggots

Ignore sodomite orders

>Funny how they seem to shill and lobby for it really hard even though they apparently don't care about it, hmmm I wonder why?

Oh don't pretend you care about the sanctity of marriage. Proper marriage died the minute we started allowing no-fault divorce and stopped shaming premarital sex & bastard children.

>Right to discriminate.
I do support it, I'd just rather focus on things that actually matter in the grand scheme of things. Promiscuity is disastrous. Wedding Cakes for gays is a minor issue that should be ignored until major problems are taken care of.

People who think like you do are the reason things like the creation of Germany and unification of Italy were delayed so long in history.

>Donating AIDS blood

And we've fixed that problem.

>AIDS money vs. Cancer money

Feel free to donate to Cancer research, then.

>I seriously doubt that.
Yes, I must be a fag because I recognize that the biggest victims of the gay agenda are the gays, and realize that women sleeping around is causing lower birthrates, sky high divorce rates, single motherhood, skewed politics, a Welfare state, etc.

>Because you're fucking letting it persist as if somehow faggots live in a vacuum

Gays are a tiny minority. Promiscuous women aren't. The damage that gays can do to civilization is limited. Promiscuous women can literally destroy civilizations.

Priorities matter. Don't go into fucking purity spirals.

>sodomy in the Right-wing

How many right-wingers are okay with premarital sex and no-fault divorce? Did you know Right-wing "saint" Ronald Reagan popularized no-fault divorce?

>Nice moving the goalpost you freak of nature
Yes, because if one unsavory group of people push for something, the idea is bad.

This is just the hypocritical moralist's version of "Hitler did X so it's automatically wrong!"

>I'm not defending whores
You're arguing that whores have some benefit to society, they don't. You're claiming gays are worse than whores, that's wrong in every way.

>Homosexuality lowers birthrates

No it doesn't. Blame female promiscuity and birth control.

>Even a whore will bear you a son.

Yes, and then statistically she is extraordinarily likely to divorce you, and take the child.

Then, statistics dictate that you're likely to be paying alimony and child support, while having limited time to spend with your son. Your son is going to be far more likely to struggle academically, report mental health problems, have a kid out of wedlock, etc. Your ex-wife will vote for Leftist politicians who will rob you through excessive taxation to prop people like her up, even though she's already getting alimony and child support, etc.

Not really. Men who settle for whores enable bad behavior and ensure its continuation.

>Yes, I must be a fag because I recognize that the biggest victims of the gay agenda are the gays, and realize that women sleeping around is causing lower birthrates, sky high divorce rates, single motherhood, skewed politics, a Welfare state, etc.
Yes you must be a fag to not realize faggots are to blame for this bullshit. Who do you think whores are emulating? Why do you think it's such a big deal for them to have a GAY BFF. The whole premise to the gay identity is that they bugger men and put that above any other qualities they have, how you think this isn't correleated to promiscuity I don't understand

>People who think like you do are the reason things like the creation of Germany and unification of Italy were delayed so long in history.
People who think like you do are the reason Rome fell

>And we've fixed that problem.
>This means that homosexuals don't have other diseases that they expose normal people to.
Can't wait to eat some more e.coli burritos at Chipotle bro!

>Feel free to donate to Cancer research, then.
Completely missing the point, good going you disingenuous fuck.

>The damage that gays can do to civilization is limited.
>What is Rome

>How many right-wingers are okay with premarital sex and no-fault divorce? Did you know Right-wing "saint" Ronald Reagan popularized no-fault divorce?
One of those things is an expression of a healthy desire to be with the opposite sex, homosexuality is an expression of child abuse and mental illness. Cute thinking they're comparable in any way though. And I don't give a fuck about Reagan or divorce right now faggot.

>Yes, because if one unsavory group of people push for something, the idea is bad.
>Same faggot shilling for the idea that AoC is bad because whores endorse it
One trick pony

>Priorities matter. Don't go into fucking purity spirals.
Oh, you're a TRS shill. Completely disregarded then go back to your hole of sodomy acceptance and leave.

They have to go after small boys, once the asshole stretches out, it stays stretched out . IT's why faggots commit suicide in the mid 30's to late 40's , like throwing a hot dog through a hallway

WE DON'T, BUT LOSING MILO ONLY BENEFITS THE LEFT. THE KULTURKAMPF AGAINST FEMINISM AND ISLAMISM MUST CONTINUE UNABATED

>No it doesn't. Blame female promiscuity and birth control.
>Gays
>Not promiscuous
>Actually able to beget children

>Yes, and then statistically she is extraordinarily likely to divorce you, and take the child.

Then, statistics dictate that you're likely to be paying alimony and child support, while having limited time to spend with your son. Your son is going to be far more likely to struggle academically, report mental health problems, have a kid out of wedlock, etc. Your ex-wife will vote for Leftist politicians who will rob you through excessive taxation to prop people like her up, even though she's already getting alimony and child support, etc.
And you know what? There's still gonna be a fucking nation to fix because there was another generation born.

If everybody became sodomites, there'd be no more country. They represent the physical death of a nation, they shouldn't be tolerated in any context whatsoever


>Not really. Men who settle for whores enable bad behavior and ensure its continuation.
I'd take a man who fucks whores over a poz pig anyday, freak.

What the fuck is all this Milo shilling? A few days ago you would be hard pressed to find a thread the had him in it, and if you did it was a bunch of people calling him a faggot jew.
He's a homosexual, that automatically makes him a pedophile, go fucking figure

Daily reminder the virtue signaling cultural libertarians are desperate to defend Milo because they think that people like him give gays a free pass to be untargeted by the right. Bullshit. This is why Sup Forums is always right. I told you newfags along with other people who knew better not to buy /r/The_Donald's hard on for talking heads like Milo. They're gonna spend the next month foaming at the mouth while they get torn a new one trying to defend their kike fag hero. Good riddance faggots.

Jesus, does reddit believe we will all of a sudden support that gay kike because he's being attacked? You people probably think we are all contrarian for being contrarian sake. Jesus, r/thedonald needs to be gassed.

Nobody gives a fuck about he being gay. The problem is he is a pedo enabler. If that's okay with you go fuck yourself you degenerate scum.

Gays are pedos, it's that simple

youtu.be/osFtCcpFrXI
Sure seems like it you cuck

>Nobody gives a fuck about he being gay.
All gays are pedophiles

They really do think this, as witnessed by this poor attempt at trying to convince us that sodomy really isn't a bad thing and that we shouldn't worry about it

Well, kikes are pedos, too. No surprise this freak is even more degenerate than he publicily displays.

lmao premarital sex is not a new thing, you think your great grandpa wasnt trying to give broads the ole in and out back in the day?

And yet faggotry acceptance is. And we only seem to really be on the brink of cultural doom and the end of western civilization after people started accepting faggotry as a normal thing


Hmmmmm makes you think doesn't it?

Reddit is so up its own ass they didn't notice we never liked that faggot to begin with. They probably think this right now is the turning point. But the worst of all is all this fucking shill spamming.

>kikes are pedos
It's why ((((THEY)))) support the LBGTxgorrillian letters

>Who do you think the whores are emulating?

Certainly not the gays considering the Sexual Revolution hit and spoiled mainstream women back when Gay Acceptance was still a divisive topic on the furthest fringes of the Left.

>People who think like you do are the reason Rome fell.

Rome fell because of diversity, female promiscuity and empowerment, and a very weak currency. The gays played very little role in that.

>Gay diseases
Pray tell, what other diseases are the gays afflicting an unwitting population with? Especially now that they've been and still are in many places, banned from donating blood.

>I don't give a fuck about Reagan or divorce right now. Promiscuity is an expression of heterosexuality.

Promiscuity isn't healthy, it's disastrous. You're ignoring the long-term effects that show it to be far worse than homosexuality.

I hate to pathologize but were you fucking molested as a child? There's no reason for someone to ignore objective reality this much.

>Y-you're a hypocrite on the AoC
No, and you're being purposefully obtuse. There are perfectly legitimate arguments for rethinking our AoC. Fertility, the biological realities of post-pubescent individuals, etc.

Congratulations, you dumb nigger.

>Anyone who disagrees with me is a shill!

Nope, try again.

>Gays not promiscuous
Never claimed that, they absolutely are, it just doesn't harm society as much as heterosexual promiscuity. Gays can't have families, thus they can't rip families apart.

>beget children

Why are you focusing so much on this? We don't want single mothers. They are objectively a disaster.

>If everybody became sodomites, there'd be no more country.
It's funny that you say that whilst our own society is crumbling because of promiscuity.

>Whores are better than gays.

Okay, that's just you being illogical. The man who fucks whores does more damage to society than the gay does, long-term. The only acceptable answers are neither, or reluctantly tolerating the fag.

I mean, like every hollywood jew and his mother have fucked an underage girl, this isn't something surprising. But I hate how among all this reddit shilling the fact dissapears that he himself was molested, further supporting the claim that homosexuality is a tranmittable disease. I saw discussions about that months ago on here really often, now nobody even thought about that.

This is a completely normal thing to do, don't focus on Milo's abhorrent behavior it's not like he's affecting anything dude gays are only 3 percent of the population that's why 99 percent of the population can't speak out against sodomy without being sued for "human right's violations", cause they're not a problem. :^)

>There are perfectly legitimate arguments for rethinking our AoC. Fertility, the biological realities of post-pubescent individuals, etc.
Yes, and the fact that it would allow sodomites free reign over our children. That really excites you doesn't it freak?

>reluctantly tolerating the fag.
There is no benefit to tolerating the faggot, why you think it's either whores or faggots when it's entirely possible to eliminate faggots and deal with whores is beyond me.

Come up with one good thing Gays do for any civilization to justify their continued presence, just one.

>but small in the grand scheme of things
46% isn't small, it's fucking next to half , Homosexuals are pedophiles

Are you two actually fucking retarded? We have the statistics on this and people who lose their virginity to their spouse has been steadily going down since the 1960s. Coincidentally, this is when society started falling apart.

>Everyone who disagrees with me is Reddit.

Go bitch at Civic nationalists. That's the only thing that Reddit has done to this board.

I'm not arguing that Sodomy isn't bad, I'm just stating that heterosexual promiscuity is far worse.

Fix major problems, then focus on smaller issues.

Milo, right now, is a useful idiot acting as a starter pack for normies. Some will stay as "cultural libertarians" and "civic nationalists." Others will go further right. Really, it doesn't even matter, because there are fewer Leftists for the proper right to worry about.

Left-wing reactions to Milo are doing a great job at undermining the credibility of the left in the eyes of the average, politically illiterate person.

I believe it's a transmittable disease , Adult queer rapes child queer. Child queer grows up to be the Adult queer, rinse wash repeat

Milo love all of a sudden is totally natural, of fucking course. Does one have to lack the ability for self awareness to become a shill or is it a coincidence all of you faggots are so retarded?

>I'm not arguing that Sodomy isn't bad
Except you are, you're essentially telling us to not pay attention to homosexuals as they're insignificant and don't affect anything even though this moral apathy to what the homosexual is doing under our nose is what created shit like pizzagate in the first place.

Eliminate them all, no fucking exceptions

Society falling apart wasn't cased by 1 thing, it was a perfect storm of , desegregation, sexual revolution, multiculturalism, forced tolerance of amoral behavior. I could go on for hours, but the 60's fucked us.

I honestly still believe it's more of a purely mental disease, mostly caused by traumas like being molested. But shit like living with two genderfluid LGBTADVVKUB parents who adopted you can also fry your brain. Or maybe it's just a (((coincidence))) that children of these genderfreaks become like them.

Are people ever going to wake up?

Enemy of my enemy is my friend, we really need to defend milo on this one.

>Yes, and the fact that it would allow sodomites free reign over our children. That really excites you doesn't it freak?

There aren't enough Sodomites to worry. You're right in that it does benefit me, though.

I'm straight out of college. I could go look for women my own age. Unfortunately, I've seen the ways girls act in college. I don't want to settle down with some used goods whore, who rode the cock carousel and now spends her nights drinking boxed wine. The best I could hope for in my own age range is a fucking serial monogamist who has "never had a one night stand."

Given the statistics on female promiscuity, I'd rather die alone that settle down with a girl who isn't a virgin. Thankfully, my home state has very lenient AoC laws allowing me (until the age of 25) to date as low as 15. That makes for a much better playing field than the average AoC in the USA.

>There's no benefit to tolerating the faggot.

No, there's not. But I won't fuck the faggot, the faggot won't fuck anyone I'm attracted to. The faggot won't create a single mother, etc.

The man who fucks whores might not ruin the younger virgins I'm interested in dating, but he will add to the partner count of whores. He might impregnate one or two. Yes, there are kids that are going to be born, but they're going to be hamstringed by their environment. There are also going to be fewer births overall if such behavior catches on, which means more nonwhites flooding into the community, etc.

>why you think it's either whores or faggots.
I just think people on Sup Forums are being hypocritical when certain posters loathe gays, but have no problem with nonvirgin women. The latter is worse.

Crack down on the one causing major societal damage first, then focus on the gays. You only have a limited amount of resources, and thus far, social conservatives waste them on the most ridiculous of issues, while the left has won the only battle that matters on the front of sexuality.

It's bad strategy.

Homosexual male couples only adopt boys, and the female couples only adpot girls.

I worked with people in the foster system, you can bet your bottom dollar the gays are looking for a fuck toy. It's why so many gay couples foster children, odds are those kids were already exposed to molestation and rape. It doesn't take much to normalize that behavior after exposure ,and the worst part is the officials seem to turn a blind eye to the homosexual couple that foster children.

I can remember that one story where two lesbians adobted a boy and he miraculously discovered he identified as a girl after staying with them for some months. This shit is so disgusting.

Yeah, the 60s did fuck us. Don't worry, I'm blaming Hart-Celler, Deseg, etc. but Sup Forums has really dropped the ball lately on promiscuity.

Sup Forums has never been completely uniform in opinion, you retarded newfag. Milo has typically had a handful of defenders in the anti-Milo threads through the months.

Yes, objectively, the majority of Sup Forums posters seem to dislike Milo. That doesn't mean anyone who sees Milo as somewhat useful comes from r/theDonald.

The majority opinion on Sup Forums isn't always right, look at how detached from facts the anti-Richard Spencer threads have been.

The sodomite is very good at convincing gullible idiots that his presence is necessary in society even though he's nothing more than a leech who contributes nothing but misery, suffering, depravity and monetary drain.

Fuck you, the only thing Milo is a friend to is sodomy and race mixing, he's our enemy and we should be siding with the shills who are right to hang this faggot out to dry over being a pederast and completely misleading normies into thinking buggery and pederasty any place in a conservative future

>No, there's not.
Then why did you say we should reluctantly accept them? You said it yourself they're a tiny minority. If it's possible to deport every illegal mexican it's possible to line up every faggot and castrate them.

>Crack down on the one causing major societal damage first, then focus on the gays
They're the biggest major societal damage right now. Unless you somehow missed all the tumblr spinsters calling themselves gay men who currently represent the future generation of American white women.

>look at how detached from facts the anti-Richard Spencer threads have been.
He ran away like a pussy after being sucker punched by a skinny antifa and said homosexuality is implicit white identity. I think Sup Forums is right in calling Spencer a faggot and controlled op.

Somewhat useful? He is a degenerate faggot further smearing the image of catholicism (which fucking podesta also openly does) and trying to propagate himself as some kind of glorious leader of the alt right. He never was useful, he always was a flamboyant attention whore and now we officially know that it comes from his mental problems.

In the US, it's customary to provide children of the same sex to single foster care givers , this translated over into same sex couples.

I'm not sure where the story you are talking about happened, but I think the couple immigrated from another country to the US

>Men who settle for whores enable bad behavior and ensure its continuation.
What good is being pious if it dies with you? You not teaching anyone anything by a standing until death.

Perhaps my future partner will have had many partners before me, but if that's my only option for children then I'll take it and just try to raise my kids better than me and my partner.

At the end of the day there's a 100% chance you achieve nothing while I have a chance of helping right the course of the shit of western values by raising children as best I can.

Yeah, believe it was in Europe. Not that the shit you wrote wasn't horrifying enough.

Milo is a filthy degenerate filth-column Jew

You cancerous redditors need to leave.

youtube.com/watch?v=ywmd8kR-AmI&t=1s

In the US, all the state cares about is freeing up space in their foster care facilities, to the point that they offer bonuses to the social workers for placing a child in a timely manner. I used to do janitorial work in their offices, its a pretty messed up system. Also the social worker don't give two fucks about the children they place

>Then why did you say we should reluctantly accept them?

I was responding to an either/or hypothetical. Gays do less damage than promiscuous heterosexuals.

Focus on the bigger problem first, then address smaller ones. Demography and heterosexual degeneracy are the bigger issues here.

>They're the biggest major societal damage right now.

Have you seen divorce rates, promiscuity rates, single motherhood rates, etc.?

>Sup Forums is right, Spencer is controlled op.

Spencer is not controlled op. He's earned the trust of guys like Taylor, Derbyshire, Brimelow (who has warned of controlled op), etc.

And it's impossible to "fight back" in that situation. The Antifa cuck punched him and disappeared back into the crowd of people dressed exactly like him. Spencer didn't run away either.

>smearing Catholicism
So is the Pope. Focus on the bigger issue.

>tries to propagate himself as the leader of the alt-Right.
He's only ever claimed to be a fellow traveler. The people claiming he's an alt-right figurehead are Center-Left globalists in the MSM.

I can't not resent a potential wife for having had sex with other people. It's just not something I'm going to be able to get over.

I wouldn't be happy in a relationship where I'm incurring more risk for less reward, and couldn't get over the fact that I've been cheated out of the most intimate experience a couple can share.

If society can't provide one suitable woman for me to settle down with, I don't owe it anything.

>He is a degenerate faggot
this
the only hero white rightwing college aged people have left, is a degenerate faggot
what the fuck is wrong with this world

Looking for heroes is degenerate in itself. It keeps yourself from achieving greatness for yourself. That's the biggest problem with all of these "figureheads" of the alt right. Because they exist, we don't need to do something. I am glad those fuckers are getting taken down or fuck themselves over. Once every last Spencer and Milo is gone, the collective will have to rise on its own, not rally behind a false prophet.

This

Shill.

Not/Argument.

Milo is anti-gay you retard. He is in favor of tranditionalist sexual relations. he was just raped as a kid and is fucked up and can't handle it.